Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Why the F should I tell BBC every year that I don’t watch TV ?

338 replies

LadyGillingham · 11/10/2025 07:49

Why can’t they upgrade their subscriptions/licencing model like Netflix etc ?

If you look at BBC corporation’s ownership, majority stakeholders are private Ltd companies and individuals. Why the f are they entitled to demand subscription fees from me for services I don’t use!

The language in the emails is quite strong, I’m sure a lot of senior citizens just pay to not get into trouble. That’s extortion!

OP posts:
RoseAndGeranium · 11/10/2025 23:11

SALaw · 11/10/2025 12:16

I don’t believe anyone that says they never watch the BBC. I just don’t. There will be something, be it sport or drama or traitors that they watch.

I don’t watch any of it illegally. I wanted to watch the C B Strike series so I bought it on Amazon. Ditto some David Attenborough shows. The kids like Bluey but they get that on Disney +. Why is this so hard to understand or believe?

Odders · 11/10/2025 22:14

Thatmoves · 11/10/2025 07:51

Huh?

if you don’t have a license you just bin the letter

I used to draw Chads on the envelope, saying "Wot, no TV?" & marking the envelope return to sender.
I think they goy the message in the end, as I've not had a letter for years.

Willyoujust · 11/10/2025 22:04

I watch a lot on BBC iplayer and so does my son. And we listen to BBC Radio stations and use their website a lot. I don’t mind paying for this reason.

BeLuckyBlueDog · 11/10/2025 19:19

They sent a threat to prosecute to our allotment site.
We have no electricity on site!

JellyLlama · 11/10/2025 19:18

I stopped my TV licence when I found out the BBC paid Huw Edwards £200k after his arrest.

Panama2 · 11/10/2025 18:52

My FIL is in a nursing home I rang them and explained the situation and was told that from time to time they would send letters asking if a license was needed. Those letters have become more threatening and also saying they will send someone to check . Well good luck with that the house is empty and there isn’t a tv in the house. They also questioned whether he needed a license where he was going!!!

RubySquid · 11/10/2025 18:16

BettysRoasties · 11/10/2025 07:55

Im sure the declaration used to last a few years. Now we get the letter year. People actually paying must be dropping a lot.

If you ignore the it’s been a year letter they start sending a new one every month with the wording getting stronger all so you go online and still click I don’t need one.

Edited

Yeah every 3 or 4 years I ight get it

CalzoneOnLegs · 11/10/2025 18:15

@SumUp we are talking eye watering sums here…harder to find how they spent it, if anyone can help that would be interesting ?

‘In the 2024-25 financial year, the BBC's licence fee revenue was approximately £3.8 billion, representing about 65% of its total income. This was an increase from the previous year, though the number of households paying the licence fee fell by around 359,000. Total income for the BBC was about £5.9 billion in 2024-25, with the remaining 35% coming from commercial activities and other sources.’

BBC licence fee revenue (2024-25)
Licence fee revenue: £3.8 billion
Percentage of total income: 65%
Total BBC income: £5.9 billion
Non-licence income: £1.9 billion (from commercial activities and other sources)
Number of licence holders: Declined by 359,000 to 22.8 million

SumUp · 11/10/2025 17:59

SALaw · 11/10/2025 12:14

I remember the weird kids at school that didn’t have a tv right enough.

They are probably wealthier than you. Doing real world activities costs a lot these days sadly. Or really into reading or some other absorbing interest.

Ireadnovelsbyfrenchauthorswithloosemorals · 11/10/2025 17:58

There's absolutely no need to reply to the letters, any more than there's a need to pop into the local police station (if you're lucky enough to live near one with a counter) to let them know you haven't misused your car in any way that year. The letters get increasingly red and hysterical, and then they start back at the beginning of the cycle. Every now and then someone comes to the house and I tell them I don't buy and sell at the door.

SumUp · 11/10/2025 17:54

CalzoneOnLegs · 11/10/2025 11:20

@SumUp as I’ve said before they will not do a subs service they would lose BILLIONS in revenue, they just aren’t that popular

Of course they won’t

Notmyreality · 11/10/2025 17:27

Thatmoves · 11/10/2025 13:14

No

but a belief that the BBC is much more important than it actually is…. Yes

Edited

This.

