Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Autistic child attacking DD part 2

756 replies

HollandAndCooper · 15/10/2025 09:14

Original thread here:
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5420774-autistic-child-attacking-dd?utm_campaign=thread&utm_medium=app_share

Hi Everyone,

me back again looking for advice, perhaps some last minute advice as I have a meeting scheduled with the head teacher this morning.

DD aged 4 has been very unwell and spent a week off school. She is really going through it at the moment. She returned to school yesterday after her time off, and I'd hoped that the boy in question would've got bored and moved on. I did have a meeting booked last week but couldn't go due to DD being poorly.

well.. it turns out he hasn't got bored and moved on. It's a very small school with 20-25 per class, one class per year from reception to year 2.

the event that happened yesterday, by DDs account.
it was play time and DD was playing with a couple other girls in the play ground. Child in question was calling DD names like 'baby' and 'you need nappies' and announced he was going to the toilet.
he came back out and proceeded to have faeces on his finger to which he wiped on her cardigan.

a staff member took her to the quiet room, swapped her cardigan for one in lost property and the cardigan was handed to me in a bag on pick up. With still an evident stain on it.

i have a meeting this morning.

I have a copy of the safe guarding policy, anti bullying policy. I just need some wise words from MN now with what I need to say but I'm going down the route of failing to keep my child safe, and this is a huge safeguarding issue, not to mention a biohazard issue.
please be kind, I'm a single parent doing my best, and she won't be returning until she is safe.

so far the child has:
kicked, punched, pinched, clouted her on the head with a metal water bottle, name called and taunted. And now this.

she will not be going back to the school until this is sorted and there are proper sanctions in place. I am so angry and utterly heartbroken for her. She has been so poorly last week and in and out of hospital and I cannot see her broken like this anymore.

i appreciate the old thread is 1000 posts but there's more information on there if needed.
My AIBU is I guess to want this child excluded and put as far away from DD as possible. But I know it's not that simple. I'm at a total loss and they are failing to safe guard my child. She will not be returning until she can be safe, I'm also looking at other provisions for her now.
thanks in advance.

OP posts:
Shad3away · 17/10/2025 16:20

WearyAuldWumman · 17/10/2025 15:03

If the boy has a formal diagnosis, the school will be frightened of antagonising the parent and being accused of discrimination against the disabled.

I've seen this in action in the secondary sector: it wasn't the fault of a 12 yr old that that they held a sharp tool against the throat of another 12 yr old, apparently. Mind you, if I'd been the parent of the victim, I'd have created merry hell and I'd have insisted on the police being called. I suspect that the parents were scared of being accused of discrimination.

Then there was this case, where a pupil attacked a teacher. On the local FB page, the boy's neighbour blamed the teacher.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-45940788

Of course they wouldn’t. Don’t be ridiculous.

shampop · 17/10/2025 16:00

My autistic son was violent at age 4. Several years later he isn’t violent at all and is a lovely little boy.
So no this boy isn’t definitely going to grow into a stronger and bigger violent man.
but that’s besides the point, the issue is what’s happening your DD here and now, and her useless school.

x2boys · 17/10/2025 15:39

HollandAndCooper · 17/10/2025 14:28

of course, but this thread isn't about a violent girl. It's about a violent boy.

there is also an epidemic of violence against women and girls. There isn't an epidemic of violence of women against boys.

completely incomparable

Which has got nothing to di with a four year old boy
I have every sympathy with your situation but your not doing your self any favours constantly comparing a very small child yo a violent abusive man
It's the school you should be angry with they have let both children down and have failed to keep your daughter safe

Easytoconfuse · 17/10/2025 15:32

Bushmillsbabe · 17/10/2025 14:55

Do much more with what money? All these comments that he needs a 1 to 1 - where from? Schools are at breaking point, EHCP's are taking years to come through, and until they do there is no money to provide him with extra support.
Reeves's NI increase and cuts to council funding have put schools in a dire position.

To anyone who doesn't believe me - apply to be a governor for your local primary to fully understand the current landscape which schools are working in.

As a governor, do you think the right help is being supplied, at the right time? I'm not point scoring because I'm genuinely interested. In my LA nothing is done till a child is 2 years behind, by which time they can't catch up in mainstream and they're then shipped out of area to any private facility that'll take them. 6% of their education budget goes on home to school transport and those places are expensive.

Do you think there's a case for pre-entry testing and then directing each child to the most appropriate school? You'd need an up front cash injection to make it possible, but I believe it'd pay for itself in financial and emotional terms.

