Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To Think that Grad & Apprenticeships are now only for Diversity Candidates

810 replies

reallyreallycrazy · 21/10/2025 10:34

Slight hyperbole but not far off.

Yes, of course I suppose my DS should be appreciative of his 'white privilege' (I do detest the term though), but he's been applying to over 100 x spring & summer internships and apprenticeships.

Invariably, he finds that lots of programmes are only open to black/female/social mobility/ND candidates. In one recent case - a global consultancy - there were NO openings for anyone outside of these categories.

And today, on LinkedIn, he forwarded me several links from leading banks reaching out about apprenticeships etc. In most photos, you might be lucky to spot 1-2 white males and in the video of one, there were not a single white male (or female for that matter).

I get that these firms need to do outreach to disadvantaged groups but if you look at the population level percentage of the various group categories, this really has swung too far the other way.

I get that many of these organisations have years to catch up with diversity hires but to try to rebalance in such an aggressive way and in a short space of time, makes it very difficult for young, white males (unless they have qualified for 'free school meals') to get a foot in the door which is especially tough in an incredibly tough grad market as it is.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
Sassiskt · 25/02/2026 19:27

5128gap · 25/02/2026 19:22

BoE appears to disagree with you. Its statement is quite clear that to do its jobs well it feels it needs to reflect the society it serves, which means addressing underrepresentation of certain groups. So regardless of whether its an issue for PP, it's an issue for them. And it's probably fair to say they know their work better than people on here.

Are they going to ensure they get below average IQ people as well as above average too? I think we ought to know.

JustSomeWaferThinHam · 25/02/2026 19:26

5128gap · 25/02/2026 19:22

BoE appears to disagree with you. Its statement is quite clear that to do its jobs well it feels it needs to reflect the society it serves, which means addressing underrepresentation of certain groups. So regardless of whether its an issue for PP, it's an issue for them. And it's probably fair to say they know their work better than people on here.

And it's probably fair to say they know their work better than people on here.

I doubt it. According to HR experts they have probably set some arbitrary recruitment quota and are at the mercy of their EDI department. Listen to Tanya de Grunwald’s podcast on this, it’s fascinating.

MasterBeth · 25/02/2026 19:26

Cloudeee · 25/02/2026 13:55

What’s got you shocked? Surely nothing I’ve said? I haven’t even said I disagreed with these points but there’s a sizeable number of people that say every white person who does well is privileged and every white that dosent do well is lazy and useless including little kids who are apparently lazy losers on the fifth generation of lazy whiteness.

Then white people also get blamed for black kids who do badly at school (racist teachers) and knife crime.

You denying there’s people that think this way? Or has me pointing it out upset you?

I have never heard people talking like that, no. Who?

JustSomeWaferThinHam · 25/02/2026 19:24

nomas · 25/02/2026 19:17

The BoE are based in London and their staff demographics don’t reflect London’s demographics. They’re probably trying to even it up. Hence this initiative, which is not needed for their white intake.

Saying BoE staff is 80% white ≠ BoE shouldn’t have white staff.

So you’re suggesting that racial quotas for staff should be based on location demographics now? That will make HRs recruitment job even more interesting.

They also have offices based in Leeds so how many white employees are they allowed to have in Leeds? Will they say to a white candidate “you performed brilliantly at interview but we have too many white people working in London so we’ll have to relocate you to Leeds to give you a job”.

It would be fascinating for organisations based in my area, they would obviously not be required to have any racial quota at all as there are hardly any black or brown people here.

5128gap · 25/02/2026 19:22

Sassiskt · 25/02/2026 18:55

Maybe non-white people didn’t apply. Why is it an issue at all? Why so you spend so long worrying about the race of a candidate rather than how good they are at doing the job? The Bank of England doesn’t need to be representative of the country to do its job well. It needs the best people.

BoE appears to disagree with you. Its statement is quite clear that to do its jobs well it feels it needs to reflect the society it serves, which means addressing underrepresentation of certain groups. So regardless of whether its an issue for PP, it's an issue for them. And it's probably fair to say they know their work better than people on here.

nomas · 25/02/2026 19:22

JustSomeWaferThinHam · 25/02/2026 19:18

It’s like you have assumed that all black or brown people are automatically victims of discrimination and oppression which in my view is pretty patronising and has been rejected by many successful, high achieving black and brown people.

