Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Genuine question for anti-vaxxers

584 replies

Raisinmeup · 12/10/2025 12:25

I see a lot online about anti-vaxxers and I’m trying to understand where they’re coming from, so this is a genuine question, not rage bait.

My understanding is that some parents choose not to vaccinate their children because they believe vaccines cause harmful side effects, or they just don’t trust the government and big pharma in general.

But what’s the alternative? If everyone stopped vaccinating, wouldn’t we start seeing diseases like polio coming back? That would mean more infant deaths and lifelong disabilities. It just doesn’t seem like a rational trade off?

From what I’ve seen, there seems to be a belief that immune systems can deal with these illnesses naturally, but I wonder if part of that belief comes from the fact that parents of today haven’t actually seen what a world without vaccines looks like. We’ve grown up in a time where infant death from preventable diseases is almost unheard of, so maybe it’s easy to forget how serious these infections really are.

And lastly, if you haven’t vaccinated your child and they then catch one of these illnesses, do you not end up turning to the same big pharma for the medicine or treatment anyway?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
MummyNeedsCoffee1 · 12/10/2025 16:07

MammaTill2Pojkar · 12/10/2025 15:46

Do you have children? If so I'm curious how you have dealt with vaccines for them between the two of you?

My husband is similar, his mother was anti-vax (however she did get him at least 1 vaccine - oral polio vaccine). He does hold the view of he hates the idea of giving our children a vaccine and them having a serious adverse side effect from it, the feeling that he would have caused that when if they hadn't been vaccinated they might never have got that illness in the first place. I do kind of understand that view/feeling.

I was raised pro-vax but admit I have become more vaccine hesitant, if vaccines were truly 100% safe and effective I would have no issues with them, but unfortunately they are not, there is always a risk (however small) that there can be a serious adverse reaction, and that makes me worry when it comes to getting them for our children. However, I am also worried about them getting the actual illnesses and suffering through those and potential serious injuries or even death from them.

So, in the end we are kind of meeting each other in the middle, my husband is more anti-live-vax now (so MMR, chicken pox etc for example), I am more hesitant than I might have been with a pro-vax partner. Our children are now mostly vaccinated but we did split the vaccines up and delay some of them, we have refused a couple (e.g. rotovirus) and are still debating with MMR which is the last big vaccine they have not yet had (eldest is going to be offered it in November at school and we are tentatively leaning towards accepting 1 dose then and calling it done as there is very little difference in efficacy between 1 and 2 doses and 1 is much much better than none). Youngest is 1 booster dose away from completing catching up with 4in1 polio, pertussis etc which he will be offered next year. Both children had chicken pox naturally last year so that is no longer a concern for us.

We live in a country with high vaccine uptake and so there has not been a case of Measles in our area for I think 5 years now, I do worry about travelling and visiting England with them having no Measles protection.

I have friends who have similar aged children who have decided not to have any vaccines for them, I think being anti-vax is quite normal in the area we grew up in now. My husbands family is all very anti-vax though some did have covid vaccines due to wanting to protect vulnerable family members. One of my friends holds the same mentality of not wanting to give her chid a vaccine at the
risk of 'causing' them to get hurt by the vaccine, it does seem to be quite a common feeling/reasoning.

We’ve agreed beforehand that they would have some vaccines but not all. We’d agree to those that are well established and used for 10+ years. I followed this agreement during our babies’ first year, but since then he voiced that he’s not happy for him to have the MMR vaccine. I took my child to be vaccinated against MMR nonetheless and behind his back (I accept that this might be morally wrong and that it is his child as much as it is mine).

Crwysmam · 12/10/2025 16:07

user098786533 · 12/10/2025 15:39

To your first point, what does it matter? If my children are safe because the disease prevalence is low, then they're still safe. I get that I'm being selfish, I don’t dispute that. But are my children less safe?

Your second point is really interesting. So if we did stop vaccinating would polio become more prevalent and then my children’s risk of paralysis from it become higher?

