Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think gentle parenting has made some kids unbearable to be around?

619 replies

KindButFirmFox · 05/11/2025 16:58

Boundaries aren’t oppression.
Sometimes “gentle” just looks like “ineffective”.

AIBU to think balance has been lost between empathy and discipline?

OP posts:
Chillithai · 06/11/2025 15:26

Horsie · 06/11/2025 15:09

I disagree. If a child was really wilfully naughty, a short sharp smack on the butt can be very effective.

Like I said, it's academic anyway, because I never really wanted kids and am now post-menopausal. Guess what, I knew I wouldn't have the patience.

How do you know given you don’t have children and have presumably never (I hope not!!) smacked any child on the butt @Horsie ?

Chillithai · 06/11/2025 15:25

Did you choose not to have children @Horsie ?

ridl14 · 06/11/2025 15:15

coldiris · 05/11/2025 17:05

Sometimes when I ask myself that question, I wonder whether it's me getting old or the times have changed. It's not just gentle parenting. A lot of things seem to have changed recently. For example, my sister has one daughter and sometimes I am under the impression that she wants to plan every second of her day every day. She just won't let her be bored even one day a week. She always has to be doing something. I honestly don't remember our parents being like that.

I am also finding that teachers these days are just afraid to do or say anything, and I understand them: it's either political correctness, rules or regulations or something else.. God forbid anyone gets offended, traumatised or upset. It's like you can't put your foot right anymore. And it isn't just with children. Sometimes it kind of feels like that at work too. It's as if we are living in a world of snowflakes.

I don't know if we just weren't aware of the issues or potential issues that existed before or the world really has changed.

As a teacher, this is definitely true for me. I trained in a tough school in London and was confident about being firm but fair, maintaining appropriate boundaries. I moved cities and schools and my current one - much better behaviour - there are so many staff that seem to tiptoe around parents. It makes me much less confident because I know I won't be backed up if for example, I gave a deserved detention but forgot to update the sanction written on the board. A parent has actually complained that I didn't write a detention on the board and the detention was deleted - even though I had, and it remained written there when a staff member spoke to me about it!

A colleague wrote on some tests of students getting less than 40% something like "you need to revise more" and the students went and filed a written complaint against him.

I could go on! It's a shame as there are so many students who can take an (appropriate) joke, like a bit of back and forth humour and straight talking. It does help build relationships and diffuse conflict.

On this thread's topic, I have one DC that's a baby so let's see how I end up parenting. I do know one parent who'll stay sat down at the library as her daughter goes round tearing books and posters off the shelves, calling "_, gentle hands!"

Horsie · 06/11/2025 15:13

GehenSieweiter · 06/11/2025 15:10

How can you feel responsible for safety or wellbeing and think physical violence is acceptable?

Like I've said ad nauseam, I would only use it in extremis, if they were really naughty, and if the child was the type whom no amount of reasoning or consequences made any difference.

I mean, I come from a whole generation (born in the Seventies) that was spanked occasionally if we were really naughty, and we are not all out here hitting everyone and thinking that adults hitting each other is OK. Neither are we all scarred for life.

GehenSieweiter · 06/11/2025 15:11

Horsie · 06/11/2025 15:09

I disagree. If a child was really wilfully naughty, a short sharp smack on the butt can be very effective.

Like I said, it's academic anyway, because I never really wanted kids and am now post-menopausal. Guess what, I knew I wouldn't have the patience.

It's effective in causing pain and fear, that should never be your motive when disciplining a child.

GehenSieweiter · 06/11/2025 15:10

Horsie · 06/11/2025 15:07

I am not responsible for the safety, welfare, or upbringing of my spouse or boss, am I? Whereas I would be for children. Additionally, I can reason with my spouse or boss, whereas children don't have adult reasoning powers. I highly doubt that my spouse or boss would key my car or throw a toy truck at my head or write on my walls. And I am not responsible for how my spouse or boss turns out as an adult.

Your comparison is meaningless.

How can you feel responsible for safety or wellbeing and think physical violence is acceptable?

Horsie · 06/11/2025 15:09

GehenSieweiter · 06/11/2025 15:01

Hitting a child won't make them listen or get to the route of the apparent naughtiness.

I disagree. If a child was really wilfully naughty, a short sharp smack on the butt can be very effective.

