Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Friend and Continued Work Absence

237 replies

GentleWord · 14/10/2025 07:16

I have a friend who has some mental and physical health diagnoses. She qualified as a teacher more than ten years ago. She has worked in different settings - state schools, private schools, and preschools.

Since then, she has had a few jobs as a teacher, but on average, she has up to half the time she is employed off sick. This does become an issue, and mostly she has to move on.

Never quietly. It usually goes through legal channels and I know the company have settled at least twice.

Before, I didn't think much about this, but now I have reason to think about schooling, I don't think it is fair that she keeps taking jobs that she cannot do. I'm actually unsure how she manages to get a new job with her history but apparently schools have only very recently been demanding of the last reference and now you can give "bad" references.

I don't think it is fair on the children to have a teacher who is so unreliable. I don't think it is fair on the staff. I think after a decade, it should be clear to her and her family that she cannot be a teacher. However, I think they cling to her profession as a status thing.

The same pattern is occurring again where shw is started to have repeated and medium term absences from a job she started last year. I think this time I should be a bit more honest with her about her career and the other people affected by how she engages with her job.

Unreasonable - dont say anything and just support her

Reasonable - find the words to say that teaching isn't an appropriate career choice.

OP posts:
CoraPirbright · 15/10/2025 08:18

I think you are getting a rough ride here OP and don’t really understand why. Yes, everyone is entitled to feel ill or struggle with their health and feel supported. The key here is that it’s a repeated pattern and your friend sues her employers when they have finally had enough! It’s a pattern that doesn’t put her in a good light at all. And for everyone saying “oh there are toxic workplaces and that probably is making her ill”, when it’s more than one or two in someone’s career then it’s usually the person that is the common denominator and the problem.

WearyCat · 15/10/2025 08:16

GentleWord · 14/10/2025 07:56

Before you didn't need one from your last employer. Now you do.

This has never been true in the 19 years I’ve worked in the education sector

@GentleWord you sound resentful of your friend. Why did you put IBS in quotation marks? Do you think she is malingering? If she had a chronic condition like rheumatoid arthritis or MS and had to be off work frequently would you also see this in the same light? Or is it because her issue is mental health that you are so concerned about her ethics?

FWIW the T&C in most teaching posts have declined as academies can opt out of Red Book conditions. My current teaching job offers almost no paid sick leave at all (at least for me; maybe the HR or management positions get a better deal) and holidays have to be booked (during school holidays, of course). So I doubt your friend is coining it while on sick leave.

Oh, and if you use your sick leave up by July it doesn’t just reset in September. You have to do time in work with no absence before it will reset.

Offloadontome · 15/10/2025 08:10

It sounds like she needs to medically retire tbh but she's doing what's best for her, like everyone else - because relying on benefits doesn't make for any good quality of life it's so little.

GentleWord · 15/10/2025 07:33

TwinklyStork · 14/10/2025 19:10

But surely in that case they just hire a replacement. The school isn’t paying for her and a cover teacher if she’s left and gone to another school, so they’re no worse off.

And in that time, the children cope with the disruption. How is it fair on them?

OP posts:
GentleWord · 15/10/2025 07:32

TwinklyStork · 14/10/2025 19:19

So she’s struggling to cope with MH issues caused by her parents by desperately trying to stay in a job she can’t cope with because they forced her into a professional degree?
That doesn’t make it any better, OP.

Nobody forced her into a degree. She went to uni because that's what most people do after they complete their private education. She wanted to have a career in teaching. She feels entitled to be a teacher, even if she isnt very good at it because she cannot consistently attend.

Oh and she's in her 30s.

OP posts:
TwinklyStork · 14/10/2025 19:19

GentleWord · 14/10/2025 19:13

I think part of this is them accepting that their daughter is quite severely disabled by her mental health problems. The issue is that they'd have to reflect on their (ongoing) part in why she has those issues.

So she’s struggling to cope with MH issues caused by her parents by desperately trying to stay in a job she can’t cope with because they forced her into a professional degree?
That doesn’t make it any better, OP.

crackersinternational · 14/10/2025 19:17

TwinklyStork · 14/10/2025 19:10

But surely in that case they just hire a replacement. The school isn’t paying for her and a cover teacher if she’s left and gone to another school, so they’re no worse off.