Lol, have you assumed I’m white?

nomas · 25/02/2026 19:20

Sassiskt · 25/02/2026 19:15

And Oxbridge are rowing back on this at a very fast pace because they realise that positive discrimination wasn’t getting the best students. And they want the best students.

What is your source? From (an admittedly quick) Google, I’m getting:

  • Strategic Plan 2024-27: The University has recently released its Collegiate University EDI Strategic Plan (2024-2027), which emphasizes that EDI is integral to their mission in teaching and
  • Active Programs: The University continues to run programs like the Astrophoria Foundation Year, Opportunity Oxford, and Academic Futures to support underrepresented students.
JustSomeWaferThinHam · 25/02/2026 19:18

nomas · 25/02/2026 19:01

It’s like you know nothing about inequality at all.

It’s like you have assumed that all black or brown people are automatically victims of discrimination and oppression which in my view is pretty patronising and has been rejected by many successful, high achieving black and brown people.

nomas · 25/02/2026 19:17

JustSomeWaferThinHam · 25/02/2026 19:12

White staff are over-represented at the BoE.

You said 80% of the staff are white, that is not over-represented.

Why would they have initiatives to increase their white intake?

Where did I say it’s about ‘increasing’ their white intake?

Who said BoE shouldn’t have white staff?

You said this, like it was a problem:

“You act like 80% of the BoE’s staff aren’t white.”

The BoE are based in London and their staff demographics don’t reflect London’s demographics. They’re probably trying to even it up. Hence this initiative, which is not needed for their white intake.

Saying BoE staff is 80% white ≠ BoE shouldn’t have white staff.

Sassiskt · 25/02/2026 19:15

grammargran · 25/02/2026 19:11

So many are either completely oblivious to the challenges of being a refugee/care leaver/disabled/in poverty and they literally can't think beyond "what about meeeee". I remember the Oxbridge threads used to have posters lamenting that their privately schooled DC were being discriminated against because state schooled children were being given access to coaching programmes. It's a sheer outrage that your privilege is being ever so slightly evened out.

And Oxbridge are rowing back on this at a very fast pace because they realise that positive discrimination wasn’t getting the best students. And they want the best students.

Sassiskt · 25/02/2026 19:14

I’m sick of this patronising assumption that we’re all racist or anti trans people or disabled etc etc if we don’t spread the jobs out evenly. Let’s look at the people studying economics. Mostly white and male. It’s no shock-horror that the majority of BofE staff are white males. They are the ones that are interested in economics!!!

JustSomeWaferThinHam · 25/02/2026 19:12

nomas · 25/02/2026 18:55

White staff are over-represented at the BoE.

Why would they have initiatives to increase their white intake?

Why shouldn’t 80% of the Bank of England staff be white and why is that relevant to you?

Who said BoE shouldn’t have white staff? Confused

Edited

White staff are over-represented at the BoE.

You said 80% of the staff are white, that is not over-represented.

Why would they have initiatives to increase their white intake?

Where did I say it’s about ‘increasing’ their white intake?

Who said BoE shouldn’t have white staff?

You said this, like it was a problem:

“You act like 80% of the BoE’s staff aren’t white.”

grammargran · 25/02/2026 19:11

MaddieJo22 · 25/02/2026 18:23

On the plus side, at least your daughter isn't a disabled, refugee in need of free school meals.

So many are either completely oblivious to the challenges of being a refugee/care leaver/disabled/in poverty and they literally can't think beyond "what about meeeee". I remember the Oxbridge threads used to have posters lamenting that their privately schooled DC were being discriminated against because state schooled children were being given access to coaching programmes. It's a sheer outrage that your privilege is being ever so slightly evened out.

nearlylovemyusername · 25/02/2026 19:09

grammargran · 25/02/2026 17:35

The point is that POC don't lack the qualifications, we are talking about 100 people applying for a job who all have the same qualifications. If you are Black/brown/disabled/trans it is much more likely you will be discriminated against in the process. Now that many recruiters do blind applications this helps, but you still have the interview process to contend with. There is a lot of research about even unconscious bias towards names that don't sound English for example. It's not the case that unqualified people are being given jobs because they are POC.

re blind applications - I'm still waiting for @Leadonmacduffs to come back and share the outcomes of their blind recruitment policy

Sassiskt · 25/02/2026 19:08

nomas · 25/02/2026 19:04

Oh Jesus, my PMS can’t take this today.

you don’t like the idea of people being judged by their talents only?

nomas · 25/02/2026 19:04

Sassiskt · 25/02/2026 19:03

Surely having schemes that CONTINUE to select people based on their skin colour not their actual talents only continues to perpetuate inequality.

