Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Childminders at soft play

287 replies

Hollygolightly89 · 15/11/2025 07:32

I visited a soft play with my 3 year old yesterday morning. There was a group of childminders about 3 or 4 of them and they each had a couple of children. They mostly sat in the baby part of the soft play chatting in a group with their backs turned to the children the whole time and also constantly on their phones, even when the children were eating they were on their phones. Most of the children they had went off into the soft play alone and most of them looked under 2. I was quite shocked by this because if I was paying for a childminder I wouldn’t expect them to be on their phones and my child let loose in the soft play. At various points the children were crying for various reasons and they acted like it was a massive chore to go and get them. I aslo heard them speaking negatively about the children like “oh guess who’s crying again”.

OP posts:
AmusedMaker · 16/11/2025 13:09

These threads just go round in circles. ( tomorrow they’ll be a thread about how disappointed a parent is with nursery because little Johnny has been bitten 3 times in a week )
The truth is, no parent will ever know exactly what goes on all day everyday, whether the child is in nursery, with a childminder, or a nanny. They’ll never know because they’re not there.
The vast majority of children in childcare are looked after well I’m sure ( or at least adequately )

FanofLeaves · 16/11/2025 12:49

EllaBellaV · 16/11/2025 12:15

THIS IS A POST FOR THE PERSON WHO HAS PUT THE POST AND OUT CHILDMINDERS IN SOFT PLAY AND FOR THOSE WHO AGREE WITH HER!
That would be like saying: “I went to the GP several times and 4–5 different doctors only told me to take paracetamol. Later I was diagnosed with something serious — therefore all GPs in England must be rubbish.”
It doesn’t make sense, right?

  1. You cannot generalise thousands of hardworking, professional childminders because of a tiny minority.
The vast majority do an excellent job every single day. Judging an entire profession based on one moment you saw in a soft play is unfair and inaccurate.
  1. Childminders know the children in their care incredibly well.
They are trained, experienced and understand children’s behaviour, development and needs — often more objectively than the child’s own parent can in a single quick glance. Children don’t need an adult glued to them every second. They need space to explore, learn independence, manage emotions and play freely. Unless you directly witnessed a child being put in serious danger (which is extremely rare — statistically far more accidents happen in nurseries), then making accusations online is unnecessary.
  1. Childminders work alone, with no colleagues, no lunch break, no HR, no backup and often no adult conversation all day.
So seeing a group of childminders chatting while their children are safe, playing, happy and supervised s not negligent. It’s human. And it’s allowed. No child was in danger, at risk, distressed or left in an unsafe situation.

Before posting judgement online, it’s worth remembering that a short Snapchat view rarely shows the full context or the reality of what’s happening.
Go and ask school nurseries how well developed children are overall if they come from childminders as opposed to those who have never been to one and and then you will have the answer!

Well I don’t consider having my child in the care of someone who isn’t likely to let them come to harm is job well done to be honest, it’s an extremely low bar! I do expect them to notice when my child’s nappy needs changing, stop them from lamping other children or intervene fairly if they are the lamper, I do expect supervision when eating, I do expect them to be engaged and interested and help my child if they need a hand up the slide etc etc. And actually a lot of small children DO need an adult on hand in these spaces, not as glue but as someone to help them, comfort, assist and advocate for them whenever necessary.

A lot of childminders get away with the above because the parents only hear what the childminder tells them or the pictures they are sent.

I also (as a nanny) work with no break or adult interaction most days but it’s not like I didn’t have a choice of what progression I went into, you make it sound like childcarers are working in an incarnation facility.

Enough of us on the thread have first hand witness accounts of what the OP described in the very first post. Go to any soft play or playgroup provision or park Monday-Friday during working hours and before long you’ll probably see it yourself.

I am a good nanny but I know there are plenty of rubbish ones. To deny that would be stupid.

werenotgoingonabearhuntagain · 16/11/2025 12:17

I think there are enough of us who have seen the same sort of scenario repeatedly to say it’s a problem. It isn’t just limited to childminders and of course most of us (me included) want to believe that the setting we use is professional and our children are thriving.

I think it’s probably going to be an issue until we start viewing caring for young children with the respect it deserves.

EllaBellaV · 16/11/2025 12:15

THIS IS A POST FOR THE PERSON WHO HAS PUT THE POST AND OUT CHILDMINDERS IN SOFT PLAY AND FOR THOSE WHO AGREE WITH HER!
That would be like saying: “I went to the GP several times and 4–5 different doctors only told me to take paracetamol. Later I was diagnosed with something serious — therefore all GPs in England must be rubbish.”
It doesn’t make sense, right?

  1. You cannot generalise thousands of hardworking, professional childminders because of a tiny minority.
The vast majority do an excellent job every single day. Judging an entire profession based on one moment you saw in a soft play is unfair and inaccurate.
  1. Childminders know the children in their care incredibly well.
They are trained, experienced and understand children’s behaviour, development and needs — often more objectively than the child’s own parent can in a single quick glance. Children don’t need an adult glued to them every second. They need space to explore, learn independence, manage emotions and play freely. Unless you directly witnessed a child being put in serious danger (which is extremely rare — statistically far more accidents happen in nurseries), then making accusations online is unnecessary.
  1. Childminders work alone, with no colleagues, no lunch break, no HR, no backup and often no adult conversation all day.
So seeing a group of childminders chatting while their children are safe, playing, happy and supervised s not negligent. It’s human. And it’s allowed. No child was in danger, at risk, distressed or left in an unsafe situation.