Yes I suppose is the answer. But then what data do we have on children in the developed world in good nutrition suffering the severe complications? Is there any? If there were then why do vaccine campaigns focus on historical global data?

It's not my child’s perceived risk of catching the disease. It's their perceived risk of severe complications from the disease.

I don’t think that polio particularly cares whether your immune system is good or bad. It’s very contagious transmitted via water droplets from mouth/throat or via fecal matter.
The last known case in the UK was in the 80s.
It has been detected in London sewage treatment plants where they constantly test for water borne and fecaly transmitted diseases. Since drinking water is taken from the same source it would be prudent to vaccinate for polio if you live there or in any area where drinking water is extracted from a source where sewage is likely to be discharged.

It’s also worth remembering that asymptomatic carriers of some diseases exist and often are the source of unexpected outbreaks. Covid is a classic example, I had a number of colleagues in healthcare who tested positive for covid antibodies during the first lockdown ( our area investigated the prevalence of the infection in healthcare workers early on), they were unaware of having symptoms but may well have inadvertently spreading Covid. I frequently pass on colds to my DH without having any symptoms other than a mild dry throat or a slight headache. He doesn’t go out much due to having had a stroke so there is no other possible vector. Frequent short lived exposure to lots of antigens makes our immune systems superhuman. Childcare workers are similar. During my first few years of work I had every cold going but then gradually my immune system toughened up and is pretty invincible.
I’ve had covid every year since the pandemic but is never more than a headache or a sniffle. I think I have it at the moment but the only symptom is an upset stomach. DS came home from uni on Friday so stands a chance he’s brought it back. I can’t be bothered to test and since I’m on leave for the week I don’t pose a risk.

user098786533 · 12/10/2025 16:03

despairofbadscience · 12/10/2025 15:58

Can you provide links to these highly qualified people who are anti vax, assuming they are peer reviewed and published and not TikTok

There are lots of qualified doctors who are anti vaccine. Do you think that appearing on tiktok can change their qualification or education status?

OchonAgusOchonOh · 12/10/2025 16:01

I think part of the problem is the black and white thinking and the refusal to discuss/listen by many who advocate for vaccine uptake plus the exaggeration wrt impact of some of the diseases by vaccine zealots.

Vaccines can cause harm, as can the diseases vaccinated against. It is important to do a risk benefit analysis when deciding whether to get vaccinated. For example, I never got the flu vaccine until last year as I was at low risk and it's not terribly effective. I am now getting the flu vaccine as I'm on immuno-suppressants for an auto-immune disease triggered by covid. I have a friend who has an auto-immune disease triggered by the covid vaccine so she is reluctant to take any more vaccines. When swine flu was a thing, I didn't get the vaccine as I felt it was rushed and I was not at high risk of harm. People I know rushed out to get it because they believed the "vaccines are good" narrative and one of them now has a long term illness triggered by the vaccine.

I didn't have the MMR as it wasn't around at the time. I, and most of the children around me, had measles. It was crap but nobody I know had any severe after effects. Well nourished and healthy children are unlikely to suffer severe aftereffects from the measles so the narrative promoted by some that children were dropping dead all round the place is nonsense. Yes, in previous generations when children were malnourished and less healthy, severe impacts were more likely.

I did not have my eldest dc vaccinated until there was a local outbreak of measles. He was 4. He hadn't been vaccinated because he was born around the time Wakefield's "research" was published in one of the most reputable medical journals and I, like many others, was not willing to take the chance.

Generally, I am pro taking a considered approach to vaccines. I believe herd immunity is important but that the individual, in conjunction with their medical advisors, needs to take a considered approach as to whether it is the right course of action for them. Neither approach, taking vaccines/not taking vaccines is risk free and I think it's important to recognise that and help people to make the right decision.

user098786533 · 12/10/2025 16:00

Yesimmoaningaboutbenefits · 12/10/2025 15:52

My DD ended up in hospital after her 8week jabs. Don't know which one caused it. She was admitted for 2 nights and still unwell for a good week at home. There's no denying it was a direct result of the vaccines.

