Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The press need to move on?

62 replies

dearydeary · 01/11/2025 08:37

I wish the focus would move away from Andrew to the other individuals who were involved in the mistreatment of women trafficked by Epstein?

AIBU- to wish they would move on and widen their reporting?

OP posts:
Needmorelego · 01/11/2025 10:46

HelpMeGetThrough · 01/11/2025 09:00

The news will move on when some new disaster happens, then the channels will report that to death. Matey will be very much out of the news then.

The media has barely mentioned the appalling situation in Jamaica.

Cantheowneroftheredcorsapleasemovetheircar · 01/11/2025 10:46

HoskinsChoice · 01/11/2025 10:43

Do you really believe that Virginia's family are doing it for her? Where were they when she was being abused as a child? Where were they when she was abused by Epstein and a whole raft of other people? Where were they when she was abused ny her husband? Where were they when she was telling the media she'd been in a fatal accident? Where were they when she had her children taken off her? Why are they just focusing on Andrew? Why aren't they talking to the media about all of these other people and events that have happened to her? Why aren't they asking the public and the media to scour the world for the other people who she claims were abused along side her so they can back up her story and they can help them? They have been absent throughout her life until kerching there's money to be made in selling books and courting the media?

Well it's her brother who's doing the talking. Her younger brother.

So I think that answers were he was when she was being abused as a child

HoskinsChoice · 01/11/2025 10:43

LookAtMeWithStarryEyes · 01/11/2025 08:51

No, this is a huge news story. Virginias family want this in the news after everything she went through, which resulted in her death, so I’m all for it. Destroy the cunt.

Hopefully the focus will then shift to others. They all need their time in the spotlight individually and each time it should be long and drawn out! If we moved onto others so soon it would water Andrew’s (and each individuals) part down. Let’s not do that.

Do you really believe that Virginia's family are doing it for her? Where were they when she was being abused as a child? Where were they when she was abused by Epstein and a whole raft of other people? Where were they when she was abused ny her husband? Where were they when she was telling the media she'd been in a fatal accident? Where were they when she had her children taken off her? Why are they just focusing on Andrew? Why aren't they talking to the media about all of these other people and events that have happened to her? Why aren't they asking the public and the media to scour the world for the other people who she claims were abused along side her so they can back up her story and they can help them? They have been absent throughout her life until kerching there's money to be made in selling books and courting the media?

BMW6 · 01/11/2025 10:29

I haven't read her book nor do I wish to but surely she names others who had sex with her other than Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor?

If she has named them why isn't there media coverage? If she hasn't isn't that rather odd that he's the only one?

LookAtMeWithStarryEyes · 01/11/2025 10:24

Q2C4 · 01/11/2025 10:19

Isn’t there a risk that if the focus is on one individual too long, the media will move on before the others are reported on?

No because the bigger story is still in the press. And the US press are already more focused on their own.

Q2C4 · 01/11/2025 10:19

LookAtMeWithStarryEyes · 01/11/2025 08:51

No, this is a huge news story. Virginias family want this in the news after everything she went through, which resulted in her death, so I’m all for it. Destroy the cunt.

Hopefully the focus will then shift to others. They all need their time in the spotlight individually and each time it should be long and drawn out! If we moved onto others so soon it would water Andrew’s (and each individuals) part down. Let’s not do that.

Isn’t there a risk that if the focus is on one individual too long, the media will move on before the others are reported on?

Cantheowneroftheredcorsapleasemovetheircar · 01/11/2025 10:19

Ponoka7 · 01/11/2025 10:12

Mandelson has got off lightly, he needs chasing out of the house of lords. They should all be in the press. No-one was calling for Meghan to be let up on, even when it was lies.

Yes!!! ❤️❤️❤️

Cantheowneroftheredcorsapleasemovetheircar · 01/11/2025 10:18

Is anyone else watching Andrew's wikipedia page, wondering when the bloody hell they're going to update the title? 😄

Having worked with Andrew on occasion I can confirm this will be Hell for him and I must admit I am highly enjoying it 😊

theunbreakablecleopatrajones · 01/11/2025 10:16

They will move on when interest declines

But threads like this do rather suggest it hasn't

Kimura · 01/11/2025 10:13

Summerhillsquare · 01/11/2025 08:45

The reporting on Andrew is to show no one is protected in the UK, sends a message.

It really isn't, that's an incredibly naive point of view.

The reason salacious stories like this get so much coverage is that they generate a massive amount of web traffic, which is the only thing keeping the lights on in the news media world these days.

First social media, then the manipulation of search algorithms completely changed the way we consume news/journalism/content online.

Most of the stories your read on big news websites are no longer written or at least edited by journalists, they're done by SEO specialists to ensure that they perform well on Google.

The media have zero interest in 'sending a message' that people like Andrew aren't protected in the UK. As long as people keep reading, watching and searching for all the guff they put out about him, they'll keep publishing it.

Ponoka7 · 01/11/2025 10:12

Mandelson has got off lightly, he needs chasing out of the house of lords. They should all be in the press. No-one was calling for Meghan to be let up on, even when it was lies.

