Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To do a day out without newborn weeks after birth?

259 replies

honeymelina · 07/10/2025 13:40

There is a big family get together coming soon that my family has been planning for long time. Many relatives will come, there will be food and children playing, all that kind of thing. It is exactly the type of day my DS would love and I would like to go too. With the drive and everything we would be out most of the day, maybe from 10 in the morning until around 4.

By that time the baby will be around one or two weeks old. I am being induced for medical reasons in next few days so the time is already quite certain, let’s not get into that. I am not really worried about if I can manage physically, my mum will be there and I can sit down if I need, but I think more if it is realistic to leave the newborn at home with DH for that long. He is fine with it but says when baby is here I probably will not want to go.

For feeding I can pump while we are out and also leave some milk already at home, so that part is okay. But I keep thinking maybe it is too soon to be away the whole day. The main thing is I would like to spend some nice time with DS and it’s an important event for my family. I would not take the baby because it is not really the right place, and I cannot just send DS without me.

So AIBU to think I can do it? Has anyone done something similar soon after birth and it was alright?

OP posts:
Rubes24 · 08/10/2025 20:44

The baby will be with their Dad- that is completely reasonable if you are happy with it. Obviously assuming the baby will take a bottle and dosent refuse it or anything!

Supergirl1958 · 08/10/2025 20:42

DwarfBeans · 07/10/2025 13:46

The baby will be with their father and will be fine. Give yourself permission to have one day after creating and carrying your baby for so long! It’s how you frame it mentally. I don’t see a problem here. Have fun.

This! I had my son in winter and went to watch a football match for three hours (including travel time) when he was three weeks old. The mum guilt was bad at first but you soon learn that you need to be yourself sometimes!

Northernlights19 · 08/10/2025 20:36

I could pump no problem with my first. Could barely pump at all with my second. Either way I couldn't and wouldn't have left either of them at that age and I wouldn't want to confuse them by introducing bottles so soon. I also wouldn't have been well enough to go myself as I nearly died as did the babies which is why I can't have any more.

I wouldn't plan anything tbh. If you feel up to it, great. If you don't, nothing lost.

Alliod40 · 08/10/2025 20:32

Not at all..you go and enjoy yourself with your family and son..take no notice of these bloody mums who need their husbands wiping their arses for 2 months after having a baby,if you feel up to it just go,these women are just fishing for gossip as to why you all can't go..Best of luck xx

JLou08 · 08/10/2025 20:19

I carried on life as normal with a newborn. There wasn't anywhere I could take one DC and not a newborn. I'd be going with baby and DC.
I don't think there is anything wrong with leaving the newborn with dad for the day in theory. I personally wouldn't have been away from my baby that long, you may have an idea of how you would feel based on how you felt when your DC was that age. I also may have struggled with expressing enough milk that early, I really struggled expressing but again you may have a better idea of what works for you if you expressed with your DC early on.

elenna55 · 08/10/2025 20:07

honeymelina · 07/10/2025 13:50

The options here are: I go with my son or he can’t go. Without going into details, derailing or making it outing, there isn’t a way to leave my son with my mum for the event or send my husband or take the baby. I simply mean, is the plan as it is, to go with just DS and myself, without DH and baby, ok or unreasonable?

Sounds very much unreasonable to leave newborn with DH. You can't know for sure if the baby will accept bottle and going to a party is not as important as being with your newborn

Nanof8 · 08/10/2025 19:33

Go with your son, your DH is willing to stay home with the NB. It's not like you will be gone for days, it's just a few hours.
My daughter stayed home with her NB when her DP had events for his side of the family and took their 3yo. He stayed at home with the newborn when she had events to attend.
A lot of people don't like taking NBs out due to all the germs (measle scare) and they are not able to be vaccinated that little.

CommonAsMucklowe · 08/10/2025 18:56

Your newborn baby will be none the wiser for a day, goodness some people making out you have to be with them 24/7 or you're a wrong un' is just ridiculous. They will be dry, fed and contented with dad and your DS get quality time with mum. Don't beat yourself up, go!

Blablibladirladada · 08/10/2025 18:49

If DP is good then you can go.

If you are likely to change your mind because you aren’t sure don’t say it to DC and warn everyone it will be a last minute decision depending on baby and all.

Give you the space you’ll need to make a good decision with the least stress.

Good luck!

