Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Sadiq Khan. Can anyone tell me something positive about what he has done?

592 replies

Luckymum20 · 08/10/2025 19:20

So the past few days I've unfortunately gone down a bit of a rabbit hole of clips about the Mayor of London.

From what I have seen the man is an utter buffoon who has done nothing to improve London, in fact quite the opposite.

Strikes increasing. Homelessness increasing. Crime - off the charts. Congestion zone charges etc.

And don't get me started on the deputy who seems to be from another planet!

I am not from London, so just wondering if anyone at all has anything positive at all to say about this catastrophe of man!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
earphoneson · 09/10/2025 11:43

Holdonforsummer · 08/10/2025 20:13

Is it just me or there more right wing/hate threads recently? Sadiq Khan is brilliant. He has introduced new bus routes that have changed my life for the better: ULEZ has helped to clean up the air (in comparison, I was in Greece on holiday during the summer and the pollution was over-powering) and I feel crime is a lot better than it could be in a major city. I think he’s done a great job. I wonder how many of these rabbit hole videos are being posted by people trying to stir up trouble for their own ends…….

It’s not you. So many of them now. I imagine mostly bots.
However sometimes I have a funny dream of separating part of the island and putting them all right-wing people, with Boris Johnson, Nigel Farage, and Tony Whatshisname in charge, with not a single immigrant/ POC in their cities, and let them live in their perfect, great land protected by high walls. Ah, dreams.

mumwheresmyribena · 09/10/2025 11:43

Even Mexican citizens have been advised not to travel to the UK.
This is blatantly untrue.
1: The Mexican government don't actually issue their own travel advisories at all (for any country), the rely on travel advisories from other N American countries like the USA and Canada.
2: Neither the USA or Canada have a 'do not travel' advisory regarding travel to the UK, either currently or in the recent past (post COVID)
3: The travel advisory for the USA is level 2 "Exercise increased caution, specifically "Exercise increased caution

in the United Kingdom due to terrorism"
Which basically puts the UK in the same group a Spain, Germany, Sweden, Greenland and France. And has been a standard sort of travel advisory for the UK, on and off since the 70s

I haven't checked Canada's advisories, but doubt they're more extreme than the USA's

Sexentric · 09/10/2025 11:42

FoodFor · 09/10/2025 10:56

London has improved??? Crime is low???

Yes. HTH.

beguilingeyes · 09/10/2025 11:12

FoodFor · 09/10/2025 10:08

He's a horrible mayor. Impoverishing us and letting crime run loose. Boris was actually a good mayor.

That would be the Boris who gave £100,000-odd of taxpayers money to the American woman he was shagging would it? Or the one who bought (again, with our money) completely useless water cannon?

FoodFor · 09/10/2025 11:07

bookworm14 · 09/10/2025 11:00

Violent crime in London is falling, yes.

Yeah right

DuncinToffee · 09/10/2025 11:05

CurlewKate · 09/10/2025 10:37

Talk to me about the garden bridge. Oh, and crime statistics.

And water cannons

bookworm14 · 09/10/2025 11:00

Violent crime in London is falling, yes.

Toomanywaterbottles · 09/10/2025 10:58

FoodFor · 09/10/2025 10:13

No he was actually a good mayor. Crime actually fell under Boris. Boris made London great.

You have to be joking. That self-satisfied lazy one, all pomp over substance?

FoodFor · 09/10/2025 10:56

Cyclebabble · 09/10/2025 10:53

I work in London. Over the last 20 years it has become more pleasant and a better run place overall. Transport works well, crime is relatively low by big European city standards. There is an issue with phone theft which has got worse over the last five/six years. The major challenges are the very high cost of housing and the COL in London. Mayor Khan has for me been okay, I would give him six out of ten alongside Johnson. It is clear though that he suffers some viscous racist attacks, which is why he is singled out.

London has improved??? Crime is low???

Cyclebabble · 09/10/2025 10:53

I work in London. Over the last 20 years it has become more pleasant and a better run place overall. Transport works well, crime is relatively low by big European city standards. There is an issue with phone theft which has got worse over the last five/six years. The major challenges are the very high cost of housing and the COL in London. Mayor Khan has for me been okay, I would give him six out of ten alongside Johnson. It is clear though that he suffers some viscous racist attacks, which is why he is singled out.

FoodFor · 09/10/2025 10:44

CurlewKate · 09/10/2025 10:37

Talk to me about the garden bridge. Oh, and crime statistics.

Yes garden bridge was a mistake. But Boris did many good things. Crime did actually fall under Boris.

Runssometimes · 09/10/2025 10:44

CurlewKate · 09/10/2025 10:37

Talk to me about the garden bridge. Oh, and crime statistics.

Don’t forget the highly successful flagship Routemaster buses that cost £280m that Boris loved so much. He was a big fan of a vanity project - they were twice the cost of a normal double decker and having to be phased out.

CurlewKate · 09/10/2025 10:37

FoodFor · 09/10/2025 10:08

He's a horrible mayor. Impoverishing us and letting crime run loose. Boris was actually a good mayor.

Talk to me about the garden bridge. Oh, and crime statistics.

Runssometimes · 09/10/2025 10:31

JillyJoy · 09/10/2025 10:06

Surely most of the improvements to air quality are due to engine technology in newer vehicles and the loss of old polluting ones. Especially the old bus and black cab engines that were in use up to about 2018. When my diesel car, 8 years old, is tested it gives results that are only just measurable.
School meals; easy to be popular handing out meal vouchers.

