Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to stop sending my kids to help my pregnant SIL now that she’s said she can’t pay?

366 replies

broodymamma · 08/11/2025 18:41

Feeling a bit conflicted and could do with some honest opinions.
My SIL is pregnant and has been told to take it easy for medical reasons. She’s got four children aged between 19 months and 7 years. She recently sent me a message saying:
“Hi. Is there any chance one of your girls would be able/want to help round here supper/bedtime for the next few days? Happy to pay.”
I’ve got a big family — 9 kids in total — and several of my older ones are very responsible. They were delighted to help out. My SIL is especially close to them, as she used to help me a lot when she was a teenager and I was having my family. She was amazing when my second was born at 29 weeks and my eldest was only 16 months. I didn’t officially pay her back then, but I did treat her in other ways (inviting her and her friends for supper, taking her on holidays etc).
I set up a little rota so one of my daughters could go over each evening after school. It wasn’t the easiest thing to manage — our eldest is 17 and youngest is 3 months — so I had to keep track of whose turn it was and make sure supper was ready for when they got home.
Since she’d said she was happy to pay, I let her know that my two younger girls (10 and 12) would get £1.50/hr and the older ones (14, 16, 17) £4/hr. With the rota, it came to about £25 a week for 10 hours total — which I thought was very reasonable.
A few years ago, I wouldn’t have asked for payment, but we’ve recently lost our main income stream and my DH’s new job doesn’t quite cover our needs. Things are very tight, so I thought this would be a way for the kids to help out and also earn a little pocket money for things I can’t currently afford.
It all went well for two weeks, then she messaged to say she’d try to manage without them. Reading between the lines, I think it was because of the cost.
The next day she texted:
“Kids so disappointed that no one came today. Each one came home and straight away asked who was coming today :)”
I replied:
“So cute. It’s so nice that my girls have had the opportunity to spend time with their cousins.”
Then she said:
“They more than welcome to keep coming if they especially want. Just can’t keep paying if you know what I mean…”
My kids say they’d be happy to keep helping without pay. DH says I’m being mean if I stop them, especially as SIL helped us a lot years ago without being paid (though I did repay her in other ways).
The thing is, my house is quite chaotic and I really notice the difference when one of the girls is missing each evening.
So —
AIBU to stop sending them now that she’s said she can’t pay?
Would it be cheeky to ask MIL if she’d like to sponsor the payment, since it would help her daughter and give my girls a bit of pocket money?
Or should I just let it go and send them anyway?
Was I asking for too much money in the first place?
Apologies for the long post, and thanks if you made it to the end!

OP posts:
Radiatelikethis · 09/11/2025 08:11

I agree that family should help each other out but to a point. It shouldn't be at the detriment to your own children's childhood and furthermore it doesn't actually seem here that your children have been given much choice here in whether they want to help out or not and it's been decided by you and your SIL, that they'll be helping out whether they like it or not.

I don't know what I'm more alarmed to read, that you have you have 9 children you clearly can't afford, that you're charging your SIL for helping her out and also thinking of asking you're MIL to pay up too.

It seems between you and your SIL, you've had far too many children between you both to cope with and neither of you seem able to bring them up without the assistance of your other children. I think it's especially worrying when you say your house is chaotic and you notice when the older kids aren't there.

I also think it's sad to read your 10 and 12 year olds are taking on a parental role, helping out with bed times and meal times. Your children didn't make the choice to be born into a loud and chaotic family and as someone said above they deserve a childhood. Their evenings should be free for them to see friends, rest, play, have downtime or activities. They shouldn't be made to doing bedtimes and supper times and helping out with younger kids that you chose to have.

You would take well to read from the posters here and the impact it's had on them and relationships with their own parents.

TheaBrandt1 · 09/11/2025 08:02

Why would you even want 9 kids? Surely it’s not possible to properly parent that many. Guess university etc for them is out of the question?

Newsenmum · 09/11/2025 07:58

Lostuser · 08/11/2025 19:24

One is more than sufficient for me lol

I have two and have always wanted a third but worry about the impact on the first two but hate the thought pf the oldest becoming basically slaves 😭

Newsenmum · 09/11/2025 07:53

Ygfrhj · 09/11/2025 06:17

Surely it's good for OP's kids to get some pocket money, learn that their time has value, practice financial responsibility by saving for a treat etc. I don't think there's anything wrong with them charging for babysitting even if it is a family member. They're not skivvies to be loaned out for free!

