Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Child only area in restaurant- discriminatory?

311 replies

Buyalot · 12/10/2025 14:28

I’ve returned from a carvery lunch with DH and DD (14 months).

On arrival, despite there being a lot of seats spare in every area, we were told we had to be seated in the dedicated children’s area - an
absolute racket with soft play etc.

AIBU to find this ridiculous?

OP posts:
DreamyTealGuide · 12/10/2025 16:34

Differentforgirls · 12/10/2025 16:31

I disagree with this. Not all parents need a soft play area in a restaurant as their children have been brought up to think that a meal is a chance for chatting to each other while eating. We shouldn’t be pandering to parents who want their children away from them while eating.

Then you go to another restaurant, how hard can it be.

We are not pandering to parents anything, we just want peace and quiet when we are child-free.

Differentforgirls · 12/10/2025 16:33

Buyalot · 12/10/2025 14:28

I’ve returned from a carvery lunch with DH and DD (14 months).

On arrival, despite there being a lot of seats spare in every area, we were told we had to be seated in the dedicated children’s area - an
absolute racket with soft play etc.

AIBU to find this ridiculous?

No. I think the same.

DreamyTealGuide · 12/10/2025 16:32

wishitwasntme123 · 12/10/2025 16:26

Why do you go out to eat so early

what do you mean "early"?

Kids are not vampire, they are out and about at any time of the day and evening

CurlewKate · 12/10/2025 16:31

I can see why this might appeal-but I would never, when mine were little, have taken them in the children’s area just us as a family. I might have if I was in a group with several families and lots of children.

Differentforgirls · 12/10/2025 16:31

murasaki · 12/10/2025 14:29

You had a child with you so no. Hopefully everyone else without them could enjoy their meal further away from the soft play.

I disagree with this. Not all parents need a soft play area in a restaurant as their children have been brought up to think that a meal is a chance for chatting to each other while eating. We shouldn’t be pandering to parents who want their children away from them while eating.

AutumnCosy2025 · 12/10/2025 16:30

Soupandaroll · 12/10/2025 15:05

If you go somewhere with a soft play it makes sense to seat all families with children in that area (so they are not repeatedly to-ing and fro-ing from the area, running through the restaurant and back to the table etc). It keeps the adult only areas quieter and keeps mess/spillages more contained as well. It’s presumably a compromise to cater for different clientele who want different things.

I do get it though. I wouldn’t like it either. I guess if you don’t want to be seated near the softplay and would like your children to have a calmer/more adult experience, I would avoid places which obviously set their stall out to cater to lots of families with kids by installing a soft play.

This^^

sometimes I'd take kids there & sit near the noisy soft play so they could have fun, other times I'd go somewhere that doesn't have soft play so we could just have a calm meal.

what I wouldn't do is complain they expected children (& their parents) to sit in a separate area to adult only diners anywhere, but ESPECIALLY in a pub that has a dedicated play area.

wishitwasntme123 · 12/10/2025 16:27

ParmaVioletTea · 12/10/2025 16:26

YABU.

You didn’t want the racket of other people’s children, just as no one wants the racket of your child ….

Correct! However those areas also have the noise from machines/play things

ParmaVioletTea · 12/10/2025 16:26

YABU.

You didn’t want the racket of other people’s children, just as no one wants the racket of your child ….

wishitwasntme123 · 12/10/2025 16:26

Cherry8809 · 12/10/2025 16:19

If there were two absolutely identical restaurants (same menu, location, etc) but one had a designated area for children to keep them separate, I would choose that one every single time.

I think some (most) parents are utterly oblivious to how loud and disruptive their little angels can be. Also, it makes perfect sense to keep the kids sat near the soft play, instead of having them barrelling back and forth through the restaurant.

Why do you go out to eat so early

Comeonbabylightmyfire · 12/10/2025 16:25

I can see your point, mine were expected to behave when out for food and a play area would have made this hard (they would have loved it though!). On the other hand most children aren’t taught to behave in restaurants so this is a good idea (although they will never learn that restaurants are for eating and not playing!).

I can’t say that I’ve ever been disturbed by children when I’ve been out for food so might feel differently if I had.

shhblackbag · 12/10/2025 16:24

ChocolateCinderToffee · 12/10/2025 16:15

Lead me to it! I've lost count of how many pubs I've left saying 'never again!' because the eating area was full of unsupervised children.

Yes, I'd love to know know where it is.