But, in the grand scheme of things, 2 nights in hospital and a week of Calpol and cuddles is nothing. A million times better than actually contracting one of the diseases she is now protected against.

I was cautious with the 12 week and 16 week jabs. Had a phone consult before hand (pre-covid when phone appointments were rare). And I had a hospital go-bag with me in case, but she was fine with those. Had my younger children vaccinated too and all was fine.

The only coherent reason for not vaccinating imo is from medical advice (allergy/immune condition etc) which is the reason we need herd immunity.

Your example is just one among many, as is those who I know who insist their child’s injuries post-vaccine were more longlasting.

But why am I going to say ‘okay I'll put my child at this risk’ for jabs, more than I'm going to say ‘okay I'll put my child at this risk’ when it's those saying ‘my child died from measles’

Well, firstly that second group don’t seem to exist.

My child is never going to be at risk of a vaccine injury. My children is at very minimal risk from complications from measles. By the time she is 10 she'll be at even lower risk from things like meningitis. Etc etc and so on and so forth. I have a teenager who never got sick and had no routine illness, yet was not vaccinated.

My children's health is my priority. They seem healthier and more resilient than their vaccinated peers, and that's the data I go on.

despairofbadscience · 12/10/2025 15:58

ThejoyofNC · 12/10/2025 15:18

I'll quote you as it's near the bottom but all of the people saying this must think they're so clever with their "gotcha".

Normal people can do research.

Plenty of highly qualified people are anti-vax and have written papers.

What exactly are you trying to prove?

Can you provide links to these highly qualified people who are anti vax, assuming they are peer reviewed and published and not TikTok

isitmyturn · 12/10/2025 15:57

GreggWallacesTrousers · 12/10/2025 15:31

They were unvaccinated for the conditions that killed them, yes. I’ve also had a significant number of adults in high dependency beds (costing tax payers thousands per day) suffering from the consequences of not being vaccinated. Of those, two patients died that I am aware of. These are not things people tend to put in the Daily Mail due to patient privacy. There are no guarantees in life but death is usually considered a worse outcome than vaccine-related side effects.

I was on a covid ward in 2021. I was vaccinated but have a weak immune system. I was very ill. On my ward the other four very poorly patients were all unvaccinated. How do I know? The privacy of hospital curtains, it was the first question asked by every doctor. The young woman (about 35) next to me had been in a month and was deteriorating. They took her off to ICU one night to be ventilated and I never saw her again. I hope she recovered.

HangingOver · 12/10/2025 15:55

I wish the HPV jab had been around when I was a kid. Cervical cancer rates are falling off a cliff.

IndoorVoice · 12/10/2025 15:55

ThejoyofNC · 12/10/2025 13:24

I am unvaccinated as are my children.

I come from a culture where probably 75% of people are unvaccinated. I did an awful lot of research and put a lot of consideration into my decision as I didn't want to blindly follow my culture when it came to medical choices. I looked into each individual vaccine and the ingredients it contained.

Ultimately I came to the decision not to vaccinate and my husband supported this (he was vaccinated as a child with everything except MMR).

I am very satisfied with my choice. And I'm not some moron who believes social media conspiracies which I know people will jump to, in fact I'm not even on social media at all.

If more people do the same are you not genuinely concerned that diseases considered widely eradicated will make a comeback? My concern is that this effects everyone, when diseases circulate widely again then they mutate and vaccinated people will not be safe from them either. We would potentially be looking at decades of impact again.

Yesimmoaningaboutbenefits · 12/10/2025 15:52

My DD ended up in hospital after her 8week jabs. Don't know which one caused it. She was admitted for 2 nights and still unwell for a good week at home. There's no denying it was a direct result of the vaccines.

