To think that Sadiq Khan needs investigated?

Why are you ignoring white nonces who got away with it or have not been punished?

Everything that's come to light the last few days. Just as much evidence as there is against Prince Andrew.

Look, I was abused as a child by my father, he was a white man. My concerns are with the girls, not men in a position of power. So imply I'm racist as much as you like, I don't give a single fuck, i care about those girls because I KNOW, first hand, how much people like you will handwave and dismiss in order to cover for men.

Ok, so why didn’t Khan talk about that 14,500 children in London when asked the question? Why did he act dumb?

Because he would have rather have played a political game in that meeting to score points over Hall than address the issue of those 14,500 children. Or he didn’t know about them. Or he did and didn’t care.

Either way, they didn’t matter to him.

Jimmy saville?

Bored of this now. When is Mumsnet going to get rid of these dodgy threads?

Virtue signalling would be Susan Hall pretending she cares about London's children, and yet not knowing what 'country lines' [sic] is even though it affected an estimated 14,500 children in London last year.

Where's your evidence for Khan being a nonce/cover?

I'm equalling people who may be themselves or cover for nonces, yes. Got a problem with that?

Why are you holding him specifically to account for the grooming gangs that are Muslim? Because he's brown?

Most grooming gangs in the UK, including the biggest one ever prosecuted, were all white.

Who are we pinning that on?

I'm guessing Starmer, yeah? 🙄

Are you seriously equating Sadiq Khan, thrice elected mayor of London, with Prince Andrew? On what grounds?

I did Google it, there isn't a single written source.

Can you give us a single quote? Anything?

A vile woman who Khan was more than willing to virtue signal to people thought she was a vile woman by refusing to engage in the issue of rape gangs in London.

So double the misogynist then.

It's OK to have an opinion on him apparently. Were people called racist for wanting him to being investigated? Nope.

Vile Woman.

“If the news sources I like don’t report on it, then harm to women and girls doesn’t matter.”

I feel like this negative opinion on Sadiq is racially motivated ..

@nomas you can listen to his allegations yourself if you’re that interested in the wide number of online interviews he’s given. Just google it, they are on X, Facebook and YouTube. It’s up to the Commission to decide if his allegations are credible.

Prince Andrew.

I’m more concerned about supporting abused girls than defending Sadiq Khan

The following year shows similar statistics. It's just that the right wing press will report on any Muslim grooming gangs which feeds into a narrative they want to promote, whereas actual figures show no real ethnic or religious trend, the problem is men, not their background.

www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/elon-musk-npcc-keir-starmer-nigel-farage-pakistani-b2677586.html

There are some snobby bastards on this thread, more than happy to sell working class little girls down the river in order that they can pat themselves on the back for 'Not Being A Racist'. Disgusting.

And yet you're unable to link to a single written allegation.

He specifically accuses Khan of continuing to deny the existence of grooming gangs despite Wedger allegedly having evidence that suggests Khan had previously been informed of their existence.

Can you link to it?

@nomas he says himself he will be appearing at the commission, seems an odd thing to lie about. He of course appeared at the 2018 International Tribunal for Natural Justice commission on human trafficking and child abuse.

As I’ve already said, he has given multiple interviews which are easily found online. Essentially his accusations against Sadiq Khan rest on allegations of wilful neglect and complicity in suppressing evidence of grooming and trafficking. He specifically accuses Khan of continuing to deny the existence of grooming gangs despite Wedger allegedly having evidence that suggests Khan had previously been informed of their existence.

If it’s in that famously neutral and unbiased publication the Daily Express, then it must be true.

I don't think anyone has said there is no child grooming in London.

Where does this article mention Sadiq Khan covering up grooming gangs?