Like I said, it's academic anyway, because I never really wanted kids and am now post-menopausal. Guess what, I knew I wouldn't have the patience.

Horsie · 06/11/2025 15:07

DontGoJasonWaterfalls · 06/11/2025 14:54

You may not go around hitting people, but you advocate for hitting defenceless children.

If you don't do your job correctly, is it appropriate for your boss to smack you?

If you forgot to do a household task or did it incorrectly, would it be ok for your spouse to smack you?

I am not responsible for the safety, welfare, or upbringing of my spouse or boss, am I? Whereas I would be for children. Additionally, I can reason with my spouse or boss, whereas children don't have adult reasoning powers. I highly doubt that my spouse or boss would key my car or throw a toy truck at my head or write on my walls. And I am not responsible for how my spouse or boss turns out as an adult.

Your comparison is meaningless.

Letsgetmilky · 06/11/2025 15:01

Neurodiversitydoctor · 05/11/2025 18:13

I didn't DS was (is) a clever, tenacious and determined child. He needed clear bounderies and firm enforcement of those bounderies (many older women including MIL regularly told me he needed spanking). Gentle persuasion was compltely ineffectual, the only things that ever worked for him were tangible rewards and significant consequences. We also had to be absolutely consistent any deviation and he'd drive a truck through it. Hard work and as PP said not especially fair on his much calmer and amenable sister but thems the breaks. IME the wheels really come off with permissive parenting in the teenage years.

How did you handle teens? When he wanted to be independent more? Curfews? @Neurodiversitydoctor

GehenSieweiter · 06/11/2025 15:01

Horsie · 06/11/2025 14:51

I do wonder sometimes if people who are against any form of mild physical chastisement simply have easy children. What if you have a seriously naughty one, who will not listen, ever?

Hitting a child won't make them listen or get to the route of the apparent naughtiness.

GehenSieweiter · 06/11/2025 15:00

Horsie · 06/11/2025 14:53

If mild open-handed chastisement on the butt to cause a shock, not an injury, when a child is being seriously naughty and nothing else works, then yes, I suppose I do.

It's physical abuse, not matter how you try to dusguise it. It's never justifiable for an adult to hit a child as a form of punishment.

DontGoJasonWaterfalls · 06/11/2025 14:54

Horsie · 06/11/2025 13:59

Well, I have been a child, and like most Seventies/Eighties children, I was smacked occasionally. I can assure you that I do not go around hitting people now! So that's that theory of yours dead in the water. As for having no idea what I'm talking about because I don't have them, I disagree. It's not hard to use your imagination.

You may not go around hitting people, but you advocate for hitting defenceless children.

If you don't do your job correctly, is it appropriate for your boss to smack you?

If you forgot to do a household task or did it incorrectly, would it be ok for your spouse to smack you?

Horsie · 06/11/2025 14:53

GehenSieweiter · 06/11/2025 14:50

You do think it's ok to physically abuse others though.

If mild open-handed chastisement on the butt to cause a shock, not an injury, when a child is being seriously naughty and nothing else works, then yes, I suppose I do.

Horsie · 06/11/2025 14:51

GehenSieweiter · 06/11/2025 14:48

That's not a voice of reason. Spanking is physical abuse. It's illegal where I live.

I do wonder sometimes if people who are against any form of mild physical chastisement simply have easy children. What if you have a seriously naughty one, who will not listen, ever?

GehenSieweiter · 06/11/2025 14:50

Horsie · 06/11/2025 13:59

Well, I have been a child, and like most Seventies/Eighties children, I was smacked occasionally. I can assure you that I do not go around hitting people now! So that's that theory of yours dead in the water. As for having no idea what I'm talking about because I don't have them, I disagree. It's not hard to use your imagination.

You do think it's ok to physically abuse others though.

Horsie · 06/11/2025 14:49

GehenSieweiter · 06/11/2025 14:47

Right, well where I live physical punishment is illegal.

It's an academic discussion for me, anyway, because I never really wanted kids and am post-menopausal now. I wouldn't have had the patience for parenting.

GehenSieweiter · 06/11/2025 14:48

Horsie · 06/11/2025 14:05

THANK YOU! The voice of reason, at last.

That's not a voice of reason. Spanking is physical abuse. It's illegal where I live.

