Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Teacher lunch hour!

366 replies

everychildmatters · 10/10/2025 00:10

First off, I am glad I left primary teaching last year after 20 years in; things are only getting worse. I feel for the colleagues I left behind.
It is now becoming a common expectation that, for many different reasons, teachers are now being expected to supervise children over the lunch hour.
I used to avoid this by taking the time to which I was entitled but in order to do this I had to physically leave the building - go for a walk etc. In reality of course this was only for about half an hour or so as I wanted to be back in time to prepare my afternoon lessons.
AIBU to think teachers should be entitled to a lunch break?!!

OP posts:
Fushia123 · 10/10/2025 11:21

I hr in theory. 45 mins setting up resources and getting afternoon lessons ready. 5 mins to eat lunch always interrupted by a child who needs you.

ManteesRock · 10/10/2025 11:19

bumbaloo · 10/10/2025 11:09

Do teachers finish at 3:30? I know classes do but I never see teachers leaving until 4:00/5:00

But they still aren't working 21 hour days; which legally you have to work to get a hour break!

ManteesRock · 10/10/2025 11:18

I get 20 minutes break for every 7 hours I work - which is the legal minimum! To get an hour my shift would need to be 21 hours long!

ridl14 · 10/10/2025 11:14

tequilam0ckingbird · 10/10/2025 06:51

There's a rota first thing for the school gates and a rota at break times but at lunch the playtime supervisors (dinner ladies) watch the children.
In some schools teachers run lunch clubs (voluntarily).

That's funny in my old school I was voluntold I would be running a language club one lunchtime a week 😂 teachers were on duty rotas as standard and heavily pressured to volunteer for lunch duties, with a £5 credit towards a school lunch (sandwich, to eat on the playground) that day.

Current school is better, they do have lunchtime supervisors. Wet breaks we still get our tutor groups in our classrooms, who we have to supervise, but we are allowed to go to the loo and get a drink. Kids are pretty sensible though

bumbaloo · 10/10/2025 11:09

LetsGoFly4Kite · 10/10/2025 10:20

In what other profession or work place would you be entitled to take an hour's break only working 8-3.30? You're entitled to 20 minutes if you work more than 6hrs that is all.
Even working 12-16 hrs shifts as a waitress, 70+ hrs a week we would get 30 mins if/when it was quiet.

Do teachers finish at 3:30? I know classes do but I never see teachers leaving until 4:00/5:00

bumbaloo · 10/10/2025 11:07

Fridgetapas · 10/10/2025 07:01

Are you sure you’re entitled to a full hour? Many contracts just say a reasonable lunch break which could mean 30mins/45mins and some schools ask teachers to supervise children as part of their lunch time because of this.

Depends what you are ‘not paid’ for.

if an hour of the day is unpaid then that hour is the lunch break.

if you are unpaid for an hour of the day then no, 30 mins is not appropriate

Julimia · 10/10/2025 10:57

Taught in Early Years and KS 1 for 40 years. Always grateful if I managed 'a tea and a wee' at lunchtime. !

Sez1990 · 10/10/2025 10:57

I would expect the teachers to have staggered lunches over the lunch hour. Does it take all the teachers in the school to supervise? I guess there does need to be at least one first aider on the playground and in the lunch hall. But yes it does seem very unfair that teachers don’t get any quiet breaks in the day or get to eat properly

everychildmatters · 10/10/2025 10:55

Another thing to consider is there are many more challenging behaviours /children with significant additional needs in mainstream than used to be the case. I can understand from a lunchtime supervisor's pov why they might find this difficult.

OP posts:
RaraRachael · 10/10/2025 10:43

And I’m really lucky to work in a school where we teachers would never be asked to give up our lunch break to supervise the children. And if we were asked, we’d unite and refuse. And our Head would respect that.

This. Exactly. It all depends on your school but I'm in Scotland and many things are a lot better here.
Teachers have never been expected to stand out in the playground with their cup of coffee and then not get those 15 minutes back.
I got such a shock when I started teaching in England as was told I had to do playground duty.

MaplePumpkin · 10/10/2025 10:39

Lunch time supervisors and TAs (who take their lunch break before or after the children) in it school.

And I’m really lucky to work in a school where we teachers would never be asked to give up our lunch break to supervise the children. And if we were asked, we’d unite and refuse. And our Head would respect that.

RaraRachael · 10/10/2025 10:38

Back in the 70s when my mum was a teacher, they had to do lunch duty for a week at a time - they got a free school lunch as a perk!
Then it changed and no teachers now do lunch duties. There are lunchtime supervisors who also watch the kids in the playground at breaktimes. The DHT and HT occasionally appear in the dining hall but no teachers are expected to.

LostInTheColonies · 10/10/2025 10:38

Octoberaddsagale · 10/10/2025 00:44

Weren’t there strikes about this in the 1980s? For a while when DS1 was first at school I had to bring him home for lunch and take him back afterwards. This meant four round trips in about six hours, which wasn’t easy with newborn DS2. It wasn’t a settling-in thing.

A neighbour/friend who worked at a secondary school used to go home at lunchtime, bringing several colleagues with him as they also wanted to leave the site.

I can’t find any reference to exactly this online, so maybe I’m misremembering. Or, perhaps it was a local thing.

There were! Our school day was rearranged, the lunch break minimized, and we left school at 2.15. No sports clubs at lunchtime or after school.

