Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Why do Labour not get it?

764 replies

Dacatspjs · 28/10/2025 12:30

It's being reported today that Labour want to stop using hotels and move migrants into barracks. Fine. But when quizzed on it Luke Pollard has suggested this will be more expensive, but the public want the hotels to close at all costs so it will be worth it.

This to me just seems like another step forward for Reform. The public who care about this, care about how much the government is spending on migrant housing. A new policy that costs more isn't going to go anyway towards solving this problem.

I don't know what the solution is, but spending more money getting mothballed barracks up to spec seems ludicrous.

"Asked about whether it would cost more to house migrants at military bases than in hotels, Mr Pollard insisted that 'the public want to see those hotels close'.

But he added: 'We're looking at what's possible and, in some cases, those bases may be a different cost to hotels, but I think we need to reflect the public mood on this asylum hotels need to close.'"

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
SandyDunesCoffeeShack · 28/10/2025 19:57

ScholesPanda · 28/10/2025 12:54

Oh well OP, once Reform get in they've promised to spend even more money on detention centres.

People want to see the migrants suffer. Maybe Reform can recoup some of the money by live streaming a kind of Big Brother of human misery?

your high up is wrong and yes, detentions centre will be created. Believe me. They are needed. This shit show won't last forever as the people will keep protesting

Julen7 · 28/10/2025 19:53

SandyDunesCoffeeShack · 28/10/2025 19:50

Then listen up, Britain. Screw your head well and stop voting for Labour ever again. Tories will be just fine

If lesson isn’t learnt this time it never will be.

SandyDunesCoffeeShack · 28/10/2025 19:53

Octavia64 · 28/10/2025 12:51

It’s not just about the money.

obviously it is partly about the money.

but people are also concerned that asylum seekers from violent countries are being housed in their communities and because of the way it works you are getting large numbers in some small communities who frankly can’t really cope with them.

if asylum seekers are housed in separate areas it’ll reduce the community tension as there will be fewer protests etc in the middle of towns and villages.

I personally would be happy for it to cost more.

i live near a few military bases and frankly I think it’s a good idea. You can provide facilities on the sites - healthcare and suchlike - and there won’t be such a clash of cultures.

And also the army should pull their hands out off their bums and actually provide 24/7 guarding of the migrants and control them. This is the army's job, to protect the nation

SandyDunesCoffeeShack · 28/10/2025 19:50

Wildgoat · 28/10/2025 12:51

I actually think this is the the first sound idea they have had. However they need to stop spending and taxing, it’s labour of old. Tax and spend, tax and spend; always the same. No one in Labour should be saying irrelevant of cost, when quite frankly it’s just about public perception in the main.

i just don’t get how it keeps happening, tories stay in power so long everyone gets fed up, labour get in, they fuck the countries economy, do one term, then the tories come back in, start trying to fix the shit show, Labour don’t get back in for another decade, and history repeats itself. Every single time.

i think it’s game over for Labour, and the budget will be the final nail in the coffin, there will be a public outcry, they are already trying to prepare the public for what’s to come with the soft leaks to see reaction, income tax increase, mansion tax etc, and there will be no way back for them, no matter what they do over the next 3 years.

Starmer will throw reeves under the bus, to save his skin, as they don’t have anyone to take over from him, so even though he’s clearly wholly incapable and out of his depth , no one wants the poison chalice other than some real hard core lefties that the public would not accept, and none of them are any more capable.

To be honest, I’m not sure even starmer wants to be pm any more, he’s just waiting to get the fuck out of there and get a lucrative consulting role.

its a shit show of epic proportions, the issue is they fucked the economy so hard and so fast and now don’t know how to fix it, so everything they do makes it worse as they are utterly clueless.

Then listen up, Britain. Screw your head well and stop voting for Labour ever again. Tories will be just fine

Bumblebee72 · 28/10/2025 19:46

user1497787065 · 28/10/2025 19:44

But Labour thought the Bibby Stockholm was inhumane?

When they were in opposition. They also thought they had a fully costed plan no ifs no buts. So I guess things can change.

