Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Why do Labour not get it?

764 replies

Dacatspjs · 28/10/2025 12:30

It's being reported today that Labour want to stop using hotels and move migrants into barracks. Fine. But when quizzed on it Luke Pollard has suggested this will be more expensive, but the public want the hotels to close at all costs so it will be worth it.

This to me just seems like another step forward for Reform. The public who care about this, care about how much the government is spending on migrant housing. A new policy that costs more isn't going to go anyway towards solving this problem.

I don't know what the solution is, but spending more money getting mothballed barracks up to spec seems ludicrous.

"Asked about whether it would cost more to house migrants at military bases than in hotels, Mr Pollard insisted that 'the public want to see those hotels close'.

But he added: 'We're looking at what's possible and, in some cases, those bases may be a different cost to hotels, but I think we need to reflect the public mood on this asylum hotels need to close.'"

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
Bumblebee72 · 29/10/2025 14:18

CorneliaCupp · 29/10/2025 14:13

Did you also misunderstand the point I was making?

You've made so many points. No one is getting a small boat because they are fleeing for their lives. They're already someone where safe when they board the boat. They are then making a decision as to whether the UK system is worth risking their life further for, in terms of both working with the criminal boat suppliers or the crossing itself.

SwingTheMonkey · 29/10/2025 14:14

CorneliaCupp · 29/10/2025 07:47

The majority are granted asylum. So refugees, not economic migrants. And that's a fact, not an opinion.

Well yes. But they aren’t going to say ‘I’m here to work cash in hand and send the money home’, are they? No, it’ll be ‘I’m gay and fear for my life in insert location here’

CorneliaCupp · 29/10/2025 14:13

Bumblebee72 · 29/10/2025 14:07

But there fleeing for their lives.... from France!! Have a heart.

Edited

Did you also misunderstand the point I was making?

Winter2020 · 29/10/2025 14:11

DuncinToffee · 28/10/2025 14:30

Because I dont have the space

Do you think it is right to scapegoat asylum seekers and dehumanise them?

Many of these people will be used to living with their family in one room - they won't mind bunking up.

Dragonscaledaisy · 29/10/2025 14:08

BoredZelda · 29/10/2025 14:01

So why were the numbers of crossings double what they are now, in 2022?

Anyone looking for a quick fix to a decades long problem is deluded.

What is it you want Starmer to do? Take up a post on the south coast with a sniper rifle?

Resign, preferably and hand the reigns to someone else until the public can get rid of them.

EasternStandard · 29/10/2025 14:08

ForestBath · 29/10/2025 14:04

Oh c'mon , don't be daft. No ones coming here for a tenner a week and a hotel stay. It's what the UK offers once their asylum application has been accepted - social housing, benefits, free health system...

Yes it’s a rational decision and not hard to see why.

Bumblebee72 · 29/10/2025 14:07

KrystalStubbs · 29/10/2025 12:35

@CorneliaCupp Do you ever read the news?
I despair at your faux naivety.

But there fleeing for their lives.... from France!! Have a heart.

Winter2020 · 29/10/2025 14:07

DuncinToffee · 28/10/2025 14:21

He has made a start in co-operation with Bulgaria.

Where would you propose asylum seekers are housed whilst waiting for their claim to be processed?

Rwanda?

Winter2020 · 29/10/2025 14:05

EasternStandard · 28/10/2025 14:20

And 900 men together, what could go wrong.

The same as can go wrong when they are all scattered about but more visible.

EasternStandard · 29/10/2025 14:04

BoredZelda · 29/10/2025 14:01

So why were the numbers of crossings double what they are now, in 2022?

Anyone looking for a quick fix to a decades long problem is deluded.

What is it you want Starmer to do? Take up a post on the south coast with a sniper rifle?

You can ask him if you like, he’s your guy.

As much as Labour protest it’s impossible and poor old Starmer is trying he’s made bad decisions.

ForestBath · 29/10/2025 14:04

BoredZelda · 29/10/2025 13:28

The point is, they are allowed to seek asylum anywhere they want.

If 1% of the 20% of refugees who seek asylum anywhere other than their neighbouring country want to come to the U.K., it really isn’t the problem people seem to think it is.