BettysRoasties · 11/10/2025 15:41

Rosesfornoses · 11/10/2025 10:42

Nobody is responding to my post about CBeebies. My five year old grandson was watching IiPlayer on his iPad in the car. He was watching g a programme about Eid. We are not Muslims or religious so it was moving to hear him enthusiastically explain Eid celebrations to me.
I am a teacher ( retired) and I so
often embedded a a short clip from one of the BBC educational programmes in
my whiteboard presentations. He was watching Something Special series I think.
I think a lot of people take this kind of provision for granted and think it gets paid for from the magic money tree.

When mine were toddlers we did pay for the licence and watch CBeebies. So I paid when I needed it and stopped once we stopped watching.

BettysRoasties · 11/10/2025 15:40

Thatmoves · 11/10/2025 10:23

How did you “tell” the BBC you didn’t need one?

Dh did the form online on their webpage his name not mine.

His more uptight about it as his from a family who believe you legally have to have a licence to watch anything on a tv and won’t hear different.

RoseAndGeranium · 11/10/2025 15:36

LlynTegid · 11/10/2025 11:04

Collecting revenue is not a free exercise. Adding it as one line to another bill is much cheaper.

Mm, I see your point. I think it would worsen the central problem discussed on this thread, though. Already the BBC uses the special status accorded to it by the licence fee to behave in a significantly more aggressive way than private companies towards non-users. If the fee were administered alongside council tax it would be very easy for the legal powers permitted for tax collection to be deployed in relation to the licence fee. And councils are, in my experience, pretty trigger happy about payment enforcement. Also, the BBC is not government funded. That’s the whole point of the licence fee: it is funded by the public but not via the government, which (in theory) accords it full independence. Tie its funding to any part of the tax system, even in purely administrative terms, and you risk losing that.

HangryBrickShark · 11/10/2025 15:15

Devilsmommy · 11/10/2025 09:39

Complete arseholes😒 imagine if she'd have been there and the kind of worry those kinds of letter can cause. Twats. Love your username by the way😂

Thanks it was a random one suggested by Mumsnet lol

MsJinks · 11/10/2025 14:31

I don’t know anything/anywhere else that I have to declare I don’t have/use something. I don’t declare non gun ownership yearly, I don’t declare I’ve not been shoplifting, I don’t ring car parks to tell them I didn’t park there. It really annoys me I have to tell them I don’t need a TV licence- though apparently I didn’t need to do so. I cancelled mine after I moved and didn’t take the TV with mea few years ago. One time I was supposed to renew I was at my parents caring for a few weeks. I phoned to renew the declaration after that time and apologised saying my dad had passed away - the guy was very, very rude about me declaring late and aggressively didn’t seem to believe I didn’t need a licence either, and it was then I decided to make sure I would never never need one again. I have lately inherited a TV but rarely watch it, and only within guidelines where I wouldn’t need a licence.
I really think it’s fair dos if they catch someone - via signals (if that’s even possible) or whatever way - but not this increasing level of harassment and threats. I had a declaration to Jan 26 and in around April this year they started sending letters to renew or pay - so it doesn’t even abide by its own processes or accept my declarations anyhow it seems.
If the BBC is essential as the official U.K. broadcaster and I have to pay on that basis then be honest and put my tax up or council tax up - those who probably need TV most, are probably struggling most and I’d not mind covering that for those who like to watch the BBC - and there is no free licence for the elderly any more just the blind. Otherwise it will have to go on a sub model if it can’t afford to broadcast Farage enough times 🤨

Salehalted · 11/10/2025 14:13

SALaw · 11/10/2025 13:10

Coffeed and fresh aired up! Can multitask. It’s a gift.

“Multi task” meaning post on multiple threads presumably?

actually more like post on mumsnet and watch BBC

kirbykirby · 11/10/2025 13:59

Cheesetoastie7539 · 11/10/2025 13:08

Nope. I had a letter last month saying I had to redeclare that I still don't need a licence. I had to go online and fill in another form etc. I've done this 3 times since cancelling my licence about 10 years ago.

