Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To Think that Grad & Apprenticeships are now only for Diversity Candidates

810 replies

reallyreallycrazy · 21/10/2025 10:34

Slight hyperbole but not far off.

Yes, of course I suppose my DS should be appreciative of his 'white privilege' (I do detest the term though), but he's been applying to over 100 x spring & summer internships and apprenticeships.

Invariably, he finds that lots of programmes are only open to black/female/social mobility/ND candidates. In one recent case - a global consultancy - there were NO openings for anyone outside of these categories.

And today, on LinkedIn, he forwarded me several links from leading banks reaching out about apprenticeships etc. In most photos, you might be lucky to spot 1-2 white males and in the video of one, there were not a single white male (or female for that matter).

I get that these firms need to do outreach to disadvantaged groups but if you look at the population level percentage of the various group categories, this really has swung too far the other way.

I get that many of these organisations have years to catch up with diversity hires but to try to rebalance in such an aggressive way and in a short space of time, makes it very difficult for young, white males (unless they have qualified for 'free school meals') to get a foot in the door which is especially tough in an incredibly tough grad market as it is.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Thread gallery
13
Beesandhoney123 · 16/03/2026 21:47

Have you rtt? There are many roles in the civil service for example which only accept applicants from a minority background. So if you aren't from a minority background, you can't apply.

Its not illegal, as our own government are doing it. Not that that means much.

BoringBarbie · 16/03/2026 09:01

Beesandhoney123 · 16/03/2026 07:13

@BoringBarbie this thread is about young people not being allowed to apply for jobs because they are white, not minority, never been in trouble with thd police, parents maybe went to uni.

Your point that the ops son should work harder makes no sense. Surely it doesn't matter how hard he works, if he can't apply to jobs because he isn't diverse enough, and his parents don't help, what with them maybe been at university. Male or female he can't apply.

Our young people should not be punished . It its all about equality, and encourage diversity, everyone should be able to apply to a job that is looking for applicants.

There are not jobs that he can't apply to due to being white, that's illegal. There are schemes aimed at helping people from certain backgrounds to be ready to apply for jobs.

Beesandhoney123 · 16/03/2026 07:13

@BoringBarbie this thread is about young people not being allowed to apply for jobs because they are white, not minority, never been in trouble with thd police, parents maybe went to uni.

Your point that the ops son should work harder makes no sense. Surely it doesn't matter how hard he works, if he can't apply to jobs because he isn't diverse enough, and his parents don't help, what with them maybe been at university. Male or female he can't apply.

Our young people should not be punished . It its all about equality, and encourage diversity, everyone should be able to apply to a job that is looking for applicants.

BoringBarbie · 09/03/2026 11:36

reallyreallycrazy · 09/03/2026 09:26

Of course it doesn't minimise the achievement. But it does mean that there will be very able kids who are not progressed to the level they should be because there is such a 'race' amongst others. Plus in certain professions, it might be that those who have put all hours into studying to get to a certain level have hit their ceiling - I guess Oxbridge are partly now trying to introduce non-teachable entrance tests for this reason.

So what if you are very able?

I'm academically gifted, on the border between moderate and highly. I can ace any unteachable test because I have a very high IQ. If I could be bothered, maybe I'd be a genius.

I am not at all motivated. I'm fine with that, I earn less than I might do but do the minimum required to do my job well and have no interest in advancing further. I have to really push myself to do enough exercise so I don't turn into a potato. I also have medical issues which cause chronic fatigue so combined with my general attitude I am completely unsuitable for anything competitive or fast paced. There's probably also an element of ND burnout which happened in my teens and I don't think I ever fully recovered from.

Put me alongside a person of average intelligence but with an excellent work ethic and the ability to survive on 4 hours sleep and I would be by far a less attractive candidate to any university or employer which is as it should be- they want it a lot more.

If your son isn't getting the opportunities you believe he's entitled to and has the ability to get, then he needs to work as hard as the people who are getting them. And if he doesn't want to, that's the choice he's made.