Before posting judgement online, it’s worth remembering that a short Snapchat view rarely shows the full context or the reality of what’s happening.
Go and ask school nurseries how well developed children are overall if they come from childminders as opposed to those who have never been to one and and then you will have the answer!

EllaBellaV · 16/11/2025 12:08
  1. You cannot generalise thousands of hardworking, professional childminders because of a tiny minority.
The vast majority do an excellent job every single day. Judging an entire profession based on one moment you saw in a soft play is unfair and inaccurate.
  1. Childminders know the children in their care incredibly well.
They are trained, experienced and understand children’s behaviour, development and needs — often more objectively than the child’s own parent can in a single quick glance. Children don’t need an adult glued to them every second. They need space to explore, learn independence, manage emotions and play freely. Unless you directly witnessed a child being put in serious danger (which is extremely rare — statistically far more accidents happen in nurseries), then making accusations online is unnecessary.
  1. Childminders work alone, with no colleagues, no lunch break, no HR, no backup and often no adult conversation all day.
So seeing a group of childminders chatting for a few minutes — while their children are safe, playing, happy and supervised — is not negligent. It’s human. And it’s allowed. No child was in danger, at risk, distressed or left in an unsafe situation.

Before posting judgement online, it’s worth remembering that a five-second Snapchat view rarely shows the full context or the reality of what’s happening.

FanofLeaves · 16/11/2025 11:48

I’ve also temped in nurseries so I’ve seen a lot! It’s a real mixed bag. Most are just ‘ok’ really and the majority of the staff do their best up against long hours, shite pay, constant staffing issues and poor management. The only one I considered very good was an expensive Montessori in an affluent area, everything was made of wood and they had cleaners in every day so it was spotless, and the teacher to child ratio was well higher than the minimum.

In all nurseries staff have good days and bad days. I’ve only reported one as she kept saying how hungover she was and telling the toddlers to shut up, and spent her shift lying half asleep in the book corner. She absolutely only did the job as it was a paid option available locally to someone who wasn’t very clever academically. She had no love or interest in it whatsoever and openly said how boring it was to be around children.

However I mainly come across older women who are mums themselves doing it as a lot of nurseries offer a 50% discount to employees who send their own children to the nursery. It’s the only thing that’s ever made me consider doing it full time.

Walkaround · 16/11/2025 11:31

werenotgoingonabearhuntagain · 16/11/2025 06:18

Nurseries are a necessity and provide a perfect setting for all sorts of abuse to take place, neglect and just a terrible setting for children and babies all together.

I’ve no idea what sort of nurseries you have been into, but the one my children attend(ed) certainly isn’t. I wouldn’t have sent my child somewhere that wasn’t.

Easily said when you have the luxury of choice.

Lovingourjob · 16/11/2025 08:54

This is honestly so sad . Im a childminder and i work myself to the bone . We dont visit soft play alot or playgroups we are out exploring the woods, collecting sticks and leafs for our crafts , on rain day we go out jumping in puddles ect . The children are the whole point of my job, we do visits to the supermarket or farmer market so the little one can see any new fruit or veg they may want to try. We meet up with other local childminder as this help our little ones to be able to make more memories.

I would most definitely have gone over and asked them to pay more attention to the little ones.

I just hope people know not all childminders are the same. I hope you get to see other childminders in action.

werenotgoingonabearhuntagain · 16/11/2025 06:18

Nurseries are a necessity and provide a perfect setting for all sorts of abuse to take place, neglect and just a terrible setting for children and babies all together.

I’ve no idea what sort of nurseries you have been into, but the one my children attend(ed) certainly isn’t. I wouldn’t have sent my child somewhere that wasn’t.

BluntPlumHam · 16/11/2025 01:18

CoffeeLipstickKeys · 15/11/2025 23:47

I’m not doing the prove it game. from practice I will tell you It’s an unfortunate truism child statistically at risk of abuse in Family setting. Parent or step parents , family member are unfortunately likely to be a perpetrator. In particular a non birth new partner being introduced in family

Child SA is almost always done by males. Yes this can be a parent, family, friend or boyfriend but the key factor is access rather than relation. That cohort of people are likely to have unfettered and easy access to the child hence why they may be over represented as a stat however without you providing a stat to support it you shouldn’t make sweeping statements like that. To suggest that nurseries are safer than a child’s own home when it comes to CSA is a massive cope. Nurseries are a necessity and provide a perfect setting for all sorts of abuse to take place, neglect and just a terrible setting for children and babies all together.

CoffeeLipstickKeys · 15/11/2025 23:47

BluntPlumHam · 15/11/2025 21:27

Where is your stat for that? Most perps are yes known to the child hence why they have access to them and a nursery/childminder is the perfect setting for that.

