Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

£15bn on hotels?

291 replies

wineandagoodbook · 27/10/2025 08:16

While Rachel Reeves is trying to find £10-£30 billion by more taxes, we are spending £15bn on hotels for asylum seekers, it beggars beyond belief

news.sky.com/story/home-office-needs-to-get-a-grip-on-asylum-seeker-accommodation-after-chaotic-response-mps-say-13458475

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Bumblebee72 · 27/10/2025 18:52

People seem to forget that the boat people are coming from France. Literally a country that millions of us go on holiday to every year. It is perfectly safe. The UK system must be very attractive for someone to risk their life to move from one perfectly safe place to another.' If we reduce the perks the number of people will fall.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 27/10/2025 18:49

Denmark solved their problem. We could solve ours

We could, @JoyintheMorning, but if we so much as tried some of Denmark's measures I guarantee the shrieks of "That's illegal/against such-and-such a treaty" would be deafening - and never mind that Denmark's part of the EU and is going ahead with it nonetheless (though I believe they're not a signatory to the common asylum policy)

Dragonscaledaisy · 27/10/2025 18:12

Summerhillsquare · 27/10/2025 15:26

This all day long.

Immigration generally has reduced under Labour, if that's what floats your boat so to speak. The backlog of asylum decisions has been reduced - that was a deliberate decision of the Tories to cut Home Office staff.

The backlog of asylum decisions has conveniently been reduced because it moves the responsibility from the Home Office to local councils.

OneDearWasp · 27/10/2025 18:01

suburburban · 27/10/2025 17:39

They’re happy to leave our own people on the street though

i wish they could strongly be discouraged from coming here in the first place

I believe the policy of not allowing asylum seekers to work was brought in to discourage arrivals.

As was deliberately slowing the processing time.

The Rwanda scheme was supposed to discourage as well although it was only ever going to take a small number and was going to cost £££££ (which the OP was emphasising as the important issue).

I suppose I'm a bit wokey-lefty but I don't actually WANT lots of asylum seekers. I'd be more upset by their arrival if it wasn't for the fact that the UK doesn't have proportionately more than other Western European countries.

Solutions to the phenomenon of irregular migration do seem trickier than "just send them back" (or we'd have done it) and does require international cooperation.

Cinnamon77 · 27/10/2025 17:47

The last government were incompetent.

The next government, if it's Reform, will be incompetent.

This government is incompetent.

This government is probably the worst of the three because it has too big a majority and the backbench MPs have the power to block anything sensible that it wants to do. Fortunately, they are yet to come up with anything sensible, so that's not actually a problem

EasternStandard · 27/10/2025 17:45

PrimoPiatti · 27/10/2025 17:44

Look closely and find out who owns and profits from these inflated prices.

You might find all roads lead back to Tory donors/supporters.....

Who knows?

Where would you accommodate asylum seekers @PrimoPiatti?

MissyB1 · 27/10/2025 17:45

randomchap · 27/10/2025 09:21

If the previous government had actually processed the claimants, rather than slow the process down and let the numbers pile up then there wouldn't be this issue.

The shit that the Tories did will take years to fix. And they did it deliberately in order to make the next government look bad. They only care about power, not the country, or it's people.

They did the same to the NHS, schools, the prison service etc etc.. now we reap what they sowed, bloody brilliant 🙄

But in regards to the hotels the only answer is to provide ways to apply for asylum that get processed quickly. Invest the money in that instead of hotel bills.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 27/10/2025 17:45

Apparently he should have been given a document by some government agency to prove refugee status and I would have at least expected her to have asked him to come back with it. The way she just admitted defeat and gave up trying to make herself clear made me believe this wasn’t a particularly novel situation.

PrimoPiatti · 27/10/2025 17:44

Look closely and find out who owns and profits from these inflated prices.

You might find all roads lead back to Tory donors/supporters.....

Who knows?

Bagsintheboot · 27/10/2025 17:42

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 27/10/2025 17:40

Because he was using Google translate through his phone and certainly knew the word Syria and refugee. Everything else that was said was from the pharmacist and was met with ‘huh’ and a shrug until she lost patience and told her colleague to just ‘give him what he wanted’.