EasternStandard · 28/10/2025 19:45

Bumblebee72 · 28/10/2025 19:19

The main reason that young men go is the family reunification scheme. Only the man needs to be be granted asylum then their family can come over on the plane. Starmer announced that would end at conference, whether it will or not is another matter. Every asylum seeker in a hotel represents a number of people coming to the UK.

We’ll more likely just have a very high majority of asylum being granted to men when this happens.

user1497787065 · 28/10/2025 19:44

But Labour thought the Bibby Stockholm was inhumane?

EleanorTopaz · 28/10/2025 19:40

This government should be using it's energy and resources to find ways to get these people out of our country.

There are now too many of these feral young men who, frankly, are not going to become useful British citizens. Their cultures are incompatible, many are violent and wish to prey on us.

Yes, they will be housed temporarily, but the focus should be on changing or removing laws, or replacing the ECHR with a British bill of rights, which will deliver what we want and need as a priority. There has to be a way to do this but there has been no political will.

We cannot solve the problems of the world or provide a better life for hundreds of thousands of those from other continents without harming or destroying our way of life.

It's as simple as that. If Labour just keep fudging this problem, hopefully the next government won't.

This situation cannot continue and we have to harden our hearts to it.

SandyDunesCoffeeShack · 28/10/2025 19:40

Whatifitallgoesright · 28/10/2025 12:39

I thought the point of army barracks was so they could be securely contained. I assume they will be locked in there and not have minibuses laid on to deposit them at the nearest town to wander round at will all day.

That will be perfect. And with a migrant tag and number

Julen7 · 28/10/2025 19:35

DuncinToffee · 28/10/2025 19:35

And something for you to look forward to

Right.

DuncinToffee · 28/10/2025 19:35

Julen7 · 28/10/2025 19:33

Who do I think can stop the boats - not the Tories or Labour as they have failed so far. Possibly Reform will but that remains to be seen. At any rate Reform will most likely form the next govt so asylum seekers have it very much better now than they might in 3.5 years time. Something to ponder.

And something for you to look forward to

Julen7 · 28/10/2025 19:33

DuncinToffee · 28/10/2025 19:23

I don't think any government can stop the boats, they can reduce them by offering safe and legal routes.

Ofcourse I want the boats stopped, nobody should die trying to seek refuge

But as the boats aren't going to be stopped any time soon, I just want the asylum seekers treated as human beings. Apparently that is something posters on here don't agree with.

I haven't seen your reply, can you point me to it?

Who do I think can stop the boats - not the Tories or Labour as they have failed so far. Possibly Reform will but that remains to be seen. At any rate Reform will most likely form the next govt so asylum seekers have it very much better now than they might in 3.5 years time. Something to ponder.

DuncinToffee · 28/10/2025 19:23

Julen7 · 28/10/2025 19:14

As I have answered all your questions and simply get more questions in return, let me ask you the same. Who do you think can stop the boats? Or do you not want them stopped?

I don't think any government can stop the boats, they can reduce them by offering safe and legal routes.

Ofcourse I want the boats stopped, nobody should die trying to seek refuge

But as the boats aren't going to be stopped any time soon, I just want the asylum seekers treated as human beings. Apparently that is something posters on here don't agree with.

I haven't seen your reply, can you point me to it?

Bumblebee72 · 28/10/2025 19:22

OnlyOnAFriday · 28/10/2025 19:08

Reform are going to have a landslide. The next election will be a one issue election. The nhs will be thrown under the bus. And god knows if Reform will actually be able to solve the problem or if they’ll just be full of hot air when in opposition like everyone else. Problem is by the time we find that out it’s too late. Will have Farage and a bunch of 19yos in charge for five years. God help us.

Just because Farage won't have a team of career politicans who know nothing about the world outside Westminister like Starmer has doesn't mean they all have to be 19.

Bumblebee72 · 28/10/2025 19:19

CorneliaCupp · 28/10/2025 18:20

Lots of reasons. It's a very dangerous trip to make, culturally young men are valued over women, and so would be the ones to make the trip, many families can only afford for one person to make the trip, so prioritise their sons, more humanitarian routes tend to prioritise women and children, so young men have less choices ...

