Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask you to swerve Shein & Temu

587 replies

DoNoTakeNo · 25/10/2025 18:12

This Christmas?
I know it’s mainly a cost thing but if it’s achievable, can people possibly manage with less stuff?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Goddessoftheearth · 26/10/2025 18:23

notthisagain2025 · 26/10/2025 08:32

Oh my God you cannot possibly be that thick. Surely not. Surely you know what a wall of text is? My goodness. How embarrassing for you.

I just added a couple of silver necklaces to the cart (well I say silver 😅) in your honour. I wasn't sure about them, but for your sake I'll bite the bullet 😘

Congratulations for your support of this, all for some cheap tat. www.walkfree.org/global-slavery-index/country-studies/china/

Blablibladirladada · 26/10/2025 18:21

Yeah…

No kids stuff. Just have a look at the package before giving and make it clear nothing unsafe will be given…then let people do what they like. You can’t really control that now?

But for adults, why not. Stuff probably don’t last as much but no one likes to keep stuff forever nowadays so. Win/win?

soupyspoon · 26/10/2025 18:17

LivingDeadGirlUK · 26/10/2025 18:10

At some point during teens/young adult we went from going out and buying something nice, ie one thing, to going out and coming home with hauls. I don't know if thats just me personally.

Well I certainly remember this for myself on the Saturdays I wasnt working, off or something, or in the holidays, we would 'go shopping' thats what you did and came home with so many bags on the bus your fingers being cut by the weight of all the bags.

Markets on Sundays were the classic though.

Goddessoftheearth · 26/10/2025 18:11

Parsleysalad · 25/10/2025 18:15

why?

Slave labour, environmental impact of products into landfill and initial production, not properly tested, it’s mostly tat - any other reasons you want?

LivingDeadGirlUK · 26/10/2025 18:10

soupyspoon · 26/10/2025 18:08

Yes Mark One, that was another one. Ive lost count of all the names. I mean you couldnt even move stuff along the rails they were that stuffed with basically throwaway stuff. We were heavily influenced by whatever the in popstars were at the time, the films coming out etc.

At some point during teens/young adult we went from going out and buying something nice, ie one thing, to going out and coming home with hauls. I don't know if thats just me personally.

soupyspoon · 26/10/2025 18:08

LivingDeadGirlUK · 26/10/2025 18:02

I think it started in the late 90s, I remember I always used to shop in Topshop and Miss Selfridge and would get maybe one item a month with my allowance. Then a shop called Mark One popped up and we couldn't believe how cheap the clothes were, you could get tops for a few pounds. The quality was absolutely terrible though.

Yes Mark One, that was another one. Ive lost count of all the names. I mean you couldnt even move stuff along the rails they were that stuffed with basically throwaway stuff. We were heavily influenced by whatever the in popstars were at the time, the films coming out etc.

itsnotfairisit · 26/10/2025 18:06

I don’t need to be asked. I’m swerving

soupyspoon · 26/10/2025 18:04

TheGoddessAthena · 26/10/2025 18:00

I was a teen in the 80s. Nobody was buying a new outfit for every night out. We were shopping in Top Shop, Miss Selfridge, Clockhouse at C&A, Chelsea Girl. You could not buy clothes in the supermarket. Clothes were EXPENSIVE compared to a hourly wage of £3 as a saturday girl. A new pair of jeans would be a whole week's wages around £25 at the cheapest. if cost of clothing had kept pace, a pair of jeans would still be 8 x minimum wage for a 16 year old, around £50 at the least. And they're not. So today's teens feel comparatively well off, and rather than saving up and buying one top for £20, they are going to these shite merchants and buying 10 tops at £2 each.

Not every night out no. But it was fast fashion and I wouldnt have paid 25 quid for jeans. I had quite a lot of jobs, Thursday late night evenings, Saturday job, baby sitting, car washing and dog walking. Then when Sunday opening came along, I did that, for double pay of course as it was then

I was loaded as a teenager. But it was still fast fashion, the new thing all the time. I was forever buying earrings that went god knows where. Also all of us would always be in Body Shop and despite the apparent ethics, it was aimed at teens with a bit of cash to buy all those tiny items that always go lost, ran out, needed replacing. The reusable containers that you always forgot to bring out with you so just got the replacement item instead. Lip glosses aplenty. Magazines in those days would always come with a free makeup bag or lippy or mascara or stuff like that. The amount of stuff we had was huge. Not to mention the cans of hairspray we got through

LivingDeadGirlUK · 26/10/2025 18:02

Pigtailsandall · 26/10/2025 17:53

I was a teenager in the late 90s and I don't remember anyone getting 10 tops for $50, or doing weekly hauls. The fashion cycle also didn't pump out new products weekly or even daily like Shein now does. You could go to the shops in September and still find the same item there in November. And stuff lasted.