My experience from the parents viewpoint is that a lot of those describing themselves as experts are no such thing. Many years ago now, I got the devil in me and went round a group of LA and school staff who were discussing my daughter (some of whom had never met her) and asked them what qualifications they had in autism. Not one of them had ever studied it and their preconceptions were as dangerous as they were entertaining. I was the only one who had formally studied it, and I was universally ignored.

Myfluffyblanket · 17/10/2025 15:26

Ed Davey (Lib Dem) talking about the proposed ban on Israeli people attending a football match :
'It is completely wrong to tackle anti Semitism by banning its victims.'
Swap 'antl Semitism' for 'bullying' and we can see how wrong it is that it is OPs daughter who has had to move. Victim blaming is rife, especially when the victim is a girl or a woman.
OP, i am so sad for your daughter. I hope she settles well in her new school and enjoys the rest of her academic career.

Kirbert2 · 17/10/2025 15:07

Bushmillsbabe · 17/10/2025 14:55

Do much more with what money? All these comments that he needs a 1 to 1 - where from? Schools are at breaking point, EHCP's are taking years to come through, and until they do there is no money to provide him with extra support.
Reeves's NI increase and cuts to council funding have put schools in a dire position.

To anyone who doesn't believe me - apply to be a governor for your local primary to fully understand the current landscape which schools are working in.

The boy apparently does have a 1:1 which seemed to be put in place rather quickly after OP's complaints when her child was hurt by this boy before the poo incident.

My son's EHCP didn't take years to come through, it did take months though but I appreciate its LA dependent and it doesn't surprise me at all to hear that it can take years.

WearyAuldWumman · 17/10/2025 15:05

While I was searching for the Lochgelly case, I stumbled across this in FB. This is definitely a separate incident. Note the victim blaming in the comments: "What did she do?"

www.facebook.com/groups/1306308666613479/posts/1762608804316794/

WearyAuldWumman · 17/10/2025 15:03

Solipsis92 · 17/10/2025 14:45

Ideally the parents of the little boy! I think that it probably comes down to the school being generally too lazy/useless to think about it rather than them meaning anything in particular by it though

If the boy has a formal diagnosis, the school will be frightened of antagonising the parent and being accused of discrimination against the disabled.

I've seen this in action in the secondary sector: it wasn't the fault of a 12 yr old that that they held a sharp tool against the throat of another 12 yr old, apparently. Mind you, if I'd been the parent of the victim, I'd have created merry hell and I'd have insisted on the police being called. I suspect that the parents were scared of being accused of discrimination.

Then there was this case, where a pupil attacked a teacher. On the local FB page, the boy's neighbour blamed the teacher.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-45940788

Police

Teenager charged over attack on teacher in Lochgelly

The teacher was reportedly stabbed in the neck with a pencil in the incident which happened in Lochgelly.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-45940788

Kirbert2 · 17/10/2025 15:02

Easytoconfuse · 17/10/2025 14:54

I don't think that happened because the OP was given the shitty jumper in a plastic bag at the end of the school day. My guess is it didn't even occur to them, along with a lot of other things.

I agree that's the most likely scenario.

Bushmillsbabe · 17/10/2025 14:55

Thekidsarefightingagain · 17/10/2025 13:34

Isolating a young child often causes future MH difficulties as they are very aware they're failing and viewed negatively (ie as a problem child) and this is how they will view themselves too. They know they're different to their peers. Behaviour is communication and needs clearly aren't being met. Once needs are met it's amazing to see the transformation. The school needs to do much more to meet needs and protect both children. It's not even sacrificing one over the other, it's failing both children badly.

Do much more with what money? All these comments that he needs a 1 to 1 - where from? Schools are at breaking point, EHCP's are taking years to come through, and until they do there is no money to provide him with extra support.
Reeves's NI increase and cuts to council funding have put schools in a dire position.

To anyone who doesn't believe me - apply to be a governor for your local primary to fully understand the current landscape which schools are working in.

Easytoconfuse · 17/10/2025 14:54

Kirbert2 · 17/10/2025 14:46

It's also possible that the school asked and his parents said no/ignored the requests. Unfortunately, I don't see how the school can enforce parents to wash another child's clothing or replace it.

I don't think that happened because the OP was given the shitty jumper in a plastic bag at the end of the school day. My guess is it didn't even occur to them, along with a lot of other things.

Easytoconfuse · 17/10/2025 14:52

Kirbert2 · 17/10/2025 14:46

It's also possible that the school asked and his parents said no/ignored the requests. Unfortunately, I don't see how the school can enforce parents to wash another child's clothing or replace it.

Of course a school can't enforce anything, but the attitude of 'here you go, it's up to you to wash another child's shit off your child's jumper' was what left me thinking 'some things can't be fixed. Get her out of there.'

