Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Marriages don’t last anymore because..

386 replies

PictureImperfect · 24/10/2025 08:21

Had a debate with an colleague about why divorce seems so much more common now.

They said that in past generations, couples stayed together because they wanted to work through things and were more committed to making relationships last. I said I think it’s mainly because women have more freedom and independence now. Yes, most of the childcare still falls on women, but that was even more true in the past. Back then, loads of women didn’t have the opportunity to work full time and build careers like their husbands, so they relied on them for financial stability. Now that women can provide their own stability, they’re simply less likely to tolerate an unhappy marriage.

To me, that just seems like basic common sense but my colleague laughed and said I was completely wrong. According to them, people today just can’t be bothered to put in the effort and treat relationships as disposable. They also scoffed when I said women still don’t have the same opportunities as men.

It’s had me thinking, I honestly thought this was just obvious, but now I’m wondering what others think. AIBU, or is my colleague?

OP posts:
HedwigEliza · 24/10/2025 20:07

JHound · 24/10/2025 18:45

I often hear misogynists say this and it’s so confusing.

Most of the women I know live off neither the state nor a husband. We have jobs.

Do we not exist as women? Are we unwoman? A new sex class not previously identified? What should our pronouns be if we are no longer women?

Edited

What a bizarre response. Why all the strawmen arguments?

PictureImperfect · 24/10/2025 19:57

Rustymoo · 24/10/2025 18:38

One of my friends is ex police and the same happened to her. As for mothers working part time, that’s their choice. The comment men are always hired as they are the best person for the job can be true in some instances. My husband was looking to employ a senior leader. A woman stood head and shoulders above all other candidates and as per equality etc he never asked about children etc. She assured him that overseas travel etc at short notice wouldn’t be an issue. He offered her the job. Once employed this became a huge issue. She was required to go away for 3 weeks (with a week’s notice) which she said as a mother she couldn’t as she didn’t want to leave her young child for that long. He asked if the child would be with his dad and she said yes, that wasn’t the issue. The issue was she didn’t want to be away that long. She resigned and she was replaced by a man. Some women don’t do themselves any favours.

Edited

To build on my previous post, I’ll give you an example.

The company I work for is headquartered in London and requires the CEO to live there. We had a woman CEO who moved over from Germany, and the amount of times I heard people question how she could move away from her kids was ridiculous, and believe me, it was frequent, because I challenged it every time I heard it. Needless to say, when she moved on and was replaced by a man from the US, I never once heard anyone question how he could have left his children in the US.

There are different expectations placed on mothers from the outset, so it’s no wonder they succumb to the pressure of ‘mum guilt’ more easily.

OP posts:
PictureImperfect · 24/10/2025 19:50

Rustymoo · 24/10/2025 18:38

One of my friends is ex police and the same happened to her. As for mothers working part time, that’s their choice. The comment men are always hired as they are the best person for the job can be true in some instances. My husband was looking to employ a senior leader. A woman stood head and shoulders above all other candidates and as per equality etc he never asked about children etc. She assured him that overseas travel etc at short notice wouldn’t be an issue. He offered her the job. Once employed this became a huge issue. She was required to go away for 3 weeks (with a week’s notice) which she said as a mother she couldn’t as she didn’t want to leave her young child for that long. He asked if the child would be with his dad and she said yes, that wasn’t the issue. The issue was she didn’t want to be away that long. She resigned and she was replaced by a man. Some women don’t do themselves any favours.

Edited

I think you’ve missed my point a bit here. Saying ‘some women don’t do themselves any favours’ is quite a sexist take and ignores the bigger picture. Women are socialised from a young age to be the primary caregivers, so of course they feel conflicted about leaving their kids for weeks at a time. If the same expectations were placed on men, from an early age, a lot of them would feel exactly the same.

The problem isn’t that women cant hack senior roles, it’s that workplaces are still built around old assumptions that there’s someone at home taking care of everything else. Companies could easily navigate this by rethinking which travel is genuinely essential, or sharing travel responsibilities between leaders.