Simplestars · 09/03/2026 10:01

reallyreallycrazy · 09/03/2026 09:26

Of course it doesn't minimise the achievement. But it does mean that there will be very able kids who are not progressed to the level they should be because there is such a 'race' amongst others. Plus in certain professions, it might be that those who have put all hours into studying to get to a certain level have hit their ceiling - I guess Oxbridge are partly now trying to introduce non-teachable entrance tests for this reason.

Competition has always been part of academic and professional selection. If some students put more time into study and preparation, the bar naturally rises.
That doesn’t mean others are being unfairly held back it just means the competition is stronger. Effort, discipline and preparation are exactly what most professions require long term, not just 'natural ability'.

reallyreallycrazy · 09/03/2026 09:26

Simplestars · 09/03/2026 08:44

There will always be a bell curve of ability across every group. Some kids are naturally gifted, most are average, and some struggle.
What you’re describing is really just different parenting priorities. Some families emphasise academics more, others focus more on balance with sport and other activities. Hard work and preparation don’t make achievement less valid.

Of course it doesn't minimise the achievement. But it does mean that there will be very able kids who are not progressed to the level they should be because there is such a 'race' amongst others. Plus in certain professions, it might be that those who have put all hours into studying to get to a certain level have hit their ceiling - I guess Oxbridge are partly now trying to introduce non-teachable entrance tests for this reason.

OP posts:
Simplestars · 09/03/2026 08:44

reallyreallycrazy · 09/03/2026 07:59

Of course it's not the case of all, but many. My YP goes to a school with a huge intake of both UK-based / born and international Chinese students. They generally don't do the whole cricket, rugby, hockey thing.

More the music (grade 8 by 10 - maybe I'm exaggerating a bit, but many are exceptional), and are always at the top of the music and maths competitions.

Sorry if that's a 'stereotype', but I do I DO think there is a huge cultural thing at play here. I have friends (Chinese, ex HK) who said they were even brought up expecting to work 6-10pm every day after school from a young age. They said they'd tried to temper this - lived in the UK for 20+ years now, married to a Brit - but admits they are still a bit 'tiger mum-ish' (her words!). Everything is competitive but it is a shame as I think our access nowadays to an unlimited number of online tutors and access to mark scheme means that there are too many students acing the tests, rather than necessarily being naturally gifted. Of course, regardless of race, there is a bell curve and there will be the same number of gifted across these, but it's slightly skewed due to the cultural differences in how much is too much (academic) work!

Edited

There will always be a bell curve of ability across every group. Some kids are naturally gifted, most are average, and some struggle.
What you’re describing is really just different parenting priorities. Some families emphasise academics more, others focus more on balance with sport and other activities. Hard work and preparation don’t make achievement less valid.

reallyreallycrazy · 09/03/2026 07:59

Simplestars · 08/03/2026 05:55

@reallyreallycrazy you would still be frazzled if a white working class boy got a placement over your son.

You claim that Chinese and Indian students are studying too much, but what evidence is there for that? Graduate jobs are extremely competitive and lots of strong candidates miss out. Many families from different backgrounds encourage their children to work hard because they know they need to stand out. Saying Asian students only study and don’t do sport, music or other activities is a stereotype plenty of them do both and become well-rounded candidates. Hard work, ambition and good parenting aren’t limited to one race or culture.

Edited

Of course it's not the case of all, but many. My YP goes to a school with a huge intake of both UK-based / born and international Chinese students. They generally don't do the whole cricket, rugby, hockey thing.

More the music (grade 8 by 10 - maybe I'm exaggerating a bit, but many are exceptional), and are always at the top of the music and maths competitions.

