Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Fuck it - the government will look me

666 replies

Phonicshaskilledmeoff · 09/11/2025 09:05

I am becoming increasingly frustrated with the way our country is run. I love my country, but what on earth can I do to fix it? the Rachel reeves pension and stamp duty rumours have tipped me over the edge.

I believe 90% of our lives is the summation of our own choices. Bar (some of) our own (and families) health and tragic life events, there is very little we can’t choose in this country.

I’m not saying that the playing field is fair - I absolutely acknowledge that some groups face structural barriers that make good choices harder. Others are unaware those choices even exist. That’s where government should step in—not to equalise outcomes, but to equalise access to meaningful choice.

I think we all acknowledge that bad governments are ones that take away choices. This government, however is also taking away choice by incentivising bad choices. Policies should nudge people toward self-sufficiency, not make state reliance easier than self-reliance, or rewarding short-term decisions over long-term

Our Government should be working towards equitable availability of choice (not equal - see below) to make sure those choices are as easy and available to everyone. Policies should be in place to make sure people are encouraged to make the right choices.

I increasingly feel like I make the right choices and think what was the bloody point!

I’m going to wish I never paid into my pension soon and went on holiday instead! Should I just spend my money, move into a smaller house and quit my job. At this point I think I’d be better off.

Jargon Buster - EQUALITY - It’s assumed there is a level playing field and everyone gets the same resources. EQUITY - Everyone gets what they need to succeed, which may mean different levels of support.

OP posts:
ForeverDelayedEpiphany · 09/11/2025 16:25

DiscoBob · 09/11/2025 09:24

Lol. I didn't choose to have disabilities, to be broke, or to have been domestically abused, or raped, or have ADHD, or not be able to handle managing people, or to suffer from life threatening mental illness. I didn't choose to lose my father a month after my 13th birthday, or to have no siblings, or to have cousins who aren't remotely interested in me or my welfare.

I didn't choose to be financially controlled by the government either but the alternative would be starve to death and live outdoors.

Bless you, that sounds hard.

In the same vein as your reply, I didn't choose to be adopted, born to heroin addicts, have a head injury and post concussion syndrome before being injured by psychotropic drugs and then have a movement disorder... I think it's all about the circumstances of someone's life but equally the way they respond to life events and the hand they have been given.

Sometimes those circumstances are easiest to get through than others, and of course, everyone is different so will react differently.

Life isn't as black and white as some people say. I do think that some people actively choose to live with a lower standard than they could, and it isnt beyond them to improve things. They sometimes just choose not to.

Damnthetorpedoes · 09/11/2025 16:24

MrsMurphyIWish · 09/11/2025 16:10

I grew up in poverty - with foster carers at some stages. Looking back I see how my child benefit, income support, family allowance (I’m 46) was spent. I grew on a benefits estate - I didn’t feel “poor” until I was taken in by carers. I was quite happy until I saw what I could have. It’s hard to acknowledge but some people will always be happy to scrape by.

Some posters would disagree with you, because it does not fit the inequality narrative.

EasternStandard · 09/11/2025 16:23

bottledboot · 09/11/2025 15:01

If they drag teachers, police and train drivers into non working people they’re likely toast

Isn't the average train driver on 50k? A Met officer and London teacher can start on 40k.

Yes I think your post doesn’t go against what I meant?

If Labour hit people over £45 or £50k it’s been determined that a whole raft of teachers, train drivers etc are in that group

The we won’t tax working people nonsense falls apart. They’ll find it hard to get MPs to defend it.

Damnthetorpedoes · 09/11/2025 16:23

bottledboot · 09/11/2025 15:47

@Damnthetorpedoes thanks

I do find that somewhat confusing. Reform
wants to reduce the welfare bill but that would directly impact some of their voters.

Well, I guess people voted for Labour - and are going to be punished for it.

Manifestos evidently count for nothing.

Barnbrack · 09/11/2025 16:23

Phonicshaskilledmeoff · 09/11/2025 11:29

I haven’t experienced it. I’m also not wholly oblivious.

My post is about equitable choice and a government supporting the right choices. For example - What choices could someone be provided with at aged 12 that would have changed their life.

Is it inevitable that the child of abuse then must live in a cycle of abuse and poverty. I don’t think so, but not unless they are given the step up and allowed to make those choices. Is it unreasonable to think we could break a cycle and that child could have choices.