The main reason that young men go is the family reunification scheme. Only the man needs to be be granted asylum then their family can come over on the plane. Starmer announced that would end at conference, whether it will or not is another matter. Every asylum seeker in a hotel represents a number of people coming to the UK.

Pickledpoppetpickle · 28/10/2025 19:14

ForestBath · 28/10/2025 13:55

So you'll be happy for the barracks to be used then?

I will be happy when people who come from other countries are speedily processed and allowed to work or, following due process, are deported. I have no issues with asylum seekers staying in hotels or barracks, providing value for money is offered to the tax payer and already billionaire individuals are not getting even more rich off offering substandard accommodation and poor quality food. Mainly, I want asylum seekers to be able to live without fear of the flag flying idiots currently standing outside the hotel housing asylum seekers in my town on a 24/7 basis.

Julen7 · 28/10/2025 19:14

DuncinToffee · 28/10/2025 19:09

Do you shout at hotels?

Or more seriously, which party do you think can stop the boats and repair the broken asylum system?

As I have answered all your questions and simply get more questions in return, let me ask you the same. Who do you think can stop the boats? Or do you not want them stopped?

DuncinToffee · 28/10/2025 19:09

Julen7 · 28/10/2025 18:50

Yes. I have never been happy funding asylum seekers’ hotel expenses.
Any other questions?

Do you shout at hotels?

Or more seriously, which party do you think can stop the boats and repair the broken asylum system?

OnlyOnAFriday · 28/10/2025 19:08

RufustheFactuaIReindeer · 28/10/2025 18:56

The barracks in my area is 20 minutes walk into a little seaside town

i mean there would be fuck all anyone could do but as others have said the problem moves to another town

and reform would win this seat, guaranteed

Reform are going to have a landslide. The next election will be a one issue election. The nhs will be thrown under the bus. And god knows if Reform will actually be able to solve the problem or if they’ll just be full of hot air when in opposition like everyone else. Problem is by the time we find that out it’s too late. Will have Farage and a bunch of 19yos in charge for five years. God help us.

JHound · 28/10/2025 19:02

ScholesPanda · 28/10/2025 15:00

Because they think it sounds more brutal and therefore will deter more from coming. Or at least make them happier that migrants are being brutalised.

Reform's proposals for a network of detention centres are even more expensive. But apparently people like them.

Madness.

Dinosaurhearmeroar · 28/10/2025 18:59

Whammyammy · 28/10/2025 12:40

Have you not seen some of these prestigious buildings? And free if charge with mesks provided.
Sound cushy to me.

Google the cresta court. It’s near me and horrible. These migrants get £10 a day from the gov but can’t get jobs. They just walk around looking depressed and utterly bored.

RufustheFactuaIReindeer · 28/10/2025 18:56

RaraRachael · 28/10/2025 18:27

The Inverness barracks is in the centre of town.

The barracks in my area is 20 minutes walk into a little seaside town

i mean there would be fuck all anyone could do but as others have said the problem moves to another town

and reform would win this seat, guaranteed

Julen7 · 28/10/2025 18:50

DuncinToffee · 28/10/2025 18:40

Did the taxpayer not pay for migrants under the Tories?

The asylum hotel contracts were awarded in 2019
The Rwanda Plan

Did you protest as much then?

Yes. I have never been happy funding asylum seekers’ hotel expenses.
Any other questions?

DuncinToffee · 28/10/2025 18:40

Julen7 · 28/10/2025 18:36

Is this a serious question? How does the good old taxpayer that coughs up for migrants and everything else with Labour’s spend, spend, spend policies “opt out of paying tax”?

Did the taxpayer not pay for migrants under the Tories?

The asylum hotel contracts were awarded in 2019
The Rwanda Plan

Did you protest as much then?

Julen7 · 28/10/2025 18:36

DuncinToffee · 28/10/2025 18:21

Are you opting out of paying tax?

Is this a serious question? How does the good old taxpayer that coughs up for migrants and everything else with Labour’s spend, spend, spend policies “opt out of paying tax”?

Swipe left for the next trending thread