But, in the grand scheme of things, 2 nights in hospital and a week of Calpol and cuddles is nothing. A million times better than actually contracting one of the diseases she is now protected against.

I was cautious with the 12 week and 16 week jabs. Had a phone consult before hand (pre-covid when phone appointments were rare). And I had a hospital go-bag with me in case, but she was fine with those. Had my younger children vaccinated too and all was fine.

The only coherent reason for not vaccinating imo is from medical advice (allergy/immune condition etc) which is the reason we need herd immunity.

FunMustard · 12/10/2025 15:52

ThejoyofNC · 12/10/2025 13:24

I am unvaccinated as are my children.

I come from a culture where probably 75% of people are unvaccinated. I did an awful lot of research and put a lot of consideration into my decision as I didn't want to blindly follow my culture when it came to medical choices. I looked into each individual vaccine and the ingredients it contained.

Ultimately I came to the decision not to vaccinate and my husband supported this (he was vaccinated as a child with everything except MMR).

I am very satisfied with my choice. And I'm not some moron who believes social media conspiracies which I know people will jump to, in fact I'm not even on social media at all.

It's people like you that infuriate me.

"I did my research" - and your research, as (presumably) not a medical professional, is better than decades of medicine etc. how exactly? I assume you mean you've read and digested absolutely everything, from sources that both support and refute your starting position (which you admit to be an anti-vax) and drawing up some sort of robust statistical analysis that comes to the conclusion that even if your kids gets, I dunno, measles - they're unlikely to die from it?

I'm sure this will be deleted as a personal attack. It's not. I feel this way about every anti-vaxxer. You think you're cleverer and more special than people who've dedicated their lives to trying to eradicate preventable diseases.

user098786533 · 12/10/2025 15:52

isitmyturn · 12/10/2025 15:50

I was a child in the 1960s when I got measles, just before the vaccine was rolled out. I'd say we had sanitation and good nutrition (probably better than many children today). Measles still had me very ill for weeks and left me partially deaf.

Thanks for this. I am considering vaccination. My 14 year old is not eligible for any kind of catch up regimen. My 4 year old may be, but I still cannot bring myself to go and get them jabbed when they seem so much healthier than their peers.

I want to though. I really, really do.

isitmyturn · 12/10/2025 15:50

user098786533 · 12/10/2025 13:49

If a child is in the developed world and has access to sanitation and good nutrition, their risk of complications from something like measles is very low.

If their risk of vaccine damage is 0, and their risk of complications from measles very low, then vaccinating decreases the risk from measles very minimally, whilst raising the risk of vaccine damage by a significant amount, from 0 to anything more than zero.

I was a child in the 1960s when I got measles, just before the vaccine was rolled out. I'd say we had sanitation and good nutrition (probably better than many children today). Measles still had me very ill for weeks and left me partially deaf.

user098786533 · 12/10/2025 15:48

GreggWallacesTrousers · 12/10/2025 15:31

They were unvaccinated for the conditions that killed them, yes. I’ve also had a significant number of adults in high dependency beds (costing tax payers thousands per day) suffering from the consequences of not being vaccinated. Of those, two patients died that I am aware of. These are not things people tend to put in the Daily Mail due to patient privacy. There are no guarantees in life but death is usually considered a worse outcome than vaccine-related side effects.

So they were vaccinated as per the schedule aside from this one illness?

What was the illness?

MammaTill2Pojkar · 12/10/2025 15:46

MummyNeedsCoffee1 · 12/10/2025 14:32

My anti vax husband (we are polar opposites on the topic of vaccines) was born in the 1980s and therefore doesn’t have first-hand experience with illnesses such as polio or measles. He believes that reports of outbreaks and fatality rates are fake to pressurise people into get vaccinated. Basically he doesn’t believe that anything more dangerous than a flu exists and any reports whether historic or current are fabricated.

Do you have children? If so I'm curious how you have dealt with vaccines for them between the two of you?