Maybe I am naive in that I think a government should be driving equity so we all have the same access to make positive choices.

Not at all unreasonable but your original post seems to be complaining that money is spent on improving the lives of children whose parents choices you disagree with. So there's an awful lot of hypocrisy here. All the socially funded schemes in place to help when I was growing up, university bursaries and funding, funding for teens who remain in education, sure start centres have been eroded by the Tories. And you seem to be arguing for the removal of MORE funding?

To help the children you first help the parents without dividing into the deserving and undeserving poor. That's the only way to benefit the next generation

Kirbert2 · 09/11/2025 16:21

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 09/11/2025 16:19

I’m saying the lazy generalisations on here about people in receipt of benefits being ‘poor’ is nonsense.

But it isn't lazy to generalise based on a few people you know?

EarthSight · 09/11/2025 16:20

JacquesHarlow · 09/11/2025 09:08

I believe 90% of our lives is the summation of our own choices

Ha. 😃

That's what I thought. Either the OP has been lucky in life, or she's from a privileged background.

EasternStandard · 09/11/2025 16:19

JustSawJohnny · 09/11/2025 15:58

Believe me - I'm not!

I'm just sick to the back teeth of the Starmer bashing when Boris and Co got a free pass to run us into the ground and the amount of deluded people who think Reform are the answer when they are even more against the working people than the Tories.

If it was up to me we'd replace the lot of them with a whole heap of Northern Grandma's and let common sense take hold for a bit!

Alas, we have this shower of shite to pick from 😩

I don’t think they do get a free pass, that’s why Reform are doing well. People are pissed off with Labour but still angry about Boris and co.

We likely need to be realistic about what is affordable, not sure the electorate will go for that though.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 09/11/2025 16:19

BringBackCatsEyes · 09/11/2025 16:16

You think people who have SEN and have children on DLA are just not applying themselves? Or do you think they should be living in worse accommodation and just get by on the bones or their arses?
Put all the people with SEN and/or claiming DLA in damp flats!

I’m saying the lazy generalisations on here about people in receipt of benefits being ‘poor’ is nonsense.

BringBackCatsEyes · 09/11/2025 16:16

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 09/11/2025 16:09

What if those middle class people are actually friends with those who you are referring to as poor? My child’s extra curricular takes place in an area that is considered ‘rough’ and I have friends who are in receipt of multiple benefits as they have SEN diagnoses alongside their children. No they don’t own their own properties, but live in lovely new builds on a clean and tidy new development. They are also able to fund things for their children through their children’s DLA that I wouldn’t be able to afford. Holidays abroad and in this country every year. Honestly there are no damp flats in my circle.

Work-wise neither of the women work although I know they did used to work in the care sector.. One does some side work as a beautician whilst her partner does a courier type job. The other has a partner but I don’t believe he works.

You think people who have SEN and have children on DLA are just not applying themselves? Or do you think they should be living in worse accommodation and just get by on the bones or their arses?
Put all the people with SEN and/or claiming DLA in damp flats!

MrsMurphyIWish · 09/11/2025 16:10

DrCoconut · 09/11/2025 16:00

Absolutely. I am always 🙄when I see people posting about how easy it is to get ahead from the comfort of their leafy, six figure salaried middle class world. That the poor just need to apply themselves and their problems will disappear. Or alternatively how crap the middle classes have it in comparison to someone living in a damp flat on £400 a month. They just have no idea of some people's reality.

I grew up in poverty - with foster carers at some stages. Looking back I see how my child benefit, income support, family allowance (I’m 46) was spent. I grew on a benefits estate - I didn’t feel “poor” until I was taken in by carers. I was quite happy until I saw what I could have. It’s hard to acknowledge but some people will always be happy to scrape by.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 09/11/2025 16:09

DrCoconut · 09/11/2025 16:00

Absolutely. I am always 🙄when I see people posting about how easy it is to get ahead from the comfort of their leafy, six figure salaried middle class world. That the poor just need to apply themselves and their problems will disappear. Or alternatively how crap the middle classes have it in comparison to someone living in a damp flat on £400 a month. They just have no idea of some people's reality.