But isn't this what has been happening and then she's sued the schools? Of course after she's gone she's not on the payroll, but she's on another school's payroll and the situation is repeated.

GentleWord · 14/10/2025 19:15

LittleBitofBread · 14/10/2025 16:53

Why do you have sneer quotes around the words immunocompromised and severe IBS? and why do you say she 'feels' she has these things?

EDITED for typo

Edited

Because the doctors don't class her that way. There was a whole thing about her vaccine classification over covid.

OP posts:
GentleWord · 14/10/2025 19:13

TwinklyStork · 14/10/2025 16:31

Ah yes, but how many of them would be acceptable to her family, who insist she must have a "professional" job?

I think part of this is them accepting that their daughter is quite severely disabled by her mental health problems. The issue is that they'd have to reflect on their (ongoing) part in why she has those issues.

OP posts:
TwinklyStork · 14/10/2025 19:10

crackersinternational · 14/10/2025 19:07

I didn't say they had no money, ever, to pay for cover. They have to find the money from somewhere, until they can't I suppose. The school she works at is finding this money to cover her absences. That doesn't mean it is an endless pot of money. Usual short term sickness or a longer term leave in unusual circumstances is definitely something that should be covered. Long term going off sick, not coping with the job, coming back and then going off with the same thing again and again in different schools (so not just one bad one or one where she wasn't a good 'fit') is a problem.

But surely in that case they just hire a replacement. The school isn’t paying for her and a cover teacher if she’s left and gone to another school, so they’re no worse off.

crackersinternational · 14/10/2025 19:07

TwinklyStork · 14/10/2025 18:56

But you were just suggesting she works as an agency teacher. Where is she meant to find work, if schools are too squeezed to hire any to cover absences?

I didn't say they had no money, ever, to pay for cover. They have to find the money from somewhere, until they can't I suppose. The school she works at is finding this money to cover her absences. That doesn't mean it is an endless pot of money. Usual short term sickness or a longer term leave in unusual circumstances is definitely something that should be covered. Long term going off sick, not coping with the job, coming back and then going off with the same thing again and again in different schools (so not just one bad one or one where she wasn't a good 'fit') is a problem.

CopperWhite · 14/10/2025 19:01

You are right OP. Someone who has a realistic expectation of being unable to complete less than a year in work without needing significant time off has no business placing themselves into children’s lives in such a prominent way.

Of course teachers have the same right to be ill and need time of work as anyone else and it is up to their employer, not them, to minimise disruption, but to be a good EY teacher you have to care about what you’re doing, because the bare minimum just isn’t enough. If she doesn’t care about children receiving a consistent reception education. then she can’t be a good teacher.

All the people sticking up for this woman would probably feel differently if it was their own 4 year old being taught by a random mixture of cover/supply staff and TAs for weeks at a time.

TwinklyStork · 14/10/2025 18:56

crackersinternational · 14/10/2025 18:52

But school budgets are so squeezed already that they can't automatically allow for a teacher's salary plus expensive cover on a regular and long term basis. What if there were five teachers like this on the staff? How could the school afford to do this long term? And a cover teacher needs to be found quickly, the school can't take weeks/ months appointing the very best fit for the class - she could be back at work before this happened (or not, and off another few months). If the teacher's sickness is regular and it seems, inevitable, it is unfair to just say that this is her right to earn a salary regardless of the consequences for anyone else.

But you were just suggesting she works as an agency teacher. Where is she meant to find work, if schools are too squeezed to hire any to cover absences?

crackersinternational · 14/10/2025 18:52

TwinklyStork · 14/10/2025 18:42

Of course, I see the point about the kids’ education. But if children are losing out on education because she’s off sick, that’s not her fault, and they shouldn’t be. If they are, that’s entirely down to the school, for not hiring a suitable replacement or cover teacher.

But school budgets are so squeezed already that they can't automatically allow for a teacher's salary plus expensive cover on a regular and long term basis. What if there were five teachers like this on the staff? How could the school afford to do this long term? And a cover teacher needs to be found quickly, the school can't take weeks/ months appointing the very best fit for the class - she could be back at work before this happened (or not, and off another few months). If the teacher's sickness is regular and it seems, inevitable, it is unfair to just say that this is her right to earn a salary regardless of the consequences for anyone else.

