Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

National Trust & tampons

555 replies

oncemoreuntothebeachdearfriends · 10/10/2025 17:37

NT have made free tampons available in the gents' toilets in a castle in the Lake District. Not unisex toilets, but actual gents.

Not just any tampons, but vegan tampons (WTF are they?).
And they're also available in the ladies.

YABU They are demonstrating what a kind, caring organisation they are, & covering their arses.

YANBU They are bonkers, tossers... add your own words.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Bagsintheboot · 10/10/2025 20:21

AngelicKaty · 10/10/2025 20:20

Yes, I agree, that's absolutely a fair point. Interestingly, OP hasn't mentioned the legality of it in her posts.

That's because there is fuck-all illegal about putting tampon dispensers in mens loos.

Midnights68 · 10/10/2025 20:20

I think it is real - funnily enough my DH and I were in a well-known NT property in Sussex today. My DH used the gents and came out and told me about it - he actually assumed it was a mistake by a cleaner or something! We’d not heard anything about it before today.

I don’t think it’s harming anyone, but it seems to me very unlikely that it will help anyone, and that it’s potentially quite an inflammatory move. So I think that makes it a questionable use of charitable funds.

Saucery · 10/10/2025 20:20

TipsyPeachSnake · 10/10/2025 20:19

Well yes, if father taking kids on day out to NT property and asked to pick up a few bits that day while mum at work. That’s one such scenario, sure there’s possibly many more.

So the man has a shopping list but grabs a handful of tampons from a Male toilet instead of the shop? Eww.

YourDandyPlumBeaker · 10/10/2025 20:20

They're for biological females who wish to use male facilities

AngelicKaty · 10/10/2025 20:20

Ddakji · 10/10/2025 20:01

Again - it is unlawful for a space marked as being single sex for men to allow women in. The NT are acting unlawfully.

Yes, I agree, that's absolutely a fair point. Interestingly, OP hasn't mentioned the legality of it in her posts.

TipsyPeachSnake · 10/10/2025 20:19

Underthinker · 10/10/2025 20:08

Does that scenario make sense to you?

Why wouldn't those women grab them from the women's???

Well yes, if father taking kids on day out to NT property and asked to pick up a few bits that day while mum at work. That’s one such scenario, sure there’s possibly many more.

samarrange · 10/10/2025 20:18

I'm no fan of Genderwangâ„¢ but I'm not sure that this is the hill I would choose to die on in defence of that position.

Perhaps a woman is concerned because her period is due and she has no tampons with her, and her DP remembers that they had them in the loo when he went earlier, and nips in to get her one. Or just tells her "They had them free in the gents, try the ladies".

Perhaps the ladies is very busy and a woman who really needs the loo "now-now" decided to go into the gents, and is pleased to find the tampons.

It's possible to do the right thing for the wrong reasons, and the thing, rather than the reasons, is what counts most.

Pharazon · 10/10/2025 20:15

TheBroonOneAndTheWhiteOne · 10/10/2025 18:52

Neither.
People must use the facilities which align with their biological sex.

An interim update on the practical implications of the UK Supreme Court judgment | EHRC Link

Edited

People have misunderstood the supreme court ruling. It is not binding on individuals as the Equality Act 2010 does not apply to individuals. No-one is going to get arrested for being in the wrong toilet. It is binding on service providers and organisations that they must provide single-sex toilets.

THe reality is that a lot of transmen have used, and will continue to use the men's toilet. A lot of transmen pass (at first glance anyway), especially if they have grown a beard, and obviously won't use women's toilets for the effect it will have on women who are using them.

LBFseBrom · 10/10/2025 20:14

I remember reading somewhere that there are men who use them up their backsides because they leak. I'd have thught they'd have carried their own discreet supply.

I can't think of any other reason they would be in a men's toilet.

Are the NT lavatories known for ..... social activities?

Ddakji · 10/10/2025 20:14

AppropriateAdult · 10/10/2025 19:51

I’d have no issue with virilised women using the men’s toilets, they’re not presenting a risk to anyone in there. Would have a huge problem with men using the women’s toilets. The two scenarios are not equivalent.

Both are unlawful, and men are entitled to their own spaces.

Underthinker · 10/10/2025 20:08

TipsyPeachSnake · 10/10/2025 20:02

Perhaps making it easier for men to pick up toiletries for their wives / girlfriend, why not?

oh and vegan means no animal products / cruelty free.

