Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The Sara Sharif case: what is the point of taxpayers funding these failing organisations?

232 replies

softstone · 13/11/2025 18:15

This appalling case has highlighted catastrophic failures of many organisations. If I failed in my job to this extent I would be sacked and possibly jailed. Yet the upshot of this report seems to be oh dear yes it’s a terrible shame, never mind.

Why is my tax funding these useless departments? This is not part of the social contract. We’re supposed to live in a civilised society. It’s awful.

OP posts:
Beeinalily · 14/11/2025 08:41

Well we can blame social workers, judges, society, but it was the father that killed her. I've spent my whole life abhorring the death penalty, but sometimes you just need people out of the gene pool.

bluewanda · 14/11/2025 08:39

Jellycatspyjamas · 14/11/2025 08:34

You do know it wasn’t two social workers who went to the wrong address don’t you? It was people from education, not social workers.

Either way, they must have had contact with someone who did know the correct address. Unless these people all work in complete isolation to one another.

PumpkinTwistyWindToots · 14/11/2025 08:39

bluewanda · 14/11/2025 08:27

If the IT system says its address A, working 1/2hr later isn't going to magic up the correct address.

So are you saying that no one in that office had visited the home before? Or was aware of the correct address? Because if they had, what was stopping those two social workers ringing the office and getting the right address? It’s not rocket science really is it?

Edited

They were not social workers

Jellycatspyjamas · 14/11/2025 08:34

bluewanda · 14/11/2025 08:27

If the IT system says its address A, working 1/2hr later isn't going to magic up the correct address.

So are you saying that no one in that office had visited the home before? Or was aware of the correct address? Because if they had, what was stopping those two social workers ringing the office and getting the right address? It’s not rocket science really is it?

Edited

You do know it wasn’t two social workers who went to the wrong address don’t you? It was people from education, not social workers.

Jellycatspyjamas · 14/11/2025 08:32

rolloverbeethoven · 14/11/2025 07:36

I do sometimes wonder if one of the problems with social workers is that they need a degree (why?) when experience and common sense would be more useful. That poor little girl.

Social workers need the critical thinking, understanding of legislation and reasoning that comes with degree level education. Common sense will only get you so far in a court making a legal case for removing a child. Common sense will only go so far in determining whether someone needs to be detained for their own safety.

It’s really not a straightforward job.

bluewanda · 14/11/2025 08:27

If the IT system says its address A, working 1/2hr later isn't going to magic up the correct address.

So are you saying that no one in that office had visited the home before? Or was aware of the correct address? Because if they had, what was stopping those two social workers ringing the office and getting the right address? It’s not rocket science really is it?

bluewanda · 14/11/2025 08:24

And sorry for the multiple posts but I am absolutely haunted by this case and that poor sweet girl. It goes to prove that some people (those monsters who killed her) genuinely are pure evil.

Alexandra2001 · 14/11/2025 08:24

bluewanda · 14/11/2025 08:11

No, a child died horrifically because someone couldn’t be bothered. If you get the wrong address, you go to the correct property. If that means working half an hour later than so be it.

This. Fucking bastards. That poor, poor girl, failed by every single one of them. It makes me so angry. I can barely read about this case as it’s utterly heartbreaking.

If the IT system says its address A, working 1/2hr later isn't going to magic up the correct address.

She and others who have died in terrible circumstances, have been failed because no one cares about Social Work until they do, this tragedy will quickly be forgotten, we'll all go back to slagging off Reeves et for trying to increase spending for public services and then jump on the next SW who, with an overwhelming workload, makes a mistake.

Its an easy target for Govts to make cuts.

We need to get out of the mindset that says we want great public services but lower taxes, the two are incompatible.

Also the pp calling for the judge to be jailed, did you sit in on the court hearing? do you think if he was jailed, would any judge ever go to the family courts again.

bluewanda · 14/11/2025 08:21

Driftingawaynow · 13/11/2025 20:13

Exactly. The pro contact culture, mimising an abusers behaviour. That judge bears huge responsibility for this. He ordered that child to live with a violent perpetrator and without proper follow up. The family court is not fit for purpose.

What is terrifying is that as far as I’m aware, this incompetent individual has been allowed to carry on in their job with no consequences, free to condemn more children to their deaths. It’s a fucking disgrace.

bluewanda · 14/11/2025 08:19

nightmarepickle2025 · 13/11/2025 20:45

family court also got a lot to answer for

Yup. The family courts in this country are a scandal.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/dec/10/explosive-court-transcript-journalists-family-cases-judge-parents-secrecy

bluewanda · 14/11/2025 08:14

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 13/11/2025 18:57

Agreed, that was an incomprehensible decision from the judge, given what was known about the father.

Why hasn’t the judge been sacked and jailed? How the fuck is he/she allowed to get away with this?

bluewanda · 14/11/2025 08:11

No, a child died horrifically because someone couldn’t be bothered. If you get the wrong address, you go to the correct property. If that means working half an hour later than so be it.

This. Fucking bastards. That poor, poor girl, failed by every single one of them. It makes me so angry. I can barely read about this case as it’s utterly heartbreaking.

Bambamhoohoo · 14/11/2025 08:07

PumpkinTwistyWindToots · 14/11/2025 07:54

We need a degree because it's a specialist profession. Social work training includes a requirement for 200 days of on the job training and they also have an assessed and supported year of employment after qualifying that they have to pass. We are expected to write high quality assessments and court statements and to understand complex research and theories. It's not a 'get in there and hope for the best' job.

