Page 2 | To loose my shit at my GP?

Peoplecoveredinfish · 2025-10-25T12:12:38+00:00

I was prescribed testosterone by gynaecologist on 16/9. I have chased this three times, and had no response. I’ve still had no response, but I see from my record that the practice has written to the gynae. They’ve been pretty good about menopause, but this is a shitty misogynist policy. TLDR: We don’t prescribe testosterone for women because it would be off licence. We prescribe off licence medication all the time, but we won’t prescribe this one, because we aren’t familiar with it and we don’t think women really need it. We think women need counselling for their made up symptoms. Even though we are not specialists and the specialist has asked us to do this, we think we know better. The actual letter… We have recently been receiving an increasing number of letters from the menopause clinics requesting us to prescribe testosterone for patients who are menopausal but have an intact uterus and ovaries and feel their menopausal symptoms are not being fully controlled on Oestrogen replacement therapy. As you are aware, this medication is not licensed for women in the UK, so a clinician can only prescribe it off licence. While there are many drugs that GPs do prescribe off licence, these are medications that we are familiar with, and there is known evidence to prove their efficacy and safety. *The GMC guidance around Good medical practice clearly states that “14 You must recognise and work within the limits of your competence. 16 In providing clinical care you must: a) prescribe medicine or treatment, including repeat prescriptions, only when you have adequate knowledge of the patient’s health, and are satisfied that the medicine or treatment serve the patient’s needs, b) provide effective treatments based on the best available evidence.*” *Also “You are responsible for the prescriptions that you sign. You must only prescribe medicine when you have adequate knowledge of your patient’s health. And you must be satisfied that the medicine serves your patient’s need.” * *The British Menopause Society states* “Randomised clinical trials of testosterone to date have not demonstrated the beneficial effects of testosterone therapy for cognition, mood, energy, and musculoskeletal health. Further better designed studies are required with these health issues as primary outcome measures as some individuals report improvement of these symptoms. Until these data are available, the primary indication for testosterone should therefore be for HSDD following a biopsychosocial approach.” We are thus unable to continue issuing testosterone prescriptions to our patients whom you have seen in clinic and advise they need testosterone. We expect you as the secondary care specialist in this area to manage these prescriptions and continue to issue and monitor their safety in those patients. We would kindly request that you avoid telling our patients to contact the surgery for the GP to continue the prescriptions for testosterone. Furthermore, any letters we receive requesting this, will be returned with a TCS letter.

alpenguin · 25/10/2025 22:21

Is the specialist a private consultant or is it from
nhs?

if the former the GP has no obligation to prescribe, if the latter they do.

BerryTwister · 25/10/2025 20:36

GaIadriel · 25/10/2025 18:27

This.

I'm not an expert but there are defo instances where the GP can refuse. However, there is often still a duty of care and this can fall with the specialist. However, IME it can often fall between the cracks if you don't chase them.

For example, I wanted to go back on my ADHD meds having not taken them since my teens and had to be reassessed as per the guidelines. Got referred to an NHS partner through the RTC pathway as NHS waiting time was five years and the partner was two months.

Got a positive assessment and was prescribed the same meds I used to take. However, after the partner had managed the initial three months period as usual, my GP refused shared care. However, they didn't state this outright. They just ignored the letters.

It was a shitshow because my provider had told me that they'd continue prescribing indefinitely at NHS rates if shared care was rejected so I didn't need to worry. However, when I suddenly realised I should've had my prescription dispatch notice a few days prior and was running out, it turned out that the provider hadn't prescribed because they didn't know whether my GP had taken it over and needed this confirmed in writing/email.

This resulted in me going almost a week without and crashing hard as you're not meant to just stop stimulants without tapering off. I was on a work course that week being trained on driving a new heavy plant vehicle and it was horrible. I had really bad brain fog, lethargy, and was driving a 25 ton loading shovel around a quarry having to do dangerous manoeuvres whilst feeling rubbish.

