Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Feminism sold a lie - Women, today, are worse off than ever

888 replies

ConservativeC2 · 28/10/2025 20:58

Listening to the women I work with, it's been interesting to hear their views about feminism and they are not happy. We are all millennial age so not too young, not too old and I keep hearing that it's the millennial generation of women that have absolutely lost out the most.

I think feminism initially promoted some idea of independence, equality and choice. Phrases like 'men hold all the money and power' at the time were very emotive whilst not entirely true. The correct statement then (and still now) is some men hold all the money and power. Most men back in the 50s-70s worked very long hours and spent pretty much all their money on their family. It was hard for everyone, but I think women were more empowered then than now.

In contrast to today, most of the women my age have to work. Whilst feminism promotes choice, most of them do not actually have a choice today. Most men today do not earn enough to run a household which means most women have to work. The worst part is they still do a larger share of the domestic work and childcare. So I think women now have it worse than ever - it's not just me, my female colleagues feel the same way. They've come to point in life where they want to start a family but they know they will have to come back to work.

Now it's all to do with feminism. There are other factors which has driven up the cost of living (inflation, property prices, profit extraction from multinational corporates etc).

OP posts:
goldenautumnleaves25 · 29/10/2025 20:59

You can stay at home today quite easily if you are ok with the lifestyle of a not-rich family in the 50s. for luxuries (shop bought clothes, shop bought food etc), you have to have money.
What you can’t have is all modern luxuries and no work if you didn’t marry rich.

goldenautumnleaves25 · 29/10/2025 20:54

Being a homemaker 70 years ago was hard physical work. Washing by hand, making clothes, rabbits/chickens in the back garden for meat and eggs, loads of cooking, ironing with a coal filled iron, no central heating, no showers, etc
It was fun for the rich - much like today. Housewifes from less affluent background did backbreaking hard work every day. they didn’t spend much time with their children.

AsAliveAsYouNeedMeToBe · 29/10/2025 20:51

Jesus no, god no.

I'm a single parent with one DD. I earn well, own my own house which I paid for myself with no man's help, have several foreign holidays per year, buy myself whatever I want (don't mean yachts obv), support my daughter and myself comfortably. No man out of choice, no need to bicker, compromise, nag, adjust to anyone's needs/wants, it's my way or the high way. Have a fuckboy for sex and companionship when the need arises. Can have one night stands should I choose to.

What would I be in the 50s? A downtrodden housewife with a lord and master, and no say? A crazy 'spinster' cat lady? A 'village bike' or what's that charming expression? A woman who everyone pities with 'awwwww.... can't get and keep a man poor dear..'?

Hell no, thanks. Life couldn't be better.

MNLurker1345 · 29/10/2025 20:47

GagMeWithASpoon · 29/10/2025 20:00

Let’s turn it around. At least you got 6 weeks. Because I’m adopted(as a baby), my mum got nothing, maybe she wasn’t happy to be working either to pay for your 6 weeks.

That’s so sad! I don’t really know what to say!

localnotail · 29/10/2025 20:45

I'm sorry but I think you are not thinking this through. Its all about CHOISE. You can chose not to work, or to work, to marry, not to marry, to have kids or to have an abortion. You can chose to be a single mum or to be childless. Our grand-grand mothers had nothing like this. They had zero choice. They had to marry, to have kids, to stay at home and be nice pretty housewives. They were not allowed to have "men's jobs" and were look down as being less intelligent then men.

There is nothing wrong in not wanting to achieve much professionally and be a housewife. Each to their own, but I dont particularly want to be SAHM, have 3 kids and be totally depended on my OH. Thanks fuck I have a choice to do as I please.

GagMeWithASpoon · 29/10/2025 20:45

pointythings · 29/10/2025 20:34

If you want to stay at home, you have the choice to marry someone rich, or make do and mend like a pp on this thread.

For the rest of it, the solution is to make men better. Not to whinge because the work of feminism isn't yet done.

I'm 57. I've always worked. My mother always worked - even when we were little, she worked two nights a week in a teacher training college, teaching the teachers of the future. Later on she went back to full time teaching in a secondary school.

And my grandmother on my father's science was a research chemist - she and my grandfather both worked.

While it's true that I didn't have a choice about working because my husband wasn't a high earner, I wanted to work. It would have been nice to have had the flexible options that are around these days, but at least they are there for the women of today.

Yup. I was a SAHM until DD started reception for various reasons. We didn’t have a 3 bed house, two cars or a foreign holiday every year. I didn’t marry rich.GrinThen I started looking for a job because I wanted to, again for various reasons. There was no pressure or expectation to, OH never threw in my face that I’m not contributing financially. I could’ve kept being a SAHM because we managed, I just didn’t want to.

