Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Moving from private to state - was it a waste?

135 replies

MummyCookies · 15/10/2025 19:24

Fees becoming unbearable now so DD year 6 we are looking at state schools and she will hopefully get into our local state school come September.

I have a younger DD also in private year 4 and we are thinking of doing the same when she gets into year 6 too.

I just feel it’s been a waste that we spent/will spend so much from age 4 to age 11. Can anyone make me feel a little at ease with our choice please and advise if you did similar, I’m also debating whether to take younger dd out now. My eldest absolutely loves her school and I am so upset for her. She’s naturally a “nerd” and absolutely fits into the life at private school. I’m not so worried about younger one as she’s more feisty and more confident. I’m just really worried eldest DD will get bullied in our local state. It’s not great but it’s definitely not the worst one in area.

OP posts:
MummyCookies · 15/10/2025 23:02

BoudiccaRuled · 15/10/2025 22:59

Prep school is a waste of money if you can't afford it. Primary schools are not where the problems are.

I disagree either way this. I’ve seen from my nieces when they were in primary it was really difficult. There were lots of children with needs in the class and teachers attention would be on them, no TA as school couldn’t afford it. There was a TA that the teachers shared across the day I was told my by sister. I think primary is where the foundations are set.

OP posts:
Tiddlywinkly · 15/10/2025 22:59

DaisyDayz · 15/10/2025 19:32

It’s not a waste! you have invested in the early years and set the foundation well and protected them. No harm in that.

Your geeky dd may struggle at a rough and tumble state secondary but hold most kids learn to hold their own and find their tribe. If there is bullying you jump on that immediately - straight in to see head of year, don’t let that fester. No need to worry it will work out ok!

I'm curious what you mean by, 'protected them'?

BoudiccaRuled · 15/10/2025 22:59

Prep school is a waste of money if you can't afford it. Primary schools are not where the problems are.

tellmesomethingtrue · 15/10/2025 22:54

Kittlewittle · 15/10/2025 22:19

I moved a child from state to private for primary, and it was incomparable. At private school school she had a small class, fantastic dedicated teachers and a wonderful approachable headteacher, and a creative pedagogy, which wasn't constrained by the national curriculum. Overall, so much more child centred and fun.

The state school was run down, with huge classes and overcrowded (up to 32/33 per class), and the teachers were often on sick leave. One year she had over 10 different supply teachers. It was a holding pen and nothing more. The headteacher was lazy and feckless.

Obviously, it depends on the individual schools, but in my experience it is definitely worth it.

Sounds like this state school could have benefited from a generous parental donation….

teacupzs · 15/10/2025 22:54

There are very clever, bookish, nerdy & wealthy dc in state schools particularly in London!

Tigerbalmshark · 15/10/2025 22:52

bittertwisted · 15/10/2025 22:04

No it’s honest. You do know children who’s parents can’t afford private can be bookish ? You are being rude suggesting otherwise

And people who could afford private but choose not to… there are several families with high six figure household incomes, second homes, etc in DS’s state primary class. And kids on FSM, and everything in between. It’s good for all of them to get used to mixing with different types of people.

OP’s child is not going to be the one rich kid in a sea of destitute Dickensian orphans. There will be doctors’ kids and lawyers’ kids and plenty of other “suitable” children for her to make friends with.

tellmesomethingtrue · 15/10/2025 22:51

MummyCookies · 15/10/2025 19:34

@DaisyDayz thank you! I’m just wondering whether to make her less geeky (sorry I sound awful I know) to prepare her for the state secondary. But I don’t want to change her personality

This is offensive. Why do you think that there are no geeks at state school? There are plenty, and I mean PLENTY of intelligent children who have a passion for something geeky like robotics, coding, chess and science who go to state schools. Take your head out of your backside.

MummyCookies · 15/10/2025 22:50

@Namechangesecretsignature what are you thinking of doing? PM me if you prefer and we can chat on there x

OP posts:
Namechangesecretsignature · 15/10/2025 22:48

Following with interest op as I’m in a similar predicament

FletchFan · 15/10/2025 22:48

I'm currently working temporarily in the prep department in a private school and the impression I'm currently getting is that private is only really worth it if your child is particularly talented at sports, creative arts or MFL, particularly in this school. If they are, it's opportunities galore. It's a different kind of education in my ways.

English and maths don't seem to be prioritised quite as much as the state schools I've worked in, but I suppose this is only one private school.

bigsoftcocks · 15/10/2025 22:43

If it really feels unbearable. I’d rip off the plaster now andtake both kids out at the same time rather than leaving the younger one in until year 6.

If they both go to the same school, it will be a shared experience for them.
it will be really weird for the older one to see the younger one continuing to go to the private school.
Frankly, having two kids and two different schools is a pain in the butt!

With the fees you’ll save on a couple of years from the youngest one will make a difference

AbsentosaurusRex · 15/10/2025 22:42

MusicalCarbuncle · 15/10/2025 22:38

The academic evidence on setting and streaming is… well… that there is no benefit.

Most if not all secondaries do set, though. If you find one that doesn’t it would be interesting to find out why: they might have very legitimate evidence based reasons.