And honestly, if we did put the same expectation on dads and they felt comfortable to start saying ‘I can’t be away from my kids for that long’ without anyone raising an eyebrow, this stops being a gender issue and just becomes normal work life balance. It’s not women who need to change, it’s the system.

OP posts:
Thepeopleversuswork · 24/10/2025 19:01

@Growlybear83

Not at all. People need to work hard to have successful and happy marriages. If they’re not prepared to commit to doing that, I don’t see the point in getting married.

Well, full disclosure I don't see the point of getting married, so maybe not qualified to comment.

But I've always thought the idea of "working hard" at marriage is a bit of an oxymoron? A marriage isn't meant to be hard work. It's meant to be supportive, fun, interesting. If I want "hard work" I'll go out and earn money.

Of course all marriages have ups and downs and you can't expect it to be sunshine and rainbows all the time. But if the duration of the marriage takes on this enormous importance such that is greater than the happiness of the two people involved in it then it it seems to me its outlived its use?

Put simply, a marriage is a great thing when it works, its a nightmare when it doesn't work. Keeping a dead marriage going out of a sense of duty seems the height of futility to me.

JHound · 24/10/2025 18:47

pointythings · 24/10/2025 18:40

Well, exactly. My DC were older teens when everything went tits up, and what they have learned is that it is possible to walk away from a marriage and for things to be better afterwards. They have learned that it is possible to live in a peaceful, stable, happy household where nobody is drunk, shouty and threatening. They have also learned that you don't need a man or a relationship to be happy because I have stayed single - and will continue to be so. There are so many post-marriage models that it really isn't necessary to focus on the 'single mum with five kids by five dads' trope.

My nan never remarried after her divorce (she never wanted to live with a man again.)

My parents split after 10 years together. My dad has been with his partner for just over 30 years and my mother with my step-dad for almost 30.

I mean - look at the king!

I also wish my parents had split a lot earlier. I learned good things about their split but bad things from their relationship.

JHound · 24/10/2025 18:45

HedwigEliza · 24/10/2025 09:19

Women can marry the state instead and be supported by the taxpayer instead of a husband. So women are enabled to make poor decisions in choosing the father of their children, and men can walk away from their responsibilities knowing the state will pick up the tab.

I often hear misogynists say this and it’s so confusing.

Most of the women I know live off neither the state nor a husband. We have jobs.

Do we not exist as women? Are we unwoman? A new sex class not previously identified? What should our pronouns be if we are no longer women?

pointythings · 24/10/2025 18:40

JHound · 24/10/2025 18:31

Why assume this is the outcome? Some people divorce and remain single or have long, happy and HEALTHY second marriages.

Well, exactly. My DC were older teens when everything went tits up, and what they have learned is that it is possible to walk away from a marriage and for things to be better afterwards. They have learned that it is possible to live in a peaceful, stable, happy household where nobody is drunk, shouty and threatening. They have also learned that you don't need a man or a relationship to be happy because I have stayed single - and will continue to be so. There are so many post-marriage models that it really isn't necessary to focus on the 'single mum with five kids by five dads' trope.

Rustymoo · 24/10/2025 18:38

PictureImperfect · 24/10/2025 12:02

You still have to acknowledge that it was harder back then, which feeds into why women were less likely to leave unhappy marriages - life was harder for them.

There’s a woman in my office, a former police officer, who told me that when she had her DC she had to leave the force because there was no option to work PT, and in the 80s, it was assumed that mothers would leave/reduce work to become the primary caregiver. The colleague in my OP seemed to think that having children had no negative impact on either parent and that it was purely a mother’s choice to step back from work. I’m honestly still reeling that he suggested leadership teams are full of men simply because they ‘hire the best person for the role.’