As well as that, if it was replaced by some kind of on the job training it would be more expensive and cumbersome (needing a whole system to support it) than working with universities to get social workers qualified externally.

PumpkinTwistyWindToots · 14/11/2025 07:54

rolloverbeethoven · 14/11/2025 07:36

I do sometimes wonder if one of the problems with social workers is that they need a degree (why?) when experience and common sense would be more useful. That poor little girl.

We need a degree because it's a specialist profession. Social work training includes a requirement for 200 days of on the job training and they also have an assessed and supported year of employment after qualifying that they have to pass. We are expected to write high quality assessments and court statements and to understand complex research and theories. It's not a 'get in there and hope for the best' job.

PumpkinTwistyWindToots · 14/11/2025 07:52

Cat1504 · 14/11/2025 07:02

SWs don’t remove babies….they don’t return babies…..they don’t have that power…..they wanted to remove Sara…..their report to the court indicated this…..but the courts sided with the view of the Guardian….so Sara remained with her father

To be fair, guardians are also social workers usually with frontline experience before they move into cafcass. Guardians' views are absolutely privileged by the courts which can be a total farce - I've known social workers who couldn't hack it in frontline move to cafcass because it's easier. They also have zero oversight of their recommendations to court. Local authority social workers have their care plans a) approved by senior managers before it's written b) checked by their manager and c) checked and approved by a lawyer but guardians write their reports and file them. They have far too much power.
Actually having written that I vaguely remember that after the Sara Sharif tragedy there was going to be a review of cafcass? I need to google that

PumpkinTwistyWindToots · 14/11/2025 07:49

Ninjasan · 14/11/2025 06:04

They are not precious. There is nothing precious about lazy civil servants who do not care about their job they're being paid to do.

You can say a lot of things about social workers as a workforce but that they are lazy and don't care are about the furthest from the truth.
I am really good at my job. I'm a team manager and have some extremely valuable skills. I could transfer my expertise to the private sector and be earning twice what I earn as a social work manager if I chose to, but I don't. I have a social worker in my team who left a corporate job earning double what she earns now to do train as a social worker because she's passionate about improving children's lives and improving the system. Believe me - it's not a job you can fail upwards into. Failing social workers exist of course but they tend to weed themselves out after a while, it's not a career for the weak.

Avantiagain · 14/11/2025 07:40

"No, a child died horrifically because someone couldn’t be bothered. If you get the wrong address, you go to the correct property. If that means working half an hour later than so be it."

This wasn't the social care team and as posters have already said they would have had no right of entry and no right to insist on seeing the child.

rolloverbeethoven · 14/11/2025 07:36

I do sometimes wonder if one of the problems with social workers is that they need a degree (why?) when experience and common sense would be more useful. That poor little girl.

Alexandra2001 · 14/11/2025 07:30

Being a social worker must be the most under valued healthcare job out there.

Screw up, make a poor judgement call ie believe a parent.. or follow the instructions of a court or go to the wrong address because the system is so slow and old, that the update done wasn't applied to their own database..... and the whole world will come down on you like a ton of bricks, even demanding jail time.

All the good work you've done in the past, will count for nothing, you'll be hung out to dry and the Govt ministers who cut child services to the bone, will retire and get an honour.

Screwyousimon · 14/11/2025 07:26

Not the same but I work as a Nurse. A few weeks ago I had 56 patients and 3 Nurses to look after them. When something goes wrong and one of those patients comes to harm as the Nurses looking after them tend to other patients who is at fault? Would it be the NHS Trust who put the Nurses in that position in the first place or the Nurses themselves for not working harder? How do you think those Nurses on duty that day felt?

Daisymay8 · 14/11/2025 07:24

From NSPCC

Findings from the data

  • In the last five years there was an average of 56 child deaths by assault or undetermined intent a year in the UK.
  • Children under the age of one are the most likely age group to be killed by another person, followed by 16- to 24-year-olds.
  • Child homicides are most commonly caused by the child’s parent or step-parent.
edit -the stats have been similar for years, in fact could be improving
Shimmyshimmycocobop · 14/11/2025 07:20

Chiseltip · 13/11/2025 18:25

If any of you think you could do a better job you could always apply.

This

Jellycatspyjamas · 14/11/2025 07:16

Ninjasan · 14/11/2025 06:04

They are not precious. There is nothing precious about lazy civil servants who do not care about their job they're being paid to do.

Social workers aren’t civil servants, they’re employed by the local authority. And there’s nothing to suggest social workers here were lazy, inexperienced maybe but that’s what happens when you expect people to carry excessive levels of risk - the good, experienced social workers leave.

Cat1504 · 14/11/2025 07:02

Netcurtainnelly · 14/11/2025 00:53

Yes, but that's why we have social workers etc, so they can intervention and prevent a tradgedy.

Why do they return kids to their parents also.? Little Finley Boden was returned to his parents care very quickly after being taken away and was killed. So was Baby Peter.
Take their babies away forever, they can't look after them. Stop giving wrong uns chances.

SWs don’t remove babies….they don’t return babies…..they don’t have that power…..they wanted to remove Sara…..their report to the court indicated this…..but the courts sided with the view of the Guardian….so Sara remained with her father

Ninjasan · 14/11/2025 06:04

VikaOlson · 13/11/2025 18:23

The main problem highlighted was the lack of experienced social workers and their huge caseloads - I think I read somewhere that they were supposed to be dealing with 6 or 7 cases a day?

Sacking and jailing the few precious social workers we have isn't going make things any better.

They are not precious. There is nothing precious about lazy civil servants who do not care about their job they're being paid to do.