Kirbert2 · 17/10/2025 14:52

WearyAuldWumman · 17/10/2025 14:50

At my old place of work, the school would have replaced the item if the parent refused to do so.

I think that's the right thing to do. I'm not surprised that this school haven't at least offered though.

WearyAuldWumman · 17/10/2025 14:50

Kirbert2 · 17/10/2025 14:46

It's also possible that the school asked and his parents said no/ignored the requests. Unfortunately, I don't see how the school can enforce parents to wash another child's clothing or replace it.

At my old place of work, the school would have replaced the item if the parent refused to do so.

WearyAuldWumman · 17/10/2025 14:49

My experience is the secondary sector, as I've said upthread. Unfortunately, the proper interventions are rarely put in place, in my experience.

I had written a very long post, but it was too outing. All I can say is that - in my opinion - if interventions are not put in place in the early years, then there is a tragedy waiting to happen.

Solipsis92 · 17/10/2025 14:48

Kirbert2 · 17/10/2025 14:46

It's also possible that the school asked and his parents said no/ignored the requests. Unfortunately, I don't see how the school can enforce parents to wash another child's clothing or replace it.

Yes thats true

Kirbert2 · 17/10/2025 14:46

Solipsis92 · 17/10/2025 14:45

Ideally the parents of the little boy! I think that it probably comes down to the school being generally too lazy/useless to think about it rather than them meaning anything in particular by it though

It's also possible that the school asked and his parents said no/ignored the requests. Unfortunately, I don't see how the school can enforce parents to wash another child's clothing or replace it.

Solipsis92 · 17/10/2025 14:45

Easytoconfuse · 17/10/2025 14:40

I'm so glad we can agree on what should have happened and what didn't happen. In the end, that is more important than what we call the perpetrator. Can I ask who you think should have washed or replaced the jumper and if you can see the symbolism of the OP being expected to do it?

Ideally the parents of the little boy! I think that it probably comes down to the school being generally too lazy/useless to think about it rather than them meaning anything in particular by it though

HollandAndCooper · 17/10/2025 14:41

Jimmyneutronsforehead · 17/10/2025 14:18

Children aren't adults.

Children with developmental disorders and delays will be developmentally disordered or delayed unless they receive the right support in their developmental and formative years. That support often comes while the child is in an educational setting and not flying under the radar. This support then mitigates the likelihood of them growing into the adults you are describing.

If an autistic adult can't work without acting upon violence then the chances are they'd be assessed not capable for work, but you can't write a 4 year old off as never being able to enter the working world when no immediate support is available and there's a ridiculous beaureacratic, lengthy legal process that has to be adhered to in order to get them that support, that is completely out of that childs hands.

Moving your daughter is a choice you can make, and I would make that choice if it was my child, but you seem to be angry at the fact you can't control that this boy won't be excluded yet rather than simply that the school have failed your daughter and this child by not providing adequate supervision. It's just baying for blood at this point.

Of course I'm angry. I'm angry at the school, and at the child. It's hard not to be when my daughter is coming home terrified and visibly injured.

im angry at the fact that HE AND THE SCHOOL have caused a great deal of upheaval for my little girl and that she has now left the school. Im angry at the fact that he could possibly link 'if I bully and pick on and attack these kids, they will leave.' What sort of a message does that send to a violent boy?

nobody knows what's going on in his mind. I feel his capabilities have been given the benefit of the doubt far far too much when these are calculated, premeditated and unprovoked attacks. There's posters on here that were bullied 60 years ago and still have the scars. I have every right to be angry, and I have every right to be angry at the school and the boy, and his mother who simply glares on watching him throw sticks at people in the morning and bangs on the notice board. I'm angry that the mother hasn't even offered to replace the cardigan regardless of me moving her to another school. That I'm expected to scrape shit stains off my daughters cardigan that her son smeared on her.

but it's by the by now. She's out of there and I've been the only one to keep her safe from all of this. It's been a huge eye opener and a huge let down. I was firmly never a fan of home schooling, I can totally see why some parents do it now.

im stepping away from this thread now as I've done what I needed to do to keep her safe. And the excuses for his behaviour and all this gentle inclusiveness to enable violence and abuse is just not needed. A few people have assumed his behaviour is down to his SEN. He could, genuinely, just be a bully. Who knows? And he's now had a victory on making a little girl leave when he notices she isn't there to target anymore. Hopefully he doesn't move onto another child.

thank you do everybody who's offered advice, support and well wishes for my little girl. I really really appreciate it. There's been so many of you on both of these threads and you all gave me the push to remove her from the school.

stepping away now - have good weekends all!