It took both the consultant and myself pestering my surgery for a couple of days before they wrote a proper letter saying they were refusing shared care due to not feeling they had the capacity to manage my treatment. Soon as I had that my consultant took over my care permanently and I must say they've been a thousand times better than the NHS. I can usually get through to the team in under five mins and they're really good and quick at sorting any issues.

Show quote history

not all Right To Choose providers have a shared care contract. It’s nothing to do with the GP.

MeridaBrave · 25/10/2025 20:33

GaIadriel · 25/10/2025 18:33

This is true, but it's also open to abuse. My mate's GP apparently told him that in an ideal world everybody would be treated but they had to consider costs. This was for about £20 of testosterone a month and a yearly blood panel. For a 35yo who hadn't been able to have sex in seven years and had hoped to one day have a family.

Show quote history

Actually for men, taking external testosterone reduces fertility, so it wouldn’t be as simple as giving him a prescription. Specialists are generally loathe to prescribe to men who want to have children.

Ilovemychocolate · 25/10/2025 20:09

GaIadriel · 25/10/2025 18:30

"Loose my shit at them" does kinda sound like OP is going to storm into the surgery and sling a bag of poo at her doctor. 🤣 Maybe they deserve it!

Show quote history

😂

Tistheseason17 · 25/10/2025 20:01

OnlyOnAFriday · 25/10/2025 19:26

Is that shared care between the local nhs hospital and gp? Or does it also stand for any private drs someone may have seen? I don’t think the OP has said but I wonder if the gynaecologist is private?

Show quote history

Usually NHS to NHS although some GPs may decide on case by case basis for private arrangement based on skills and competence. As you can imagine this meana not every GP does the same thing.
GPs are not obliged to enter into shared care agreements whether nhs or private and many are choosing not to.
This is happening less as the sheer volume of work transfer is beyond the capacity of day to day GP working.
If anyone thinks GPs are getting lots of funding I can confirm this is FAKE news. One funding pot was decreased (QOF) then Wes Streeting announced new GP funding (its not - its this same money just moved around).

The Govt has decided that GPs who see over 90% of all NHS appointments are NOT the NHS - so the NI increase has been applied. Same with your community nursing teams - NOT the NHS for NI purposes.

Hospitals who see less than 10% of NHS consults are classed as the NHS and have been made except from NI increases- rich get richer.

How can your GP NOT be the NHS? My local MP has not answered this.

It is important the general public recognise that by putting patients against GP practices- there will be no GPs - we'll all need private insurance. Don't believe the rhetoric - do more trading - don't help the Govt to privatise your GP.

oldclock · 25/10/2025 20:00

Rosscameasdoody · 25/10/2025 19:38

I was cross with them, but unfortunately being cross doesn’t get you the vaccine. Paying for it privately was the only option.

Show quote history

Actually a formal complaint via PALS would have probably got it sorted. My point was that you seemed furious with your GP for not doing it, when the fault lay 100% with your consultant whose job it was.

justasking111 · 25/10/2025 19:59

My practice won't prescribe to men either.

Silverbirchleaf · 25/10/2025 19:57

i don’t think this is a sexual issue either, but a licensed v unlicensed issue. Your surgery has a policy that they will not prescribe the unlicensed testosterone. It’s not an anti-woman policy.

Have you considered changing surgeries if you’re not happy with this one?

Original poster

Peoplecoveredinfish · 25/10/2025 19:50

GaIadriel · 25/10/2025 18:43

I don't think it helps to make it a battle of the sexes though, OP.

Men have a tough time getting prescribed steroids too. Specifically because of the negative stereotypes associated with men abusing anabolics. If a man who looks like he lifts weights/has a rugby physique asks his GP to test for low testosterone/enquires about TRT, he'll often be given the third degree and treated with suspicion. Probably even more so by male doctors.

This was defo the case with my ex training partner who is a pretty muscular guy. The doctor actually commented that he'd be surprised if he had low testosterone going by how strong a beard he had and by his physique.

Didn't ask any questions about whether he'd ever had a head or groin injury etc, or if he'd ever taken anabolic steroids. When he saw the private doctor the first thing they did was test his pituitary gland and look for symptoms of a thyroid problem etc.

