Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder if the rise in gender confusion is due to

108 replies

Checkcheckout · 18/10/2025 12:27

The levels of oestrogen in water? For many years now the levels of female hormones in the water supply has been steadily building up, due to the use of hormonal contraception, which cannot be filtered out of the waste water, as well as agricultural practices which contaminate water due to run off from fields into the water supply. This has been affecting marine life for a long time, so it stands to reason that it’s also affecting humans.

I’m sure there’s other factors too, there seems to be a disproportionate number of SEN teens confused about their gender, so maybe it’s a feeling of not belonging for them which leads them to think that they must have been born in the wrong body and that’s why they don’t fit in. But is it possible that there is a rise in genuine confusion in males feeling like females due to the female hormones they’re ingesting every day?

Disclaimer - I’m not a scientist so happy to be corrected!

OP posts:
strawgoh · 19/10/2025 12:28

Blump2783 · 18/10/2025 15:11

Not being a scientist either I couldn't comment on the water supply.
My own concerns with gender identification is that there is still too much gendering in society. Clothes, toys, what activities you can do. So when for example someone born male wants to wear pink and do ballet rather than just being allowed by society there is negativity about it. They then might question if their gender as they don't fit the mould they are told they are meant to be in. I also think this will impact neuro diverse people more as they already struggle to fit in a world designed to work best for neuro typical people.

Boys who do ballet don't wear pink.

Cheese55 · 19/10/2025 11:22

OMG!!,

spannasaurus · 19/10/2025 11:20

Cheese55 · 19/10/2025 11:16

Can I ask a q about AGP.? If you are turned on by dressing as a woman and others seeing you as such, do these men walk around in a permanently aroused state? How do they manage throughout a night in a club or walking around a supermarket etc.

Grayson Perry has said that he has his skirts specially designed to hide his erection

Cheese55 · 19/10/2025 11:16

IronSpam · 18/10/2025 12:39

Maybe.
I don’t think it’s a chemical difference though.
My take on it is that there are basically two different paths - being a girl having a traumatic childhood (Cass report identified that 97.5% of transitioning teens are autistic, abused, neglected or have severe mental illness). This is a fad much like goths, and has parallels to other mental conditions like anorexia and bulimia, affecting a similar demographic and with a similar contagion effect. This is encouraged by the rise in more inflexible gender stereotypes over the last few years. The only difference in how it’s been treated is that trans has been wholly validated rather than being seen for what it is.

Then we have the men, and the catastrophic rise in porn culture which starts younger than ever before, and violent videos are easier to find now. Porn is addictive and these men need to find ever more ways to get their rocks off.
Transsexuals of the past tended to be gay men with internalised homophobia. Whilst they do still exist the majority of trans identified men are now AGP - turned on by viewing themselves as women and by others viewing them as such, whilst still behaving in very much male ways, and many also getting off on humiliation. Again this is treated by validating.

To me it’s fairly obvious that it’s a societal issue that people have been manipulated into.

Can I ask a q about AGP.? If you are turned on by dressing as a woman and others seeing you as such, do these men walk around in a permanently aroused state? How do they manage throughout a night in a club or walking around a supermarket etc.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 19/10/2025 11:02

This is all so sad. Society has allowed children to be gaslit that a change of sex will cure their uncomfortable developing bodies and emotional vulnerabilities.
It's shameful as we know the impact of social contagion amongst children / young people in relation to eating disorders, suicidal ideation, self harm etc. Yet schools, the NHS, universities etc have allowed adults / groups with a vested interest in transitioning to sell their ideology to children who are emotionally and intellectually too young to navigate this complex set of beliefs.

The impact of this plus social contagion has resulted in thousands of children / young people giving up their future fertility, sexual function and good physical / mental health. Collectively we've failed to safeguard them with too many believing the lies they're told about "harmless" drugs and surgery.

These are adult decisions. As they realise the grim consequences of the life changing decisions they've made before they reached maturity, their rage and despair will be immense.