OP posts:
Easytoconfuse · 17/10/2025 14:40

Solipsis92 · 17/10/2025 14:28

They should have got the TA to actually supervise the little boy all day, staying with him constantly, not wandering off and leaving him alone to harm OPs little girl. The teacher should have talked to her and explained that they were going to make sure that she wasnt hurt again, and then made sure that happened. They could have explained to her that what happened to her was wrong, that its never ok for someone to hurt you, and that none of it was her fault. You can do all that without calling four year olds abusers and comparing them to violent men. The school are the ones who are ultimately responsible for this, they massively failed in their duty to keep the children safe.

I'm so glad we can agree on what should have happened and what didn't happen. In the end, that is more important than what we call the perpetrator. Can I ask who you think should have washed or replaced the jumper and if you can see the symbolism of the OP being expected to do it?

HollandAndCooper · 17/10/2025 14:28

Avantiagain · 17/10/2025 13:58

"Yes children aren't adults but these violent boys will grow into adults"

And the violent girls will also grow into adults.

of course, but this thread isn't about a violent girl. It's about a violent boy.

there is also an epidemic of violence against women and girls. There isn't an epidemic of violence of women against boys.

completely incomparable

OP posts:
Solipsis92 · 17/10/2025 14:28

Easytoconfuse · 17/10/2025 14:20

I note your points. Can I ask what you think should have been happening to the little girl who's been targeted? What steps do you think should the school have been taking to keep her safe and able to learn not just academically but about life and making friends? How would you explain what has happened to her and reassure her that it wasn't her fault and she didn't deserve it to happen and that, most of all, she will be safe at school?

They should have got the TA to actually supervise the little boy all day, staying with him constantly, not wandering off and leaving him alone to harm OPs little girl. The teacher should have talked to her and explained that they were going to make sure that she wasnt hurt again, and then made sure that happened. They could have explained to her that what happened to her was wrong, that its never ok for someone to hurt you, and that none of it was her fault. You can do all that without calling four year olds abusers and comparing them to violent men. The school are the ones who are ultimately responsible for this, they massively failed in their duty to keep the children safe.

Thekidsarefightingagain · 17/10/2025 14:24

Solipsis92 · 17/10/2025 14:09

You can refer to his behaviour as being completely unacceptable and unsafe without labelling a very small child as an abuser and comparing him to adult violent prisoners etc, its just not the same thing. As I have repeatedly said, they should get a proper 1-1 ta or a special school placement for the little boy, non of that requires him to be demonized, he is incredibly young and to be showing that kind of behaviour at his age could well mean something serious is going on at home, we just don't know.

Absolutely. Although I bet that when the right provision is put in place his behaviours will reduce significantly.

Easytoconfuse · 17/10/2025 14:20

Solipsis92 · 17/10/2025 14:09

You can refer to his behaviour as being completely unacceptable and unsafe without labelling a very small child as an abuser and comparing him to adult violent prisoners etc, its just not the same thing. As I have repeatedly said, they should get a proper 1-1 ta or a special school placement for the little boy, non of that requires him to be demonized, he is incredibly young and to be showing that kind of behaviour at his age could well mean something serious is going on at home, we just don't know.

I note your points. Can I ask what you think should have been happening to the little girl who's been targeted? What steps do you think should the school have been taking to keep her safe and able to learn not just academically but about life and making friends? How would you explain what has happened to her and reassure her that it wasn't her fault and she didn't deserve it to happen and that, most of all, she will be safe at school?

Jimmyneutronsforehead · 17/10/2025 14:18

HollandAndCooper · 17/10/2025 12:47

But if a disabled autistic adult man assaults a woman in a work place by punching her in the face, would the work place need to 'attempt to meet the employment needs of the disabled employee?'

of course not.

why should school be any different? Yes children aren't adults but these violent boys will grow into adults and when it comes down to it, violence is violence, end of!

Edited

Children aren't adults.

Children with developmental disorders and delays will be developmentally disordered or delayed unless they receive the right support in their developmental and formative years. That support often comes while the child is in an educational setting and not flying under the radar. This support then mitigates the likelihood of them growing into the adults you are describing.

If an autistic adult can't work without acting upon violence then the chances are they'd be assessed not capable for work, but you can't write a 4 year old off as never being able to enter the working world when no immediate support is available and there's a ridiculous beaureacratic, lengthy legal process that has to be adhered to in order to get them that support, that is completely out of that childs hands.

Moving your daughter is a choice you can make, and I would make that choice if it was my child, but you seem to be angry at the fact you can't control that this boy won't be excluded yet rather than simply that the school have failed your daughter and this child by not providing adequate supervision. It's just baying for blood at this point.