ELMhouse · 08/10/2025 18:43

Why not? I went on my daughter’s school trip for the day when I had just have my other daughter, she was two weeks old. She was with her father, I had pumped and left lots of bottles. Dad and daughter had a lovely day and I kept my promise to my other daughter to join her on her school trip (reasons that I needed to attended not my husband). I really can’t see what all the big fuss is about. No child newborn or not is more important than another. You will have a lovely day with DS and your husband will get one on one time with newborn!

DearDenimEagle · 08/10/2025 18:40

Normally, I wouldn’t want to leave a new baby a couple weeks old, but it’s going to be a big change for DS and I think some time with you, doing something wants to do is important at a time he might be feeling pushed aside, replaced, less important. Reassurance he is still important. There are many ways to do this, of course, but a special day out is something he might remember. So long as you have organised feeding, I don’t think the baby will come to harm with his father present. They can do extra bonding.
Only you will know how it’s going to feel at the time and it might not be practical when the time comes, so I’d keep things flexible for now. No promises either way.

AnotherEmma · 08/10/2025 15:21

SalamiSammich · 08/10/2025 10:05

The baby will be fine but I don't think it's in the their best interest so I wouldn't do it.

I think the new baby should be your priority in the first 2 weeks of its life, same as your firstborn was.

This

DemonsandMosquitoes · 08/10/2025 14:40

I did similar ten days after birth with my first. I was desperate for the break. No issues.

RubySquid · 08/10/2025 14:36

UpWhereTheyWalk · 08/10/2025 14:12

I breastfed for 14 months. My baby only ever had one bottle of formula, actually when he was 2 weeks old because I was exhausted and needed a sleep. We slept for a much needed few hours after he drank it down, then he woke up constipated. I was in no state to leave the house that day let alone go to a family party.

I was advised by the health visitor not to mess around with a breastpump for the first 6 weeks to build a good milk supply and by the time I tried it and actually pumped some milk my baby was then only interested in breastfeeding and refused bottles. So that one bottle of formula at 2 weeks old was the only bottle he ever had. He also spat out dummies.

At 5 and a bit months I gave him solid food, water in a sippy cup and carried on feeding him but obviously much less once he was on solids, so at that point I could have left him for a day. At 2 weeks there was no chance.

I think op should do whatever is right for them but there are most certainly babies who won't take bottles.

Its expressed milk my dd gives in bottles. Not sure how formula comes into it.

Minnie798 · 08/10/2025 14:27

I think it's fine and you can always leave early if you decide to.
Not everyone does the whole 'bubble' thing and for lots of mums, 'business as usual' is the preference, especially when it's not your first baby.
Make your plans, you can always change them if circumstances change.

HGSurvivor1 · 08/10/2025 14:26

RubySquid · 08/10/2025 09:00

All the people who say their babies would never take bottles. Seeing as a very tiny % of babies are exclusively breastfeed by 6 months ( under 2%i believe) shoes the majority of babies DO take bottles. Not necessarily from mum if they smell milk

A baby who has been exclusively breastfed for two weeks may not take a bottle. Introducing a bottle can also affect breastfeeding; it's easier for babies to get milk from a bottle than the breast, so many develop a preference which can make them reluctant to breastfeed. It then becomes a cycle which can lead to babies refusing to nurse at all.

Combination feeding is possible but it takes careful management and I think OP will struggle to hit that balance in the short timeframe available.

Notagain75 · 08/10/2025 14:24

Frankblackwife · 07/10/2025 14:50

Left my first to go to a gig at a couple of months old, she was fine with my sister.

A couple of months is very different from a couple of weeks.
A baby that tiny will still be establishing feeding and her supply will also be up and down. The baby is likely to be constantly feeding.
I know I could never have pumped enough milk for a full day two weeks after birth and if i hadn't fed the baby for a full day my breasts would have been agony . And also my children wouldn't take a bottle anyway.

HGSurvivor1 · 08/10/2025 14:21

Only you can decide if you're happy being away from your baby so soon after birth. In general I think newborns benefit from being with their mums, but nonetheless are fine with other caregivers, so leaving the baby with your husband isn't intrinsically an issue.

The issue is that if your baby is only 1 or 2 weeks old I think it is incredibly unlikely your milk supply will be sufficiently established for you to build up a stash which will last most of a day, especially if the baby is cluster feeding. You'll need to introduce a bottle or so a day from the start so that you know the baby will take a bottle, and be prepared with formula in case it is needed. You will also need to be religious about pumping so you don't get mastitis.

If you end up having a c-section you will not be able to drive (even if you feel well enough check that your insurance would still be valid).

