Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Schools admission criteria......

715 replies

LookingforMaryPoppins · 18/10/2025 23:01

So, my youngest has her heart set on the same grammar school as her sister. She has worked hard and successfully passed the 11 plus. Really proud off her, she is dyslexic so no mean feat.... having just checked the admission criteria, having a sibling at the school makes no difference. Passing the 11 plus is the first criteria followed by children in care, pupil premium and then distance - she is bottom of the pile. If she doesn't get a place, which with that criteria is likely., the option is a sink failing school..... how is that fair?

OP posts:
SheilaFentiman · 19/10/2025 18:54

SleepingStandingUp · 19/10/2025 18:48

And also how does this work? You've got 25 really bright kids in a class and 5 siblings who are average at best, do they have their own work set or are they just made to feel shit for not keeping up?

I think that’s quite unlikely though as a significant number… siblings will for the most part have both similar genetics (re intelligence, such of it as is hereditary) and similar environments (parents who have the ability and capacity to help with homework, Bond work books, books in the house etc etc)

Camelcarpet · 19/10/2025 18:53

Yabu, that's unfortunately just life... Especially if applying to a selective school. Life isn't fair. The sun shines on the righteous and the unrighteous alike. You win some, you lose some. If you feel that passionately about your daughter getting in to a certain school, then you need to move house. That's the reality of it.

LIZS · 19/10/2025 18:52

Wait until op hears about contextual uni offers!

DelectableMe · 19/10/2025 18:48

Wasitabadger · 19/10/2025 18:26

I know, which is why myself and other amazing Care Leavers are trying to change an corrupt system and lead by example. Unfortunately change takes time and we need to learn from the lessons of the past to save the future. All children no matter their circumstances deserve equal access to opportunities to an education whether that be vocational or academic. The opportunity to have a stable and safe adulthood.

I agree. I can't tell you how many frustratingly sad stories I've known over the years, how many opportunities lost.
This resentment of having a child's Geography field trip paid for, or given a free revision guide is just beyond my ken. Absolutely appalling.

SleepingStandingUp · 19/10/2025 18:48

Bushmillsbabe · 19/10/2025 18:35

Now that is incredibly unfair, when other children work so hard to get in. What area is this?

And also how does this work? You've got 25 really bright kids in a class and 5 siblings who are average at best, do they have their own work set or are they just made to feel shit for not keeping up?

Bushmillsbabe · 19/10/2025 18:47

LookingforMaryPoppins · 19/10/2025 17:14

There is a much bigger picture here. The school is in a deprived area, the pupil premium children actually make up a high percentage of the intake - double that of other grammar schools. Whilst I am very pro evening the playing field, this doesn't actually achieve that.

My daughter (at the school) has friends who are not pupil premium who don't get to go on any school trips because their families simply can't afford the cost - these trips prioritise pupil premium both in terms of offering places and that the cost to everyone else is inflated to subsidise them.

The provisions designed to "even" the playing field simply shift deprivation to those who are low income but not sufficiently low as to be pupil premium. This isn't a fair system.

The omission of a sibling policy adds to that pressure -no ability to hand down uniform and no ease of transport.

Surely we should be improving education for all 🤷‍♂️

You said your oldest gets the train? So ease of transport doesn't apply, it's not as if this is primary and you are driving them in 2 different directions. Your youngest can get public transport to whichever school she gets. You haven't mentioned which area this is but I presume there are other grammars she can apply to?

If she is bright she will do well anywhere.

Had the sibling policy been in place for your oldest, she may have not got a place. There are pros and cons to every policy, but a sibling priority system has no place in secondary schools, especially grammar

CandyAppleChristmas · 19/10/2025 18:44

neverbeenskiing · 19/10/2025 17:45

any child that isn't in care or pupil premium is on a back foot

This is one of the most staggeringly tone-deaf statements I've ever read on MN.

Agree - well said!

