Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To hesitate to move back from US to UK because of terrible state of NHS

315 replies

Star555 · 26/10/2025 17:26

(Apologies for the double post; posted on Living Overseas board but realised it's probably better to post here to get the perspective of MNers who currently live in the UK rather than the US)

I'm a long-term expat (in my 30s) living in the US. My parents and I moved to the US many years ago when I was in school, and although I have always thought about moving back home as an adult (I love history and culture and easy access to Europe, which the US woefully lacks), my parents are settled in the US and don't want to move back because they think the UK is in a bad state (failing NHS, high taxes, older infrastructure, etc.) One parent had a major operation recently and is under ongoing treatment at a top hospital here in America, and they think they would not have had received timely care like this in the UK given the current state of the NHS.

I have been on the fence about whether moving back home would be a good choice or not, and am thinking about it more seriously now given the US government situation, although my parents are against the idea. I don't mind the lower salaries in the UK so much (I have a STEM postgraduate degree and would likely have a job at a company in/near London), but I am mainly concerned about the state of healthcare. I have heard so many horror stories about overflowing A&Es and huge waits for life-saving treatments in the UK. I am currently single and don't have any close family or friends in the UK that I could count on for support if I were to need major medical treatment (touch wood). I would be willing to pay (or my employer would pay) for private insurance, but am not sure how much it would truly help.

Has anyone else decided against moving back to the UK, or decided to move out of the UK, primarily because of the sorry state of the NHS? Is access to timely medical care really that bad in London and the South in general? On one hand, I want to return to my homeland and raise (future) children there because of the culture, etc. but on the other hand I want reliable, high-quality medical care for myself and any kids I might have.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
RogueFemale · 26/10/2025 23:15

Star555 · 26/10/2025 23:09

I was advised to go to the emergency by the 24/7 phone nurse because I was at risk of severe dehydration and would need IV fluids.

Complete overkill covering ass advice. What else would you expect from a 24/7 phone nurse? Of course you're told to go emergency. Millions of people have thrown up after eating something a bit dodgy and millions have survived.

TenGreatFatSquirrels · 26/10/2025 23:13

I’m in London and have never had an issue getting a same or next day appointment at the longest on a weekday. On weekends you’d call 111 and ask for their advice (they can get you into an OOO GP or a doctors call out or even send you an ambulance). The regular GP is closed.

Star555 · 26/10/2025 23:09

Bloozie · 26/10/2025 22:59

Yeah if you turned up to A&E with a tummy bug you’d wait hours here.

Because it’s not an accident or an emergency.

Edited

I was advised to go to the emergency by the 24/7 phone nurse because I was at risk of severe dehydration and would need IV fluids.

OP posts:
Star555 · 26/10/2025 23:06

RogueFemale · 26/10/2025 22:50

@Star555 You seem to have a very rose-tinted view of the USA.

Have you considered the risk of your future children being shot dead at school? (or even having to teach them what to do if there's a shooting?) or the risk of you being prosecuted and imprisoned for having a miscarriage?

Curious about what your parents think is 'new' infrastructure in the USA? USA is notoriously backward in terms of anything other than roads. The train network is decades behind Europe. The emergency service network in terms of addressing and responding to environmental hazards such as flood, wildfire, is poor and underfunded, especially now, with Trump's wrecking ball.

But yeah, if you have health insurance it's fine in the US. Ditto in the UK. If you're specifically concerned about getting quick treatment at A&E, then central London is your best bet, with multiple A&E departments.

The shootings are indeed a big cause of worry in the US, I will not deny it. But I live in a liberal coastal city so it's better than being in the Southern US at least.

'New' infrastructure according to parents -- buildings better-maintained, newer, bigger and cleaner, more accessible. Shops open longer hours. Public toilets and drinking water fountains more numerous and accessible (airports, museums, etc.) More money for better equipment in hospitals, universities, scientific labs, etc. I do agree with many of these things, but I think I actually have a rose-tinted view of the history and culture the UK offers so I'm willing to compromise.

OP posts:
RogueFemale · 26/10/2025 23:02

Swiftie1878 · 26/10/2025 22:55

Yeah. Most of us just sleep that off.
Stay in the US. I think you’ll be happier there.

Agree.

RogueFemale · 26/10/2025 23:00

Bloozie · 26/10/2025 22:59

Yeah if you turned up to A&E with a tummy bug you’d wait hours here.

