Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AITA for proposing to pay 70% of the bills instead of contributing to my GF's mortgage to protect my savings for our future home?

162 replies

DrSpongey · 29/10/2025 19:03

TLDR:

I'm (36M, £28k salary) moving into my GF's (37F, £44k salary) flat in new year. I'm have savings for a future house deposit, she has very limited bar equity she doesnt want to release, wants to at least keep her flat for 10 years to build the equity which makes sense, says in principle she used that to then pay off some of the mortgage if we got a house when I'd put the deposit down which is majority of my life savings before we met.

I suggested paying 70% of all bills to protect my savings instead of contributing to her mortgage. I can tell she thinks it's unfair but won't explicity say so. She has hard time not people pleasing or saying how she really feels with anyone.

My girlfriend (GF) bought her two-bed flat in Feb 2023, well before we met. We're getting serious and planning for me to move in permanently in the New Year—it’s just getting tiring packing and unpacking constantly to come to hers. I lived at home with parents. She comes over very rarely which I get. I actually prefer to be at hers due to better lighting and she encourages it especially in the winter where my mood is low. I moved about daily and workout 2-4 times a week consistently. We both shared domestic labour and contribute halves on food, fuel costs whilst I'm here as well as treating her to little surprises and gifts. She's says she loves having me around but feel there's disconnect and dissonance between what she says and how she actually feels.

The ultimate goal is to buy a house together, which is why I’ve saved up £40-50k for a deposit which is my lifetime savings; she, admittedly, has very little.

The Proposal
We initially agreed to split all costs (including the mortgage) based on our income percentage. Since then, I've had a rethink.

My new proposal is to pay 70% of all the bills (Council Tax, utilities, internet, etc.) but £0 towards her £690/month mortgage.

My Thinking (Why I'm Doing This)
Protecting My Investment: If I pay her mortgage, that money is gone forever if we break up. I don't get equity, and it slows down my ability to save for the massive deposit I plan to use on our joint home and sets me back further in my plans to move out.

The Maths Works Out: I genuinely don't think she's losing money. My high contribution to the bills (£28k vs £44k salary split) essentially frees up her money, which she could then put toward the mortgage herself or save (which I encourage). I'm not trying to short-change her; I'm trying to minimise my risk but genuinely don't think she understands how she could use the money cut back in bills to distribute towards whatever she feels to.

It’s About the Long Game: I want us to succeed, and that means protecting the deposit that will get us into a bigger home together eventually.
She's the kind of person who struggles to express feelings and manages money less consistently than me (her sister basically gifted her most of her savings). She just keeps saying "we need to think about sharing costs fairly," but that's precisely what I feel I'm doing by protecting our future large deposit while still shouldering the majority of our living expenses.
I'm thinking long-term here, not just about the next six months. I've heard too many horror stories as old as time where people get fleeced and dont have cohabiting agreement of some sort.

My concern is if the relationship went completely south I wouldn't see or get that money back. I've also paid for nearly 3k holiday for us to enjoy in December of which she is paying me back monthly for next six months. Her mortgage is relatively low for 2 bed flat in middle of Newport.

I think lot of it, is due to upbringing and culture (Afghan British Muslim). I eventually want to get married and have a child so this would be stepping stone to that. I just want to do this fairly now so by living together for extended period of time permanently, we'll know if we're compatible.

She actually sent me a tiktok about cohabiting agreement a little while ago about cohabiting couple who unlike there friends where it just never got discussed or addressed properly decide to draw up this agreement so there would be no stone unturned or potential messy unwavering consequences so alleviated any pressure or confusion in the way of divisions to allow conscious free state by knowing what each would be entitled to.

AITA for wanting to protect my savings for our future house deposit by paying the vast majority of bills instead of contributing to her existing mortgage?

Thanks,

Rob

OP posts:
mindutopia · 29/10/2025 21:59

You should pay all household expenses including housing costs in proportion to your incomes. She earns more, so should pay more as per her extra income. But it will cost you more than say £300 a month to privately rent a room in a flat, so contributing to housing costs proportionally is a fantastic deal for you.

I can’t see how paying off some landlord’s mortgage with your rent is fine, but paying off your partner’s mortgage who you live with and plan to create a financial future with isn’t. 🤷🏻‍♀️

PracticalPixie · 29/10/2025 21:57

Honestly, would you not be better off saving properly for your own place or save for your first place together? This all sounds very complicated and unnecessarily stressful. Arguing over who pays what before you even live together is not the best sign to me

Arlanymor · 29/10/2025 21:51

nomas · 29/10/2025 21:17

You’re backtracking. You said ‘And pay her an amount for rent. Nothing to do with the mortgage - pay the going market rate for rent’. You’re now changing it to pay her the ‘EQUIVALENT of what would be market rate for someone with use of a room and facilities’ because you’ve realised how ridiculous your post was.

