To want Prince Andrew to lose his title and go to prison?

We now know that he lied to Emily Maitliss during that interview. He told her that the very last time he had any contact with Epstein was when he visited him in New York in December 2010 to tell him in person that their friendship was over (when he said that, if anything, he was too honourable).

An email has just been released that he sent to Epstein on 28 February 2011 where he says:

'Don’t worry about me! It would seem we are in this together and will have to rise above it. Otherwise keep in close touch and we’ll play some more soon!!!!'

So he's a proven liar. I believe he is guilty but unfortunately he won't be tried in a courtroom. He paid £12 million to ensure that this wouldn't happen.

I blame the parents on how he turned out

send him to Australia !!!!

Yes I’m aware of this Act . The Windsors’ ‘real’ name is Saxe - Coburg and Gotha and many their family was fighting for the Germans in WW1 , as they would do as the whole line is German

I saw an MP yesterday estimate it would take a couple of hours for something similar to be passed now.
The letters patent etc more protocol bullshit made up to aid the Windsors as and when needed

If we decided to get rid, as seems increasingly likely sooner rather than later , it would be done without issue.
Just as fir example Germany and Italy did post war

Because of the 1917 Titles Deprivation Act which (in and of itself only provided for removals within the context of WW1 and those acting as enemies of the state):

“provided for a committee tasked with considering whether a peerage or a title should be removed from a person, and subject to parliament’s approval, made a recommendation to the king when action should be taken.”

UK law provides for titles to be in the gift of the monarch and so, by definition Parliament has to include them in the process.

I believe Stephen Flynn MP has tabled an amendment to this to be debated, whether or not they vote it through is another matter. It remains, as galling as it is, the fact that he has not been convicted of anything.

Lots of people knew about Saville . And Charles was warned about him

Sound familar ?

Theres a whole list of pedophiles and sex offenders that the Windsors protected even championed so forgive me for not believing a word that say.

They are a very dark family .
Time to shine some light on them properly

It’s not about the money. !!
It’s about finding the real abusers - rich , poor , or somewhere in between and stopping the abuse.
The ones that are carrying on today - probably in plain sight.
How many people knew about Jimmy Saville. He certainly wasn’t a one man band.

@Franpie I agree- I’m not a monarchist and can’t stand Andrew and his behaviour was disgusting but he’s definitely being used as the ‘’keep eyes away from others’ here I feel

It's the ghostwritten word of a dead woman against his. Unless they find concrete evidence, no chance.

Yes others must be culpable too of course they are .

But I can also point out that when you ask to stop the focus on Andrew with this argument you are letting Andrew and the Windsors dodge questions about what they knew and when.

Other rich men are also not supported in a life of privilege by hard pressed taxpayers in an uneasy arrangement where we have this family as head of the state religion and clearly above the law !

If I was betting woman, I’d put my money on “the gods” having nothing to do with it. It is extremely fishy that the only emails being leaked from the FBI dossier are related to Prince Andrew and not all the other high profile Americans (including Trump).

Trump and his ilk must be thanking the gods that all attention on Prince Andrew

Also agree.
And while everyone is looking at this (idiot) person , as somebody said , it’s taking away from real abusers , traffickers, etc
Lets put focus on what’s happening now , that we can actually change and stop suffering

That would never happen. He would always receive help from his family no matter what. Prison seems like a much better alternative.

100% This ☝🏼

The RF means that much to you.

I would like to know who Ed Perkins told about the emails he received from Andrew telling him that he asked his tax payer funded Met police protection officer to dig for dirt on VG having supplied the officer with her social security number.
Did Mr Perkins inform his boss - the Queen’s Press Secretary? Did he in turn inform the Queen and Prince Philip?

The tax payer has everything to do with it !
Every penny the Windsors have is taken from us .
They don’t own any of it - not even the Duchies despite treating them t like their own tax free bank .

They paid Virgina because it was that or Andrew appear in a court .

Royals avoid proper scrutiny at all costs .

Nothing to do with saving the tax payer money. Saving their own money. The tax payer had nothing to do with the civil case in the US.

Saving the tax payer money?? How very altruistic.🤣🤣🤣🤣

Yes it can . She was trafficked

What he did was vile and inappropriate but I don’t think it could be classed as rape could it ?

@Franpie

Well that’s a new angle - an utterly unbelievable one in my opinion .

Elizabeth paid off Andrew’s accuser to save the tax payer money . As if lol !

Twas ever thus...rich, powerful man abuses vulnerable young women/girls. Makes my blood boil.