To think that Sadiq Khan needs investigated?

From london.gov:

Susan Hall asks him about grooming gangs, he replies:

Sir Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The situation in London in relation to young people being groomed is different to other parts of the country. What we have in London is young people being groomed - to use your word, not mine - to be used in county lines in relation to sometimes --

Susan Hall AM: OK. Let me make it clear. Sorry, I was not clear enough. I was told I should not be saying rape gangs. They are rape gangs. I am not talking about county lines [she calls them country lines], but to go back, nobody likes me saying rape gangs, although they are rape gangs. Grooming gangs, that I would call rape gangs. Tell me about them. How many of those have we got? Not county lines. Those particular groups.

Sir Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): To avoid any misunderstanding, can she define what she means by that?

Susan Hall AM: Yes, if you look at what has gone on in Rotherham where there are people taking young girls and grooming them for sex. That is what I am talking about.

Sir Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We know in London there are issues about exploitation of young people, but they are not as defined by the Member in her definition of what those types of gangs are.

So he is answering her question.

Are you really concerned about defending abused girls? In that case why are you wasting everyone's time and effort by accusing random people? I don't think you care about abused girls at all. You are probably happy they exist so that they can fuel your racist hate campaign.

So you think it’s OK for Khan - the Mayor of London - to refuse to answer a question about grooming gangs in London.

Do you think Susan Hall cares about the young girls being used in county lines in London? Given she doesn't even know what it is?

She couldn't even say the word county line, she didn't know what it was.

And I don't think Susan Hall would prioritise women, given she says she wouldn't call herself a feminist, called Gemma Collins a “stupid fat blond woman”, and treated a pregnant employee badly.

Sorry- what does this mean?

I’m more concerned about supporting abused girls than defending Sadiq Khan

So you think it’s OK for Khan - the Mayor of London - to refuse to answer a question about grooming gangs in London.

I’m sure she does. She was on a clock. Why couldn’t Khan answer her question?

Are there grooming gangs in London?

Yes, there are grooming gangs in London. We are a very large city and unfortunately this issue hasn’t escaped us. I would infer from the questioner given her history that she is alluding to whether these gangs are of a particular race. Let me be clear that I won’t be drawn on the race specifics of the gangs. It should be clear to all from the uncovering of these gangs that they are of all races. But I will also make it clear to the women and girls of London that the race of any gang will not impact any investigation by the Metropolitan Police who will pursue these gangs without fear or favour, because the safety of women and girls is the priority.

Instead, we got, “sorry, I don’t get it”.

https://www.policeconduct.gov.uk/news/investigation-report-offensive-whatsapp-messages-officers-linked-wayne-couzens

Yes they were

Why him in particular? Most politicians (including some women - ever been to Govan?) do hee haw all about grooming gangs or sex offenders of any background because girls' lives, health, and safety simply don't matter in the face of the "needs", wants, and desires of men - unless perhaps the girls have rich, well-connected parents. They should all be investigated.

Gary glitter?

Am I the only one who has noticed what it starting to seem like a targeted campaign against Sadiq Khan across various forums and social media?

So you think it's ok for people to make accusations without any evidence about Khan as they've done on this thread?

Which brings us neatly to Wayne couzens.

Not one of the officers involved in his group chat about victims has ever been investigated.

@nomas the accusations concerning Khan are in the public domain. In the Express series of articles, repeated by Chris Philp in The Telegraph and picked up elsewhere.

Do you think Susan Hall cares about the young girls being used in county lines in London? Given she doesn't even know what it is?

Which brings us neatly to Wayne couzens.

Not one of the officers involved in his group chat about victims has ever been investigated.

https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/baroness-caseys-audit-of-group-based-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse

Very keen on naming home grown or Australian white paedophiles but gangs are a huge issue no matter what the colour and as far as im aware Gary glitter etc are sick individuals not gangs

Oh FFS
Children are being abused and you are only interested in throwing the “she’s a known racist” card
I don’t like racists but I REALLY don’t like people who use accusations of racism to cover up child abuse

Ched evans

@nomas the accusations concerning Khan are in the public domain. In the Express series of articles, repeated by Chris Philp in The Telegraph and picked up elsewhere.