But will ALL men, having seen a specialist consultant who has requested testosterone be sent a letter saying that NO MEN will be prescribed testosterone, regardless of guidelines, diagnosis or clinical history and further referrals will be returned. By this and only three other practices countywide? And women will be prescribed on another clinical model. Because that is what this letter says. It's not saying it will be difficult. Or that it is inappropriate for me. It is saying it will not be prescribed. By any doctor in the practice. For any woman. For any reason.

OP posts:

rainingsnoring · 25/10/2025 19:44

Peoplecoveredinfish · 25/10/2025 18:32

What is not factual?

Of course I am angry at being discriminated against and having to do my GP's job for them. Why shouldn't I be? I shouldn't be rude - and haven't been. Women are allowed to be angry if they at treated poorly, no?

I know Androfeme was only licenced in August. And so does my Gynae. But the GP, who feels they have the right to make withhold this medication for all women in the practice, doesn't. And while the testosterone has only recently been licenced, the NICE guidelines have said doctors should consider prescribing testosterone for HDSS for TEN YEARS. There IS evidence that it is safe. There IS evidence of it's efficacy for HDSS. Meds in general and HRT in particular ARE usually prescribed like this. But one doctor is keeping the entire practice from prescribing it for menopausal women at all, even within the guidelines, even with specialist advice, without knowing the patient's clinical history, because they feel their knowledge is superior, while using the fact that is isn't as a reason not to. When that is out of date now and was wrong before anyway? Which proves my point they are not competent to make the decision.

The fact they prescribe it for men IS relevant. They have said it was unfamiliar. It is not. If there are clinicians who are able to prescribe it for men, it is hardly a great feat of medical skill to review the evidence and guidelines on prescribing for women, is it? I've done it this afternoon. And even if it were never prescribed for men, that is no excuse not to have the skills in the practice to be unable to provide a fairly basic medication half of the population may need if they live long enough to reach menopause. Medical misogyny is not imagined. And women are absolutely entitled to be angry about it.

Show quote history

You need to calm down as I already suggested.
I'm sure you are aware that testosterone is a predominately male hormone which has been licensed for men for a very long time and the fact that the sexes are different and have different hormones in their bodies.. Androfeme (the only preparation, others being unlicensed) has only been licensed for women for 2 months.
You are just making a fool of yourself behaving like this. All you need to do is write to them politely or ask your specialist to do so and hopefully they will change their mind. You can't expect the GP to be up to date with every single change that has come out in the last week. That's unrealistic.

Silverbirchleaf · 25/10/2025 19:43

“No one would be able to sue a GP for prescribing in the community something as directed by the consultant.”

Thats not actually true. The gp is liable for any prescription they put their name to.

Rosscameasdoody · 25/10/2025 19:38

oldclock · 25/10/2025 14:34

Why didn't your consultant do the vaccine and why aren't your cross with them for not doing so?

Show quote history

I was cross with them, but unfortunately being cross doesn’t get you the vaccine. Paying for it privately was the only option.

WutheringBites · 25/10/2025 19:37

Hi there, gp here. I’ve seen some horrible, irreversible side effects from testosterone. So I’m very very cautious about prescribing it. And it’s my name on the paperwork, so it’s me that’d end up in court if it all goes wrong. This is the case for anything I prescribe, even if it’s on other medical advice.

also. We are consultants in general practice (we all hold a CCT qualification) and are expert generalists. Lots of us do have special interest in women’s health & will want to support you. But we will have had experiences which frame how we work.

Honestly, if you don’t like your GP surgery’s policy, maybe look to register elsewhere?

KindnessIsKey123 · 25/10/2025 19:32

Hello, you can ask for your gynaecologist to give you a private prescription. Short term solution whilst you work it out with the GP.

I have a private allergy doctor in London & GP practice didn’t get it re: off licence meds. Even with the letters from my consultant. I pay privately cuz it’s not worth the hassle & it’s online so a company send me the meds by post. But you can collect a private prescription at your local pharmacy.

mines not forever though, for a year or so.