Edited

The benefit is the geeky / studious kids don’t have to put up with the little shits interrupting class all the time. Harsh but true I’m afraid.

teacupzs · 15/10/2025 22:42

One of the other schools we went to visit told me there are no sets and they mix all the kids - what does everyone think of this?

Not sure that's the norm. DD was set straight away.

teacupzs · 15/10/2025 22:39

Are you near good secondary options? there are excellent ones in London & then so do ones.

MusicalCarbuncle · 15/10/2025 22:38

The academic evidence on setting and streaming is… well… that there is no benefit.

Most if not all secondaries do set, though. If you find one that doesn’t it would be interesting to find out why: they might have very legitimate evidence based reasons.

PolarExpression · 15/10/2025 22:38

There are plenty of 'geeky' children in state schools. You probably just only notice the loud and unruly ones!

My dd goes to an 'average' state comp, has 'geeky' friends and they are all predicted top GCSE grades.

If your daughter is genuinely interested in learning she will do well in a state school. You can always supplement with some tutoring if you think she needs it.

teacupzs · 15/10/2025 22:36

I always think primary is where you can save money as there are so many good state options.

AbsentosaurusRex · 15/10/2025 22:31

Check that the school ‘sets’ the classes. That would help any kid achieve their potential. Or at least, more so than one size fits all. Because in education, it really doesn’t.

Hereforthecommentz · 15/10/2025 22:25

Kittlewittle · 15/10/2025 22:19

I moved a child from state to private for primary, and it was incomparable. At private school school she had a small class, fantastic dedicated teachers and a wonderful approachable headteacher, and a creative pedagogy, which wasn't constrained by the national curriculum. Overall, so much more child centred and fun.

The state school was run down, with huge classes and overcrowded (up to 32/33 per class), and the teachers were often on sick leave. One year she had over 10 different supply teachers. It was a holding pen and nothing more. The headteacher was lazy and feckless.

Obviously, it depends on the individual schools, but in my experience it is definitely worth it.

That's all very well but the op can no longer afford it.

SkaterGrrrrl · 15/10/2025 22:24

RedLeggedPartridge · 15/10/2025 19:40

My DS is a quiet, hard-working, academic boy. He attempts our local bog-standard comp. He has found plenty of friends similar to him and is doing well.
Secondaries are big places, she will find her tribe there. No need to try and do anything to change/toughen her before she goes.

I could have written this. Plenty of bright book worms at state schools.

(I say this as the parent of 2 DC, one at private and one at state.)

Kittlewittle · 15/10/2025 22:19

I moved a child from state to private for primary, and it was incomparable. At private school school she had a small class, fantastic dedicated teachers and a wonderful approachable headteacher, and a creative pedagogy, which wasn't constrained by the national curriculum. Overall, so much more child centred and fun.

The state school was run down, with huge classes and overcrowded (up to 32/33 per class), and the teachers were often on sick leave. One year she had over 10 different supply teachers. It was a holding pen and nothing more. The headteacher was lazy and feckless.

Obviously, it depends on the individual schools, but in my experience it is definitely worth it.

Hereforthecommentz · 15/10/2025 22:19

All schools have a few badly behaved children in them. Your dd, I imagine, wouldn't be mixing with them. There are plenty of bright kids in state schools. She will make friends with like-minded children. Just make sure your aren't projecting your snobishness, if she acts above them that would go down like a lead balloon. (Edited as I used the word kids too many times!)

bittertwisted · 15/10/2025 22:04

MummyCookies · 15/10/2025 19:46

Your response is nasty. Bear in mind she has only ever known private and she has only ever known 15 kids in a classroom. Your response to my reasonable worry is just very aggressive!

No it’s honest. You do know children who’s parents can’t afford private can be bookish ? You are being rude suggesting otherwise

Bramble234 · 15/10/2025 21:59

My kids went to private school until year 4 and year 1. All the way through nursery too. It was a waste. I dont think it helped in any way and I think the pushiness of the teachers and parents have deeply affected my eldest. She lost her academic confidence and im still helping her to get it back 4 years later. I dont regret moving them to state school. I regret ever putting them in private school in the first place. It was a total waste of time, effort and money. They are much happier now with local friends and lots of playdates. They have found it harder with friends though because they weren't at the state primary from the start when friendship groups were made

ryme · 15/10/2025 21:59

I actually find it quite offensive that you think your child is too nerdy for state. I was a classic nerd (still am!) and I went to one of the roughest schools in the north of England in the 80s during all the miner's strikes. My Dad was a labourer, both parents had learning difficulties, and by the time I was 7 years old I'd surpassed both my parents academically, so no help there and definitely no money for tutoring.

I never had any issues with bullying, there were other nerds like me, and I still look back in awe at the sheer dedication of some of the teachers.
I did amazingly well, got great GSCEs and A-levels - I have a Ph.D. in a stem subject and work in tech.
Sorry OP, but my life experiences mean that I think private school is as useful as sitting in front of a fire and throwing £50 notes into it.

Swipe left for the next trending thread