What if those middle class people are actually friends with those who you are referring to as poor? My child’s extra curricular takes place in an area that is considered ‘rough’ and I have friends who are in receipt of multiple benefits as they have SEN diagnoses alongside their children. No they don’t own their own properties, but live in lovely new builds on a clean and tidy new development. They are also able to fund things for their children through their children’s DLA that I wouldn’t be able to afford. Holidays abroad and in this country every year. Honestly there are no damp flats in my circle.

Work-wise neither of the women work although I know they did used to work in the care sector.. One does some side work as a beautician whilst her partner does a courier type job. The other has a partner but I don’t believe he works.

PandoraSocks · 09/11/2025 16:08

bottledboot · 09/11/2025 15:53

@PandoraSocks that is what confuses me.

It doesn't confuse me.

Struggling benefit claimants - Farage says blame the immigrants! Vote Reform for no more immigrants!

Struggling working people - Farage says blame the immigrants and workshy benefit claimants! Vote Reform for no more immigrants and workshy benefit claimants!

And on and on it goes.

It is like a Ponzi scheme of scapegoating. But people are so blinded by hate, they don't see it. Even when they are the ones being scapegoated.

Farage is a scumbag, but he's a clever scumbag.

DrCoconut · 09/11/2025 16:00

PigletJohn · 09/11/2025 09:55

People who have never been poor like to claim that the poor have an easy and comfortable life.

Absolutely. I am always 🙄when I see people posting about how easy it is to get ahead from the comfort of their leafy, six figure salaried middle class world. That the poor just need to apply themselves and their problems will disappear. Or alternatively how crap the middle classes have it in comparison to someone living in a damp flat on £400 a month. They just have no idea of some people's reality.

JustSawJohnny · 09/11/2025 15:58

EasternStandard · 09/11/2025 14:49

Well that’s a reply with some spice I’ll give you that.

I can see you’re still in the Labour camp, but sadly for them it is declining. I think the budget will be a clincher for even more people.

If they drag teachers, police and train drivers into non working people they’re likely toast.

Believe me - I'm not!

I'm just sick to the back teeth of the Starmer bashing when Boris and Co got a free pass to run us into the ground and the amount of deluded people who think Reform are the answer when they are even more against the working people than the Tories.

If it was up to me we'd replace the lot of them with a whole heap of Northern Grandma's and let common sense take hold for a bit!

Alas, we have this shower of shite to pick from 😩

Kirbert2 · 09/11/2025 15:58

YesSirICanNameChange · 09/11/2025 15:53

🙋‍♀️ on benefits, desperate to work here.

Me too! I miss working so much.

bottledboot · 09/11/2025 15:53

@PandoraSocks that is what confuses me.

YesSirICanNameChange · 09/11/2025 15:53

lightand · 09/11/2025 15:44

I dont hear those on benefits saying they want to work?

And yes, governmnet needs to spend way less.

🙋‍♀️ on benefits, desperate to work here.

bottledboot · 09/11/2025 15:53

no probs

PandoraSocks · 09/11/2025 15:52

bottledboot · 09/11/2025 15:47

@Damnthetorpedoes thanks

I do find that somewhat confusing. Reform
wants to reduce the welfare bill but that would directly impact some of their voters.

Farage's own constituency has 60% claiming benefits.

Fuck it - the government will look me
Fuck it - the government will look me
Swiftie1878 · 09/11/2025 15:51

bottledboot · 09/11/2025 15:38

@Swiftie1878 I know you didn't, that was the poster I replied to. I was just saying I didn't interpret their post as a could....

Ah, sorry! Misunderstood again.
Yes, I just give them the benefit of the doubt!

bottledboot · 09/11/2025 15:49

It's the working poor, not the rich, middle earners, the pensioners, disabled or unemployed who have been completely and utterly failed by this country

As a group current pensioners have not been failed by this country, the young have.

bottledboot · 09/11/2025 15:47

@Damnthetorpedoes thanks

I do find that somewhat confusing. Reform
wants to reduce the welfare bill but that would directly impact some of their voters.

NotEnoughKnittingTime · 09/11/2025 15:45

Kendodd · 09/11/2025 15:43

I'm not working poor, I'm quite well off and love my job.

Thought so.

lightand · 09/11/2025 15:44

Haroldwilson · 09/11/2025 09:14

Any government that was in would be struggling. You need to either spend less or raise taxes. Neither is very palatable.

Try living off benefits and I think you'll soon see there is a point to working.

I dont hear those on benefits saying they want to work?

And yes, governmnet needs to spend way less.