I’m not doing the prove it game. from practice I will tell you It’s an unfortunate truism child statistically at risk of abuse in Family setting. Parent or step parents , family member are unfortunately likely to be a perpetrator. In particular a non birth new partner being introduced in family

BluntPlumHam · 15/11/2025 21:29

Walkaround · 15/11/2025 16:03

There is virtually no resemblance between a nursery and a hunter gatherer society. People no longer live in such small communities and we don’t teach our children how to live and survive in our modern communities in remotely the same way.

Exactly, the hunter gatherer model is similar to maternal/paternal grandmother’s and aunts assisting with childcare rather than complete strangers who’s main motive is to
be remunerated. Only in that environment can a child make more than one primary attachment.

Nickyknackered · 15/11/2025 21:29

werenotgoingonabearhuntagain · 15/11/2025 19:09

And a toddler was murdered by a childminder. Extreme sort of cases make bad generalisations.

Link please?

BluntPlumHam · 15/11/2025 21:27

CoffeeLipstickKeys · 15/11/2025 20:52

parents & family and step parents are main perpetrators of CSA. Applying yiur logic Shall we ban parents and step parents?

Where is your stat for that? Most perps are yes known to the child hence why they have access to them and a nursery/childminder is the perfect setting for that.

CoffeeLipstickKeys · 15/11/2025 20:52

AmusedMaker · 15/11/2025 18:58

A male nursery worker has just been charged with rape and abuse. And some people still think nurseries are the safest option.

parents & family and step parents are main perpetrators of CSA. Applying yiur logic Shall we ban parents and step parents?

Birlngsnotnicepeople · 15/11/2025 20:15

Pay peanuts you get......

MumOf4totstoteens · 15/11/2025 20:09

I’ve witnessed this before too a group of them used to go to the same place I did each week: I’ve seen kids bang their heads and the childminders just not give a F *ck

FortyFacedFuckers · 15/11/2025 19:55

Used to see things like this & worse with the childminders in my area when DS was small, I was absolutely disgusted by the things I seen, totally put me off using paid childcare. The ones in my area are all full as well and have long waiting lists.

Jessicawarriner · 15/11/2025 19:46

I am a fellow childminder and I wouldn’t be doing this but I can actually tell u that quite a few childminders have an app you hand to add on infomation about the child like nappies food intake milk everything is now documented so when do they get a chance to do it and they don’t have breaks to be able to fill in paper work on the computer and tapping on the phone is easy to upload it and some perents are keen to keep in touch via message so please be mindful before u judge it’s not nice to judge a book by its cover so they say and also some children may cry a lot and sometimes have to be left to being themselves out of the situations themselves and if they don’t they will get worse so be more mindful again don’t judge u don’t no what is going on mabye if u are that bothered ask them

AleaEim · 15/11/2025 19:37

ResusciAnnie · 15/11/2025 08:24

Yup. Nursery all the way!

I witnessed similar at many nurseries I used to work in. I temped for an agency so worked in many and only liked one nursery out of 15, the rest were bordering neglect, and yes I reported them to ofsted before anyone asks. I used to nanny, and most Nannies were great.

oceanraine · 15/11/2025 19:32

Dontlletmedownbruce · 15/11/2025 13:57

When I was a sahm I went to soft play with my friends so we could chat and let's face it, get a break from the intensity of full on minding kids at home. You can keep an eye on your kids while chatting, it's different if the kids were hitting other kids, but for the most part the purpose of soft play is for the kids to socialise and have physical activity. They learn these skills be the parent distancing themselves not trying to lead their play and stifling them. I know it's a fair point that they are getting paid but they are also in lieu of parents and it's ok to behave as a parent does IMO. It's a job with no lunch or toilet breaks and it probably took them ages to get organised to get there so I don't begrudge them taking a bit of a break. They were probably interacting for hours before they got there so that snap shot doesn't really tell you what goes on at home.

In the OP it says they weren't even watching them properly when the children were eating.

oceanraine · 15/11/2025 19:23

Venturini · 15/11/2025 18:32

This. Parents can be and often are the absolute worst. Oblivious to their 3 year old bodyslamming your 15 month old with a shopping trolley in the play cafe and then walking over in the aftermath muttering ‘what happened?’ as you carry your screaming child away to safety and their three year old zones in on a fresh target.

This is missing the point of the thread though, the OP was on about child minders who are being PAID on their phones not watching their charges, not parents. These child minders are supposed to be "at work".

Dontlletmedownbruce · 15/11/2025 19:16

AmusedMaker · 15/11/2025 18:58

A male nursery worker has just been charged with rape and abuse. And some people still think nurseries are the safest option.

A woman has just illustrated lack of rationale and critical thinking. And some people still think everyone should have a vote.

werenotgoingonabearhuntagain · 15/11/2025 19:09

AmusedMaker · 15/11/2025 18:58

A male nursery worker has just been charged with rape and abuse. And some people still think nurseries are the safest option.

And a toddler was murdered by a childminder. Extreme sort of cases make bad generalisations.

Swipe left for the next trending thread