Sorry if that's a 'stereotype', but I do I DO think there is a huge cultural thing at play here. I have friends (Chinese, ex HK) who said they were even brought up expecting to work 6-10pm every day after school from a young age. They said they'd tried to temper this - lived in the UK for 20+ years now, married to a Brit - but admits they are still a bit 'tiger mum-ish' (her words!). Everything is competitive but it is a shame as I think our access nowadays to an unlimited number of online tutors and access to mark scheme means that there are too many students acing the tests, rather than necessarily being naturally gifted. Of course, regardless of race, there is a bell curve and there will be the same number of gifted across these, but it's slightly skewed due to the cultural differences in how much is too much (academic) work!

OP posts:
Simplestars · 08/03/2026 05:55

@reallyreallycrazy you would still be frazzled if a white working class boy got a placement over your son.

You claim that Chinese and Indian students are studying too much, but what evidence is there for that? Graduate jobs are extremely competitive and lots of strong candidates miss out. Many families from different backgrounds encourage their children to work hard because they know they need to stand out. Saying Asian students only study and don’t do sport, music or other activities is a stereotype plenty of them do both and become well-rounded candidates. Hard work, ambition and good parenting aren’t limited to one race or culture.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 07/03/2026 21:25

OneDivineHammer · 07/03/2026 18:18

Argh - but no - I hadn't selected by course. In fact, for Medicine, it's 36% white. The majority (46%) is 'Asian' (I'm afraid the distinctions are a bit less subtle than Imperial et al). Microsoft Power BI

Is that filtering for a category such as British Asian or including international students/recent entries into the UK? The devil's in the detail of what you're asking with Power BI (which is why I get panicked management assuming one thing when if they waited half an hour, they wouldn't need to send 34 shrieking emails).

ETA Have looked. So they are from applications submitted via UCAS. But you can't see if the applicants had entered the UK two and a half years before or whether they've been here since birth, or stack multiple filters to drill down to the finer details.

EmpressoftheMundane · 07/03/2026 18:46

It’s interesting to consider London. It’s our capital city and it does not reflect the country that it rules.

OneDivineHammer · 07/03/2026 18:18

Argh - but no - I hadn't selected by course. In fact, for Medicine, it's 36% white. The majority (46%) is 'Asian' (I'm afraid the distinctions are a bit less subtle than Imperial et al). Microsoft Power BI

Power BI Report

Report powered by Power BI

https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiOTFiZGUwMDItMWIzMy00NDNkLTgzZDQtNGZjODM4MzM3NWYwIiwidCI6IjQ5YTUwNDQ1LWJkZmEtNGI3OS1hZGUzLTU0N2I0ZjM5ODZlOSIsImMiOjh9

OneDivineHammer · 07/03/2026 18:10

5128gap · 07/03/2026 17:38

If we extrapolated the London data to the rest of the UK, then only 5-11% of UK medical students would be white. However, we know from fact based data, that 69% are white.
All we know from the London data is that 5% of medical students in one uni and 11% in another are white. We also know that this is obviously not reflective of the UK, because if it were, we wouldn't have the known figure of 69% white medical students.

Intrigued - and quite prepared to concede the point! I've had a quick google, and if the 69% stat is from the BMJ open national cohort study, that was looking at entrants in the years 2012-2014, so over ten years ago. I imagine things can have change a lot in that time. Unfortunately, there don't seem to be up-to-date stats on a large scale.
What was your source?

I did find UCL has about 41 out of about 334, giving a third London uni, with 12% white intake. Here

Edited to add: but yes, Cambridge's nifty admissions stat generator thingy, if i'm using it correctly, does suggest about 60% white admissions for medicine in 2022-2024

5128gap · 07/03/2026 17:38

Pleasealexa · 07/03/2026 14:57

London isn't the UK, though

One in 6 people live in London, if you extrapolate to other cities such as Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester the figures would be fairly representative.

However the point still stands, London is an example of hiring focus

Edited

If we extrapolated the London data to the rest of the UK, then only 5-11% of UK medical students would be white. However, we know from fact based data, that 69% are white.
All we know from the London data is that 5% of medical students in one uni and 11% in another are white. We also know that this is obviously not reflective of the UK, because if it were, we wouldn't have the known figure of 69% white medical students.