Original poster

Peoplecoveredinfish · 25/10/2025 19:32

Silverbirchleaf · 25/10/2025 18:37

You still haven’t answered why the consultant hasn’t prescribed it?

Because that's not (as most people are assuming) normal practice. My schedule two controlled drugs were initially given by the hospital, but once I was stable, they wrote to the GP with the dose and the GP prescribes from then on. The consultant reviews annually, usually after anything like bloods or obs are done but the GP. That means if different consultants are prescribing a myriad of things one doctor holds all the information. And you can't say, get two lots of controlled drugs from an NHS and a private consultant. Or two scripts a month. A GP is NOT expected to be competent to prescribe all meds from scratch, but to oversee them between consultant reviews. They are generalists. They keep a broad eye on how much you are taking and how often, monitor side effects as indicated by the consultant, and flag any glaringly obvious (to a doctor) drug interactions. No one would be able to sue a GP for prescribing in the community something as directed by the consultant. The GP would rightly point out they were acting as local provider and within the expertise as directed by the consultant, unless it were something really obvious that 99 percent of GPs would know, or they varied the dose or prescribed something that interfered with it and didn't check. They do this all the time with unfamiliar and off label drugs. so why single out with testosterone specifically for menopausal women only? Against NICE guidelines. Against BNF guidance. Against BMS information. Which they include in an incomplete and misleading manner. And are only one of three practices in the county that refuse?

OP posts:

OnlyOnAFriday · 25/10/2025 19:26

Tistheseason17 · 25/10/2025 19:12

Most GP practices are funded to do this as part of a Local Enhances Service for medicines management, which is why you are prescribed and monitored by your GP and there is a formal shared care agreement in place which is criteria based.

Show quote history

Is that shared care between the local nhs hospital and gp? Or does it also stand for any private drs someone may have seen? I don’t think the OP has said but I wonder if the gynaecologist is private?

Tistheseason17 · 25/10/2025 19:12

DuchessofStaffordshire · 25/10/2025 18:59

But it sounds like the clinic (consultant) have prescribed it in this case and asked the GP to continue to issue scripts. This is commonplace. My psychiatrist has prescribed me Lithium which requires an alert card and careful monitoring. She has also requested that the GP continue to prescribe and manage it accordingly with blood tests etc

Show quote history

Most GP practices are funded to do this as part of a Local Enhances Service for medicines management, which is why you are prescribed and monitored by your GP and there is a formal shared care agreement in place which is criteria based.

Tistheseason17 · 25/10/2025 19:11

OP - Why aren't you angry at the specialist who wont prescribe it?

Also, I have 1 GP who can prescribe - but our practice policy is NOT to prescribe as 1 GP is not enough. What happens when they are off sick or on annual leave?

We have a policy that is equitable. It is not misogynistic to not prescribe off licence. We also do not prescribe and monitor ADHD meds or transgender meds as we are not experts in these areas. Not sure why some think this is misogyny or discrimination - its equitable treatment.

Also, please think about all the people saying, "but what about me..." if a GP practice did all of secondary care work when would we actually see patients we are contracted to see?

We cannot do hospital and GP work but we still have this pressure and posts like this show a deep misunderstanding of what your GP is actually paid to do.

Be angry at your consultant who CAN and should prescribe it - not your GP.

DuchessofStaffordshire · 25/10/2025 18:59

Toddlerteaplease · 25/10/2025 18:29

I completely agree. It’s their registration on the line if anything goes wrong. The clinic should prescribe it.

Show quote history

But it sounds like the clinic (consultant) have prescribed it in this case and asked the GP to continue to issue scripts. This is commonplace. My psychiatrist has prescribed me Lithium which requires an alert card and careful monitoring. She has also requested that the GP continue to prescribe and manage it accordingly with blood tests etc

GaIadriel · 25/10/2025 18:43

I don't think it helps to make it a battle of the sexes though, OP.