Bushmillsbabe · 19/10/2025 18:35

GagMeWithASpoon · 19/10/2025 17:26

It can be area dependent. In our area , siblings can go to the school even if they don’t get high enough scores, they’re automatically in.

Now that is incredibly unfair, when other children work so hard to get in. What area is this?

ThesebeautifulthingsthatIvegot · 19/10/2025 18:30

LookingforMaryPoppins · 19/10/2025 17:14

There is a much bigger picture here. The school is in a deprived area, the pupil premium children actually make up a high percentage of the intake - double that of other grammar schools. Whilst I am very pro evening the playing field, this doesn't actually achieve that.

My daughter (at the school) has friends who are not pupil premium who don't get to go on any school trips because their families simply can't afford the cost - these trips prioritise pupil premium both in terms of offering places and that the cost to everyone else is inflated to subsidise them.

The provisions designed to "even" the playing field simply shift deprivation to those who are low income but not sufficiently low as to be pupil premium. This isn't a fair system.

The omission of a sibling policy adds to that pressure -no ability to hand down uniform and no ease of transport.

Surely we should be improving education for all 🤷‍♂️

But you don't want to improve education for all. And you don't care about pupils who are just above the PP threshold. You just want your daughter to have a better education than poor children. You think she is more worthy because she comes from a "normal" family.

You can pass uniform down to people who are not siblings. And ease of transport is irrelevant, given you seem like you live pretty far from the school.

The cost of trips is not allowed to be inflated to subsidize other pupils. The discount that some schools offer for PP comes from direct funding to the school.

You're pissed off, and worried for your daughter, I get it. But you're also "punching down" in a really unpleasant way. It's good that you've done so anonymously because I don't think many would look on what you've said in a positive light.

Wasitabadger · 19/10/2025 18:26

DelectableMe · 19/10/2025 18:04

You and your pesky principles! I'm glad it worked out for you, though.
We know that for so many, it doesn't.

I know, which is why myself and other amazing Care Leavers are trying to change an corrupt system and lead by example. Unfortunately change takes time and we need to learn from the lessons of the past to save the future. All children no matter their circumstances deserve equal access to opportunities to an education whether that be vocational or academic. The opportunity to have a stable and safe adulthood.

ThesebeautifulthingsthatIvegot · 19/10/2025 18:24

LookingforMaryPoppins · 19/10/2025 03:41

Also doesn't mean they are disadvantaged....

It means they are a much, much higher chance of being educationally disadvantaged.

They are much more likely to have ACEs (adverse childhood experiences).

They also don't have disposable income for extra curricular experiences, or to pay for a daily train to get to school.

Charlotte120221 · 19/10/2025 18:23

@LookingforMaryPoppins think you’re being a bit melodramatic here.

Dont know any grammar that has sibling priority- and if yours did your elder dd might not have got in?

also don’t know any grammar school without pp or in care as priority groups. For those near us (Bexley/Kent) those admission rules have been in place for some time and only a tiny number each year from those groups get in.

hand wringing about ‘normal families who value education and work hard’ not getting equal access to grammar schools is nonsense.

DrowningInSyrup · 19/10/2025 18:13

LookingforMaryPoppins · 19/10/2025 03:14

not unfair that hardworking families are lowest priority?

The things I wish I could say, but would get banned for. It has nothing to do with hardworking families. You could have 2 very hardworking parents in shit jobs that you would refuse to do, still having to claim free schools meals for a multitude of reasons that we don't know about. Hardworking has nothing to do with a LAC. This whole thread is revolting and your replies just get more and more entitled.

What I want to say but can't..... .... ...... ...... ........ ..... ... ..... ..... ...... ...... ..... .... ...... .......... ... ...... ....... .... ....... ...... ....... ........ ......?*£%^&

Poonu · 19/10/2025 18:12

Op which county are you in? I have never known any Grammar school to fulfill it's quota of pupil Premium and children in care. What I mean is that if they reserve 20 places it's highly unlikely that even 10 would fill. This thread doesn't ring true.