I think it started in the late 90s, I remember I always used to shop in Topshop and Miss Selfridge and would get maybe one item a month with my allowance. Then a shop called Mark One popped up and we couldn't believe how cheap the clothes were, you could get tops for a few pounds. The quality was absolutely terrible though.

TheGoddessAthena · 26/10/2025 18:00

soupyspoon · 26/10/2025 17:43

There absolutely was fast fashion/style and beauty products 30 years ago, 60 years ago for gods sake. Throw away nails, earrings, eye lashes, tights would only usually last one wear, that sort of thing. Was no one a teen in the 80s?

I was a teen in the 80s. Nobody was buying a new outfit for every night out. We were shopping in Top Shop, Miss Selfridge, Clockhouse at C&A, Chelsea Girl. You could not buy clothes in the supermarket. Clothes were EXPENSIVE compared to a hourly wage of £3 as a saturday girl. A new pair of jeans would be a whole week's wages around £25 at the cheapest. if cost of clothing had kept pace, a pair of jeans would still be 8 x minimum wage for a 16 year old, around £50 at the least. And they're not. So today's teens feel comparatively well off, and rather than saving up and buying one top for £20, they are going to these shite merchants and buying 10 tops at £2 each.

envbeckyc · 26/10/2025 18:00

Personally I try to buy good quality products that last as presents rather than spend money on things that will just go in the bin a few days later.

This probably means I buy less things overall, but they are more used, loved and when outgrown can be given to a charity shop and resold. (Potentially sold on vinted / eBay)

You can easily bulk up Christmas presents with books etc… when they are on promotion if you are looking to increase the volume of gifts!

soupyspoon · 26/10/2025 17:59

Pigtailsandall · 26/10/2025 17:53

I was a teenager in the late 90s and I don't remember anyone getting 10 tops for $50, or doing weekly hauls. The fashion cycle also didn't pump out new products weekly or even daily like Shein now does. You could go to the shops in September and still find the same item there in November. And stuff lasted.

You didnt go down the market then. You absolutely would get loads of stuff for cheap prices and it was almost one wear stuff. And changed all the time. Top shop, Jane Norman, Miss Selfridge, C+A, tons more. Every time you turned around a new little boutique had set up and the stuff was rubbish but very attractive.

Reasontoreason · 26/10/2025 17:53

What’s the difference buying from there ? .Compared to a uk shop that buys it from china and sells it for double the price ?. Just because you buy something in the UK doesn’t mean it made here, most things are made in china.

Pigtailsandall · 26/10/2025 17:53

soupyspoon · 26/10/2025 17:43

There absolutely was fast fashion/style and beauty products 30 years ago, 60 years ago for gods sake. Throw away nails, earrings, eye lashes, tights would only usually last one wear, that sort of thing. Was no one a teen in the 80s?

I was a teenager in the late 90s and I don't remember anyone getting 10 tops for $50, or doing weekly hauls. The fashion cycle also didn't pump out new products weekly or even daily like Shein now does. You could go to the shops in September and still find the same item there in November. And stuff lasted.

soupyspoon · 26/10/2025 17:43

There absolutely was fast fashion/style and beauty products 30 years ago, 60 years ago for gods sake. Throw away nails, earrings, eye lashes, tights would only usually last one wear, that sort of thing. Was no one a teen in the 80s?

Pigtailsandall · 26/10/2025 17:20

Bagsintheboot · 26/10/2025 10:16

Pretty much. I'm highly sceptical of the "it's the only place in existence I can possibly buy things I desperately need to live" argument.

Because "things they need to live" usually turn out to be, taking examples from this thread: manicure sets, advent calendars and stocking fillers for adult children, and beauty bits.

When I was hard up I wasn't thinking about buying any kind of manicure set from anywhere, no matter how cheap. Every penny had to go towards food and the gas meter. There was nothing spare for beauty bits, even if they were rock bottom prices.

I suspect I have a very different idea of hard up to some posters on here.

Edited

I've often thought about this - I have a friend who regularly buys from Shein because it's "the only place" she can afford to shop at. Yet her wardrobe is heaving and she often spends £50 a go. £50 would instead buy one nice item every now and again. She often says it won't matter if something only lasts a season because it's only £10.

There was no fast fashion 30 years sgo, and people didn't walk around naked cause they could afford clothes from "regular". They just had less and that should be normalised. I got two shopping trips a year with my mum and a few new items each times. It all fit into a single wardrobe and it was enough.

