Darlington nurse case flying under the radar

In the Fife case the senior staff in charge of the ED /A&E (a male doctor if I remember correctly) wanted the female member of staff arrested by the police (as in handcuffed in work, charged with a crime, tax funded trial, prison term, loose professional registration, loose current job, loose the ability to get new job) for objecting to the male doctor watching her undress in the female changing room.

When you think you've heard it all, something else comes out of the woodwork. I wasn't aware of the arsehole wanting Sandie handcuffed at work and the rest. That has out cunted all the rest of the utter cuntery that this whole fucking thing is.

🤔Should out cunted be all one word?

The trans activists influencing British schools, sports and the NHS | Mumsnet

.

IIRC from dipping in and out of observing the Darlington Nurses case over the last week or so, the nurses were expected to nominate a spokeswoman so that the hospital only had to deal with one complainant, not 26.

But they were also ordered not to discuss the issue amongst themselves. What an effective way for the trust to knee-cap their complaint

That's not correct, they're supporting in part but not completely:

The nurses have already received significant financial and legal support for free. But there are big legal bills still to pay to cover their ongoing employment tribunal case. And they need to be defended against the complaints made to the Nursing and Midwifery Council. And – win or lose - if the case goes further up the courts, these courageous nurses will need your support to make sure they get the world-class support they deserve and need.

Yep. Impregnating your wife through good ol' piv sex. The most womanly of all womanly acts! 👍

There is also a fundraiser for the case being run by Christian Concern. Google: crowdjustice Darlington Nurses

Search for Support the Darlington Nurses. They're getting low on funds. Employment Tribunals are expensive and ones that last over 3 weeks are cripplingly so.

I believe the Christian Legal Centre are paying the bills.

Their much better than expected Barrister did a really good job.

Now we wait.

Also claiming in local pages that he is/was also trying to get his biologically female wife pregnant.

Here's a BBC article from yesterday outlining how they had to bring in an academic expert (Jo Phoenix) to explain the no-shit-Sherlock finding that women are likely to feel more distressed than men about having to change in front of someone of the opposite sex.

It was also suggested that Jo may not be considered independent because she is gender-critical - i.e. believes that people cannot change sex, that sex and gender identity are different, and that in some situations sex matters more. In other words a common-sense belief likely held by much of the population.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckgk8gjkn3xo.amp

Keep in mind with this case the sheer number of sexual harassment cases there are in the NHS full stop. And the way women in the NHS are treated and the way the men (especially those actually found guilty in court) are treated.

It is institutionally sexist.

And based upon the stonewall deliberate misinterpretation of the actual law.

Stonewall. EDI training - very expensive, provided by Stonewall and other government funded advisors and dubious charities.

Agreed.

You might also want to look up Jessica Yaniv if you're not familiar with his particular predilections...

Danielle Muscato and his "suck my ladydick" comments.

Alex Drummond and his "expanding the bandwidth of how to be a woman."

Travis Albanza who, despite 'only' declaring himself non binary and using the pronouns they/them (rather than a full on woman) was Very Upset at not being allowed in the female changing rooms at Top Shop, when the male changing rooms would have serviced his non binary needs equally well.

And so on and so on and so on.

https://www.medicalbrief.co.za/uk-hospital-tells-police-patient-could-not-have-been-raped-since-attacker-was-transgender/

Sorry, almost a year. Not over a year.

I didn't find a UK source that wasn't behind a pay wall but it was reported in The Times and The Telegraph too.

There was also the case of the woman who had been raped whilst an inpatient.

The hospital gaslighted her for over a year telling her that she couldn't have been raped because, as a female only ward, there were only women on it.

Just denied outright that she could have been raped.

They finally admitted that one of the women was actually male.

Over a year.

https://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2019/12/09/hospital-apologises-to-rape-victim-for-branding-her-request-for-same-sex-breast-screening-medic-as-transphobic/

This is the only one I could find in a quick search but it was widely discussed on FWR at the time.

Basically, you have the right to request treatment from a same sex HCP. This patient had requested it on the basis she had been raped. But the law is that, whilst it can be requested, the hospital can deny it if staffing doesn't allow it.

The issue wasn't so much that they didn't have a female HCP to perform the procedure, the issue was that they said she could have a female HCP but then sent a man because he said he was a woman.

They then denied her treatment on the basis that her request was transphobic.

There was a high profile case a few years ago when a woman had asked for a female HCP to perform a mammogram.

When a burly bloke with hairy arms and a five o'clock shadow turned up in a dress, she apologised and said she'd asked for a woman. He gruffly replied, "I am a woman." She disagreed, the hospital sided with him and she didn't have her mammogram.

They did later apologise for that.

Eg should your husband/male partner (if you have one) declare himself a woman in the next 5 mins, he is one. No different to you or me or any other woman.

And he wouldn't even be expected to shave, apply make up or put on a dress. If we don't expect women to subscribe to 'performative femininity', then we can't expect it of men either. Just declaring you are is enough.

They use Stonewall's definition.

Any man who says he is at any point in time, for any duration and for any reason - Acceptance Without Exception.