Men have a tough time getting prescribed steroids too. Specifically because of the negative stereotypes associated with men abusing anabolics. If a man who looks like he lifts weights/has a rugby physique asks his GP to test for low testosterone/enquires about TRT, he'll often be given the third degree and treated with suspicion. Probably even more so by male doctors.

This was defo the case with my ex training partner who is a pretty muscular guy. The doctor actually commented that he'd be surprised if he had low testosterone going by how strong a beard he had and by his physique.

Didn't ask any questions about whether he'd ever had a head or groin injury etc, or if he'd ever taken anabolic steroids. When he saw the private doctor the first thing they did was test his pituitary gland and look for symptoms of a thyroid problem etc.

Silverbirchleaf · 25/10/2025 18:37

You still haven’t answered why the consultant hasn’t prescribed it?

Jumpingthruhoops · 25/10/2025 18:34

Can't you get it privately?

GaIadriel · 25/10/2025 18:33

Silverbirchleaf · 25/10/2025 18:30

It is not the duty of the gp to blindly issue repeat prescriptions. Consultants are not Gods that GPs have to bow down to. They’re all doctors, but have just followed different professional routes. Consultants advise and recommend in their field, but it’s up to the individual GP to decide whether they accept this recommendation.

Show quote history

This is true, but it's also open to abuse. My mate's GP apparently told him that in an ideal world everybody would be treated but they had to consider costs. This was for about £20 of testosterone a month and a yearly blood panel. For a 35yo who hadn't been able to have sex in seven years and had hoped to one day have a family.

Original poster

Peoplecoveredinfish · 25/10/2025 18:32

rainingsnoring · 25/10/2025 16:23

Is there a particular reason why you can't write to them in a calm way instead of 'losing your shit'?
It looks as if Androfeme was licensed only 2 months ago. Prior to that, testosterone was not licensed for women in the UK. The fact that they prescribe for men is irrelevant and so is your imagined bias against women. You need to calm down and present the facts.

Show quote history

What is not factual?

Of course I am angry at being discriminated against and having to do my GP's job for them. Why shouldn't I be? I shouldn't be rude - and haven't been. Women are allowed to be angry if they at treated poorly, no?

I know Androfeme was only licenced in August. And so does my Gynae. But the GP, who feels they have the right to make withhold this medication for all women in the practice, doesn't. And while the testosterone has only recently been licenced, the NICE guidelines have said doctors should consider prescribing testosterone for HDSS for TEN YEARS. There IS evidence that it is safe. There IS evidence of it's efficacy for HDSS. Meds in general and HRT in particular ARE usually prescribed like this. But one doctor is keeping the entire practice from prescribing it for menopausal women at all, even within the guidelines, even with specialist advice, without knowing the patient's clinical history, because they feel their knowledge is superior, while using the fact that is isn't as a reason not to. When that is out of date now and was wrong before anyway? Which proves my point they are not competent to make the decision.

The fact they prescribe it for men IS relevant. They have said it was unfamiliar. It is not. If there are clinicians who are able to prescribe it for men, it is hardly a great feat of medical skill to review the evidence and guidelines on prescribing for women, is it? I've done it this afternoon. And even if it were never prescribed for men, that is no excuse not to have the skills in the practice to be unable to provide a fairly basic medication half of the population may need if they live long enough to reach menopause. Medical misogyny is not imagined. And women are absolutely entitled to be angry about it.

OP posts:

OnlyOnAFriday · 25/10/2025 18:31

sosorryimnotsorry · 25/10/2025 18:09

YADNBU the GP is hugely unreasonable. Your consultant has prescribed it and it is the duty of the GP to issue repeat prescriptions. I would be making complaints to the practice manager, CQC and my MP frankly.
We have put up with piss poor service from GP practices for far too long. I would be furious if my practice acted in this manner and would move practices if necessary.

No it isn’t, especially not when the medication isn’t licensed for this issue.

so say if I’d heard that mounjaro helps with my adhd symptoms and a private dr agreed with me and wrote to my GP to tell them to prescribe it. Should I get it on the nhs prescribed by my GP?