My husband is similar, his mother was anti-vax (however she did get him at least 1 vaccine - oral polio vaccine). He does hold the view of he hates the idea of giving our children a vaccine and them having a serious adverse side effect from it, the feeling that he would have caused that when if they hadn't been vaccinated they might never have got that illness in the first place. I do kind of understand that view/feeling.

I was raised pro-vax but admit I have become more vaccine hesitant, if vaccines were truly 100% safe and effective I would have no issues with them, but unfortunately they are not, there is always a risk (however small) that there can be a serious adverse reaction, and that makes me worry when it comes to getting them for our children. However, I am also worried about them getting the actual illnesses and suffering through those and potential serious injuries or even death from them.

So, in the end we are kind of meeting each other in the middle, my husband is more anti-live-vax now (so MMR, chicken pox etc for example), I am more hesitant than I might have been with a pro-vax partner. Our children are now mostly vaccinated but we did split the vaccines up and delay some of them, we have refused a couple (e.g. rotovirus) and are still debating with MMR which is the last big vaccine they have not yet had (eldest is going to be offered it in November at school and we are tentatively leaning towards accepting 1 dose then and calling it done as there is very little difference in efficacy between 1 and 2 doses and 1 is much much better than none). Youngest is 1 booster dose away from completing catching up with 4in1 polio, pertussis etc which he will be offered next year. Both children had chicken pox naturally last year so that is no longer a concern for us.

We live in a country with high vaccine uptake and so there has not been a case of Measles in our area for I think 5 years now, I do worry about travelling and visiting England with them having no Measles protection.

I have friends who have similar aged children who have decided not to have any vaccines for them, I think being anti-vax is quite normal in the area we grew up in now. My husbands family is all very anti-vax though some did have covid vaccines due to wanting to protect vulnerable family members. One of my friends holds the same mentality of not wanting to give her chid a vaccine at the
risk of 'causing' them to get hurt by the vaccine, it does seem to be quite a common feeling/reasoning.

Busted2006 · 12/10/2025 15:41

I think we have to stop gaslighting parents and saying there’s no risk, your child will be fine etc

Nobody will ever know this for sure, I think anytime someone shares their concern they are shot down, called stupid and uneducated.

Let parents share their concerns! Have a rational conversation.

When I gave my children their 1st vaccinations I was scared and anxious and felt like I had done the wrong thing for a long time. I have met a few people who have been damaged by vaccines, I believe them. I also personally know someone who died the next day of a blood clot after taking the COVID vaccine.

Not everyone has confidence in vaccines and personally I can see why. It’s a massive decision for parents to make.

I don’t know what the alternative is OP, however I am against forcing parents into vaccines- which I know is the case for different parts of the world.

user098786533 · 12/10/2025 15:39

Raisinmeup · 12/10/2025 15:10

I understand that you feel a vaccine isn’t worth the risk because of potential side effects and the low likelihood of your child catching the disease. But that perceived sense of safety only exists because others around you are vaccinated.

It still doesn’t really answer my question. Where does this approach lead? Do we just wait until these viruses become widespread again? You’ve mentioned that most polio cases are asymptomatic. So if polio were rampant, would you feel it’s safer to take the chance that your child would have a mild case rather than risk any potential side effects from the vaccine?

I don’t mean this to sound accusatory, I’m just trying to get my head around this way of thinking.

To your first point, what does it matter? If my children are safe because the disease prevalence is low, then they're still safe. I get that I'm being selfish, I don’t dispute that. But are my children less safe?

Your second point is really interesting. So if we did stop vaccinating would polio become more prevalent and then my children’s risk of paralysis from it become higher?

Yes I suppose is the answer. But then what data do we have on children in the developed world in good nutrition suffering the severe complications? Is there any? If there were then why do vaccine campaigns focus on historical global data?

It's not my child’s perceived risk of catching the disease. It's their perceived risk of severe complications from the disease.