Sartre · 19/10/2025 10:01

When I was at school in the mid 00s it was immensely popular to be bisexual. Being gay not so much and gay boys in particular were bullied but being bi became a bit of a fashionable fad. Now it seems to be non-binary. It’s fashionable to use ‘they/them’ pronouns. I have no issue with people being gender critical, fucking around with fashion and haircuts and whatever else. The pronoun thing is just a bit cringe though.

As soon as I see someone is a they/them or even worse a she/they (what?!), I kind of get a gist for the sort of person they will be. Usually alternative style, which again I dressed that way as a teen too so no judgement but there does seem to be a link between that world and being non-binary. Have definitely also noticed a link with SEN or disabled people.

Iwanttoliveinagardencentre · 19/10/2025 09:55

Social contagion, vulnerable and ASD teens made even more vulnerable by lockdown which increased social isolation, and male sexual fetish.

Not the water.

potpourree · 19/10/2025 09:54

Piccolomaforte · 19/10/2025 09:50

I work in a mental health profession and completely agree with this comment. I very rarely come across people where I would feel genetics is the root of their need to transition - the rest have unfortunately experienced trauma which has resulted in their decision.
A reasonable number of clients I’m in professional contact with, have reversed their decision to transition once the early trauma has been addressed.

Thank you - that's interesting.

MsJinks · 19/10/2025 09:52

Tiebiter · 19/10/2025 09:37

'out of pattern'. I think if anyone bothered to ask the fish they'd probably say they were sick of being male-fishsplained to and thought they'd swap over for a bit to get some headspace and perhaps someone talking to them about the seaweed removal job required on the fish-car rather than deferring to their male husband fish.

I can see why young woman find it appealing to want to be like those fish.

’out of pattern’ was my poor attempt to explain that more freshwater fish are changing to male to female without the normal reasons for their change - eg/ limited fish to mate with - this is then damaging to their continuation as a species.
There also seems to be some feminisation of the hermaphrodite male though it’s not at a point where it should need to change to be female so there is disruption there as well.
I’m not sure how to explain it better but I wonder what these damaging pollution effects as seen in the fish are having on humans though not in a trans sense as fish don’t choose, nor have a concept of gender.
As it happens I also wonder about bees who were starting to lose their homing navigational systems due to pesticides - again damaging their population.
I think we ought to pay closer attention to what is happening in other animals due to our treatment of the environment but whilst no scientist I just do find it fascinating how much we can be altered by outside factors.
I am obviously only talking about sex as fish are not gendered nor would they understand gender - maybe it’s interesting more go male-female than female to male recently - if they understood gender and gad an actual choice in their sex change then we could hope they found female the best to be!

Piccolomaforte · 19/10/2025 09:50

IronSpam · 18/10/2025 12:39

Maybe.
I don’t think it’s a chemical difference though.
My take on it is that there are basically two different paths - being a girl having a traumatic childhood (Cass report identified that 97.5% of transitioning teens are autistic, abused, neglected or have severe mental illness). This is a fad much like goths, and has parallels to other mental conditions like anorexia and bulimia, affecting a similar demographic and with a similar contagion effect. This is encouraged by the rise in more inflexible gender stereotypes over the last few years. The only difference in how it’s been treated is that trans has been wholly validated rather than being seen for what it is.

Then we have the men, and the catastrophic rise in porn culture which starts younger than ever before, and violent videos are easier to find now. Porn is addictive and these men need to find ever more ways to get their rocks off.
Transsexuals of the past tended to be gay men with internalised homophobia. Whilst they do still exist the majority of trans identified men are now AGP - turned on by viewing themselves as women and by others viewing them as such, whilst still behaving in very much male ways, and many also getting off on humiliation. Again this is treated by validating.

To me it’s fairly obvious that it’s a societal issue that people have been manipulated into.

I work in a mental health profession and completely agree with this comment. I very rarely come across people where I would feel genetics is the root of their need to transition - the rest have unfortunately experienced trauma which has resulted in their decision.
A reasonable number of clients I’m in professional contact with, have reversed their decision to transition once the early trauma has been addressed.

Luna6 · 19/10/2025 09:43

potpourree · 19/10/2025 09:31

Regardless of that debunked stat, there is someone claiming that they see "several cases a week" of babies "born with both male/female reproductive organs."