DryIce · 29/10/2025 20:37

Zov · 29/10/2025 20:27

Do they though? Do women REALLY have a choice these days???

Whilst women had little choice years ago and couldn't work/didn't work, and now they're allowed, many women now HAVE to work because they don't have the choice to NOT work. Some women would much rather stay at home with the children, and be a homemaker.

Yes, yes, yes.... I know, some of you will say you 'couldn't think of anything WORSE' 🙄 but some women would rather not HAVE to go out to work, along with STILL doing most of the wifework/domestic drudgery/childcare. And they do.

Don't anyone pull the 'husband/partner does 50% of everything' card, because the majority of men do not. And they still expect the wife/the mother of their children to go out to work though (as well as picking up most of the domestic work!)

Feminism has fucked over many women, because just like our mother/grandmothers/great grandmothers and so on, many of us STILL have no choice. The difference is many women today have no choice but to WORK. As well as taking on all the domestic duties, childcare, and gruntwork.

Yeah, are women REALLY better off? 🙄I agree with the OP - feminism has sold women a LIE, a bit fat LIE. Some women are buying it too.

Sad.

Oh, and in my family, the majority of women in past generations (pre 1970s) did not work, (once they were married,) and they were working class. So it's nonsense that all working class married women have always worked. They did (part time) when the kids had left home, for a bit of money of their own, but many did not work until they were 45-50+. I know it doesn't suit some people to hear that, but it's true. It's nonsense that ONLY middle class and upper class married women stayed at home!!!

Well by that token they had no choice beforehand, but were forced to stay home. I bet there are more SAHMs now than there were breadwinning women before.

Again, I don't believe feminism is about "choice". Feminism is about rights and opportunities. We are (more!) equal in that sense now, but it comes with more responsibility: like financially supporting ourselves/our families.

And yes, of course some couples decide it is more beneficial to split the income earning and the house/children-caring into two distinct roles, and that is fine. But that fact that you can pick with overwhelming success which sex does which indicates to me that we still need feminism!

RayonSunrise · 29/10/2025 20:37

Coolasfeck · 29/10/2025 20:23

Haven’t read whole thread and someone’s probably already said this, but your OP reads very middle class background. Every woman in my working class family going back generations has had to work whilst raising kids.

This is not a new millennial thing for us. My life is better and I have more opportunities than all the women in my family before me.

Absolutely. My working class grandmothers and great-grandmothers worked AND had children to raise. They just weren’t allowed to make much money compared to men doing the same job.

pointythings · 29/10/2025 20:34

Zov · 29/10/2025 20:27

Do they though? Do women REALLY have a choice these days???

Whilst women had little choice years ago and couldn't work/didn't work, and now they're allowed, many women now HAVE to work because they don't have the choice to NOT work. Some women would much rather stay at home with the children, and be a homemaker.

Yes, yes, yes.... I know, some of you will say you 'couldn't think of anything WORSE' 🙄 but some women would rather not HAVE to go out to work, along with STILL doing most of the wifework/domestic drudgery/childcare. And they do.

Don't anyone pull the 'husband/partner does 50% of everything' card, because the majority of men do not. And they still expect the wife/the mother of their children to go out to work though (as well as picking up most of the domestic work!)

Feminism has fucked over many women, because just like our mother/grandmothers/great grandmothers and so on, many of us STILL have no choice. The difference is many women today have no choice but to WORK. As well as taking on all the domestic duties, childcare, and gruntwork.

Yeah, are women REALLY better off? 🙄I agree with the OP - feminism has sold women a LIE, a bit fat LIE. Some women are buying it too.

Sad.

Oh, and in my family, the majority of women in past generations (pre 1970s) did not work, (once they were married,) and they were working class. So it's nonsense that all working class married women have always worked. They did (part time) when the kids had left home, for a bit of money of their own, but many did not work until they were 45-50+. I know it doesn't suit some people to hear that, but it's true. It's nonsense that ONLY middle class and upper class married women stayed at home!!!

If you want to stay at home, you have the choice to marry someone rich, or make do and mend like a pp on this thread.

For the rest of it, the solution is to make men better. Not to whinge because the work of feminism isn't yet done.

I'm 57. I've always worked. My mother always worked - even when we were little, she worked two nights a week in a teacher training college, teaching the teachers of the future. Later on she went back to full time teaching in a secondary school.

And my grandmother on my father's science was a research chemist - she and my grandfather both worked.