Well yes, that’s what the ULEZ did, stopped people driving them in certain zones unless they paid, had a scrappage scheme to upgrade vehicles and generally disincentivised driving in certain areas and separately promoted and made safer non polluting alternatives - better bus options, walking and cycling routes. Some areas are still over polluted.

it’s not just cleaner cars but there’s pollution from brakes and tyre wear so an overall reduction in cars is needed too.

and CO2 emissions from cars have reduced. Given he faced backlash from Starmer, being taken to court by several London boroughs and people destroying cameras and so on it’s been a huge win. The people least likely to drive (London’s poorest) were most affected by pollution and many of the biggest improvements to air quality were in the most deprived areas. It’s a really marked improvement. If they’d continued just as it was it would have got worse as the pace of swapping habits and switching to cleaner cars wouldn’t have been as fast. There’s definitely lives saved by this policy. It was very comprehensive and not at all easy to push through.

www.london.gov.uk/programmes-strategies/environment-and-climate-change/pollution-and-air-quality

SuffolkSun · 09/10/2025 10:30

@Everythingwillbeokeventually44

He condemns any normal British person who has genuine concerns about the current state of the country. Everyone has a right to protest and express their concerns about things that are important to them and one group should not be singled out. People are raising very valid concerns and just get called racist of fascist and it's disgraceful.

Can you provide a specific example(s) of Khan "condemning any normal British person" - as well as define what a "normal" British person actually is?

"People are raising very valid concerns" - such as? I believe other posters have asked you to outline these concerns, can you?

"just get called racist or fascist". If an individual uses racist language or fascist terminology they are likely to be racist and/or fascist. To avoid doubt, all an individual has to do is articulate their "valid" concerns without using racist or fascist language. Simple really.

The incumbent Mayor of London is not responsible for the UK and is not obliged to respond to random "normal" British people outside London, who struggle to define what their "concerns" about the state of the country are (let alone why they believe the Mayor of a city should fix them). The Mayor is answerable to his/her voters in London. If the "normal" person is a London voter, they have a number of ways to raise their concerns directly with the Mayor's office.

Are you as het up about what Andy Burnham is doing in Manchester, another large city? Or Richard Parker in Birmingham? Or Steve Rotherham in Liverpool? Or is it just the London Mayor?

GasperyJacquesRoberts · 09/10/2025 10:24

JillyJoy · 09/10/2025 10:06

Surely most of the improvements to air quality are due to engine technology in newer vehicles and the loss of old polluting ones. Especially the old bus and black cab engines that were in use up to about 2018. When my diesel car, 8 years old, is tested it gives results that are only just measurable.
School meals; easy to be popular handing out meal vouchers.

Strange. I remember a bunch of (admittedly mostly non-Londoner) people whining at great length about how ULEZ expansion would effectively ban their old vehicles from entering greater London and that it would be a disaster for local businesses. A number of ULEZ cameras were cut down or otherwise damaged.

If, as you're claiming, those old polluting engines were gone well before the ULEZ was expanded, why all the complaints?

Spookyspaghetti · 09/10/2025 10:17

London is really lucky to have the congestion zone. The last few times I’ve visited, the air has been much improved and the reduction in traffic in some residential areas is great. It gives the areas a lovely atmosphere.

I with we could have something similar in my city which has had illegal levels of air pollution too but the car people just loose their minds whenever a scheme is set up to improve things.

FoodFor · 09/10/2025 10:13

LadyKenya · 09/10/2025 10:12

Were you 💤 when you wrote that? That useless Boris wasted taxpayers money, hand over fist. Pathetic.

No he was actually a good mayor. Crime actually fell under Boris. Boris made London great.

LadyKenya · 09/10/2025 10:12

FoodFor · 09/10/2025 10:08

He's a horrible mayor. Impoverishing us and letting crime run loose. Boris was actually a good mayor.

Were you 💤 when you wrote that? That useless Boris wasted taxpayers money, hand over fist. Pathetic.

Toomanywaterbottles · 09/10/2025 10:12

I think he’s great and will vote for him
again. He actually cares about London and Londoners.

FoodFor · 09/10/2025 10:08

He's a horrible mayor. Impoverishing us and letting crime run loose. Boris was actually a good mayor.

JillyJoy · 09/10/2025 10:06

Surely most of the improvements to air quality are due to engine technology in newer vehicles and the loss of old polluting ones. Especially the old bus and black cab engines that were in use up to about 2018. When my diesel car, 8 years old, is tested it gives results that are only just measurable.
School meals; easy to be popular handing out meal vouchers.

CurlewKate · 09/10/2025 10:04

@GymrabbitIf there are numerous videos of him treating women like shit, why do we only ever see his run-ins with Susan Hall?

Redpeach · 09/10/2025 10:03

Nestingbirds · 08/10/2025 20:23

Sadiq is hated in London, only on here is he revered. Free school meals?! No, that was cross party policy. London’s property market is crashing, investors are deserting London and the trains are constantly cancelled due to suicides and strikes. Apart from that it is all going swimmingly.

Sadiq is hated in your small london bubble you mean?, time to expand your horizons

Swipe left for the next trending thread