One of my friends is ex police and the same happened to her. As for mothers working part time, that’s their choice. The comment men are always hired as they are the best person for the job can be true in some instances. My husband was looking to employ a senior leader. A woman stood head and shoulders above all other candidates and as per equality etc he never asked about children etc. She assured him that overseas travel etc at short notice wouldn’t be an issue. He offered her the job. Once employed this became a huge issue. She was required to go away for 3 weeks (with a week’s notice) which she said as a mother she couldn’t as she didn’t want to leave her young child for that long. He asked if the child would be with his dad and she said yes, that wasn’t the issue. The issue was she didn’t want to be away that long. She resigned and she was replaced by a man. Some women don’t do themselves any favours.

JHound · 24/10/2025 18:37

Horsie · 24/10/2025 14:28

Sigh. I find that it's always the happily married people who trot out this line about people not being as committed anymore. Perhaps they have gone through challenges in their own marriages and have been able to work them out, so it's a kind of self-congratulatory pat on the back. And good for them if they have worked things out.

However, I find it very rude, because to an extent, they have had an element of random good luck as well as working at it. No amount of working on a marriage can change an abusive person into a non-abusive person, or a serial cheat into a faithful spouse, or an addict into a sober spouse, unless the person really wants to change and commits to it. And how often does that happen?

They also seem oblivious to the fact that many abusers only let their mask slip once you are good and trapped, as happened to me.

The attitude described by the OP is SO rude, because so many divorced people have tried to move heaven and earth to keep their marriages together, and flogged and flogged a dead horse. People with this attitude have NO idea why a given person's marriage broke up, so they should stop with the judgement. Yes, there are always going to be people who don't take marriage seriously, but most people value their marriages highly and don't let go of them lightly.

And also, people with the attitude that OP describes should be aware of the saying about glass houses...As those of us who had bad spouses know, you really have so little control. If one person decides to cheat or gamble or whatever, there's nothing you can do to stop that. They can find themselves on the other side of the divorce debate in a trice, through no fault of their own, so they should practise some humility.

This!!!

”Oh people aren’t willing to compromise!”

Lucky you - you have a spouse willing to compromise and work with you. What if you don’t?!

JHound · 24/10/2025 18:36

CatHairEveryWhereNow · 24/10/2025 13:26

Likelyhood of getting married at all is now highly social economic dependent - higher social economically you are more likely marriage is.

So fewer marriage is why there a drop in divorse - couples never married in first place. 51% of births in UK are outside marriage or civil partnerships.

While co-habiting in Europre including UK isn't as unstable as USA but it's less stable than marriage.

I think kids make a massive difference - once they exist to often the additional tasks fall on mothers causing resentment- then once kids leave home things change and more splits. If you seeing it going up I wonder if it's your social group and I wonder if it's an age range thing or things like youngish kids or kids leaving home.

Edited

Saying cohabitation is less stable than marriage makes no sense as it’s a self selecting sample. A lot of married couples see cohabitation as a first step to assess long term compatibility. And more than a few will realise they are actually not suited long term and split.

Almost nobody is going to marry as a “first step” to commitment and to assess long term suitability.

So of course, on paper, marriage is more stable.

Elsvieta · 24/10/2025 18:31

People just "can't be bothered" with their marriages like they used to? What, human nature just sort of spontaneously changed? That makes about as much sense as the idea that the obesity rate keeps going up because the entire population got greedier and lazier (which just happened to everyone at once, but is also entirely within everyone's control, and the solution is for them to all stop being greedy and lazy). Your friend just doesn't sound very bright, really - s/he clearly hasn't actually really thought about this at all. Sound like someone who runs on prejudices and assumptions and never really thinks about anything at all.

Yes, I think part of the reason is that being single no longer has to mean destitution for women. Try asking your dim acquaintance why they think three-quarters of divorces are instigated by women.

I think another important factor is the general acceptance of serial monogamy, premarital sex and living together without being married (people used to pretend it was all about morality, but the fact is that as soon as we had the pill, attitudes changed fast). I mean, if leaving your spouse meant never having sex again, perhaps a lot of people would be slower to do it.