While it's true that I didn't have a choice about working because my husband wasn't a high earner, I wanted to work. It would have been nice to have had the flexible options that are around these days, but at least they are there for the women of today.

DryIce · 29/10/2025 20:31

MagicLoop · 29/10/2025 19:54

You're absolutely right of course. That's actually very probably why I don't feel like that about it. Dh and I are both lucky to come from very stable families full of long-lasting marriages. When I say I don't feel proud about staying together, I suppose it's because it hasn't felt difficult to me, and it just feels like a normal trajectory. On reflection I can absolutely see why it fees like a wonderful achievement if you come from a difficult family background. You are very justified in feeling proud!

This is a lovely gracious taking of an alternative viewpoint

GagMeWithASpoon · 29/10/2025 20:30

Zov · 29/10/2025 20:27

Do they though? Do women REALLY have a choice these days???

Whilst women had little choice years ago and couldn't work/didn't work, and now they're allowed, many women now HAVE to work because they don't have the choice to NOT work. Some women would much rather stay at home with the children, and be a homemaker.

Yes, yes, yes.... I know, some of you will say you 'couldn't think of anything WORSE' 🙄 but some women would rather not HAVE to go out to work, along with STILL doing most of the wifework/domestic drudgery/childcare. And they do.

Don't anyone pull the 'husband/partner does 50% of everything' card, because the majority of men do not. And they still expect the wife/the mother of their children to go out to work though (as well as picking up most of the domestic work!)

Feminism has fucked over many women, because just like our mother/grandmothers/great grandmothers and so on, many of us STILL have no choice. The difference is many women today have no choice but to WORK. As well as taking on all the domestic duties, childcare, and gruntwork.

Yeah, are women REALLY better off? 🙄I agree with the OP - feminism has sold women a LIE, a bit fat LIE. Some women are buying it too.

Sad.

Oh, and in my family, the majority of women in past generations (pre 1970s) did not work, (once they were married,) and they were working class. So it's nonsense that all working class married women have always worked. They did (part time) when the kids had left home, for a bit of money of their own, but many did not work until they were 45-50+. I know it doesn't suit some people to hear that, but it's true. It's nonsense that ONLY middle class and upper class married women stayed at home!!!

Well I was talking about the “choosing not to have kids “ part.

As for the other part, I dunno , women in my family always worked. The unlucky lot on the fields, now that definitely wasn’t fun after being awake at 4 to do housework, bake break, tend to the animals and kids, then 10 hours in the field in the scorching sun, back home, cook, kids, animals, crash and repeat. No retirement. The end is death.
The lucky ones , jobs in the city, nurse, factories , office etc. Some worked harder than others. Not a lot of mothering went on though.

I didn’t do everything even when I was a SAHM. Why? Not because OH is some amazing unicorn(he can be and was at times a twat in fact). It was because I didn’t want to, so I didn’t. I haven’t cooked for him in years for example. No one has died. The sky didn’t fall over.

Zov · 29/10/2025 20:27

GagMeWithASpoon · 29/10/2025 18:32

And isn’t it amazing that they have that choice ? Which wouldn’t have been the case in the years gone by.

Do they though? Do women REALLY have a choice these days???

Whilst women had little choice years ago and couldn't work/didn't work, and now they're allowed, many women now HAVE to work because they don't have the choice to NOT work. Some women would much rather stay at home with the children, and be a homemaker.

Yes, yes, yes.... I know, some of you will say you 'couldn't think of anything WORSE' 🙄 but some women would rather not HAVE to go out to work, along with STILL doing most of the wifework/domestic drudgery/childcare. And they do.

Don't anyone pull the 'husband/partner does 50% of everything' card, because the majority of men do not. And they still expect the wife/the mother of their children to go out to work though (as well as picking up most of the domestic work!)

Feminism has fucked over many women, because just like our mother/grandmothers/great grandmothers and so on, many of us STILL have no choice. The difference is many women today have no choice but to WORK. As well as taking on all the domestic duties, childcare, and gruntwork.

Yeah, are women REALLY better off? 🙄I agree with the OP - feminism has sold women a LIE, a bit fat LIE. Some women are buying it too.

Sad.

Oh, and in my family, the majority of women in past generations (pre 1970s) did not work, (once they were married,) and they were working class. So it's nonsense that all working class married women have always worked. They did (part time) when the kids had left home, for a bit of money of their own, but many did not work until they were 45-50+. I know it doesn't suit some people to hear that, but it's true. It's nonsense that ONLY middle class and upper class married women stayed at home!!!