Its very hard to imagine an event which is for families with kids but excludes your husband and baby from attending, but assuming this truly the case I would play it by ear and decide a day or two before if you feel up to it and are confident the feeding will work out.

Notagain75 · 08/10/2025 14:16

I think it would be much better to take the baby with you. I wouldn't want to be away from a newborn for that length of time.
But also you may not be able to drive that near to the birth and definitely not if you end up having a section

UpWhereTheyWalk · 08/10/2025 14:12

RubySquid · 08/10/2025 09:00

All the people who say their babies would never take bottles. Seeing as a very tiny % of babies are exclusively breastfeed by 6 months ( under 2%i believe) shoes the majority of babies DO take bottles. Not necessarily from mum if they smell milk

I breastfed for 14 months. My baby only ever had one bottle of formula, actually when he was 2 weeks old because I was exhausted and needed a sleep. We slept for a much needed few hours after he drank it down, then he woke up constipated. I was in no state to leave the house that day let alone go to a family party.

I was advised by the health visitor not to mess around with a breastpump for the first 6 weeks to build a good milk supply and by the time I tried it and actually pumped some milk my baby was then only interested in breastfeeding and refused bottles. So that one bottle of formula at 2 weeks old was the only bottle he ever had. He also spat out dummies.

At 5 and a bit months I gave him solid food, water in a sippy cup and carried on feeding him but obviously much less once he was on solids, so at that point I could have left him for a day. At 2 weeks there was no chance.

I think op should do whatever is right for them but there are most certainly babies who won't take bottles.

RubySquid · 08/10/2025 11:32

Babyboomtastic · 08/10/2025 11:27

The criteria on exclusive breastfeeding is so extreme this doesn't really represent how many women are feeding. In my friendship circle, I know only one woman who met the criteria for exclusive breastfeeding. Some didn't because of mix feeding - so as you say, they took bottles, others because they introduced food early, either on medical advice or otherwise. Or they gave some formula in those first few days, some of them on only one occasion. These were all women who ended up breastfeeding until well into toddlerhood btw. I gave some formula in the first week (out of choice, I wanted to mix feed) until my baby refused the bottle. She then breastfed for 2.5 years. The numbers are misleading basically.

Go into many areas and hardly any babies are breastfeed at all by 6 weeks. Especially as their free f or nearly ormula for many of the parents there. The midwife tells the mums about it often before baby is even born

Babyboomtastic · 08/10/2025 11:27

RubySquid · 08/10/2025 09:00

All the people who say their babies would never take bottles. Seeing as a very tiny % of babies are exclusively breastfeed by 6 months ( under 2%i believe) shoes the majority of babies DO take bottles. Not necessarily from mum if they smell milk

The criteria on exclusive breastfeeding is so extreme this doesn't really represent how many women are feeding. In my friendship circle, I know only one woman who met the criteria for exclusive breastfeeding. Some didn't because of mix feeding - so as you say, they took bottles, others because they introduced food early, either on medical advice or otherwise. Or they gave some formula in those first few days, some of them on only one occasion. These were all women who ended up breastfeeding until well into toddlerhood btw. I gave some formula in the first week (out of choice, I wanted to mix feed) until my baby refused the bottle. She then breastfed for 2.5 years. The numbers are misleading basically.

RubySquid · 08/10/2025 11:27

LivingOnCoffee567 · 08/10/2025 09:25

No, people are saying exclusively breastfed babies don't take a bottle. Women eventually give up breastfeeding by 6 months which is how you get to that figure. But doing both bottle and boob at the same time is challenging.

And at 2 weeks you actually risk baby developing a bottle preference which if you want to breastfeed would be devastating.

Hmm as I previously stated by DD introduced one bottle a day from a few days old. That her husband gave the baby with her out of room. Still case now at nearly a year and baby breastfeeds from her

dijonketchup · 08/10/2025 11:11

One or two WEEKS, not months?! I was still crying in my bed two weeks in with both mine!

Milk only comes in day 2-3, so maybe four days in to breastfeeding, you’d be leaving them to try and get feed from a bottle with dad?! Not even back to birth weight yet?!! 😳

Women are so different, aren’t they. You’ve done it before, so you do you, don’t try to decide based on others.

PercyPigInAWig · 08/10/2025 11:02

LivingOnCoffee567 · 08/10/2025 09:22

If you formula feed from day one, totally possible.

Breastfeeding and pumping (I've done both) at 2 weeks post partum? Absolutely no way.

But even if you do formula feed, at that stage a newborn and their mother would be better off together than apart. It’s still early days (for both).