LostInTheDream · 07/03/2026 15:41

On the fence. I would be more for a guaranteed interview for anyone hitting the benchmark similar to disability confident schemes to encourage diversity. There are reasons for ring fencing though and it's probably because unconscious bias means white men are more likely to hire other white men. It is a very competitive playing field these days.

What does concern me though is that state educated kids are struggling to get a foot on the ladder. Many are less confident and less well connected than their privately educated counterparts and not as well versed in selling themselves, my kids won't get hired by our employers or anyone we know unless they apply the same as anyone else. It isn't a new issue that people graduate or leave school and find that the openings aren't grad schemes or apprenticeships where competition is fierce and may assume some mobility, but often it's call centres and hospitality. But then I know a fair few people who have done well off that springboard and sometimes ended up on the grad schemes or engineering appreneships later on and I don't think workplaces are significantly different so that wouldn't be a possibility.

Pleasealexa · 07/03/2026 14:57

London isn't the UK, though

One in 6 people live in London, if you extrapolate to other cities such as Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester the figures would be fairly representative.

However the point still stands, London is an example of hiring focus

5128gap · 07/03/2026 14:45

OneDivineHammer · 07/03/2026 14:34

As far as medical students go, that's not true of London at least: it looks like 14 out of 341 students in their 25/26 intake will be white. So under 5%.

IMPFOI-25-456-Medical-student-demographics-by-year.pdf

I imagine it's the same for the other London unis.

Edited (again): and 38/336 for the same year's intake at King's, interestingly, so about 11%. Medicine (A100) student demographics by year - a Freedom of Information request to King's College London - WhatDoTheyKnow

Edited

London isn't the UK, though, is it? 87% of the UK population don't live there. Only 36% of the population are white British, meaning the demographic isnt at all reflective of the country as a whole. So I don't think what's happening in London is more pertinent than the fact that UK wide, 69% of medical students are white.

OneDivineHammer · 07/03/2026 14:34

5128gap · 06/03/2026 20:02

That's not evidenced by the official stats. 68% of professionally qualified NHS clinicians are white, 16% Asian and 8% black. 48.8% of GPs are white. So while not representative of the white population, its nowhere near 80/90% non white.
The reason is international recruitment of qualified medical staff to fill staffing gaps, because we historically haven't offered sufficient training places to keep up with demand.
69% of medical students are white though, so I'm not sure we're looking at a stark underpresenration in the training places that are available.

Edited

As far as medical students go, that's not true of London at least: it looks like 14 out of 341 students in their 25/26 intake will be white. So under 5%.

IMPFOI-25-456-Medical-student-demographics-by-year.pdf

I imagine it's the same for the other London unis.

Edited (again): and 38/336 for the same year's intake at King's, interestingly, so about 11%. Medicine (A100) student demographics by year - a Freedom of Information request to King's College London - WhatDoTheyKnow

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/administration-and-support-services/legal-services-office/public/freedom-of-information/pulication-scheme-docs/IMPFOI-25-456-Medical-student-demographics-by-year.pdf

5128gap · 06/03/2026 20:02

reallyreallycrazy · 06/03/2026 19:32

It's also worth noting that in the past, many Asian families would not be supporting their children going into banking as they wanted the usual dental, medical, engineering. So that was self-selecting themselves out. Of course outreach should help with that.

To be fair, if you look in the medical profession or GPs you'll see a certain generation where there is probably 80-90% non-white in these roles. Mainly because those groups were seeking those jobs and that education. Maybe we should consider why those who are white are not considering jobs in those professions to the same extent anymore. Does anyone know?

That's not evidenced by the official stats. 68% of professionally qualified NHS clinicians are white, 16% Asian and 8% black. 48.8% of GPs are white. So while not representative of the white population, its nowhere near 80/90% non white.
The reason is international recruitment of qualified medical staff to fill staffing gaps, because we historically haven't offered sufficient training places to keep up with demand.
69% of medical students are white though, so I'm not sure we're looking at a stark underpresenration in the training places that are available.