Because it’s not an accident or an emergency.

Edited

Yup.

Bloozie · 26/10/2025 22:59

Star555 · 26/10/2025 22:52

No, I said I've been to urgent care many times. (Injuries, infections, etc.) Most of those times, I called my GP office first and asked for a same day appointment. Only of they couldn't give me that, then I went to urgent care.

I have only been to the emergency room (A&E) once, and that was because the urgent care was closed in the middle of the night and I had caught a bad stomach bug from travelling abroad and couldn't keep any food down.

Yeah if you turned up to A&E with a tummy bug you’d wait hours here.

Because it’s not an accident or an emergency.

RogueFemale · 26/10/2025 22:58

@Star555 "The USA has significantly higher rates of food poisoning compared to the UK and Europe, with estimates suggesting one in six Americans are affected annually, compared to about one in 28 in the UK. The US also has a higher death rate from foodborne illnesses, with approximately 3,000 deaths per year, compared to about 500 in the UK."
It'll be because of lower food standards in the US.
Good luck.

Bloozie · 26/10/2025 22:58

HoskinsChoice · 26/10/2025 22:40

I'd stay in the US. Not because the US is better but because we already have a load of entitled whingers in the UK, we don't really want another one that's judging us on the histrionics of mumsnet and the Daily Mail.

Also, you say you're healthy but yet you've been to A&E many times? I'm twice your age and have never been to A&E in my life. So you're not that healthy!

I’m not sure the OP is real. I haven’t been to A&E for decades. Neither has my son.

My husband is quite a sickly person. He has something major needing urgent attention about every 18 months. He doesn’t just get shingles. He gets SHINGLES capital letters, advancing on his eye. Everyone else gets a UTI, he gets kidney infections. His bowels are unspeakable. He’s had 3 surgeries on various bits of him since we met and we’ve only known each other for 9 years. He goes to his GP with a list. Right now he’s having active treatment for 4 unrelated conditions.

Not only has he always had excellent care - he’s the world’s sickliest human and even he has avoided A&E. (He gets value for money from the walk-in centres though…).

Swiftie1878 · 26/10/2025 22:55

Star555 · 26/10/2025 22:52

No, I said I've been to urgent care many times. (Injuries, infections, etc.) Most of those times, I called my GP office first and asked for a same day appointment. Only of they couldn't give me that, then I went to urgent care.

I have only been to the emergency room (A&E) once, and that was because the urgent care was closed in the middle of the night and I had caught a bad stomach bug from travelling abroad and couldn't keep any food down.

Yeah. Most of us just sleep that off.
Stay in the US. I think you’ll be happier there.

Star555 · 26/10/2025 22:52

HoskinsChoice · 26/10/2025 22:40

I'd stay in the US. Not because the US is better but because we already have a load of entitled whingers in the UK, we don't really want another one that's judging us on the histrionics of mumsnet and the Daily Mail.

Also, you say you're healthy but yet you've been to A&E many times? I'm twice your age and have never been to A&E in my life. So you're not that healthy!

No, I said I've been to urgent care many times. (Injuries, infections, etc.) Most of those times, I called my GP office first and asked for a same day appointment. Only of they couldn't give me that, then I went to urgent care.

I have only been to the emergency room (A&E) once, and that was because the urgent care was closed in the middle of the night and I had caught a bad stomach bug from travelling abroad and couldn't keep any food down.

OP posts:
RogueFemale · 26/10/2025 22:50

@Star555 You seem to have a very rose-tinted view of the USA.

Have you considered the risk of your future children being shot dead at school? (or even having to teach them what to do if there's a shooting?) or the risk of you being prosecuted and imprisoned for having a miscarriage?

Curious about what your parents think is 'new' infrastructure in the USA? USA is notoriously backward in terms of anything other than roads. The train network is decades behind Europe. The emergency service network in terms of addressing and responding to environmental hazards such as flood, wildfire, is poor and underfunded, especially now, with Trump's wrecking ball.

But yeah, if you have health insurance it's fine in the US. Ditto in the UK. If you're specifically concerned about getting quick treatment at A&E, then central London is your best bet, with multiple A&E departments.

