Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

My husband is giving up on our 7 year old daughter.

506 replies

daddywoe · 05/10/2025 21:28

We have 3 children and our middle one is autistic and has ADHD.
Dh is stressed and struggling with her and today he told me he doesn’t love her.
He has always been such a hands on dad and we’ve always said how we need to be a team and get through the tough times together but he doesn’t care anymore, she tells him she hates him and doesn’t want to talk to him and he just said fine, I’m done with her.
I can see that he means it, he doesn’t care anymore and I think he’s ready to give up and walk away.
I feel helpless, I need him because I’m struggling too.

OP posts:
Efacsen · 06/10/2025 19:32

@Nestingbirds Did you even read what I wrote about assessment of risk?

I doubt I have 'fundamentally misunderstood the law' with my professional experience in forensic psych

Anyone saying that that they have had thoughts of seriously harming someone is not making a 'threat to kill' - it's simply verbalising the homicidal thoughts

,

DIYagainstMould · 06/10/2025 19:30

KittyHigham · 06/10/2025 16:10

Neurodiversity is not a "trend".
Bubble tea and KPop are trends!

A trend in health variations, like a natural trend or a feature?

Rosscameasdoody · 06/10/2025 19:15

Nestingbirds · 06/10/2025 19:11

I think you have fundamentally misunderstood the law to be honest. You actually can’t just say whatever you like and that’s fine. It doesn’t work that way at all.
Threats to kill carries a custodial sentence for example.

It would have to be interpreted as a threat to kill. And this clearly wasn’t. It was the voicing of a thought in a situation of high stress. As I said context is everything. He was venting to his partner, not threatening to kill his daughter.

Nestingbirds · 06/10/2025 19:11

Efacsen · 06/10/2025 18:49

There's really not enough information in the post to make an assessment of 'serious risk of harm'

Lots of people have evil thoughts but thankfully the reality is that the vast majority of the time people don't enact those thoughts - you'd want to see evidence of intent /of planning/ other risk factors like disinhibition or impulsivity and the best indicator of future risk is previous behaviour

For example fascination with fires/ setting things alight/ even a bit of playing with fire is not uncommon but arson is pretty rare

I think you have fundamentally misunderstood the law to be honest. You actually can’t just say whatever you like and that’s fine. It doesn’t work that way at all.
Threats to kill carries a custodial sentence for example.

Fridgemanageress · 06/10/2025 18:50

I’ve just read the first page of this. One of my part time jobs was driving minibuses with some seriously autistic/unwell children and adults, and the look that you used to get from some of the parents at the beginning of half term/full term holidays was a mixture of fear, dread, devastation and yes tears.

we would turn up at 0845 or 0900 roughly the same time every morning, the children would happy to get on the minibus, and it gave the parents six/seven hours a day to themselves, to do what they wanted, clean the house, do the ironing, in the early days of that job, I was shocked how many parents “just slept” and looked happy and refreshed they had managed to have good kip.

Not everyone wants to work long hours and come home to abuse, and not everyone has it in their armour to allow days/months/years/decades of abuse to unaffect them.

i take my hat off to anyone who lives with a family member with issues such as these I genuinely do. I hope and pray that you and your husband find it easier extremely soon. xxxxx

Efacsen · 06/10/2025 18:49

Nestingbirds · 06/10/2025 18:26

Are you the husband?

Because you are on here making a lot of excuses and putting a child at serious risk. Fortunately most of the thread doesn’t agree with you.

There's really not enough information in the post to make an assessment of 'serious risk of harm'

Lots of people have evil thoughts but thankfully the reality is that the vast majority of the time people don't enact those thoughts - you'd want to see evidence of intent /of planning/ other risk factors like disinhibition or impulsivity and the best indicator of future risk is previous behaviour

For example fascination with fires/ setting things alight/ even a bit of playing with fire is not uncommon but arson is pretty rare

Rosscameasdoody · 06/10/2025 18:40

Moonflowered · 06/10/2025 18:39

There was research published last month about the high number of parent carers who find themselves in a similar situation. Around half have considered suicide, some have considered suicide/homicide. This isn't a unique reaction. It's just not one that people feel comfortable talking about.

The LTB/what an awful human being/he doesn't deserve to have a family responses here just emphasise why very, very few of the parent carers who reach this point in their own deteriorating mental health feel so stigmatised that they will never, ever seek support.

www.birmingham.ac.uk/about/college-of-social-sciences/policy-engagement/parent-carers

This. Couldn’t agree more.