HangingOver · 12/10/2025 15:38

user1471538275 · 12/10/2025 13:36

I don't use the term 'anti vaxxer' as I think it is used as an insult by those who simply refuse to understand that people think differently to them. Some people have vaccine hesitancy which is that they are not sure about all vaccines, especially those that are new to the schedule.

Whilst vaccination is undeniably a public good that benefits society there are winners and losers in it. People very rarely want to talk about the small group who are damaged by vaccination. As to individuals it can be a more nuanced risk assessment - what is their personal risk, what is the possible cost - this is different for each person and not all information is known.

The video below is two American doctors talking about vaccination in a more open fashion and part of it discusses that the information and safety of older vaccines may need updating, but no one will research it. I agree with them that we need to actually be able to discuss this openly - vaccination is no different to any other medical procedure - consent should be informed and should not be assumed or coerced.

Sanitation and healthcare in modern times would affect outcomes from the vaccinated diseases. On the other hand our use of group childcare and UPF foods may increase negative health outcomes. There are lots more factors to consider - we have more premature and chronically ill or immune vulnerable children in our society than we did when these vaccinations began.

Isnt that the guy who thinks autism is caused by gluten?

user1471538275 · 12/10/2025 15:36

@GreggWallacesTrousers

Death is a vaccine side effect.

A medical practice has accepted that a 26-year-old man who died within two weeks of taking AstraZeneca's Covid-19 vaccine was not told the correct risk.
Jack Hurn, from Redditch, developed blood clots on the brain in June 2021 after he got the jab at the Revival Fires Clinic in Dudley.

BBC

The parents of a young woman who died after being given an AstraZeneca Covid jab have accused the NHS of failing to pass on known safety warnings about the vaccine.
Marina Waldron, 21, visited hospital with excruciating headaches three times in the week before her fatal collapse from a brain haemorrhage in March 2021.
Max and Liz Waldron said that despite her deteriorating condition, A&E doctors had seemed unaware of the emerging side-effects associated with the jab and warnings that had been issued.

The death of a psychologist after his Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid-19 jab was due to "unintended complications of the vaccine", an inquest has ruled.
Stephen Wright, an NHS employee in south-east London, died 10 days after his first dose in January 2021, senior coroner Andrew Harris found.
Dr Wright, 32, suffered a blood clot to the brain after receiving the vaccine.

Crwysmam · 12/10/2025 15:35

user098786533 · 12/10/2025 15:02

These are the cases that would change my mind.

Were the kids totally unvaccinated?

If I saw in the paper 'all unvaccinated children in an area die from a VPD' I'd probably take my kids to be vaccinated tomorrow, but it's usually 'one kid dies of a VPD and it wasn't the unvaccinated kid, he's healthy but we're blaming him'

That keeps me from doing it

The fear that my child will die from a VPD and then my mistake is paraded in the daily mail terrifies me, yet I still can't do it. I just can't find evidence my children are more at risk when they're healthier than their peers.

What the mortality rate doesn’t tell you is the serious complications that are caused by some illness. Encephalitis can occur with measles, which can cause permanent damage. It can lead to blindness, permanent lung damage and immune amnesia, wiping out previously anquired immune response, so leaving you open to infections you’ve previously been immune to.

It’s a virus so not treatable with antibiotics and because of a long period of successful vaccination programmes there has been no investment in alternative treatments. It’s basically treated with antipyretics.

Mortality rate as a population isn’t high but for an individual family it is devastating. In addition we are no longer equipped to nurse the disease at home so the pressure on the health service could be catastrophic.

Polio is another “old” disease that people dismiss. The last epidemic was horrendous. My aunts father lost the use of his leg muscles and spent the rest of his life in a wheel chair, my DH’s uncle lost the use of one leg. But this generation has pretty much disappeared so the damage is no longer visible.Again it’s viral so treatment is limited. It’s also a lottery as to how it will affect you. My aunts DF was on a ward with many in iron lungs to breath for them but often walked out of hospital, my aunts DF had a relatively mild infection but never walked again.