Op is taking the money back

Newsenmum · 09/11/2025 07:53

YouCantProveIt · 09/11/2025 06:44

@nomas

I will bite on the bait.

This woman is a user. She’s used her sister in law and her children to look after the family she has. Without it she clearly couldn’t have coped. She notices when on of her slaves are missing a night.

These children formed a close bond with her sister in law - because the sister in law was likely focused on them and paid them attention. The children probably like it over there because there is much less noise and hassle compared to doing work for a woman with nine kids v one with four.

This mother is negligent and a user. She stopped the girls going when her sister in law stopped contributing to her house via laying children’s pocket money.

To reiterate - no 10 years old child should be parentified to do the work of a mother - yet here we have a whole family eco-system dependent on using child labor to exist.

Each of the set of parents should be embarrassed and address the ongoing neglect of their own children.

Sadly I agree with this. And the pocket money is actually the girls’ money, not the ops. It’s not the victorian times. I feel sad for the op but it’s not right on these girls.

Newsenmum · 09/11/2025 07:51

So you’re relying on your girls to help you? If theyre going to have to play mothers helper I think you should let them choose where to do it.

FluentOP · 09/11/2025 07:48

Zanatdy · 08/11/2025 18:44

I think given she helped you, and your girls don’t mind, keep doing it a bit longer. Maybe not every evening if inconvenient - maybe a few times a week.

Agree with this.

Cheeseandquackers21 · 09/11/2025 07:40

Uou are being VERY unreasnable. She helped you out for free....yes you gave her other benefits ie a holiday but it wssnt probsbly a holiday if she was helping your children. Give her a chance to give back.

samthepigeon · 09/11/2025 07:28

Yes, your children should help their aunt for free, if they want to. It is only in the short term. It's what families do. However, if they are busy (out socialising, or too busy with school work), then help may not be on hand every day, and that is fine.
Ideally, families all muck in together. My own two muck in with cleaning, cooking, gardening etc - not much, not all the time, but that is normal for families, isn't it?

RampantIvy · 09/11/2025 07:27

The thing is, my house is quite chaotic and I really notice the difference when one of the girls is missing each evening.

Of course having a family of 11 will be chaotic. You knew that when you decided to have so many children. It was your choice, not your children's choice. You have to suck up the consequences of making a rod for your own back.

SilentAndQuietLight · 09/11/2025 07:03

OhFeckWhatNow · 08/11/2025 23:03

@SilentAndQuietLight

If they want to go help their aunt during this medically complex episode, that's to their credit. But between times they should not be looking after your children or your (considerable, due to the choices you've made) domestic responsibilities for you.

I agree the OP is batshit, but isn't it normal to expect older kids to help around the house? Not childcare particularly, but other domestic stuff/chores? Isn't that how they learn to look after their own homes?

(Genuine question, as a childless (but pg) person!)

I did both chores and childcare as a teen and don't regret it at all - although to be fair the childcare was for one sibling and I did it voluntarily, loved it, so the odd occasion I was actually asked/expected to I didn't mind.

Genuine answer, "chores" in a mega-family like OP's or like my family of origin are not like chores in a typical family, especially as they're inextricably intertwined with small-child-care. If you haven't experienced life as a child in a family like this, you may not understand how very unreasonable it is to expect children - almost universally girl children - to give up the only childhood and adolescence they will ever have in order to provide unpaid household labour.

My children do chores. But they do age-appropriate chores in a household of four. Their experience is not even in the same universe.

My parents also would have described me as mature and keen to help, btw. This was because, as a child, I didn't have enough experience to recognise that the situation was abusive.

YouCantProveIt · 09/11/2025 06:44

nomas · 09/11/2025 04:49

  1. the SIL hasn’t offered holidays / meals

  2. the situations aren’t the same. SIL didn’t have kids when she helped OP at a certain time, OP is the mum of 9, including a 3 month old!

@nomas

I will bite on the bait.

This woman is a user. She’s used her sister in law and her children to look after the family she has. Without it she clearly couldn’t have coped. She notices when on of her slaves are missing a night.

These children formed a close bond with her sister in law - because the sister in law was likely focused on them and paid them attention. The children probably like it over there because there is much less noise and hassle compared to doing work for a woman with nine kids v one with four.