I didn’t say he shouldn’t pay her rent but your suggestion lacked any vestige of common sense.

I am not. I said pay rent equivalent to market value. That means market value of what he is getting - i.e. a room, use of facilities etc. Wasn't ridiculous at all - I was clear from the beginning. You're just being a bit of an arse for no reason.

ConcordeSkyHigh · 29/10/2025 21:50

I've read much worse AI.

sets me back further in my plans to move out But you are moving out, in with her? How are you looking at this - as a relationship or financial arrangement?

genuinely don't think she understands how she could use the money cut back in bills to distribute towards whatever she feels to

I don't think you're super wrong that she's not making financial sense. But does it really matter?

I would basically ask her directly what amount in £ does she think is fair? That's the only way you'll know where she is coming from.

wants to at least keep her flat for 10 years to build the equity which makes sense, says in principle she used that to then pay off some of the mortgage if we got a house when I'd put the deposit down which is majority of my life savings before we met.

So you plan to buy a home presumably in less than 10 years with your deposit. Given that it will be your deposit, how much say will she have on the property, the furnishings etc. After owning my own place, I'd want an equal say in where and how I live.

It doesn't really make sense - equity grows on any decent property. It sounds like she wants to use some of the equity on herself, and some of it on your TBC mortgage. That's how I read it anyway.

Ilovemychocolate · 29/10/2025 21:29

I think you are being very disingenuous here.
Why on earth do you think you should live rent free?
You are 36 and still live at home?
Bloody hell, time to grow up and pay your way!

DrSpongey · 29/10/2025 21:27

Itsskea · 29/10/2025 20:55

it’s hard for people to think posters are genuine when they do this.
‘AI give me all the pros and cons of moving into someone else’s house and include arguments about not wanting to pay their mortgage for them’…

I can show you the prompt if you like but it was essentially my original pasted message followed by "Please can you condense this draft to make it 6000 characters whilst retaining most of my original tone". I never asked anything else.

OP posts:
themerchentofvenus · 29/10/2025 21:21

@DrSpongey you should pay 50% of bills but NOTHING towards the mortgage. It's not your property.

Or she treats you as a lodger and you pay her rent.

nomas · 29/10/2025 21:17

Arlanymor · 29/10/2025 21:13

He pays the EQUIVALENT of what would be market rate for someone with use of a room and facilities. Why should he not pay any money for his accommodation? That’s mad. I can’t make you see common sense. And in case you missed it - because you did - I said he shouldn’t contribute to the mortgage - but she can do what she wants with her money.

You’re backtracking. You said ‘And pay her an amount for rent. Nothing to do with the mortgage - pay the going market rate for rent’. You’re now changing it to pay her the ‘EQUIVALENT of what would be market rate for someone with use of a room and facilities’ because you’ve realised how ridiculous your post was.

I didn’t say he shouldn’t pay her rent but your suggestion lacked any vestige of common sense.

Arlanymor · 29/10/2025 21:13

nomas · 29/10/2025 21:10

That’s ridiculous. He pays market rent for a home he does not have sole use of, and she gets to pay off her mortgage and have him contribute to the bills?

How is that equivalency?!

Edited

He pays the EQUIVALENT of what would be market rate for someone with use of a room and facilities. Why should he not pay any money for his accommodation? That’s mad. I can’t make you see common sense. And in case you missed it - because you did - I said he shouldn’t contribute to the mortgage - but she can do what she wants with her money.

bumptybum · 29/10/2025 21:12

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Silly response. Why would you not ask women what they thought was fair. Do you really hate men that much?

nomas · 29/10/2025 21:10

Arlanymor · 29/10/2025 21:09

Equivalency - I didn’t think I needed to spell it out. It’s obvious.

That’s ridiculous. He pays market rent for a home he does not have sole use of, and she gets to pay off her mortgage and have him contribute to the bills?

How is that equivalency?!

Arlanymor · 29/10/2025 21:09

nomas · 29/10/2025 21:07

Why would he pay market rent?! He’s not getting sole use of the home!

Equivalency - I didn’t think I needed to spell it out. It’s obvious.

nomas · 29/10/2025 21:07

Arlanymor · 29/10/2025 19:06

Pay half of all bills with the exception of council tax where presumably she will lose her single person discount, so either spilt the new amount or make up the difference so she doesn't lose out.

