Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

I’ve easily found £30bn of savings, so why can’t the government do this?

462 replies

OwnGravityField · 02/11/2025 10:36

How about this state pension adjustment proposal?

Currently, the state pension system pays the same to everyone, even to households with very large private pensions and investment incomes. Much of this money ends up funding luxuries.

The proposal is simple:
*full SP for everyone who depends on it (60% of pensioners)
*households with more than £12,000 a year from private pensions, work, or investments have 50p of SP withdrawn for every £1 above that level, up to the value of the pension itself
*A quarter of pensioners would only have a modest reduction, and only the wealthiest 15% would no longer receive a publicly funded pension they do not need.

I used chatGPT to do the calculations.

Savings? THIRTY BILLION A YEAR

That’s 1% of GDP

List of things that could improve?

restored trust between generations so young taxpayers see their money spent on genuine need, not luxury.

national renewal: homes, NHS, lower childcare costs, investment in schools, training, the police force. It could be used to help families who are struggling with mortgage costs.

re-directing spending from low-value consumption (luxuries, imports) to investment (homes, healthcare, infrastructure) improves living standards

Positive effect on the bond markets, sterling value, credit-rating agencies, inflation trends, reduction in government debt - the UK really really needs this right now

I’d absolutely get up off my bum and vote for a party that proposed this. Would you?

OP posts:
Cinnamon77 · 02/11/2025 15:48

It's a no from me. If you want £30bn in savings let's start with cutting the benefits bill, the waste on DEI in the public sector and the money spent on housing asylum seekers

Biker47 · 02/11/2025 15:47

OK, so I'll stop paying into my private pension, cash what I have in at 60 or earlier if I'm allowed, take my 25% tax free allowance (if that hasn't been thieved off me by then), cut my hours and stress at work to bring down my salary and tax liabilities, draw pension out at lowest possible tax liability but maximum to drain it over 8 years, draw it out as cash regularly and hoard it under the floorboards, buy precious metals and other things as small off grid investments, then claim full state pension at 68 because I'm now destitute on paper.

RosesAndHellebores · 02/11/2025 15:45

Yellowshirt · 02/11/2025 15:27

Where is the fairness in spending money we don't have?
Working class people struggling to put food on the table, paying extortionate rent and energy bills whilst well off pensioners sit at home with extra money on top of triple lock pensions.
Meanwhile the debt keeps increasing. But it's OK I'll youngsters will pay it all back on top of there university fees

Were some pensioners not working class then?

I'm 65. I had my first baby in 1994. Mat leave was 26 weeks: 18 were paid; six at 90%, 12 at £50. I was back at work when my baby was 18 weeks. Only 7% of my generation went into HE, about 4% to university. MIL had DH in 1962. She was a teacher, she had to leave the Easter before he was born in August because it was considered undignified for dc to see a big bump. She had no right to return to her job. Her DH born in 1929 had little medical care prior to 1947 despite a serious accident when he was 10.

Many families in the 60s had outside toilets and no bathrooms. Few had central heating.

Thank goodness that in those days we knew the difference between their and there, even if we weren't university material. I dropped out of university. I have never been skint or struggled even without that privilege.

Sadly, you sound like an entitled moo with green eyes. I'm pleased my dc don't share your views.

kittywittyandpretty · 02/11/2025 15:45

Kendodd · 02/11/2025 15:33

I shall decline your kind offer, I don't think your advice is worth the money.

I doubt you could afford me if you can’t see the value in Providing for yourself versus claiming £3600 per year in universal Credits

DoraSpenlow · 02/11/2025 15:43

RosesAndHellebores · 02/11/2025 14:42

@yellowshirt. Not all pensioners have been given £200 winter fuel allowance. Married couples have received £150 each; single pensioners have received £200. Those with sufficient earnings will repay it through theor tax codes.

The elderly were not given houses. They largely bought them with interest bearing mortgages and repaid the debt. Their children will benefit from the capital when their parents die. Also, not all pensuoners are owner occupiers.

Can you please confirm your own situation. May I assume, you have a full time job, pay tax and national insurance and are not in receipt of any benefits whatsover: child, tax credits, universal credit, fsm for your children?

