Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Andrew not being able to use his Duke title is just too little too late..

103 replies

Attictroll · 18/10/2025 12:33

And the way the media is seeing it as worthy of his behaviour just shows how the misogynistic establishment wins. I bet VG was not the only girl either and the Chinese spy not the only dodgy businessman

OP posts:
Tutorpuzzle · 18/10/2025 13:19

It’s the RF throwing a bone to the masses (ahead of Virginia Giuffre’s book being released), fully supported by establishment media.

Implying he has been stripped of his titles (as many will understand it) whilst nothing changes, trusting that most people don’t really care about child sexual exploitation.

I would prefer to see him being questioned by the CIA. Couldn’t really care less about some buffoonery title.

TankFlyBossW4lk · 18/10/2025 12:51

I completely agree with you. Also, it's an example of how risky it is having your Head of State determined by a hereditary monarchy. It could so easily have been Andrew, the corrupt menace to society as the King. The Queen made loads of rules excluding her from all sorts of things. She was apparently a Saint. Can you imagine what Andrew and Sarah would be like.

didntlikeanyofthesuggestions · 18/10/2025 12:36

Prince Andrew. Please give him his full name.

Swipe left for the next trending thread