Swoopingin · 26/10/2025 17:07

Terrytheweasel · 26/10/2025 16:04

Clearly nothing urgent then, you just wanted some shite to add to all your other shite

You sound like your having a bad day.

Digdongdoo · 26/10/2025 17:05

Happyhappymeee · 26/10/2025 16:42

I think the presumption has been all schools with no money are primary and therefore I have been force feeding 5 year olds poisonous lead pencils. I mention pencils as ONE of the things I purchase from Temu. Also I teach GCSE and Alevel - many of whom have their own pencil cases full of Temu purchased stationary!

Edited

I did ask what you buy, twice. As did another poster. You said pencils and display borders. We can only respond to the information you provide. What else do you buy?

FuckRealityBringMeABook · 26/10/2025 16:45

WilfredsPies · 26/10/2025 14:48

It’s not nonsense at all. It’s a response to short sighted, over privileged hypocrisy. Your logic works on the basis that the people shopping at these places also have the money to be flying a couple of times a year, running a two car household, buying original designs from the high street etc and are just buying cheap crap because they’re too tight to fork out for the same stuff from the high street. The whole point of shopping at these places is that many people aren’t that same person. If they had the money to be buying better quality stuff with no safety issues and no slave labour/ data harvesting stuff, then don’t you think they would be doing exactly that? It’s like asking someone why on earth they would be shopping at Aldi when they could simply ask F&M to deliver a hamper 🤦‍♀️

You fly twice a year, someone else buys some cheap jumpers from China. You’ve got no moral high ground at all.

This makes no sense when the ethical option of not buying random shite or buying second hand, swapping etc. literally costs less.

Happyhappymeee · 26/10/2025 16:42

Digdongdoo · 26/10/2025 15:06

FYI, I do. I volunteer at my DCs school weekly, and although they can fortunately afford pencils, I do spend a fair chunk of money helping stock the library and time working with the PTA. I'm not talking out of my arse thanks.

I think the presumption has been all schools with no money are primary and therefore I have been force feeding 5 year olds poisonous lead pencils. I mention pencils as ONE of the things I purchase from Temu. Also I teach GCSE and Alevel - many of whom have their own pencil cases full of Temu purchased stationary!

Thankyourose · 26/10/2025 16:40

millymollymoomoo · 25/10/2025 18:12

On what grounds?

Forced Labour, prisoner Labour, child Labour, awful environmental impact…. I could go on but you do you, dangerous ( chemicals used, safety standards not met ) etc

Happyhappymeee · 26/10/2025 16:39

Werp · 26/10/2025 14:51

As many people have pointed out in this thread, many of our more rigorously regulated and tested products are also manufactured in China. So there would be a natural transition from the more exploitative to the more regulated end of the spectrum in response to the shifting consumer demand of eg people buying a plate or a lipstick from Sainsburys instead of Temu. That would improve health and safety in this country and reduce some of the worst aspects of labour in factoriesfor global export. To really improve matters then we would need further pressure to increase supply chain transparency rather than just test product safety, through initiatives like electronics watch and the clean clothes campaign - the industrial equivalents of the fairtrade mark. I used to think that an increasingly connected world would mean more UK consumers would want to try and reduce global slavery, exploitation, child labour and unsafe working conditions, as we can see and hear so much more of what goes on. I find it so depressing and disturbing that instead for some people at least it fuels even more hyperconsumption with even less care for the people in the supply chains.

(Although my main takeaway from this thread is still horror that teachers are giving children lead paint to chew on without their parents knowing as at least I already knew the rest of it…)

I teach secondary. I am not force feeding my GCSE and alevel students pencils 🙄

jen337 · 26/10/2025 16:26

You can ask but you won’t get far with us consumerist sheeple, we just need the latest thing cheap, baaaaa!

Terrytheweasel · 26/10/2025 16:04

Swoopingin · 25/10/2025 19:23

Nowt to do with you what others buy.

Clearly nothing urgent then, you just wanted some shite to add to all your other shite

WilfredsPies · 26/10/2025 15:52

TheGoddessAthena · 26/10/2025 15:29

If they had the money to be buying better quality stuff with no safety issues and no slave labour/ data harvesting stuff, then don’t you think they would be doing exactly that?

Well no. Because data shows that the average Temu/Shein shopper is spending considerable sums on the sites and is not on the bones of their arse financially. And lots of people cannot look beyond the fact things are cheap.

And do those stats differentiate between my skint people who would like more than two summer tops and your people who have the cash to fly twice a year but just like a bargain?