May I also assume that you don't drink, smoke or eat too much rendering you obese and a potential drain on health services.

Sorry, married couples have not all received £150 each. We had £100 each.

Paetina · 02/11/2025 15:41

Freda69 · 02/11/2025 14:38

I’m a pensioner; a much fairer idea is to increase income tax (paid by pensioners) and reduce National Insurance (not paid by pensioners). Better off pensioners would pay more, but would ease the burden on working people. Very simple to administer as well.

Agree - wouldn't hugely surprise me if this made an appearance in the Autumn budget.

Breadcat24 · 02/11/2025 15:41

Op you sound like the chatGPT search you wanted to run was "would it be a good economical strategy for the UK to shoot everyone who lives to 65"

PrettyDamnCosmic · 02/11/2025 15:39

OwnGravityField · 02/11/2025 10:53

See the original calcs. Teachers and doctors minimally affected.

See the original calcs. Teachers and doctors minimally affected.

Retired doctor here. Under your proposal I would lose my state pension entirely. Someone with private pensions of £36K plus £12K state pension would see their income of £48K reduced to £36K which is a 25% income reduction. I don't regard a 25% reduction in income as being minimally affected by this crazy proposal.

MrsWhites · 02/11/2025 15:38

I know I’m missing the point of this thread (and the terrible idea) but I’d love to know how much of this black hole could be filled with departmental savings in government - they waste billions every year.

The NHS included, my sister in law recently mentioned how her department ordered some chairs for a conference room, the chief exec didn’t like the colour - instead of sending them back the original ones where thrown onto a disused room whilst new ones in a nicer shade of the same colour were ordered. If ‘working people’ are expected to pay more, this sort of nonsense needs to stop too!

Hermione101 · 02/11/2025 15:37

Excellent idea, I have enough in my private pensions to cover retirement. When can I stop paying NI? I also want a refund for all the NI contributions I have thus paid. While you’re at it, I want a refund on 20% VAT and whatever % my taxes pay for state education since my children don’t use state school.

winter8090 · 02/11/2025 15:34

Another idea for those who work and save hard to support those who don’t.

Those with the broadest shoulders are fed up.

Kendodd · 02/11/2025 15:33

kittywittyandpretty · 02/11/2025 14:15

Sadly, it’s not £15,000 every Five days, Or even every 50 days that’s not how compounded interest or pension funds work. I’d offer to talk you through it but I do charge about two grand to Advise, let me know if you’re keen. I’ll book you in an appointment.

I shall decline your kind offer, I don't think your advice is worth the money.

Mummyoflittledragon · 02/11/2025 15:31

So you think that the 44.2% of people, who are net contributors to the economy, many of who have paid all of their NI years up to receive a full pension and are still paying, should now also be penalised further. Screw that. No I will not be voting for such a stupid policy.

DoraSpenlow · 02/11/2025 15:31

DoraSpenlow · 02/11/2025 13:28

Sorry, haven't rtft but the state pension doesn't pay the same to everyone. I don't get the full state pension because I paid into a company pension scheme. My husband gets less state pension than me because he paid into a company pension scheme for longer than I did.

And I didn't get my state pension until 65 and 5 months instead of 60. So, waited longer and got less.

Alexandra2001 · 02/11/2025 15:31

OwnGravityField · 02/11/2025 10:44

I ran the calcs on chatgpt about public sentiment:

Whether people would back this reform depends on how it is framed, who explains it, and when it is introduced. Yet the evidence suggests that, if presented clearly and fairly, a majority of voters would support it.

Around thirteen million people currently receive the State Pension which is about one in four voters. The remaining three-quarters are working-age, and many of them feel that the system no longer reflects today’s realities. Research by YouGov and Ipsos shows:

  • 60–70% of under-50s believe the triple lock and universal pension payments are unsustainable.
  • Around 40% of pensioners agree that wealthier retirees should receive less.
  • Roughly two-thirds of all voters support the principle that people with large private pensions should get a reduced State Pension.

So, it looks like it would actually be a vote winner at election.

ChatGpt told me that the average temp in May for a town in France i'm hoping to visit, is 1820'C

I'll pack some factor 50.