If you don’t think that scenarios like this playing out all over the place doesn’t feed into anti -asylum rhetoric and the certainty that Reforn will get in next time, then you have your head in the sand. It’s a scandal.

Edited

If you don’t think that scenarios like this playing out all over the place doesn’t feed into anti -asylum rhetoric and the certainty that Reforn will get in next time, then you have your head in the sand. It’s a scandal.

Well since this is the first time you've brought that up in our conversation I'm not sure how you've reached that conclusion, but I agree with you that it does feed into it.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 27/10/2025 17:40

Bagsintheboot · 27/10/2025 17:37

And? I don't have to show ID when I pick up my (free) prescription either. I confirm my address, that's it. I shared a house with six other people. I could have been any one of them.

How do you even know this person was a refugee?

Because he was using Google translate through his phone and certainly knew the word Syria and refugee. Everything else that was said was from the pharmacist and was met with ‘huh’ and a shrug until she lost patience and told her colleague to just ‘give him what he wanted’.

If you don’t think that scenarios like this playing out all over the place doesn’t feed into anti -asylum rhetoric and the certainty that Reforn will get in next time, then you have your head in the sand. It’s a scandal.

suburburban · 27/10/2025 17:39

Bagsintheboot · 27/10/2025 17:35

Well they need accomodation because they're not allowed to work and it's in everyone's interest not to have lots of people living on the street.

The accommodation in these hotels is not of the same standard as it would be if paying guests were there (i.e. it's not 'wonderful'). The asylum seekers don't just move straight in to an unchanged hotel room, the furnishings and fittings are stripped and replaced with basic furnishings, often with multiple beds to a room.

It is likely to be worse than the student accommodation you're referencing.

They’re happy to leave our own people on the street though

i wish they could strongly be discouraged from coming here in the first place

Bagsintheboot · 27/10/2025 17:37

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 27/10/2025 17:35

Because he literally had no identification aside from that. No paperwork which was required. No money which might have been required. No ID to say he had legitimate refugee status and thus exception. Nothing to even confirm he was the person to whom the prescription was made out to and yet he accessed the NHS and walked away with free medication. Wonderful! Delighted my taxes just paid for that.

Edited

And? I don't have to show ID when I pick up my (free) prescription either. I confirm my address, that's it. I shared a house with six other people. I could have been any one of them.

How do you even know this person was a refugee?

JenniferBooth · 27/10/2025 17:36

Bagsintheboot · 27/10/2025 16:54

Free healthcare - you get that too. The difference is that they can't make NI payments since they're not allowed to work.

Free food and accomodation - well yes they kind of have to get that since, again, they're not allowed to work.

Access to entertainment and amenities - again, we all have that too. They just have a max budget of £49 / week to spend on everything that isn't food / accommodation.

she said ‘just give him what he wants How exactly did she know what he wanted if he spoke no English, had no paperwork or documentation?

And free dentistry?

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 27/10/2025 17:35

Bagsintheboot · 27/10/2025 17:30

So he did have the right paperwork for the medication then? So why shouldn't the pharmacist just give him what he wants (or in other words, why don't they fill the prescription)?

There's also no sob story in my post. Just the facts of the matter.

Edited

Because he literally had no identification aside from that. No paperwork which was required. No money which might have been required. No ID to say he had legitimate refugee status and thus exception. Nothing to even confirm he was the person to whom the prescription was made out to and yet he accessed the NHS and walked away with free medication. Wonderful! Delighted my taxes just paid for that.

Bagsintheboot · 27/10/2025 17:35

suburburban · 27/10/2025 17:30

Then they get trashed

why do they need wonderful accommodation in the first place. What do they get in other countries?

student accommodation is often really grotty and the students or their parents have to pay for it

Edited

Well they need accomodation because they're not allowed to work and it's in everyone's interest not to have lots of people living on the street.

The accommodation in these hotels is not of the same standard as it would be if paying guests were there (i.e. it's not 'wonderful'). The asylum seekers don't just move straight in to an unchanged hotel room, the furnishings and fittings are stripped and replaced with basic furnishings, often with multiple beds to a room.

It is likely to be worse than the student accommodation you're referencing.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 27/10/2025 17:32

Iwantmyoldnameback · 27/10/2025 17:30

So you mad up the rest of the scenario then?