TwinklyStork · 14/10/2025 18:42

crackersinternational · 14/10/2025 18:38

Absolutely, I agree, it's not black and white, but when this has happened repeatedly, it surely must be time to reassess. Agency work as a teacher when she's well enough is still teaching and a profession, and not leaving a class to potentially fall behind without their permanent teacher. Lots of people carry family expectations of achievement, and some of those children who are losing out on a decent quality education could well be among them. Should young children be having to catch up in their spare time so that they are meeting the high expectations of their parents? Tutoring would also leave students without their regular tutor during the times when she isn't well enough to work, so probably wouldn't be a good alternative. I fully sympathise with anyone struggling with their job and I hope OP's friend can find an alternative solution to their presumably quite unhappy situation.

Of course, I see the point about the kids’ education. But if children are losing out on education because she’s off sick, that’s not her fault, and they shouldn’t be. If they are, that’s entirely down to the school, for not hiring a suitable replacement or cover teacher.

crackersinternational · 14/10/2025 18:38

TwinklyStork · 14/10/2025 17:21

That depends on so many things, doesn’t it.
Is this person well enough to retrain in another career path?
Is she young enough? The OP hasn’t said how old she is despite being asked.
Are there any other jobs she’s able to do, or qualified for?
She also has the family pressure of the expectation that she will be in a professional job to deal with.
Tutoring, maybe, but it takes time to build up enough students to make it worthwhile and then she’s not earning while she’s doing that.
It’s not as black and white as people make out.

Absolutely, I agree, it's not black and white, but when this has happened repeatedly, it surely must be time to reassess. Agency work as a teacher when she's well enough is still teaching and a profession, and not leaving a class to potentially fall behind without their permanent teacher. Lots of people carry family expectations of achievement, and some of those children who are losing out on a decent quality education could well be among them. Should young children be having to catch up in their spare time so that they are meeting the high expectations of their parents? Tutoring would also leave students without their regular tutor during the times when she isn't well enough to work, so probably wouldn't be a good alternative. I fully sympathise with anyone struggling with their job and I hope OP's friend can find an alternative solution to their presumably quite unhappy situation.

TwinklyStork · 14/10/2025 17:21

crackersinternational · 14/10/2025 17:14

Surely if you take a maternity package without going back to work afterwards you have to pay it back? I'm pretty sure anyone I know who was lucky enough to have something like this also had a minimum amount of time they had to return to work for after the maternity leave. A workplace can plan for maternity leave(s) cover as it's usually a fixed time and they aren't having to pay high cover rates on a daily/ weekly basis. I'm not saying disabled or (sometimes) unwell people shouldn't work, but surely one should also consider the type of work you are doing or are able to do, and the knock on effects of being unable to perform in that role. A large team of admin workers can absorb an absent colleague's workload in a way that a missing teacher can't be well replaced with multiple covers. When those most affected by your absence are really reliant on the job being done well and consistently, surely it is the better choice to allow them that and to look for a job that is easier for you to both earn a living with and not let down not necessarily your employers, but the people who have no choice but to rely on your presence in the workplace.

That depends on so many things, doesn’t it.
Is this person well enough to retrain in another career path?
Is she young enough? The OP hasn’t said how old she is despite being asked.
Are there any other jobs she’s able to do, or qualified for?
She also has the family pressure of the expectation that she will be in a professional job to deal with.
Tutoring, maybe, but it takes time to build up enough students to make it worthwhile and then she’s not earning while she’s doing that.
It’s not as black and white as people make out.

Tontostitis · 14/10/2025 17:16

Personally I couldn't be friends with someone who was so manipulative and deceitful. Education in this country is up against the wall financially we don't need people like her taking the piss. Literally taking money away from children what an awful awful woman.

crackersinternational · 14/10/2025 17:14

Surely if you take a maternity package without going back to work afterwards you have to pay it back? I'm pretty sure anyone I know who was lucky enough to have something like this also had a minimum amount of time they had to return to work for after the maternity leave. A workplace can plan for maternity leave(s) cover as it's usually a fixed time and they aren't having to pay high cover rates on a daily/ weekly basis. I'm not saying disabled or (sometimes) unwell people shouldn't work, but surely one should also consider the type of work you are doing or are able to do, and the knock on effects of being unable to perform in that role. A large team of admin workers can absorb an absent colleague's workload in a way that a missing teacher can't be well replaced with multiple covers. When those most affected by your absence are really reliant on the job being done well and consistently, surely it is the better choice to allow them that and to look for a job that is easier for you to both earn a living with and not let down not necessarily your employers, but the people who have no choice but to rely on your presence in the workplace.