Mintylizzy9 · 19/10/2025 18:09

OP - AIBU?
The world - yes!
OP - but but but

Awkward Hamster GIF by Grind
DrowningInSyrup · 19/10/2025 18:05

DelectableMe · 19/10/2025 16:41

It's just awful. I can't imagine anyone, let alone a mother, be so resentful of any support given to a child growing up in care. It beggars belief.

Agreed she should be banned for just this

DelectableMe · 19/10/2025 18:04

Wasitabadger · 19/10/2025 18:01

Thank you, funnily enough I actually experienced homelessness during my Masters studies. I got the keys to a LA house the day after I handed in my PMP.

Proud to say five years later I returned the property to the LA in a vastly improved state despite my then limited income.

I have been fortunate. My then fiancé now husband and his family offered me a home. I could have done as others would continued living in the property and then purchased it via right to buy then made a significant profit either renting it out or selling it. My pesky principles of what I consider to be fair and equitable to other disadvantaged individuals having an opportunity to be safely housed got in the way of my making a financial gain.

You and your pesky principles! I'm glad it worked out for you, though.
We know that for so many, it doesn't.

DrowningInSyrup · 19/10/2025 18:03

QuayshhLawrain · 19/10/2025 14:53

So you think your children from a "normal family" should be prioritised over children who are in care?

I'm actually amazed that you're willing to admit publicly just how entitled you are.

@LookingforMaryPoppins it's not just about income.

Quentin who has 2hrs tutoring ever week, might not be as bright as Sally who has zero tutoring and who comes from a 2 parent NORMAL family, with 2 working parents, but still claim free school meals, why, that's none of our business.

Also LAC may live with high earners but come from a very different background.

Finally so what if you have a sibling who goes to grammar too. They are trying to award places on merit whilst levelling the playing field. This thread screams "But all lives matter".

Wasitabadger · 19/10/2025 18:01

Thank you, funnily enough I actually experienced homelessness during my Masters studies. I got the keys to a LA house the day after I handed in my PMP.

Proud to say five years later I returned the property to the LA in a vastly improved state despite my then limited income.

I have been fortunate. My then fiancé now husband and his family offered me a home. I could have done as others would continued living in the property and then purchased it via right to buy then made a significant profit either renting it out or selling it. My pesky principles of what I consider to be fair and equitable to other disadvantaged individuals having an opportunity to be safely housed got in the way of my making a financial gain.

80smonster · 19/10/2025 17:56

OP is essentially miffed that the school is applying its criteria. They don’t live in the priority zone and her DD’s test score doesn’t sound strong enough for that to be grounds alone. OP have you checked if moving closer would get you further up the list? Also what’s the in-year transfer admission like?

CoconutGrove · 19/10/2025 17:52

neverbeenskiing · 19/10/2025 17:45

any child that isn't in care or pupil premium is on a back foot

This is one of the most staggeringly tone-deaf statements I've ever read on MN.

I agree

DelectableMe · 19/10/2025 17:48

neverbeenskiing · 19/10/2025 17:45

any child that isn't in care or pupil premium is on a back foot

This is one of the most staggeringly tone-deaf statements I've ever read on MN.

It's just unbelievable.

DelectableMe · 19/10/2025 17:47

Thank you for sharing your story, @Wasitabadger . It is one repeated many times over. I genuinely do not know why anyone would resent giving help and support to such children.
It's not like you were given a free house and a car.

neverbeenskiing · 19/10/2025 17:45

any child that isn't in care or pupil premium is on a back foot

This is one of the most staggeringly tone-deaf statements I've ever read on MN.

LandOfFruitAndNut · 19/10/2025 17:44

I find it really hard to believe that someone is so blinkered and unaware of the myriad disadvantages that come with PLAC LAC and PP students that they think they shouldn’t have priority.

Also ‘normal’. That’s just horrible.