BIossomtoes · 01/11/2025 10:09

Sadcafe · 01/11/2025 09:04

I’ve said the same on several other threads, he’s not the only person to have been friends with Epstein but no one really seems to mention them, some of it does seem to be the obsession with royal bashing

I feel the same way. It’s getting quite performative and spiteful now. There were numerous equally disgusting men who did equally vile things and are hiding in plain sight. It’s about time the spotlight extended to them.

LookAtMeWithStarryEyes · 01/11/2025 10:06

KnickerlessParsons · 01/11/2025 09:36

From what I understand Virginia’s family were the cause of a lot of what happened to her. She left home young because she was being sexually abused at home.

Her brother and SIL are her family, they want this in the news and were definitely not ‘the cause of a lot of what happened to her’. Her brother was a child.

LookAtMeWithStarryEyes · 01/11/2025 10:03

BeeWitchy · 01/11/2025 09:43

Virginia said was sexually abused by her father. The family members referred to here, the ones speaking up for her, are her younger brother (and her sister in law). Her brother was only a child when Virginia was victimised by Epstein. He was much younger than that when Virginia suffered sexual abuse at home.

Yes, but that hasn’t stopped the pro Andrew posters pointing the finger at her brother. They’re pathetic and desperate.

PoetryEmotion · 01/11/2025 10:02

On the contrary, OP. The more the press report what has been done to Andrew, the more pressure it puts on other countries and Trump.

BeeWitchy · 01/11/2025 09:52

LookAtMeWithStarryEyes · 01/11/2025 09:20

I haven’t said we should let any of them off the hook. I just believe they deserve a long time individually in the spotlight. We already have the context of this being part of something much bigger.

You only need to read some posters on the RF board to see that they want this shut down about Andrew particularly, they can’t see anything bad said about their precious RF. They’re desperately trying to blame Harry, Virginias brother, even saying their poor Andrew was groomed…ffs. No, he needs to have a long time individually the spotlight because this must never be allowed to be minimised. The public have literally paid for him whilst he has been involved in raping girls, of course Andrew as a British Prince is going to get a lot of attention in Britain, probably more so than American billionaires who have funded themselves.

I have family in the US and their press is much more focused on the American men involved in this and they aren’t so bothered about a British man.

Yes, I’ve followed US media coversge and it is more focussed on the American men. Andrew’s getting coverage now in America because it is current news, and it helps to keep the demand for the Epstein files in the forefront of people’s minds.

DickDewey · 01/11/2025 09:45

I do think the press are dragging this on a bit now.

But then I’d also quite like to see a photo of Andrew leaving Windsor looking dejected in a car rammed with his belongings. 😆

cottonwoolie · 01/11/2025 09:43

In fact when you look at Andrew’s involvement with the Chinese and Middle Eastern interests and the fact that details of his time as a trade envoy are sealed we look bloody medieval as usual

yep, so much shady financial stuff.

BeeWitchy · 01/11/2025 09:43

KnickerlessParsons · 01/11/2025 09:36

From what I understand Virginia’s family were the cause of a lot of what happened to her. She left home young because she was being sexually abused at home.

Virginia said was sexually abused by her father. The family members referred to here, the ones speaking up for her, are her younger brother (and her sister in law). Her brother was only a child when Virginia was victimised by Epstein. He was much younger than that when Virginia suffered sexual abuse at home.

cottonwoolie · 01/11/2025 09:42

some of it does seem to be the obsession with royal bashing

What's wrong with royal bashing though? And during times of economic strife it tends to increase.

cottonwoolie · 01/11/2025 09:41

Tbf they have probably sat on it for years so have a lot of material. Add in associated stories they can write about Charles, William and Harry.

KnickerlessParsons · 01/11/2025 09:36

LookAtMeWithStarryEyes · 01/11/2025 08:51

No, this is a huge news story. Virginias family want this in the news after everything she went through, which resulted in her death, so I’m all for it. Destroy the cunt.

Hopefully the focus will then shift to others. They all need their time in the spotlight individually and each time it should be long and drawn out! If we moved onto others so soon it would water Andrew’s (and each individuals) part down. Let’s not do that.

From what I understand Virginia’s family were the cause of a lot of what happened to her. She left home young because she was being sexually abused at home.

captainoctopus · 01/11/2025 09:34

I expect efforts are being made to keep Andrew out of sight and shut him up, rather than letting him give evidence because he could dump Trump and other major American (possibly British) big- wigs in the shit which would cause a major diplomatic upset.
Perhaps if Trump gets ousted eventually Andrew will be encouraged to speak?

Summerlilly · 01/11/2025 09:31

I do wish the media would also focus on all the other victims and powerful men involved in this. They also need to be identified, investigated and flamed alive.

Virginia’s father sex trafficked her out also and then got on the telly one day and talked about how great it was going to be to take money from Andrew for what he did.
Meanwhile he drove and collected his daughter from said parties and even took part in them.
I wouldn’t be surprised if he took a cut of the money she made. This also needs to be talked about and the rest of men need to be punished!

Ukisgaslit · 01/11/2025 09:22

@LookAtMeWithStarryEyes

Yes - exactly . I sense the same thing here as you do
How depressing.

Swipe left for the next trending thread