Dinnerplease · 26/10/2025 22:48

The US also has that weird thing where they over-specialise. You don't need to see a gynecologist every year for a pelvic exam if you're not having any issues. Ditto annual checkups with a pediatrician. We're much more generalist and nurse led in the UK- the idea of the GP or family doctor is much less common in the US. Another function of insurance. This can lead people to think they're getting worse care, but you don't need a specialist to prescribe you antibiotics for a chest infection or sort out your birth control or do your kid's vaccinations.

OneZanyPoet · 26/10/2025 22:45

Hahaha yes. I should have said the climate is very context dependent on where you are in the states. Rather the British climate than the desert.

HoskinsChoice · 26/10/2025 22:40

I'd stay in the US. Not because the US is better but because we already have a load of entitled whingers in the UK, we don't really want another one that's judging us on the histrionics of mumsnet and the Daily Mail.

Also, you say you're healthy but yet you've been to A&E many times? I'm twice your age and have never been to A&E in my life. So you're not that healthy!

WhatIsTheCharge · 26/10/2025 22:33

BruFord · 26/10/2025 22:27

@OneZanyPoet We disagree on the British climate, I love it!

Me too 😂

I currently live in a desert state and the summers are beyond brutal. It’s rained twice this year.
It’s currently still 83°F outside. I’m looking forward to coming back to the U.K. and October actually October-ing properly 😂

BruFord · 26/10/2025 22:27

@OneZanyPoet We disagree on the British climate, I love it!

OneZanyPoet · 26/10/2025 22:23

The simplest way to think about it:

If all you’ve ever known is the NHS, the US system is very scary.

If all you've ever known is the US system, you will cycle between marvelling at what you get on the NHS to being mildly horrified.

If you can look at both with an objective lens you will see there are pluses and negatives to both depending on your circumstances.

As I see it, healthcare doesn’t factor in

Reasons to leave/not move the US:
The horrifying political situation and racism (however don’t kid yourself that that can’t/wont happen in the UK)
Work culture, employment rights and crap holidays
Most of the other things (educational choices, culture) can be offset a bit by moving to a major coastal city and travelling

Reasons to leave/not move to the UK:
Parochialism, racism and a stupid political situation/race to the bottom
Taxes and what you get in return for them
Miserable salaries
The climate
Disingenuous British communication style

AleaEim · 26/10/2025 22:22

i live in SE london, NHS is brilliant, it’s better than when I’m from (Ireland) never had much of a problem. I have some health problems and always get appointments quite quickly, doctors are generally good, spoke to my neurologist on the phone recently, very personable I thought to be able to arrange phone calls with them. GPs are hit and miss but I get appointments fast. Free medication if you’re pregnant and one year postpartum, same with dental care.

ELMhouse · 26/10/2025 22:20

Having lived in the US and Uk as an adult the UK far outweighs the US for me and my family. It seems like a cliche but I was afraid of ‘shootings’ and the healthcare system seems better in some ways but so many people wouldn’t dream of going to a Dr or getting a prescription for fear of cost. And one of the reasons people get treated so badly at work is because they are scared to death of losing their jobs (a lot of this is to do with health/dental), so put up with shit working hours, and low annual leave and really crappy maternity. They are conditioned to put up and shut up.

for me the UK even with its issues is far better for a safer happier family life than the US.

(not to mention the UK has a much better sense of humour and generally don’t take religion quite so seriously either).

edited to add I had to call an ambulance when my waters broke quickly and I couldn’t make it to hospital, the paramedics arrived in seven minutes and delivered my DD before midwife could attended. They were wonderful and I named my DD after the female paramedic.

SusanChurchouse · 26/10/2025 22:14

My recent NHS experience has been brilliant. Saw a GP with a breast lump on a Wednesday afternoon in February, seen at breast clinic on the Friday morning. I’ve since had surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy and the only thing it cost me was my train fare to one of the hospitals.

Private medical insurance is good for non emergency treatments. Dh saved a wait for a hernia op that way. Even paying out of pocket for treatments isn’t that expensive comparatively.

Kirbert2 · 26/10/2025 22:08

Star555 · 26/10/2025 21:45

Coming back to the thread now, had a quick look through all the replies and will read more later. Thanks for sharing all your experiences!

To clarify, I would definitely get private insurance (either paying on my own, or more likely through employer) so I wouldn't be relying on "just" the NHS. But I know that at the end of the day, the resources/doctors are the same regardless of NHS-only or private, but having private insurance provides faster appointments. (Please correct me if I'm wrong.)