Coolasfeck · 29/10/2025 20:23

ConservativeC2 · 28/10/2025 20:58

Listening to the women I work with, it's been interesting to hear their views about feminism and they are not happy. We are all millennial age so not too young, not too old and I keep hearing that it's the millennial generation of women that have absolutely lost out the most.

I think feminism initially promoted some idea of independence, equality and choice. Phrases like 'men hold all the money and power' at the time were very emotive whilst not entirely true. The correct statement then (and still now) is some men hold all the money and power. Most men back in the 50s-70s worked very long hours and spent pretty much all their money on their family. It was hard for everyone, but I think women were more empowered then than now.

In contrast to today, most of the women my age have to work. Whilst feminism promotes choice, most of them do not actually have a choice today. Most men today do not earn enough to run a household which means most women have to work. The worst part is they still do a larger share of the domestic work and childcare. So I think women now have it worse than ever - it's not just me, my female colleagues feel the same way. They've come to point in life where they want to start a family but they know they will have to come back to work.

Now it's all to do with feminism. There are other factors which has driven up the cost of living (inflation, property prices, profit extraction from multinational corporates etc).

Haven’t read whole thread and someone’s probably already said this, but your OP reads very middle class background. Every woman in my working class family going back generations has had to work whilst raising kids.

This is not a new millennial thing for us. My life is better and I have more opportunities than all the women in my family before me.

pointythings · 29/10/2025 20:20

taxguru · 29/10/2025 19:49

I've been saying this for years. Women have the illusion of "power" etc but in reality, things are different, rather than better. Working women now have to do even more, i.e. work as well as childcare/housework etc., as housing costs have risen so high, due to demand push inflation, i.e. because couples have more income (due to two workers), they can pay more for housing, and thus has caused the housing cost inflation (and other inflations), which mean that you now need two working people to pay for the same life style that you could afford on one wage a few decades ago.

I have to disagree. Very many things are very much better indeed. Unless you think that it isn't better to:

  • have laws against rape within marriage,
  • have laws against firing women for being pregnant (OK, so employers wriggle out of that one, but that is a reason to come down harder, not to yearn for the bad old days)
  • allow women to own property and manage their own financial affairs
  • make it possible for women to leave abusive relationships
  • have laws against sexual harrassment in the workplace
  • enable women to develop their own skills and careers instead of being the default carer/housekeeper (and yes, men wriggle out of this, but that is a reason to stand up to inadequate men, not yearn for the bad old days)
  • be able to not continue an unwanted pregnancy
RubySquid · 29/10/2025 20:18

MNLurker1345 · 29/10/2025 18:53

I went back to work when DD was 6 weeks old, because in the 90s -

”Women were legally entitled to 14 weeks of maternity leave, and only some qualified for Statutory Maternity Pay (around six weeks at 90 % of earnings, then 12 weeks at a flat rate that was barely £50 a week). Many employers offered nothing extra, so plenty of mothers went back within three to four months, sometimes sooner”.

I looked at my DD as she napped. I was skint and I called work and said can I come back?

That would be considered cruel by mums now days, but DD is well adjusted and we have a brilliant relationship.

My millennial niece said to me the other day “I
am happy to pay my taxes for new mums stay at home with their babies for a year”.

My reply “I’m not!”

I hung out on ML for 13 weeks with my eldest. Was ready to go back earlier but nursery didn't accept younger.also the 90s. My DD managed 4 months after birth to return with her two. Their dad is very hands on

TheignT · 29/10/2025 20:03

ConservativeC2 · 28/10/2025 21:13

I mean how many men can singularly afford to pay the mortgage for a three bed semi detached, bills, 2 cars (one when he's at work, other needed for school drop/picks and clubs), at least one holiday a year and all the other things that just what an average brit does, I'm not talking about an excessive lifestyle.

The point was men could afford to run a household a long time ago and now then can't. This means women have to work to work to ensure all those costs are met. This was my point, they had the choice before and it's pretty much that they don't have the choice.

My parents never had a mortgage just rent, they never had one car let alone two, holidays didn't happen every year and would be a week in a caravan.

Oh and my mum always worked factory, shop, barmaid.

GagMeWithASpoon · 29/10/2025 20:00

MNLurker1345 · 29/10/2025 18:53

I went back to work when DD was 6 weeks old, because in the 90s -

”Women were legally entitled to 14 weeks of maternity leave, and only some qualified for Statutory Maternity Pay (around six weeks at 90 % of earnings, then 12 weeks at a flat rate that was barely £50 a week). Many employers offered nothing extra, so plenty of mothers went back within three to four months, sometimes sooner”.