Your plans are full of holes, would have a host of unintended consequences, they aren't really worthy of consideration.

MrsSkylerWhite · 02/11/2025 15:30

Yellowshirt · 02/11/2025 15:27

Where is the fairness in spending money we don't have?
Working class people struggling to put food on the table, paying extortionate rent and energy bills whilst well off pensioners sit at home with extra money on top of triple lock pensions.
Meanwhile the debt keeps increasing. But it's OK I'll youngsters will pay it all back on top of there university fees

You do understand that those pensioners were often young, struggling families too?

OnlyOnAFriday · 02/11/2025 15:29

OwnGravityField · 02/11/2025 11:08

Actually, no, I’d totally be affected by it. I’d be in the 85% with modest or no reduction in state pension. Based on my calcs, I’d probably lose a few hundred a year of SP. I’m ok with that. I’d rather my children had a decent future.

And if you were facing losing the lot which I would with your proposal I bet you’d think differently. Easy to think this is ok if you’re only going to lose a few hundred. I’m ok Jack

my private pension won’t be massive. Maybe 17-19k a year. But the state pension on top will make all the difference between turning the heating on or not.

Kendodd · 02/11/2025 15:28

cardibach · 02/11/2025 14:34

Not-quite-pensioner here.
Yes, we know that. Nobidy with any political awareness or general knowledge is ignorant of that. We paid for the pensions of those older than us, on the understanding that those coming behind would do the same for us.

Edited

The demographics don't add up anymore though.

SparkFinder · 02/11/2025 15:28

Outside of the rights and wrongs of removing state pension from people who have private pensions and other sources of income, I do believe that this will be a reality by the time I retire simply because the maths can't work of paying the state pension to a large, long living cohort of pensioners from taxpayers who can't afford the basics of living. So I'm working off the assumption I'll need to fund my own retirement.

MrsSkylerWhite · 02/11/2025 15:27

Ritasueandbobtoo9 · 02/11/2025 15:05

@MrsSkylerWhite

Sorry Mrs White. I want my tax spent on UK citizens that have contributed and work hard.

Then you’ll be delighted to know that most asylum seekers are granted citizenship. Those who aren’t will be deported.

So, your taxes will be spent on UK citizens. And theirs on you.

Yellowshirt · 02/11/2025 15:27

LaserPumpkin · 02/11/2025 14:26

So if you have two people, both earning the same amount throughout their lives. One has saved to buy a one bedroom flat, the other spent all their income as they got it. Both have State pension only (just for sake of argument)

The pensioner who owns a one-bedroom flat wouldn’t get WFA.

Whereas the one having their rent paid by the State (because they’d qualify for help) would?

Where is the fairness in that?

Where is the fairness in spending money we don't have?
Working class people struggling to put food on the table, paying extortionate rent and energy bills whilst well off pensioners sit at home with extra money on top of triple lock pensions.
Meanwhile the debt keeps increasing. But it's OK I'll youngsters will pay it all back on top of there university fees

EmeraldRoulette · 02/11/2025 15:26

Maybe OP is just shit posting

Especially with ChatGPT, some people treat it like a new toy.

swimlyn · 02/11/2025 15:26

“Yadda, yadda, yadda… …I’d absolutely get up off my bum and vote for a party that proposed this. Would you?”

One vote ain’t gonna crack it hun.

You need to get up off your bum and JOIN THAT PARTY AND WORK ON IT. The ChatGPT party presumably???

They need big thinkers like you.

caringcarer · 02/11/2025 15:23

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 02/11/2025 10:50

I’ve paid voluntary NICs, so where is my refund?

Me too to make sure I will get full state pension when I am 67. When the government make major changes they have to phase it in over 10 years or so to give those nearing state pension age time to adjust their savings. You are assuming all people would carry on paying exactly the same pension contribution which is extremely naive.

Kendodd · 02/11/2025 15:23

PrettyDamnCosmic · 02/11/2025 15:14

This is incorrect. NI does drop from 8% to 2% on earnings over £50K (actually £967 a week) but there is no upper limit above which NI is not paid.

Ah, OK, thank you. I think it used to drop to zero years ago.