GehenSieweiter · 06/11/2025 14:47

Horsie · 06/11/2025 14:01

I'm British but live in the US.

Right, well where I live physical punishment is illegal.

Horsie · 06/11/2025 14:05

atmywitsend1989 · 06/11/2025 00:11

Physical abuse is leaving bruises and beating for no reason. Spanking is open handed and usually done more to shock than actually harm

THANK YOU! The voice of reason, at last.

Horsie · 06/11/2025 14:01

GehenSieweiter · 06/11/2025 06:12

Where do you live?

I'm British but live in the US.

Horsie · 06/11/2025 13:59

frozendaisy · 06/11/2025 06:58

We all think we would be the perfect parent

And it’s all well and good saying you would smack them under certain circumstances but you didn’t have any and the practice is much easier than the theory. Plus love gets in the way, pesky strong, amazing emotion that love for your small children, nothing like it. Nothing, nothing prepares you for it.

It’s perfectly possible to be a firm, effective parent without resorting to physical violence.

There is also the flip side parents who swear at and hit their child so their kids are scared shadows.

Some people are better parents than others like all things in life, some kids are easier than others. What works with one of your children doesn’t work with others (naughty step I am looking at you).

I’ve never hit our children, and had them completely under control with voice, yes a couple of times we had to leave because the countdown ran out, no long lasting damage. Only had to do that a couple of times.

You build trust with them, if they trust you do things for their best interests they don’t need to understand why they just need to accept it, once they get that rest is straightforward.

You’ve never had them you have no idea what you are talking about. You have no idea what you would’ve done as a parent.

Ours are teenagers now, fun, kind, ambitious, one at college one doing GCSEs. They have mates they talk to and hang out with, but still tell us , talk to us for advice when they feel they need it, they don’t get into fights or exhibit any aggressive behaviour out the house, because they haven’t seen it from us . If you hit a small child who you are supposed to love more than anyone else, someone much smaller and weaker than you - what message does that send to a child? That violence is a way of getting things done? If your mum would hit you then surely it’s not so bad if you hit others? Yeah you know nothing about this. Hitting is never the answer.

Well, I have been a child, and like most Seventies/Eighties children, I was smacked occasionally. I can assure you that I do not go around hitting people now! So that's that theory of yours dead in the water. As for having no idea what I'm talking about because I don't have them, I disagree. It's not hard to use your imagination.

Horsie · 06/11/2025 13:55

Barnbrack · 06/11/2025 07:24

Well firstly you don't have a clue what you'd do and I'm unsurprised you don't have kids. And pre planning hitting children makes you some kind of nutcase in my book. I hope you aren't planning children and just theoretically plan to hit them. I also wonder, are you a man?

Omg, you are crazy! 😂 I'm a post-menopausal woman who never really wanted kids. As for your other post about the harm, I can't say I've looked into it, since I was probably never going to have kids. Perhaps you're right.

TheIceBear · 06/11/2025 12:21

MinglyMadly · 06/11/2025 00:58

"Blather on" ...that was unnecessary.

I think they made a very good point actually and suspect I'm not alone.

Your rude response was uncalled for.

Your lengthy judgement on my child and parenting was uncalled for.

TheAutumnalCrow · 06/11/2025 11:57

There was a type of parenting in the 1970s that was quite rare and was just called ‘spoiling your children’.

It was indulgent, slack and very unfair on the children who were hard work to be around.

It wasn’t gentle parenting so much as giving in to every demand. Buying the children every toy they wanted. It’s got to have been hard for those kids to adjust as adults.

KindleKlub · 06/11/2025 11:45

Icebreakhell · 06/11/2025 11:39

I think the thread is being derailed by pedantry about what is gentle/permissive etc.

The op is clearly talking about kids who are never told off/corrected or given firm boundaries for behaviour.

These kids must be a nightmare to teach and I wonder how they maintain friendships if always must have their own way. They struggle in the real world, including now they are reaching the age where they’re in the workplace and an absolute nightmare to manage quite frankly.

I think that could be more generally called "lazy poor parenting" though.

There are so many people who just cant be bothered to do the leg work any more. They are obsessed with their own phones and encourage and enable obsessive screen isage for their kids. They don't want to deal with the boring and messy stuff so just opt out.