Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The £100k childcare cliff edge - how is anyone meant to make this work?

262 replies

Saladleaf · 21/10/2025 22:06

I completely understand that on paper, a six-figure household income sounds like a lot. I’m not trying to be ignorant of the fact that many people are struggling far more. But for anyone actually living it, especially in the South East, the reality feels very different once you factor in childcare costs.

We’re looking at full-time nursery fees of around £2,500 a month per child, and I honestly don’t know how families are supposed to make it work once you hit the £100k cliff edge and lose access to the 30 free hours. It’s completely unsustainable.

I know some people say you can get around it by putting more into your pension so your income technically falls below the threshold, but that just isn’t realistic for everyone. With the cost of living, mortgage, and general expenses, we simply can’t afford to take home hundreds less each month. We already don’t have holidays, don’t buy new clothes, and don’t even have a car. There isn’t any more to cut back.

It’s not even about wanting handouts, it’s that full-priced childcare in this country is so eye-wateringly expensive that it makes working impossible for many women. The system actually discourages the lower earner, usually the mother, from staying in work.

A friend of mine is a good example. Her husband earns over the threshold, and she’s just spent years retraining into a new career that she’s passionate about, but is now entry level. We worked out that if they have a baby, it would literally cost them money they can't afford for her to keep working once childcare, rising mortgage payments and bills are factored in. She’d have to give it all up. It’s so demoralising.

And the whole system makes no sense. Two people earning £99k each can claim free hours, but one person earning £100k can’t. Someone on £50k with one child gets support, but a couple on £100k with two children get nothing, even though their childcare costs are double and they are taxed more. It’s not unreasonable to have worked hard, built a decent career and want two children, but the government seems to penalise you for it.

Other countries manage to offer affordable childcare to everyone because they see it as essential. Here it just feels like you’re being punished for trying to do well. For those of us in the South East, it’s even harder. Living costs are sky high, childcare is extortionate, and it’s not realistic to just move somewhere cheaper when your jobs and lives are here.

It feels like you’re being backed into a corner. I find it so demoralising that the system seems designed to push mothers out of their careers, especially when you’ve worked so hard to build one in the first place. AIBU in feeling like this?

OP posts:
seasid · 21/10/2025 22:18

while I agree with the sentiment - what is the solution? If low income people didn’t get help with the childcare benefit - then they wouldn’t be able to work and would have to rely on benefits solely. Then this would be another thing that people would complain about. There’s no solution other than if the government do what they do in other countries and have free childcare at people’s workplaces or overall just free childcare as a whole. But it’s not like that and people have to work- so it makes sense that people who earn less get help with childcare to allow those to work and if people can afford it because they earn over the threshold then they pay for it themselves

Theyreeatingthedogs · 21/10/2025 22:18

EmeraldRoulette · 21/10/2025 22:09

@Saladleaf I agree with your point about the cliff edge

Not sure about the rest of it

Who brought in this cliff edge? Government spend so much time tinkering around with weird stuff but really obvious oddities don't get changed. But I actually don't know how this one was created in the first place.

It was Jeremy Hunt. Remember him?

Saladleaf · 21/10/2025 22:17

mo25 · 21/10/2025 22:12

I agree. It’s a terrible policy and discourages growth. I actually think it’s too keep women in our place - the years you lose by stepping back from a professional role in your 30’s often mean it is difficult to reach your full potential in a career. Even on a healthy salary over £2000 a month on childcare (which probably won’t even allow you to do your job so you are stuck working in the evening as that is generally what a six figure salary requires) is an excessive amount of money.

I agree, and it's forcing women who have worked just as hard as men in their careers to become a SAHP against their wishes, which is detrimental to their career aspirations and general wellbeing. It's extremely hard being a SAHP with no support or village, and is not something you should be forced into. That's if you can even afford it on £100k in the South East with the cost of living.

OP posts:
24252627a · 21/10/2025 22:17

I agree here. The policy needs to be reassessed for 2025

Shamesame · 21/10/2025 22:14

Yep. At a point where I should be looking to be promoted I’m holding back and dropping a day to come in under that threshold. Win for me short term as more time with my baby, lose for me long term with regards to salary and pension.

Bunnycat101 · 21/10/2025 22:13

It is a temporary expense. People have been complaining about nursery fees for years and now there is more help than there ever was. It is a tough period of life if you’re working but for many people keeping a career and pension going are worth it longer-term. So yes women have been making decisions that might not be financially advantageous in the short term for ages re childcare and most of them will be earning much less than £100k.

Are the costs high? Yes. But they also should be high. Looking after babies and toddlers shouldn’t be done on the cheap. I remember a former minister (might have even been Liz Truss but I can’t remember) proposing lowering ratios for cheaper childcare and everyone was outraged.

mo25 · 21/10/2025 22:12

I agree. It’s a terrible policy and discourages growth. I actually think it’s too keep women in our place - the years you lose by stepping back from a professional role in your 30’s often mean it is difficult to reach your full potential in a career. Even on a healthy salary over £2000 a month on childcare (which probably won’t even allow you to do your job so you are stuck working in the evening as that is generally what a six figure salary requires) is an excessive amount of money.

MovingMad87 · 21/10/2025 22:12

I agree with you completely. The cost of childcare here is absurd. My cousins in Amsterdam are faring much better; their childcare costs are a third of ours.

Tralalalama · 21/10/2025 22:11

completely agree OP

Saladleaf · 21/10/2025 22:11

EmeraldRoulette · 21/10/2025 22:09

@Saladleaf I agree with your point about the cliff edge

Not sure about the rest of it

Who brought in this cliff edge? Government spend so much time tinkering around with weird stuff but really obvious oddities don't get changed. But I actually don't know how this one was created in the first place.

Exactly. I'd like to know what year it was brought in also, with no change in inflation or weighting to wildly varying living expenses across the UK.

OP posts:
EmeraldRoulette · 21/10/2025 22:09

@Saladleaf I agree with your point about the cliff edge

Not sure about the rest of it

Who brought in this cliff edge? Government spend so much time tinkering around with weird stuff but really obvious oddities don't get changed. But I actually don't know how this one was created in the first place.

WickedElpheba · 21/10/2025 22:08

Yes it doesn't make sense that two people can earn £90k and get the funding but a couple with one person earning £100k can't but it's the same with child benefit in that it's not a joint threshold. You should be able to afford nursery for one child with one of you on £100k though. It's not forever.