AgnesMcDoo · 12/10/2025 16:24

Sounds like a great idea.

If you don’t like it pick another restaurant.

Bromptotoo · 12/10/2025 16:23

If you'd booked and only found this when you arrived I think you'd have a legitimate gripe. But if you're turn up and go there are plenty of other eateries.

That said other than a place in Scotland where non residents in the hotel were, contrary to the sign outside, anything but welcome we never had a problem with ours.

Neither does our daughter and grandson.

I'd hazard a guess the problem is kids who are not kept engaged at table and/or once mobile are not prevented from running wild.

wishitwasntme123 · 12/10/2025 16:22

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 12/10/2025 16:20

Regarding the question "Is this discriminatory?"

Yes, it is. It shows the restaurant owners' ability to discriminate between adults dining with their small children and adults who prefer to dine without children all round them.

Discrimination is not always wrong; sometimes what it means is being able to tell the difference between two things without feeling obliged to judge one to be bad and the other good. For instance, someone with a particular form of colour-blindness (tritanomaly), may be unable to discriminate between blue and yellow. Most of us can discriminate between the two colours, and we are not wrong and nasty for being able to do this.

It's not adults who prefer to dine without children around them..... It may be the prefence but you can't generalise all. Because op isn't one of them

Almost2026 · 12/10/2025 16:22

Guessing it’s a framhouse inn. When our kids were older, I would add a note that I wanted to be further away from the play area but still in the family area. They are older teens now so we can sit in the none family area again. It makes sense to keep all the kids / families together tbh.

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 12/10/2025 16:20

Regarding the question "Is this discriminatory?"

Yes, it is. It shows the restaurant owners' ability to discriminate between adults dining with their small children and adults who prefer to dine without children all round them.

Discrimination is not always wrong; sometimes what it means is being able to tell the difference between two things without feeling obliged to judge one to be bad and the other good. For instance, someone with a particular form of colour-blindness (tritanomaly), may be unable to discriminate between blue and yellow. Most of us can discriminate between the two colours, and we are not wrong and nasty for being able to do this.

Wadadli · 12/10/2025 16:19

FreyjaOfTheNorth · 12/10/2025 14:31

What an excellent idea. Which restaurant is this? Sounds perfect.

😂

Sirzy · 12/10/2025 16:19

wishitwasntme123 · 12/10/2025 15:59

Why not?

Having a disability and asking for consideration to sit X is perfectly ok

Not if it’s against the policy though. They are still a child!

DS is autistic and wouldn’t have coped with it, we would pick somewhere he would. That’s not discrimination against him it’s common sense.

Cherry8809 · 12/10/2025 16:19

If there were two absolutely identical restaurants (same menu, location, etc) but one had a designated area for children to keep them separate, I would choose that one every single time.

I think some (most) parents are utterly oblivious to how loud and disruptive their little angels can be. Also, it makes perfect sense to keep the kids sat near the soft play, instead of having them barrelling back and forth through the restaurant.

latetothefisting · 12/10/2025 16:19

Do you think that areas dedicated to children existing at all is wrong, or do you think you are okay but you personally shouldn't be expected to sit in them?

ChocolateCinderToffee · 12/10/2025 16:15

Lead me to it! I've lost count of how many pubs I've left saying 'never again!' because the eating area was full of unsupervised children.

wishitwasntme123 · 12/10/2025 16:14

TypeyMcTypeface · 12/10/2025 14:44

I think it's a 'vote with your feet' situation - don't go back if you don't like it.

I'm childfree and I don't mind sitting near children in restaurants as long as they're not screaming and shouting. I suppose having a dedicated children's area removes any need to feel awkward if they do start making a proper racket.

I was child free and wouldn't be eating before 7.30pm so having children in restaurants didn't bother me....because they weren't there lol

Greggsit · 12/10/2025 16:12

Buyalot · 12/10/2025 15:56

Appreciate the mix of views! It was a nice roast, just the policy striked me as odd.

Mix of views 😂

It's pretty unanimously against you!

At least you came back.

Hoodlumboodlum · 12/10/2025 16:10

If they had an adults only area and sat all the adult dining without children in one area I doubt you'd have an issue with it even though it's the same thing.

ApplebyArrows · 12/10/2025 16:10

Sounds awful. Many 14-month-olds are lovely and quiet! On the other hand can restaurants start having segregated spaces for the noisy adults please?