This mother is negligent and a user. She stopped the girls going when her sister in law stopped contributing to her house via laying children’s pocket money.

To reiterate - no 10 years old child should be parentified to do the work of a mother - yet here we have a whole family eco-system dependent on using child labor to exist.

Each of the set of parents should be embarrassed and address the ongoing neglect of their own children.

CatchTheWind1920 · 09/11/2025 06:25

SharpMintUser · 08/11/2025 18:45

You are being so unreasonable that I struggle to believe this is real

This

NotEnoughKnittingTime · 09/11/2025 06:25

Maybe you should all stop having kids. Nine? Get a hobby.

MissMarplesNiece · 09/11/2025 06:22

TomatoSandwiches · 08/11/2025 19:48

As the eldest of 5 let me enlighten you.

Basically the mother (op) parentifies her older daughters by making them look after or provide care for several of the other younger ones, because she's had too many children to cope with on her own and doesn't want to or can not pay for additional help.

This was my mother, the daughter who had to look after her younger siblings from a young age. She resented it until the day she died - in fact she seemed to become more bitter about losing her own childhood & adolescence as she got older.

Sartre · 09/11/2025 06:19

She helped you for years unpaid and you’re unwilling to do the same in return? Your DC are also happy to do it without the pay and seem to enjoy it (probably a break from the chaos of 8 siblings!) so yeah, YABU.

user1492757084 · 09/11/2025 06:18

You should help out if at all possible.
Don't ask for payment. Send yourself or one of your older children until the medical crisis is over.
Don't involve MIL but do tell MIL why you are helping out as MIL might decide to make a meal each week for SIL, or help out some evenings.
Family should be able to ask for help and give help because they care.

Ygfrhj · 09/11/2025 06:17

Surely it's good for OP's kids to get some pocket money, learn that their time has value, practice financial responsibility by saving for a treat etc. I don't think there's anything wrong with them charging for babysitting even if it is a family member. They're not skivvies to be loaned out for free!

GingerPaste · 09/11/2025 06:15

Like PPs, I can’t believe that you’re seeing this mainly as a money-making transaction. She’s family and you say she helped you loads when you were struggling with a premature baby.

Ownyourchoices · 09/11/2025 06:02

9 kids and money is tight? Why on earth did you keep having more kids? And why did you sister? Both of you sound bonkers

MellowPinkDeer · 09/11/2025 05:54

I think it’s terrible that you use your older kids to support you having such a big family tbh. If you can’t cope without them then that’s on you. If they still want to go and be with your cousins you should let them! I’d never ask a family member for money like this!

Zanatdy · 09/11/2025 05:50

broodymamma · 08/11/2025 21:03

I meant to say that my kids would have some pocket money which they could choose to use to treat themselves to something nice when it suits them as it's difficult for me to do so at the moment. I wouldn't dream of taking the money off them for my own use.

It was obvious that you meant that your DDs would use this money to treat themselves. I don’t understand how some people read the same post and make up a whole scenario where your girls are handing the money to you. It was very clear (to me at least) that you weren’t taking the money from them.

JMSA · 09/11/2025 05:37

SharpMintUser · 08/11/2025 18:45

You are being so unreasonable that I struggle to believe this is real

This. It’s unbelievably unreasonable!
And for the love of God, don’t have any more kids.

BeenChangedForGood · 09/11/2025 05:34

SharpMintUser · 08/11/2025 18:45

You are being so unreasonable that I struggle to believe this is real

@SharpMintUser id struggle to believe this too if I didn’t come from the family that I do 😂
I live in the neighbouring village to my parents and my MIL (3 miles away). They pass my house every time the go to the supermarket. I was pregnant during lockdowns and was put on bed rest with DH stuck abroad as an essential worker. None of them would even drop a few groceries off for me on their way back from the supermarket the few times I was unable to secure a delivery slot 🫠😂 I was paying for the groceries obviously, I wasn’t expecting them for free.

OvenChick · 09/11/2025 05:32

Golly, who'd have thought that having nine children would equal a chaotic home. And yet despite being so profoundly fecund, you have no loyalty or empathy when it comes to a family member in need. Instead you bring out the scorebook and ask for money. Shame on you.

Swipe left for the next trending thread