If you think people are getting on boats to make a treacherous journey across the channel so they can get less than £10 quid a week and stay in a disused hotel and be fed mass produced slop, just for shits and giggles, you are fooling yourself.

Oh c'mon , don't be daft. No ones coming here for a tenner a week and a hotel stay. It's what the UK offers once their asylum application has been accepted - social housing, benefits, free health system...

Julen7 · 29/10/2025 14:04

BoredZelda · 29/10/2025 14:01

So why were the numbers of crossings double what they are now, in 2022?

Anyone looking for a quick fix to a decades long problem is deluded.

What is it you want Starmer to do? Take up a post on the south coast with a sniper rifle?

Why say the very first day you are elected that you are going to scrap Rwanda and solve the problem instead by “smashing the gangs” and then do nothing?

BoredZelda · 29/10/2025 14:01

EasternStandard · 29/10/2025 13:58

I’m pretty sure smash the gangs means a reduction not this.

You’re backing Starmer and still believe it’ll change and go down. He hasn’t shifted the dial anywhere, except up.

And yes boats are bigger recently under Labour, maybe recent attempts to control that too meant crime networks went to a better source for dinghies.

So why were the numbers of crossings double what they are now, in 2022?

Anyone looking for a quick fix to a decades long problem is deluded.

What is it you want Starmer to do? Take up a post on the south coast with a sniper rifle?

Winter2020 · 29/10/2025 14:01

RaspberryRipple2 · 28/10/2025 14:07

For those that are saying this is Starmer’s/Labour’s fault (ok then… no comment), what do you think is the magic solution that Nigel will ride in on his horse and fix the issue with, genuinely?

  • shoot all asylum seekers at dawn? No comment
  • put them in concentration camps (pretty sure auschwitz etc must have cost a substantial amount of tax payers funds…)
  • return them - where? How? Also see tories c2023
  • make country less attractive to immigrants by reducing benefits (pretty sure those benefit claiming reform voters will love this one)
  • leave the ECHR - sure, so sensible to alienate most of our trading partners and the majority of the electorate, and put our human rights into the hands of fascist maniac, but you do you
  • rejoin the EU? (erm…)

Do you think he has a workable plan?

Third country processing I expect.
Several European countries are looking at it.
Worked for Australia.

BeachLife2 · 29/10/2025 14:00

CorneliaCupp · 29/10/2025 13:23

As has been said ad infinitum, they do not have to stay in France, and are free to claim asylum in any country they choose. The vast majority do so in the neighbouring country.

Well, under the Dublin Convention (which Brexit helpfully removed us from), they have to stay in the first EU country they reach.

Winter2020 · 29/10/2025 13:59

BadgernTheGarden · 28/10/2025 14:05

I think the hotels were pretty basic, it sounds like they are going to install mobile homes (or holiday camp type chalets) on the bases, most of the existing accommodation hasn't been used for years and won't be suitable, they will also have to install catering, etc. And of course a local enquiry at each location, where everyone will say they don't want it, more protests, just in different places! Not a solution just moving the problem at even greater expense. And they will still have to honour the contracts with the hotels for however many years rent and pay to undo all the modifications that were done to turn them into hostel like accommodation and then redecorate throughout, all part of the contract.

Edited

They will need the hotels as well won't they? Record numbers are still arriving. A couple of barracks is going to add to the accommodation not replace it surely.

BoredZelda · 29/10/2025 13:58

Winter2020 · 29/10/2025 13:52

I think you are being unfair on the British people. I don't see anyone protesting about the Government reaching out to and accommodating people from Ukraine, Hong Kong or people that helped our military in Afganistan.

But there is infinite need in the world and the British people and Governments should choose our asylum priorities. It should not be survival of the fittest, first on the dinghy gets first dibs. These people (large fit young men) are not our asylum priority. They are a self selecting group of people travelling to Britain for a better life. But literally billions of people in the world would like to come to Britain for a better life.

We provided safe routes for those countries which is why families were able to come together. We haven’t done that for other nations, so refugees are forced to make a treacherous journey. Stands to reason they send the fittest members of their family first, those unable to make the full journey move to refugee camps in the next country, which is not a long term solution for any family.

EasternStandard · 29/10/2025 13:58

BoredZelda · 29/10/2025 13:54

Channel crossings are up

2025 numbers of migrants crossing are on track to be similar to 2022.