Sugarfish · 12/10/2025 15:31

user098786533 · 12/10/2025 13:49

If a child is in the developed world and has access to sanitation and good nutrition, their risk of complications from something like measles is very low.

If their risk of vaccine damage is 0, and their risk of complications from measles very low, then vaccinating decreases the risk from measles very minimally, whilst raising the risk of vaccine damage by a significant amount, from 0 to anything more than zero.

I have an ex who is permanently deaf as a result of getting measles when he was young. He grew up in Oxford and his parents were anti vax. He has so much anger towards them now.

Jujujudo · 12/10/2025 15:31

I know a few extreme anti vaxxers and I can’t get my head around their thinking, but I will say that if I cherry pick, some of what they say makes sense. I absolutely vaccinated my kids when they were little, but one child was subsequently hospitalised after his MMRV - the Drs told us it wasn’t related but I’m certain it was a bad reaction. I’d still encourage parents to vaccinate though. And he was fine, despite the reaction. My second child was diagnosed with Coeliac when he was small and I didn’t even consider it was a vaccine that triggered it, because after genetic testing we found the gene in both children but only one has active Coeliac, the other may never have it. I have been told by this parent that a vaccine triggered it, but I’ll never know, and I would take Coeliac over measles, diphtheria and whooping cough any day! But I do understand the arguments on some level, and I know that vaccines aren’t 100% safe. It’s a case of making a decision that makes sense to you as a parent.
I’ll add that I’m interested to know what one of these staunch anti-vaxxers would do if their child had an accident and needed a tetanus or rabies jab.. would they do it? That’s something I’d be interested to find out.

GreggWallacesTrousers · 12/10/2025 15:31

user098786533 · 12/10/2025 15:02

These are the cases that would change my mind.

Were the kids totally unvaccinated?

If I saw in the paper 'all unvaccinated children in an area die from a VPD' I'd probably take my kids to be vaccinated tomorrow, but it's usually 'one kid dies of a VPD and it wasn't the unvaccinated kid, he's healthy but we're blaming him'

That keeps me from doing it

The fear that my child will die from a VPD and then my mistake is paraded in the daily mail terrifies me, yet I still can't do it. I just can't find evidence my children are more at risk when they're healthier than their peers.

They were unvaccinated for the conditions that killed them, yes. I’ve also had a significant number of adults in high dependency beds (costing tax payers thousands per day) suffering from the consequences of not being vaccinated. Of those, two patients died that I am aware of. These are not things people tend to put in the Daily Mail due to patient privacy. There are no guarantees in life but death is usually considered a worse outcome than vaccine-related side effects.

Chiaseedling · 12/10/2025 15:30

This is what my dad believed and I wasn’t vaccinated as a child. He thought that the side effects of vaccinations were worse than catching the disease. Also that one’s own good immunity could ward off illnesses.

Unfortunately he passed away in his 50s when I was still a teen - he contracted mumps (cf. no vax) which must’ve weakened his dodgy heart and he had a fatal heart attack.

My DCs had all their vaccinations and I’m pretty much vaccinated now (except for mumps ironically - had measles as a child and had Rubella vax after having DD - was not immune). I also had whooping cough which was awful - just after the vaccine came in to being.

So yes, I do agree with vaccination but I’m not so naive to think some people are susceptible to being harmed by them.

SwarmsofLadybirds · 12/10/2025 15:29

ThejoyofNC · 12/10/2025 15:18

I'll quote you as it's near the bottom but all of the people saying this must think they're so clever with their "gotcha".

Normal people can do research.

Plenty of highly qualified people are anti-vax and have written papers.

What exactly are you trying to prove?

You haven't answered any of the questions though.

What ingredients were you concerned about in which vaccines and why?

Do you also research the ingredients of antibiotics, painkillers, any medical treatment - or is it just vaccines? Would you/do you refuse antibiotics for your child when they're recommended?

Swipe left for the next trending thread