You could have just ignored the letter. You're not obliged to declare online that you don't need a licence. What will happen is your will get a scary letter every few months (these are automated and sent to any address that doesn't have a licence) and you will get these even if you have declared, however, if you don't declare they will not know who to address these letters to and eventually they will revert to being address to "the occupier" or something like that. You can just recycle these letters like you would any other unsolicited paper mail and if anyone from Capita turns up at your door either don't answer or just close the door. They are not police, have no legal authority and cannot just enter your home.

Just to reiterate, it is not a legal requirement to have a television licence. Plenty of people don't own TV's and plenty of people own TV's but do not watch live broadcasts (they use them for gaming etc) which is perfectly legal.

BedlingtonFloof · 11/10/2025 13:51

Longnightsshortdays · 11/10/2025 08:33

Well I admit the BBC isn't the great institution that it once was.
And a lot of it's problems actually stem under funding. As well as political interference.

But it still fulfills a very important function. And it would be a sad loss.

I find all this anti BBC campaigning very disturbing.The absolute outrage about being asked if you need a TV licence would be almost laughable if didn't seem so politically motivated.

Edited

I would have agreed with you until they started sending my elderly, vulnerable dad letters claiming they’d caught him watching the iPlayer (he wouldn’t know how even if he wanted to). They had him so scared I sent them a very angry email, which is something I’ve never done before. They’re little more than bullies and their target audience is often very vulnerable. There’s no excuse for it.

Clarabell77 · 11/10/2025 13:50

DaffodilTuesday · 11/10/2025 08:20

Okay, this is a good point. Nobody in our house watches BBC or iPlayer and I need to cut costs. I am literally paying this so I don’t get hounded but it sounds like I need to go online and submit the declaration and keep it up to date.

It’s not just about bbc and iplayer, its any live or recorded tv on any channel. So basically if you watch any tv through a sky, virgin etc box, whether it’s live or recorded.

I despise the BBC and think the licence fee is a joke, we should all stop paying it.

CalzoneOnLegs · 11/10/2025 13:45

@Sesma there are the catch up free channels as well. I have permanently NOW which is sky content, plus one other streaming service it’s more than enough

NOW is very reasonable if you choose the long term deals and they have some great drama on there, especially Sky Atlantic.
I found Apple to be pricey and limited

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 11/10/2025 13:42

OonaStubbs · 11/10/2025 13:31

What is the point of it when there are so many other content providers out there?

The BBC is obliged by its charter to provide programming for minority interests and other things commercialbroadcasters wouldn't touch or only the very safe mainstream stuff - e.g. classical music, new music, high quality children's programmes, impartial coverage of current affairs. They also do stuff of wide appeal to draw in a large audience and justify the licence fee arrangement. Much of this is sold on to other countries, generating revenue. No shareholders, so no profit motive.

Tryingtokeepgoing · 11/10/2025 13:41

SALaw · 11/10/2025 12:16

I don’t believe anyone that says they never watch the BBC. I just don’t. There will be something, be it sport or drama or traitors that they watch.

I’m in my early 50s, retired and spend more than half my time outside the UK. I don’t think I’ve turned on a television at home in the UK this month, let alone watched a BBC channel. I’m amazed that anyone would presume to know with such certainty what other people’s viewing habits are ;)

Edited to add, just how much TV are people watching? I have a Netflix subscription because it can be used anywhere in the world (unlike the iPlayer) and it’s handy for downloading things to watch on planes. But I’d say that there are easily more days in a week/month/year when the television is off than on. Now, before my husband died it was on most days, and we did have a TV licence then, but I reckon in the 6 years since he died and I cancelled them I must have been through 5 cycles of 8 to 10 increasingly threatening letters across several properties. Which is why I just return them all to sender now in batches :)

Sesma · 11/10/2025 13:39

OonaStubbs · 11/10/2025 13:31

What is the point of it when there are so many other content providers out there?

It's all spread quite thinly though isn't it, I wouldn't find much to watch if I just had Netflix or just had the TV licence, you need to subscribe to at least half a dozen providers to get a decent spread of things to watch.

Swipe left for the next trending thread