If this is true, it's huge and probably one of the most drastic increases in a medical condition that I've heard of - hence my wanting to find out about it.

But I'm just being given a vague unevidenced figure about anything classed as a DSD in general (as far as I can see) when I've asked about it. If you simply got it wrong @Luna6 please do say - no-one will think badly of you.
I'm interested to know what it actually is that has increased in the way you are talking about.

Maybe I got the terminology wrong - I am not a scientist. I am going on what a paediatric surgeon told me. Their job is to operate on babies who are born with some form of DSD. A decision has to be taken as to whether they are male or female. They commented that this was quite rare at the beginning of their career but it much more common now. The thought was that it could be down to the contraceptive pill - especially if people fall pregnant while taking it. It is worrying that these things are becoming more common.

Tiebiter · 19/10/2025 09:37

MsJinks · 18/10/2025 22:59

It’s probably not so relevant to the direction of this thread now, but I think it’s interesting that freshwater fish change sex out of pattern (and damaging to their continuation) because of pollutants including pesticides and the birth control pill.
I wonder how damaging such pollutants are to humans in the longer term - I appreciate we don’t change sex as fish do, as we are made differently, but the same pollutants do still affect our hormone levels and fertility- so I guess they may also affect other parts of how we are physically and mentally.

'out of pattern'. I think if anyone bothered to ask the fish they'd probably say they were sick of being male-fishsplained to and thought they'd swap over for a bit to get some headspace and perhaps someone talking to them about the seaweed removal job required on the fish-car rather than deferring to their male husband fish.

I can see why young woman find it appealing to want to be like those fish.

potpourree · 19/10/2025 09:31

Regardless of that debunked stat, there is someone claiming that they see "several cases a week" of babies "born with both male/female reproductive organs."

If this is true, it's huge and probably one of the most drastic increases in a medical condition that I've heard of - hence my wanting to find out about it.

But I'm just being given a vague unevidenced figure about anything classed as a DSD in general (as far as I can see) when I've asked about it. If you simply got it wrong @Luna6 please do say - no-one will think badly of you.
I'm interested to know what it actually is that has increased in the way you are talking about.

ThatBlackCat · 19/10/2025 09:24

As to 'non-binary', well, everyone is non-binary. No one is 100% adhering to their gender stereotypes 100% of the time. Non-binary is simply a label to make someone feel 'unique'. It really means f all, because everyone, by definition, by practice and by default, is not 100% binary. That's the joke with this. Non-binary simply means you're the same as 100% other human beings. And:

To wonder if the rise in gender confusion is due to
ThatBlackCat · 19/10/2025 09:16

Luna6 · 18/10/2025 20:44

I’m not sure where you are getting your statistics from but approx 1.7% of babies are born what is classed as intersex conditions.

It's actually 0.018%. People wrongly added conditions like PCOS and got 1.7%. The 1.7% is a debunked myth that was pushed by trans activists.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/

How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling - PubMed

Anne Fausto-Sterling s suggestion that the prevalence of intersex might be as high as 1.7% has attracted wide attention in both the scholarly press and the popular media. Many reviewers are not aware that this figure includes conditions which most clin...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/

MsJinks · 18/10/2025 22:59

It’s probably not so relevant to the direction of this thread now, but I think it’s interesting that freshwater fish change sex out of pattern (and damaging to their continuation) because of pollutants including pesticides and the birth control pill.
I wonder how damaging such pollutants are to humans in the longer term - I appreciate we don’t change sex as fish do, as we are made differently, but the same pollutants do still affect our hormone levels and fertility- so I guess they may also affect other parts of how we are physically and mentally.

MouldyPeppers · 18/10/2025 22:46

Luna6 · 18/10/2025 20:44

I’m not sure where you are getting your statistics from but approx 1.7% of babies are born what is classed as intersex conditions.

The fact that you call them by the derogatory term ‘intersex’ rather than disorders of/variation in sexual development or congenital reproductive disorders show you are repeating transactivist statistics rather than those or medical professionals. People with these conditions are not some ‘other’ sex - they are either male or female.