What happened to dinner ladies? Admittedly it’s a long time since I was at infants’ school, but they kept an eagle eye on the playground after we’d eaten. Some of them were absolutely terrifying…

everychildmatters · 10/10/2025 10:31

I think a lot of the problem is that so many teachers will give up their lunch break (because they feel pressured to do so) that then their colleagues feel an obligation to do so as well. Example: I don't tutor Fridays and I am good friends with an ex teaching colleague (relatively newly qualified) I suggested a quick coffee over her lunch break at a café less than a minute walk away from school. She said she is unable to do this as she has to "supervise children" and "perform First Aid if required." She simply will not accept that she has every right to leave the school site.

OP posts:
lickycat · 10/10/2025 10:27

Duechristmas · 10/10/2025 08:11

Leave a child in crisis?
Leave a class unsupervised?
Walk out of a meeting?
How do we 'just' take our lunch.

I’m not going to join a race to the bottom in who has it worse - all public sector workers have been treated poorly for decades.

In the case of teaching, I’ve never once begrudged giving up a lunch break, or time before or afterschool, in order to support a child in crisis, or to sort out a pastoral issue, or to meet with parents. But what is worrying, and what I do begrudge, is when we are directed to work during lunch breaks for free. When a lunch duty is timetabled into the week so we’re denied a break, or when lunchtime detentions are written into behaviour policy with no regard for staff losing their lunch to implement the policy. Lots of people work through their lunch break, but I’m talking about systematic removal of a legal entitlement.

BobbinThreadbare123 · 10/10/2025 10:24

I had to have an ultrasound on my bladder a few years ago. The sonographer asked me what I did for a living. She said teachers and nurses show the most damage to their bladders. I haven't taught for years but clearly it left a physical impact on me due to all of the missed breaks and lack of time/opportunity to have a drink.

SomethingFun · 10/10/2025 10:24

I don’t understand the race to the bottom comments. I used to teach and I wouldn’t go back despite in theory working less hours and having more holidays. I also wouldn’t be grateful for a 20 minute lunch because it’s more than some are getting - we should all be getting a break! And it’s shit that you don’t, it shouldn’t just be normal and everyone shrugs their shoulders and dies 5 years earlier than they should have because they were put under too much stress because of work.

CottongrassPrincess · 10/10/2025 10:23

ThanksItHasPockets · 10/10/2025 10:20

Correct - if paid on the leadership scale you are not covered by the 1265 directed hours established in STPCD.

I used to do an hour and a half of lunch duty every day + break duty + detention duty + bus duties morning and afternoon.

ThanksItHasPockets · 10/10/2025 10:20

CottongrassPrincess · 10/10/2025 10:16

On leadership scale you give up all rights to breaks - that was my experience. I didn’t eat during the school day.

Correct - if paid on the leadership scale you are not covered by the 1265 directed hours established in STPCD.

LetsGoFly4Kite · 10/10/2025 10:20

In what other profession or work place would you be entitled to take an hour's break only working 8-3.30? You're entitled to 20 minutes if you work more than 6hrs that is all.
Even working 12-16 hrs shifts as a waitress, 70+ hrs a week we would get 30 mins if/when it was quiet.

CottongrassPrincess · 10/10/2025 10:16

everychildmatters · 10/10/2025 09:00

@neverbeenskiing It's rubbish, I agree, but at least as SLT you get "half an hour to eat at your desk." Obviously classroom teachers don't get that and they also have the additional burden of prepping lessons for the afternoon.

On leadership scale you give up all rights to breaks - that was my experience. I didn’t eat during the school day.

Periperi2025 · 10/10/2025 10:12

MoreDangerousThanAWomanScorned · 10/10/2025 10:04

The problem is, you can argue that teachers actually have a great deal all you like, but it's irrelevant whether or not you're right. The fact is that not enough people want to try and it and - and this is the biggest problem - a huge percentage of the ones who do try it, having done all that training then leave within a few years. You're not going to solve the teacher retention crisis by telling teachers that they should be very satisfied with what they've got.

But it's not the pay or t&c that are seemingly the problem for teachers recruitment and retention. Likewise in my profession (paramedic) you could pay me 4x what i get but it would still be sh*t as increased pay won't get rid of the long delays outside hospital, and the skills decay and subsequent background anxiety that comes with it.

Teachers t&c are bloody amazing, they really are. No night shifts, long holidays, sensible length days, meals (even if taken with kids about) at sensible times, no unsocial hours etc. So if the job is terrible it is something else that is the problem and requires fixing.

Muchtoomuchtodo · 10/10/2025 10:07

CottongrassPrincess · 10/10/2025 10:06

30 minutes without patient/student contact.

Which what op says they’re getting. Seems ok to me!

CottongrassPrincess · 10/10/2025 10:06

Muchtoomuchtodo · 10/10/2025 10:04

30 minutes is fine. It’s all that NHS staff are entitled to (unpaid) if they manage to take a break at all. How much should you get if it’s unpaid?

30 minutes without patient/student contact.

CottongrassPrincess · 10/10/2025 10:05

MoreDangerousThanAWomanScorned · 10/10/2025 10:04

The problem is, you can argue that teachers actually have a great deal all you like, but it's irrelevant whether or not you're right. The fact is that not enough people want to try and it and - and this is the biggest problem - a huge percentage of the ones who do try it, having done all that training then leave within a few years. You're not going to solve the teacher retention crisis by telling teachers that they should be very satisfied with what they've got.

This is true. I wouldn’t go back now.

Swipe left for the next trending thread