I looked at my DD as she napped. I was skint and I called work and said can I come back?

That would be considered cruel by mums now days, but DD is well adjusted and we have a brilliant relationship.

My millennial niece said to me the other day “I
am happy to pay my taxes for new mums stay at home with their babies for a year”.

My reply “I’m not!”

Let’s turn it around. At least you got 6 weeks. Because I’m adopted(as a baby), my mum got nothing, maybe she wasn’t happy to be working either to pay for your 6 weeks.

5128gap · 29/10/2025 19:59

I think the other reason it's hard to hear we didn't work (aside from the fact it's untrue) is that by perpetrating the myth, you are basically erasing our contributions. Past generations of women who've worked just as hard as men with skill and intelligence, who've made things, discovered things, taught people, cured people, served them, supported them. History already hides much of what we've done behind men who take the credit, and its galling to see women buying into the falsehood we were all just sitting at home living the life of Mrs Riley while the men did the stuff that gets remembered.

JFDIYOLO · 29/10/2025 19:56

Mum (b1930s) worked in NHS, pubs, care homes.

Her mum (born 1900s) worked in shops.

Dad's mum (born 1900s) was in service.

Women have always worked and juggled. Feminism didn't cause it - economics did. Feminism made it easier in terms of rights.

MagicLoop · 29/10/2025 19:54

ThankYouNigel · 29/10/2025 19:16

Sounds like you under-estimate how much commitment it takes to sustain a marriage for over 20 years- you both have a great deal to be proud of IMO.

I had no template of a good marriage and stability myself, I come from a family with all sorts of really awful issues, so I am perhaps prouder than most of what my husband and I have achieved together, I don’t take it for granted. When you come from chaos you appreciate stability, companionship, loyalty, truth and teamwork.

You're absolutely right of course. That's actually very probably why I don't feel like that about it. Dh and I are both lucky to come from very stable families full of long-lasting marriages. When I say I don't feel proud about staying together, I suppose it's because it hasn't felt difficult to me, and it just feels like a normal trajectory. On reflection I can absolutely see why it fees like a wonderful achievement if you come from a difficult family background. You are very justified in feeling proud!

taxguru · 29/10/2025 19:49

I've been saying this for years. Women have the illusion of "power" etc but in reality, things are different, rather than better. Working women now have to do even more, i.e. work as well as childcare/housework etc., as housing costs have risen so high, due to demand push inflation, i.e. because couples have more income (due to two workers), they can pay more for housing, and thus has caused the housing cost inflation (and other inflations), which mean that you now need two working people to pay for the same life style that you could afford on one wage a few decades ago.

ObelixtheGaul · 29/10/2025 19:47

Everydayimhuffling · 29/10/2025 19:37

Working class women have always worked. Either with their husbands on farms/in small businesses or later in factories as well. There wasn't a golden time where women didn't go out to work. Additionally, those who worked in the home did much harder physical labour without hoovers, washing machines etc etc.

The magical pre-feminist past you are dreaming of never existed. What did exist was women trapped in abusive or miserable marriages because divorce didn't exist and then was seen as shameful.

Yep. Nostalgia for an age that never existed is a big problem, not helped by bucolic television that presents this 'golden age' (particularly the 50s and usually American) where everyone lived in a leafy suburb, not only did the women not work, they were immaculately dressed and didn't have a hair out of place, the men were all good providers, dutiful wives soothed their brows after all they'd done all day was flick a duster around.

Anonymous6789 · 29/10/2025 19:47

MidnightPatrol · 28/10/2025 21:51

I know lots of women with top 1-2% incomes and they are still expected to pick up the slack with domestic duties and childcare.

Income level doesn’t seem to impact this - the only plus being they can afford to outsource some of it.

Who “expects” them to pick up the slack? Their partners? If that’s the case then why don’t they leave their sexist partners? Why are they putting up with this sexist shit?

goldenautumnleaves25 · 29/10/2025 19:46

@PeonyPatch most women worked and raised children in the past. Housework was endless and backbreaking, women had very little time to play with their children.
The modern housewife with all technology has a very, very easy job in comparison.

Bruisername · 29/10/2025 19:46

Even the old hunter gatherer stories - a lot of emphasis on the big man being the hunter but it was the women who were doing the gathering and ensuring a base level of food was constantly available and prepared

women have always had to contribute and it’s really depressing that there’s a group of modern women who want to turn the clock back to a time that has been romanticised. Keep moving forward and whilst at it why don’t we try and lift up those women who aren’t as fortunate as us when it comes to rights