Basing every job interview on the interviewees talents is surely the definition of equality. Ignoring skin colour entirely.

Edited

Oh Jesus, my PMS can’t take this today.

Sassiskt · 25/02/2026 19:03

nomas · 25/02/2026 19:01

It’s like you know nothing about inequality at all.

Surely having schemes that CONTINUE to select people based on their skin colour not their actual talents only continues to perpetuate inequality.

Basing every job interview on the interviewees talents is surely the definition of equality. Ignoring skin colour entirely.

nomas · 25/02/2026 19:03

Sassiskt · 25/02/2026 19:01

Why would they look at the skin colour of a job applicant? In what way is that even remotely relevant to their ability to do their job? Why does it matter at all?

🤦🏻‍♀️

I cant do this, this is painful.

nomas · 25/02/2026 19:01

Sassiskt · 25/02/2026 18:55

Maybe non-white people didn’t apply. Why is it an issue at all? Why so you spend so long worrying about the race of a candidate rather than how good they are at doing the job? The Bank of England doesn’t need to be representative of the country to do its job well. It needs the best people.

It’s like you know nothing about inequality at all.

Sassiskt · 25/02/2026 19:01

nomas · 25/02/2026 18:59

Why would they what?

Why would they look at the skin colour of a job applicant? In what way is that even remotely relevant to their ability to do their job? Why does it matter at all?

JustSomeWaferThinHam · 25/02/2026 19:01

MaddieJo22 · 25/02/2026 18:50

Yes, I'm happy for specific schemes that target minorities who historically haven't been given the same opportunities to exist. Like I said, it's imperfect, but lots of things are. Thinking pragmatically, I can't think of a better system, although I'm sure there is one. Similarly, I'm happy for Russell Group Universities - Oxbridge specifically, I suppose - to consider an application from a state school pupil differently to that of a fee-paying pupil.

who historically haven't been given the same opportunities to exist.

What are you talking about? They exist - no one said they don’t exist. Historically they didn’t exist here though as we are a majority white country.

I find it fascinating that you are so ‘anti racist’ that you are happy for much racist discrimination against young people who have done literally nothing but exist. This thread isn’t discussing giving a bit of extra targeted help or guidance to certain groups, we are talking about excluding young people from jobs and training in the basis of them being white. And you and PPs are comfortable with that.

nomas · 25/02/2026 18:59

Sassiskt · 25/02/2026 18:56

Why would they? Why is the colour of someone’s skin at all relevant?

Why would they what?

Sassiskt · 25/02/2026 18:56

nomas · 25/02/2026 18:55

White staff are over-represented at the BoE.

Why would they have initiatives to increase their white intake?

Why shouldn’t 80% of the Bank of England staff be white and why is that relevant to you?

Who said BoE shouldn’t have white staff? Confused

Edited

Why would they? Why is the colour of someone’s skin at all relevant?

Sassiskt · 25/02/2026 18:55

nomas · 25/02/2026 18:42

One of the Bank of England’s internship programmes

Key words there being ONE OF.

The BoE don’t exclude any applicants as a whole.

You act like 80% of the BoE’s staff aren’t white.

Maybe non-white people didn’t apply. Why is it an issue at all? Why so you spend so long worrying about the race of a candidate rather than how good they are at doing the job? The Bank of England doesn’t need to be representative of the country to do its job well. It needs the best people.

nomas · 25/02/2026 18:55

JustSomeWaferThinHam · 25/02/2026 18:53

So you haven’t looked at the Bank of England schemes (and have conveniently ignored all the other discriminatory organisations).

The Black Heritage Sponsored Internship pays internees an additional £5000 towards living costs on top of the salary. White internees don’t get any additional help. They are excluded from that scheme because of their skin colour and that could mean they can’t access any internship on financial grounds.

Why shouldn’t 80% of the Bank of England staff be white and why is that relevant to you?

White staff are over-represented at the BoE.

Why would they have initiatives to increase their white intake?

Why shouldn’t 80% of the Bank of England staff be white and why is that relevant to you?

Who said BoE shouldn’t have white staff? Confused