As I mentioned in an earlier post, I am healthy and have no chronic conditions, thankfully. But I have had many one-off issues needing urgent treatment at an urgent care or emergency room if it was a weekend / late night (such as a fracture, infection and sudden swelling, severe pneumonia, etc.) Also, wait times in the US, even at top hospitals and with referrals, to see specialists or have surgery can be pretty long (several months). I know of one case where an operation was needed to diagnose an anomaly that showed up on a scan during an emergency visit, but the surgeon was on holiday so it was delayed by a month. After the operation revealed cancer, there was again a few months' delay before chemotherapy could begin due to lack of available appointments. And the patient's stay in the hospital was terrible -- very poorly staffed with nurses, even if the patient pressed the call button for something urgent (vomiting, IV drip disconnected, alarm beeping, etc.), help would take more than 30 min to arrive, etc. All this was in a major US city with excellent hospitals! So I'm worried that the situation in London/Southeast might be even worse, with longer delays, lack of follow-up appointments, etc. Hopefully I won't need any of this, but I would feel safer knowing that reasonably timely, good-quality care is available at least in a way comparable to what we have in the US.

There was a thread on MN the other day about a lady whose DH spent over a day waiting in A&E with a perforated bowel and had no choice but to sleep on the floor...which is terrible. I know someone who went to the emergency room here in the US with a bowel obstruction and they were triaged and given a bed almost immediately.

My son had a bowel obstruction last year which turned out to be caused by cancer and he was triaged and given a bed almost immediately and that was actually when it was suspected to be gastroenteritis.

His case became complicated as unbeknown to us, the cancer had caused a twist in his bowel which caused some of his bowel to begin to die which then caused septic shock. My son had a cardiac arrest in the middle of a children's assessment ward and their outstanding care meant that they got him back.

He was transferred to a children's hospital with a PICU as soon as he was stable enough with a critical care team in the ambulance rather than a standard hospital transfer. He then had 2 high risk surgeries within the next 2 days to remove the dead part of his bowel and fit a stoma to allow his bowel time to heal and rest, both times I was told that it's possible he wouldn't survive as he was in multi organ failure due to septic shock and against all of the odds, he made it through both surgeries. Not long after the 2nd surgery, he declined again and they put him on ECMO to rest his heart and lungs which is what slowly began to stabilise him and it was able to be removed after about a week. We then found out a few days after that it was cancer that had caused all of this.

He was too unwell for chemotherapy at this point and as the cancer was all removed during his surgery and scans kept coming up clear, we all decided that chemotherapy when everything looked clear was a bad idea. Unfortunately, it came back 4 months later and steroids were started the same day, chemotherapy a few days later because they didn't want to start it over the weekend with less staff as he was at risk for bowel perforation and tumor lysis.

7 weeks in PICU
3 months inpatient chemotherapy
10 months in hospital overall
1 year in remission as of last month

They performed a miracle on my son.

For every bad experience, there's an experience like my son's but they don't get talked about as much and I feel like it's only the bad experiences you hear.

BruFord · 26/10/2025 22:03

I know it’s not the same for everyone. But you only hear the dramatic ‘14 hours in A&E without a chair’ bad news stories. There are plenty - PLENTY - of good news stories. They’re just not as headline grabbing.

@Bloozie I agree. It’s the same in the US, the worst healthcare stories are the ones that get reported here too.

Bloozie · 26/10/2025 21:58

A couple of weeks ago I had pins and needles in my hands and bruising on my legs. I used my GP’s online ‘describe your symptoms and we’ll triage you’ system.

They invited me for an appointment within the hour. I was with my GP two hours after I’d submitted the form. She referred me for same day emergency care. 5 hours after I sent my form, I was in hospital.

I know it’s not the same for everyone. But you only hear the dramatic ‘14 hours in A&E without a chair’ bad news stories. There are plenty - PLENTY - of good news stories. They’re just not as headline grabbing.

Flippo · 26/10/2025 21:55

but having private insurance provides faster appointments. (Please correct me if I'm wrong.)
Private will often get you faster appts or surgeries and it’s good to have a second opinion easily, my cancer was diagnosed privately due to having issues with getting my gp to take me seriously and I think this may depend on what company you go with but lots (all?) will let you choose your surgeon/specialist to see if that’s important to you

Swipe left for the next trending thread