And pay her an amount for rent. Nothing to do with the mortgage - pay the going market rate for rent - and she can spend it as she pleases. You have no claim on her property, you can continue building your deposit for the time being, she also doesn’t put her property at risk by having you remotely connected to the legal ownership
of her home.

AITA is a Reddit term; we use AIBU around here.

Edited

Why would he pay market rent?! He’s not getting sole use of the home!

nomas · 29/10/2025 21:06

DrSpongey · 29/10/2025 20:49

I know but it was too long otherwise. I actually drafted this from scratch initially but then just asked Gemini to condensed it.

Ignore them, they live in the dark ages where co-pilot didn’t exist.

nomas · 29/10/2025 21:05

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

If you can’t add anything useful to the thread, leave the grown ups to talk.

Arlanymor · 29/10/2025 20:56

People who are saying he shouldn’t pay rent are being completely ridiculous.

Itsskea · 29/10/2025 20:55

DrSpongey · 29/10/2025 20:49

I know but it was too long otherwise. I actually drafted this from scratch initially but then just asked Gemini to condensed it.

it’s hard for people to think posters are genuine when they do this.
‘AI give me all the pros and cons of moving into someone else’s house and include arguments about not wanting to pay their mortgage for them’…

DrSpongey · 29/10/2025 20:49

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I know but it was too long otherwise. I actually drafted this from scratch initially but then just asked Gemini to condensed it.

OP posts:
AllTheChatsAboutTea · 29/10/2025 19:46

Whatever you agree, you need a cohabitation agreement setting out your respective contributions and your intentions about what happens if you split up. That protects you if she decides to kick you out of her property in a few years, and protects her if you try to claim a beneficial interest in her property.

Itsskea · 29/10/2025 19:40

I would also say the same to a man or woman! In fact said something similar to a male friend who owned the flat & the GF was going to move in.
They drew up a rent agreement to make sure it was clear she wasn’t paying his mortgage - but then they decided to not move in together at all yet.

Forgetsheepcountducklings · 29/10/2025 19:38

Vaxtable · 29/10/2025 19:37

It’s it funny how if this was a women as the lower earner people would say split bills proportionally to salary, and don’t pay towards the mortgage

i agree with you op what you are doing is fair, although maybe some rent, but I would insist on a rent agreement being drawn up

No, I would (and do!) say the same thing when it's a woman. I don't think you should pay top market rent to move in with a partner, but I don't see why anyone should expect to live rent free either. It benefits both - the person moving in still pays less than they would to rent elsewhere.

Presumably he pays his parents some rent at 36!

Vaxtable · 29/10/2025 19:37

It’s it funny how if this was a women as the lower earner people would say split bills proportionally to salary, and don’t pay towards the mortgage

i agree with you op what you are doing is fair, although maybe some rent, but I would insist on a rent agreement being drawn up

Forgetsheepcountducklings · 29/10/2025 19:31

I never understand the "but I don't want to contribute to a mortgage" argument. Surely as a grown adult you should expect to be paying something for your rent, as you would if you lived anywhere else. I don't think it needs to be market rate though as some posters are suggesting - probably more along the lines of a lodger rate + 50% bills.

There's no reason why the gf can't use the rent money towards a future home together if she wants to, but this way she's not at risk of them breaking up and her having let someone live with her for free for no reason. The theory that by him retaining control of the balance of what the unpaid rent should be "protects savings for our future house deposit " makes no sense and only benefits him.

DoYouReally · 29/10/2025 19:29

TheBlueHotel · 29/10/2025 19:17

Why should he pay her rent when she's paying the mortgage and accruing equity in her asset? She'd be paying the mortgage with or without him. Charging him rent instead of letting him save towards a joint asset in future is shitty profiteering behaviour.

It's not. It's the cost of living with her or with anyone else on the area.

Why should be benefit from mooching off his GF?

Cerialkiller · 29/10/2025 19:29

It's generally recommended that a live in partner doesn't pay towards the mortgage because in some cases this can result in entitlement to a share of the equity (or an unsuccessful but still unpleasant court case)

By not contributing to the mortgage, the op is also protecting his gf.

They aren't married, they are not legally tied and should not co-mingle finances ideally.

Paying 70% is more then fair and you could justify 50/50 and by the sounds of it, the amounts would be far off anyway. 690 is a tiny mortgage.

Swipe left for the next trending thread