MouldyPeppers · 18/10/2025 22:42

Luna6 · 18/10/2025 20:44

I’m not sure where you are getting your statistics from but approx 1.7% of babies are born what is classed as intersex conditions.

It Is 0.018%

potpourree · 18/10/2025 20:53

Luna6 · 18/10/2025 20:44

I’m not sure where you are getting your statistics from but approx 1.7% of babies are born what is classed as intersex conditions.

Specifically ones that involve both ovaries and testes? Or are you now talking about something else i.e. all DSDs?
Some of these are very common ( eg Kilnefelters) - but it would be absurd to claim that they are in any way confusable with being "born with both male/female reproductive organs".

Which conditions are you talking about that one individual is seeing 10+ every month?

Luna6 · 18/10/2025 20:44

potpourree · 18/10/2025 14:19

Sorry, a single surgeon sees 10+ kids a month born with both ovaries and testes?

Only around 500 people have ever been
identified as having an ovotesticular DSD.

Where on earth does he work?

I’m not sure where you are getting your statistics from but approx 1.7% of babies are born what is classed as intersex conditions.

Checkcheckout · 18/10/2025 18:15

mindutopia · 18/10/2025 16:09

Thing is, we all drink the water. I’m 45. I have loads of friends from school and my early life who are trans and non-binary. They were just as gender non-conforming back in the 90s when we were teenagers as they are now, except now there is a name for it and the Daily Mail has worked the peasants into a frenzy about it. But I don’t see much difference in terms of young people today and my friends when I was in school other than just more acceptance today that not everyone fits neatly into comfortable boxes.

I’m a similar age to you and I didn’t have any peers when I was young who were trans. The ‘thing’ back then was to experiment with sexuality. Of course some really were gay, but in the vast majority of cases it was a passing phase. Being trans seems to have taken over from that.

OP posts:
potpourree · 18/10/2025 17:14

mindutopia · 18/10/2025 16:09

Thing is, we all drink the water. I’m 45. I have loads of friends from school and my early life who are trans and non-binary. They were just as gender non-conforming back in the 90s when we were teenagers as they are now, except now there is a name for it and the Daily Mail has worked the peasants into a frenzy about it. But I don’t see much difference in terms of young people today and my friends when I was in school other than just more acceptance today that not everyone fits neatly into comfortable boxes.

That's interesting - when you say they're gender-non-conforming do you mean their behaviour etc doesn't conform to that commonly associated with their birth sex, or to that of the gender they identify as?

The difference is that today people are reaching conclusions 1 or 2 in my post above from 12.39, rather than conclusion 3.

JLou08 · 18/10/2025 16:15

I think there are more girls feeling like boys so I don't think it has anything to do with estrogen.

Tiredofwhataboutery · 18/10/2025 16:10

Anononony · 18/10/2025 14:35

I don't know, I think it's just because tweens/teens are online so much, and it's infiltrated schools so kids looking to fit in find a super welcoming group that are almost immune to bullying because it's seen as transphobic

I wanted to be a boy for a time as a child, the difference is there was no group to join to encourage it, no flags to wave or marches to go on, and I certainly couldn't have told my parents and been taken seriously! There have always been masculine women and feminine men, and kids used to group together based on music taste (goths, emos, punks etc) and that doesn't seem to be the case anymore, they group based on their gender identity and sexual preferences

I think this is true. I wanted to be a boy as a teenager, puberty hit I shot up to 5 11” I felt really lanky in comparison to my dainty, feminine peers. I filled out eventually and sort of grew into myself. I suspect had these organisations existed then I’d of been led firm a fifferent path which is why I advocate watchful waiting.

mindutopia · 18/10/2025 16:09

Thing is, we all drink the water. I’m 45. I have loads of friends from school and my early life who are trans and non-binary. They were just as gender non-conforming back in the 90s when we were teenagers as they are now, except now there is a name for it and the Daily Mail has worked the peasants into a frenzy about it. But I don’t see much difference in terms of young people today and my friends when I was in school other than just more acceptance today that not everyone fits neatly into comfortable boxes.