Figures for the first 6 months of 2025, were very similar to first six months of 2024, 2023 and lower than 2022.

Number of crossings is largely similar as this point in 2024 and 2023. It’s about half what it was in 2021 and 2022. It’s also the same as it was in 2020, when there were fewer migrants moving anywhere.

You have to be very careful when cherry picking any individual day, week, month, to say “crossings are up” as the number fluctuates due to so many variables. There is also a change in the number coming on each boat. Not sure why, maybe the boats are bigger, maybe they are more crowded.

The number of boats arriving went from 42 boats in 2018 to 1111 in 2022. It went down to 600-700 for the following couple of years and has largely remained constant since. The last government did nothing to solve the issue in 6 years, but Labour are expected to fix it in 18 months or they are a total failure?

I’m pretty sure smash the gangs means a reduction not this.

You’re backing Starmer and still believe it’ll change and go down. He hasn’t shifted the dial anywhere, except up.

And yes boats are bigger recently under Labour, maybe recent attempts to control that too meant crime networks went to a better source for dinghies.

Isthisright220 · 29/10/2025 13:56

Whammyammy · 28/10/2025 12:40

Have you not seen some of these prestigious buildings? And free if charge with mesks provided.
Sound cushy to me.

What are mesks?

BoredZelda · 29/10/2025 13:54

Channel crossings are up

2025 numbers of migrants crossing are on track to be similar to 2022.

Figures for the first 6 months of 2025, were very similar to first six months of 2024, 2023 and lower than 2022.

Number of crossings is largely similar as this point in 2024 and 2023. It’s about half what it was in 2021 and 2022. It’s also the same as it was in 2020, when there were fewer migrants moving anywhere.

You have to be very careful when cherry picking any individual day, week, month, to say “crossings are up” as the number fluctuates due to so many variables. There is also a change in the number coming on each boat. Not sure why, maybe the boats are bigger, maybe they are more crowded.

The number of boats arriving went from 42 boats in 2018 to 1111 in 2022. It went down to 600-700 for the following couple of years and has largely remained constant since. The last government did nothing to solve the issue in 6 years, but Labour are expected to fix it in 18 months or they are a total failure?

1457bloom · 29/10/2025 13:52

I’m not saying it’s acceptable but in France the asylum seekers don’t get accommodation, there isn’t enough available, so they end up sleeping rough. Compare that to what we offer in the UK.

Winter2020 · 29/10/2025 13:52

HRTQueen · 28/10/2025 13:38

Absolutely agree

Also may take away some of the concerns of large numbers of young men with nothing to do being housed in city centres.

But lets be honest many people in this country do not want to support genuine asylum seekers particularly if they are not white

I think you are being unfair on the British people. I don't see anyone protesting about the Government reaching out to and accommodating people from Ukraine, Hong Kong or people that helped our military in Afganistan.

But there is infinite need in the world and the British people and Governments should choose our asylum priorities. It should not be survival of the fittest, first on the dinghy gets first dibs. These people (large fit young men) are not our asylum priority. They are a self selecting group of people travelling to Britain for a better life. But literally billions of people in the world would like to come to Britain for a better life.

Ablondiebutagoody · 29/10/2025 13:49

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 29/10/2025 13:36

Wasn’t that the idea behind Rwanda and Labour voted against it. They’re hardly going to now implement similar.

I reckon that they will eventually. The safe third country is a tried and tested method that works. Its why the Danes and the Dutch are making deals with Rwanda and Uganda.

Labour were also dead against using army camps etc. until about yesterday.

CorneliaCupp · 29/10/2025 13:47

Ablondiebutagoody · 29/10/2025 13:44

Point still stands though. They are not fleeing for their lives from France to here. Have you been? Its perfectly nice over there. You are being very melodramatic and it doesn't do your arguments any favours.

I don't believe I am. At no point have I said that they are fleeing France in fear of their lives, they are however fleeing their homeland for that reason (at least many of them are). Most refugees settle in their neighbouring country, a very few come here. I apologise if I wasn't clear.

Locutus2000 · 29/10/2025 13:45

Winter2020 · 29/10/2025 13:45

I guess we will wait for Reform to do it then as there is no way Labour will be re-elected while the number of people coming on the small boats continues to rise.

Oh give it a rest. It's four years til the next election.