JHound · 24/10/2025 18:31

HedwigEliza · 24/10/2025 13:13

The children are punished anyway by their parents example - a series of low-value relationships and not-so-happily blended families isn’t something to aspire to. Girls and boys grow up lacking accountability for their actions knowing someone else will pick up the tab regardless.

Why assume this is the outcome? Some people divorce and remain single or have long, happy and HEALTHY second marriages.

JHound · 24/10/2025 18:28

Hons123 · 24/10/2025 16:18

A lot of studies have been done and it has been concluded, by most, that it is not financial independence (working women earning a crust) that is to blame for the disintegration of the family unit, but a social, i.e. welfare state. Reliance on the welfare state is the main contributing factor. Same goes for loneliness - welfare state-pension-social workers-meals on wheels - no need to be nice to your children and look after your grandchildren in exchange for a warm corner and one bowl of soup a day.

Anything is true when you make it up.

Crikeyalmighty · 24/10/2025 18:18

@Horsie yep and how many of us would not have believed that our partners could turn into alcoholics, porn addicts, sex pests, chronic gamblers, work shy, totally useless at domesticity etc- or combinations of !! there’s a lot of very intelligent women on here with great jobs who have been knocked sideways, women who would have thought they made smart choices- the implication is often that we go round choosing complete losers when the reality is that people can change , whether that’s at 3 years, 13 years or 30 years into the relationship

MeridaBrave · 24/10/2025 18:17

Women have more Independence so can leave but also there is less stigma on divorce so less motivation to compromise (this could be seen as less inclined to put effort in). I guess it depends on what the issue is; I would probably have asked the colleague if they thought women should tolerate ongoing repeated not violent domestic abuse.

If you look at insular (religious) communities where there is still stigma the divorce rates are often low. Men in these group might say it’s because their marriage are more successful, I just think it’s because the women have less options.

JHound · 24/10/2025 18:14

Growlybear83 · 24/10/2025 17:20

@JHound. I see the ending of a marriage as a failure - surely everyone enters into a marriage with the intention of it being for the rest of their lives? If that doesn’t happen, for whatever reason, then I think it is a failure.

Why? Yes you enter marriage expecting it to last but factors change. If factors change in such a way that you are no longer compatible why is it a failure to part?

Is a marriage that lasts till death of one spouse but marred by infidelity, disrespect and complete incompatibility a “success” purely because it lasted? It’s such an odd point of view. I don’t get why “permanence” is the marker of success.

JHound · 24/10/2025 18:12

OutsideLookingOut · 24/10/2025 17:31

Is just staying in a marriage a success? Most people could have successful marriages by that token if they are willing to put up with anything.

Ignore me - I misread.

Crikeyalmighty · 24/10/2025 18:11

@Horsie couldn’t agree with you more - marriage shouldn’t be a penance

DryIce · 24/10/2025 18:05

RowanRed90 · 24/10/2025 13:27

I think higher expectations for "happiness" is a large contributer to the epidemic of depression, anxiety and loneliness. So yes! These expectations are a bad thing

I agree in the sense of aspiring to an Instagram lifestyle.

But when I refer to higher expectations in marriage, I mean - expecting more than someone earns an income, who mows the lawn and who doesn't beat you. And I don't think it is a bad thing that women are less likely to be shackled to abusive men for financial or social reasons.

Horsie · 24/10/2025 17:50

Growlybear83 · 24/10/2025 17:20

@JHound. I see the ending of a marriage as a failure - surely everyone enters into a marriage with the intention of it being for the rest of their lives? If that doesn’t happen, for whatever reason, then I think it is a failure.

I used to think that, too.

I was in an abusive marriage and then was left by my abuser. I would not have left, because I had swallowed all the lines about divorce being a failure etc. and that you just have to work on it.