FitAt50 · 06/03/2026 19:40

University recruiter, just hired 3 apprentices all white British, 2 male 1 female.

reallyreallycrazy · 06/03/2026 19:37

nearlylovemyusername · 26/02/2026 16:01

why? we aren't talking about global scale so why global majority? UK has white majority.

I'm so glad that in my time of applying for jobs there wasn't this EDI insanity so no one ever suspected me in being diversity hire.

Edited

I think that many (most) of the diversity candidates are incredibly bright and hardworking and deserving of their internships.

And I genuinely believe there should be specific schemes for groups who don't apply to the same extent to certain professions (even though in some cases, it's because the cultural norms stipulate that medicine/engineering is seen as 'better' so it's not necessarily a barrier issue).

But it does seem odd not to have schemes open at all.

It's just bound to breed resentment.

OP posts:
reallyreallycrazy · 06/03/2026 19:34

Supporting2026 · 26/02/2026 20:50

I think you're completely missing the point of Spring Insight weeks. They are not the "real" internships that lead to jobs - which I've never known for banking or consultancy to require diversity to apply for - they are a simple week designed to give people with less likelihood of exposure to what finance is at its broadest sense a bit of a sense of it and encourage them to not be too scared to apply to the real internships. They were only invented to marginally improve application diversity and are incredibly superficial. I don't how it works now but when I was applying to banking internships a long time ago most the annual deadlines for the "real" internships (i.e. 10 weeks over the summer where you do real work) were October each year before the summer they applied to and having also been at the "picking" end of candidates attending a Spring Insight week provided no leg up in terms of getting them except they might have a marginally more polished presentation at interview. If your son couldn't find any to apply to was he just applying too late in the year?

Nowadays they do say that spring weeks often leads to fast-track for the summer internships and some professions, the spring week is definitely seen as the first stepping stone...

OP posts:
reallyreallycrazy · 06/03/2026 19:32

5128gap · 25/02/2026 09:07

Only about 15% of the population is white and male and middle class though, and this group disproportionately hold the top positions in our society.
No one is suggesting that being white male and middle class automatically makes a person LESS qualified, but if we look at outcomes for this group, and imagine that positions are gained only on merit, then we'd be forced to conclude that being white male and middle class makes a person innately MORE qualified for these roles.
I don't know about you, but I don't believe in the inate superiority of the white middle class male. So when I see their disproportionate success over other groups, I tend towards thinking there are other things at play that give them an advantage.
Its not about blocking them from jobs. It's about making sure that other people aren't blocked from competing with them for jobs because they weren't fortunate enough to have the opportunities and connections of being a privileged white male.
And yes, I am aware that the right are misrepresenting and exaggerating EDI initiatives to further a racist sexist agenda that paints white males as victims. However I don't think the answer to right wing threat is appeasement by removing protections and support for disadvantaged groups.

Edited

It's also worth noting that in the past, many Asian families would not be supporting their children going into banking as they wanted the usual dental, medical, engineering. So that was self-selecting themselves out. Of course outreach should help with that.

To be fair, if you look in the medical profession or GPs you'll see a certain generation where there is probably 80-90% non-white in these roles. Mainly because those groups were seeking those jobs and that education. Maybe we should consider why those who are white are not considering jobs in those professions to the same extent anymore. Does anyone know?

OP posts:
Beesandhoney123 · 27/02/2026 06:36

DallasMinor · 26/02/2026 22:50

Another thread about how hard life is for white Brits? Do these bots ever sleep?

your reaction and comment supports the issue this thread is about. Perhaps that was your intention.

DallasMinor · 26/02/2026 22:50

Another thread about how hard life is for white Brits? Do these bots ever sleep?

Swipe left for the next trending thread