Cosyblankets · 14/10/2025 16:58

GentleWord · 14/10/2025 16:03

Why would I need to mention how I support my friend? This is about her not going to work and the kids not having a consistent teacher. Lots of people support her - financially, emotionally, physically even.

Because it's a forum and some people like me were questioning whether she is actually your friend. Because you don't sound very much like her friend.

LittleBitofBread · 14/10/2025 16:53

GentleWord · 14/10/2025 07:33

Yes I think by this time, three or four teaching jobs in, we know there is a pattern where she starts the job, all is well until she starts to feel that at least some of her colleagues don't like her and/or the workload increases. Such as towards the end of the year when children are moving on or up. Then she starts taking weeks off for mental health related conditions and this is often on top of odd days as she feels she is "immunocompromised" and has "severe IBS".

This will go on for months of fit notes, some presence and some absence until she basically has to leave.

Why do you have sneer quotes around the words immunocompromised and severe IBS? and why do you say she 'feels' she has these things?

EDITED for typo

TwinklyStork · 14/10/2025 16:31

HoskinsChoice · 14/10/2025 16:22

Actually, we absolutely can have it both ways! Adjustments have to be 'reasonable'. There are certain jobs that certain people can't do. You wouldn't have to adjust a roofer's role for someone with multiple amputations or a proofreader role for someone with dyslexia. We have to be practical. There are many many types of jobs - she can work without claiming disability benefits, it may just not be teaching.

Ah yes, but how many of them would be acceptable to her family, who insist she must have a "professional" job?

NorthernLass2025 · 14/10/2025 16:30

Hats off to someone with mental health problems and still trying to work. Doesn't matter what work she is trained in teacher,cleaner etc at least she isn't sitting on her butt when she is well. Sorry but if I was her friend she would be getting praised for trying the rest is none of my business. I'm pretty sure anybody with mental health problems that never know when the next bad flare up will be and keeps trying needs support not a critical friend. She must actually be a very good teacher when well for her to actually be able to get the jobs

HoskinsChoice · 14/10/2025 16:22

youmustbeshittingme · 14/10/2025 07:26

It sounds like, despite her difficulties, she is trying to work and maintain a profession.

She needs to be supported to do that and her employer has a statutory obligation to do so. What do you propose she does if she leaves her job? What job would be acceptable to be unwell in?

People are constantly moaning about benefit claimants on here and in the media. You can’t have it both ways. If we want sick and disabled people to keep working then we have to make adjustments for the impact their disability or health issues may have.

Actually, we absolutely can have it both ways! Adjustments have to be 'reasonable'. There are certain jobs that certain people can't do. You wouldn't have to adjust a roofer's role for someone with multiple amputations or a proofreader role for someone with dyslexia. We have to be practical. There are many many types of jobs - she can work without claiming disability benefits, it may just not be teaching.

TwinklyStork · 14/10/2025 16:10

GentleWord · 14/10/2025 15:57

Who says that specific behaviour is ethical? I don't know anyone who has done that, myself. Most people have 2 or 3 kids over about 8 or 10 years.

Most people have 2 or 3 kids over about 8 or 10 years.

Actually, not so much these days. With the cost of living as it is, many people are having their kids very close together so they can get the high nursery fees out of the way as quickly as possible. That absolutely leads to repeated maternity leaves with very little time in between them; meanwhile the employer is stuck paying their maternity package (if they have one) and for repeated maternity cover staff.

And then you have those who take their full entitlement knowing full well they're not going back to work afterwards but don't tell their employer until the last minute, so that they don't lose maternity pay.

I don't see that as any different, aside from the fact that it's deliberate and planned for, whereas ill health is not.