Being on the other side if an abusive marriage, it doesn't feel like a failure, it feels like a rebirth. It feels cleansing and like a second chance at peace. I think if your marriage is truly toxic, as mine was no matter what I did, then divorce is a very healthy choice.

I know that there are people who will judge me, as is clear on this thread. They think I've failed or that I didn't try hard enough. And that's fine, I don't care at all, because they have NO idea what they're talking about. Or what went on behind closed doors. If judgement when I meet people is the price to pay for my rebirth, that's OK. And it really does feel like a rebirth. To live without being bullied all the time, it's absolute bliss.

Nowadays, I think it's a pity that so many people remain trapped in bad marriages because of all the stigma and judgement. We can see from this thread that it still exists. Bad marriages that cannot be improved because one party is seriously flawed are VERY bad for your health. Both mentally and physically. We should be encouraging these kinds of marriages to end. It's better for everyone, not a failure.

pointythings · 24/10/2025 17:43

Randomesttnought · 24/10/2025 17:32

You mean as in the men leave but dont file?

Thanks this is interesting.

It's actually typical male behaviour. It happens in relationships at all ages - the men behave incredibly badly so that the women break up with them - making it All Their Fault and making her The Crazy Ex.

pointythings · 24/10/2025 17:41

Growlybear83 · 24/10/2025 17:20

@JHound. I see the ending of a marriage as a failure - surely everyone enters into a marriage with the intention of it being for the rest of their lives? If that doesn’t happen, for whatever reason, then I think it is a failure.

I see it in a far more nuanced light, but then I would because my marriage ended due to my husband's addiction and concomitant abusive behaviour. If there was failure, it was his - I can hand on heart say I did everything humanly possible to help him, which resulted in my staying in the marriage too long.

Horsie · 24/10/2025 17:40

222days · 24/10/2025 16:01

A very good post. It is all rather smug and self-congratulatory, isn’t it?

And yet how many times do we see here posts from women in total shock whose husband - often after 20+ years of marriage - has just been discovered to be having an affair/ having sex with prostitutes/ gambling or whatever, who were completely oblivious and convinced this could never happen to them and say “I would never have believed he was the kind of man to do this!”?

Yet, simultaneously, there are posters who try to disparage people who have got divorced - for very good reasons - telling them they “should have made better choices about who to marry”, as if any of that is foreseeable decades ahead. The cognitive dissonance involved is immense and, as always, it boils down to trying to blame women for men’s behaviour.

Whenever I read such comments I do think the posters writing them are tempting fate in a rather provocative manner.

I agree so much with all this.

And the making better choices thing...I guess they've never experienced love-bombing. Or had a front-row seat at a man's mid-life crisis. My friend's husband was so in love with her when they got married, and about a decade on, he changed completely. Drinking heavily, affairs, trouble with the law...horrendous. Of all the couples who I thought might get divorced, they were pretty much the last one I'd have expected. Then there's another couple in that group where the husband is a serial cheater and has been since before they married and had kids, and twenty years on they're still together!!

Sometimes I really think that staying together isn't any indicator of marital quality at all.

Yes, the cognitive dissonance is immense, and yes, the smugness is somewhat tempting fate. I suppose it's to stave off the fact that we know, deep down, we have no control of our marital fate. You can be the best spouse in the world, but ultimately you are only 50% of the equation. Marriage is a truly enormous risk. I had no idea how much, when I got married.

Growlybear83 · 24/10/2025 17:33

OutsideLookingOut · 24/10/2025 17:31

Is just staying in a marriage a success? Most people could have successful marriages by that token if they are willing to put up with anything.

Not at all. People need to work hard to have successful and happy marriages. If they’re not prepared to commit to doing that, I don’t see the point in getting married.

Randomesttnought · 24/10/2025 17:32

MeTooOverHere · 24/10/2025 13:18

Yes women file the paperwork most of the time. Seems to me a lot of the time the men have already voted with their feet by that time.

You mean as in the men leave but dont file?

Thanks this is interesting.