I made up absolutely nothing but it’s interesting to me that you think it might be made up because that’s easier isn’t it? Ah the system isn’t broken because that has to be a made up story. Nope. Sorry. You are going to have to suck up the nasty, smelly truth. Yes it stinks.

Bagsintheboot · 27/10/2025 17:30

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 27/10/2025 17:28

Because he had a prescription in his hand!

I honestly don’t care about the rest of your sob story. I am not responsible for all the men in Syria and Iran, nor the men of Sudanese and the Congo. I don’t care that they are desperate to work and pay their National insurance contributions and I don’t care that they might not think much of the food or the weather or the hospitality.

Edited

So he did have the right paperwork for the medication then? So why shouldn't the pharmacist just give him what he wants (or in other words, why don't they fill the prescription)?

There's also no sob story in my post. Just the facts of the matter.

Iwantmyoldnameback · 27/10/2025 17:30

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 27/10/2025 17:28

Because he had a prescription in his hand!

I honestly don’t care about the rest of your sob story. I am not responsible for all the men in Syria and Iran, nor the men of Sudanese and the Congo. I don’t care that they are desperate to work and pay their National insurance contributions and I don’t care that they might not think much of the food or the weather or the hospitality.

Edited

So you mad up the rest of the scenario then?

suburburban · 27/10/2025 17:30

Bagsintheboot · 27/10/2025 16:41

There are huge logistical challenges with using large, securely contained sites like barracks.

For one, we don't have lots of sites like that in a usable condition sitting, well, unused. To bring an abandoned complex up to scratch is a huge outlay. Secondly, they tend to be surprisingly low-density accommodation given the size of the site and are therefore not very efficient. Thirdly, it is logistically more costly to supply and maintain these sites and they are not always easy to access for e.g. court visits.

The use of hotels has arisen because these buildings are in good condition, provide a high density of accommodation, are usually in central areas where it's easy to supply catering, security, get the residents to court, doctors appts etc, and because there have been an awful lot of hotels closing in recent years these buildings are quite commonly available on the open market and are cheap for what they are.

Then they get trashed

why do they need wonderful accommodation in the first place. What do they get in other countries?

student accommodation is often really grotty and the students or their parents have to pay for it

EasternStandard · 27/10/2025 17:30

TopPocketFind · 27/10/2025 17:27

It's too good not to use.

I have shared reports on how Brexit is a factor in the increase of small boats, Tories have admitted to it.

But let's keep pretending it has nothing to do with Brexit.

I am starting to wonder if posters actually want the boat crossings stopped, demonising asylum seekers seems to be very popular.

Sure. I don’t mind if Labour think this will do it. It won’t help them at the next GE.

If it’s bad lines against rising Channel crossings they’ll struggle.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 27/10/2025 17:28

Bagsintheboot · 27/10/2025 16:54

Free healthcare - you get that too. The difference is that they can't make NI payments since they're not allowed to work.

Free food and accomodation - well yes they kind of have to get that since, again, they're not allowed to work.

Access to entertainment and amenities - again, we all have that too. They just have a max budget of £49 / week to spend on everything that isn't food / accommodation.

she said ‘just give him what he wants How exactly did she know what he wanted if he spoke no English, had no paperwork or documentation?

Because he had a prescription in his hand!

I honestly don’t care about the rest of your sob story. I am not responsible for all the men in Syria and Iran, nor the men of Sudanese and the Congo. I don’t care that they are desperate to work and pay their National insurance contributions and I don’t care that they might not think much of the food or the weather or the hospitality.

TopPocketFind · 27/10/2025 17:27

EasternStandard · 27/10/2025 17:19

I think you’re the only one using it tbf

It's too good not to use.

I have shared reports on how Brexit is a factor in the increase of small boats, Tories have admitted to it.

But let's keep pretending it has nothing to do with Brexit.

I am starting to wonder if posters actually want the boat crossings stopped, demonising asylum seekers seems to be very popular.

EasternStandard · 27/10/2025 17:19

TopPocketFind · 27/10/2025 17:18

Farage boats is still upsetting people

Thanks Ed

I think you’re the only one using it tbf

TopPocketFind · 27/10/2025 17:18

Farage boats is still upsetting people

Thanks Ed

Swipe left for the next trending thread