Does that scenario make sense to you?

Why wouldn't those women grab them from the women's???

HeyThereDelila · 10/10/2025 20:07

It implies that property is managed by an idiot who is ignoring the For Women Scotland Supreme Court judgement…

NapoleonsToe · 10/10/2025 20:05

Ddakji · 10/10/2025 20:01

Again - it is unlawful for a space marked as being single sex for men to allow women in. The NT are acting unlawfully.

Well exactly (as I said upthread)

I'm astonished at the "who cares" on this thread. Does no-one read the news or take an interest in current affairs any more? Single sex toilets are exactly that. That's why what the NT is doing is wrong. As so many organisations are doing, they're wilfully ignoring the law.

ChocolateCinderToffee · 10/10/2025 20:05

Why do you care?

TipsyPeachSnake · 10/10/2025 20:02

Perhaps making it easier for men to pick up toiletries for their wives / girlfriend, why not?

oh and vegan means no animal products / cruelty free.

Ddakji · 10/10/2025 20:01

AngelicKaty · 10/10/2025 19:58

@oncemoreuntothebeachdearfriends YABU. Personally I think it's great that the NT are providing tampons free of charge to all women. If there are some trans men (biological women) who are happy using the gents then why shouldn't they be able to access free tampons too if they need them?

Again - it is unlawful for a space marked as being single sex for men to allow women in. The NT are acting unlawfully.

AngelicKaty · 10/10/2025 19:58

@oncemoreuntothebeachdearfriends YABU. Personally I think it's great that the NT are providing tampons free of charge to all women. If there are some trans men (biological women) who are happy using the gents then why shouldn't they be able to access free tampons too if they need them?

UnderMedicatedMum · 10/10/2025 19:58

They’re covering their own asses but also providing for the mentally unwell women who believe they are men.

MrsJeanLuc · 10/10/2025 19:52

TheBroonOneAndTheWhiteOne · 10/10/2025 18:52

Neither.
People must use the facilities which align with their biological sex.

An interim update on the practical implications of the UK Supreme Court judgment | EHRC Link

Edited

Oh dear.🙄

Like quite a few others I was pointing out the inconsistency in @LarryIsMyRomanEmpire 's post.

You need to get down off your soapbox

AppropriateAdult · 10/10/2025 19:51

I’d have no issue with virilised women using the men’s toilets, they’re not presenting a risk to anyone in there. Would have a huge problem with men using the women’s toilets. The two scenarios are not equivalent.

OneCleverEagle · 10/10/2025 19:51

Jc2001 · 10/10/2025 19:49

Are they not putting them in the ladies toilet or something?

Do you object to them being made out of materials that don't use animals products?

Why are you so angry about it?

Where did OP say she was angry?

Jc2001 · 10/10/2025 19:49

oncemoreuntothebeachdearfriends · 10/10/2025 17:37

NT have made free tampons available in the gents' toilets in a castle in the Lake District. Not unisex toilets, but actual gents.

Not just any tampons, but vegan tampons (WTF are they?).
And they're also available in the ladies.

YABU They are demonstrating what a kind, caring organisation they are, & covering their arses.

YANBU They are bonkers, tossers... add your own words.

Are they not putting them in the ladies toilet or something?

Do you object to them being made out of materials that don't use animals products?

Why are you so angry about it?

Ddakji · 10/10/2025 19:47

GasperyJacquesRoberts · 10/10/2025 19:40

My ex - someone who literally gave birth before my eyes and who was unambiguously and unapologetically a woman - would sometimes use the gents if the line for the ladies was too long and she couldn't be arsed to wait. She'd have laughed in your face at the suggestion that it was both illegal and unsafe.

She can laugh all she wants. It is unlawful and she clearly doesn’t care that blokes may well have not appreciated her being there.

We were in the Louvre and lots of teen girls were queuing to use the gents as the ladies had a massive queue and DH wouldn’t use that loo, said he felt like a creep standing with a bunch of teen girls.

A woman there by deceit is in danger.

ChampagneLassie · 10/10/2025 19:44

As a NT member I think it’s a bit of a waste of money that could be better spent elsewhere than in some daft virtue signalling

Linenpickle · 10/10/2025 19:44

Bloody stupid. The national trust should pay their staff a real living wage before eating money on tampons for the men’s toilets.