Rosscameasdoody · 06/10/2025 18:39

Nestingbirds · 06/10/2025 18:26

Are you the husband?

Because you are on here making a lot of excuses and putting a child at serious risk. Fortunately most of the thread doesn’t agree with you.

No. I’m not the husband and fortunately for the clients I dealt with during my working life I tended to rely more on actual facts and experience than hysteria. Context is everything.

Moonflowered · 06/10/2025 18:39

There was research published last month about the high number of parent carers who find themselves in a similar situation. Around half have considered suicide, some have considered suicide/homicide. This isn't a unique reaction. It's just not one that people feel comfortable talking about.

The LTB/what an awful human being/he doesn't deserve to have a family responses here just emphasise why very, very few of the parent carers who reach this point in their own deteriorating mental health feel so stigmatised that they will never, ever seek support.

www.birmingham.ac.uk/about/college-of-social-sciences/policy-engagement/parent-carers

Rosscameasdoody · 06/10/2025 18:36

Lalaloope · 06/10/2025 11:01

But isn't that the point of the wider picture strategy SS usually adopt? Genuine question.

The fact that he's said he fantasises about throwing her off a bridge (which to me is a red flag because it's one thing to say it in the heat of the moment and another to say you fantasise about it. Isn’t that daydreaming with pleasure?), and said right back at you to "I hate you" (what you've said is a concern) should make it more of a bigger concern.

It means he's shown atleast more than one way of posing harm to the child, even if it's "only" emotional.

It’s about intent. And something said out of frustration when you’re at the end of your tether doesn’t have the same intent as when it’s said in anger. I find it more concerning that he’s essentially saying ‘right back at you’ when DD says she hates him, not because he actually does - any more than he would actually throw her off a bridge - but because it signals that he’s reached the end of what he can reasonably cope with and he’s about to leave. In my experience people say lots of things they don’t mean in times of stress, and when the situation is calmer, are horrified that they’ve even thought it, and these thoughts don’t match up with their actions.

nCofcihave · 06/10/2025 18:35

Nestingbirds · 06/10/2025 18:26

Are you the husband?

Because you are on here making a lot of excuses and putting a child at serious risk. Fortunately most of the thread doesn’t agree with you.

I think plenty agree, they may not be as persistent as some but in any event, it doesn’t make those advocating for immediate removal of the husband correct.

Nestingbirds · 06/10/2025 18:26

Rosscameasdoody · 06/10/2025 18:24

I can guarantee you that social services wouldn’t see it that way if it was reported to them. They would look at the situation and realise that this was letting off steam and not actually said with anger or intent. If the family is to stay together, as OP says she wants, they need professional input, and soon. Unfortunately it’s not easy to access, which is why families end up in this situation. But as ever, not much insight here - just the usual advice to LTB.

Are you the husband?

Because you are on here making a lot of excuses and putting a child at serious risk. Fortunately most of the thread doesn’t agree with you.

Rosscameasdoody · 06/10/2025 18:25

Nestingbirds · 06/10/2025 18:23

How in gods name do you know he won’t do it?????

You have no idea at all either about his state of mind or his capacity for harm.

What an extraordinarily irresponsible post.

The child is at risk, serious risk best case.

You asked me that question upthread and I answered it.

Rosscameasdoody · 06/10/2025 18:24

Nestingbirds · 06/10/2025 18:12

Op might well feel daunted going it alone, but what choice does she have? He is no longer a safe person, and no parent is going to leave a highly vulnerable young child in his care even for five minutes given what he has said.

Edited

I can guarantee you that social services wouldn’t see it that way if it was reported to them. They would look at the situation and realise that this was letting off steam and not actually said with anger or intent. If the family is to stay together, as OP says she wants, they need professional input, and soon. Unfortunately it’s not easy to access, which is why families end up in this situation. But as ever, not much insight here - just the usual advice to LTB.

Nestingbirds · 06/10/2025 18:23

Rosscameasdoody · 06/10/2025 18:20

As described by myself and several other posters with professional experience of this kind of situation - voicing a fleeting thought such as this and actually acting on it are two different things, and a world apart. The comment was made as a result of frustration and exhaustion, not anger. Surely you’re not naive enough to think that many people haven’t had such thoughts at times of similar stress ? Several posters have commented that they have, and it doesn’t mean they are a danger to their children.

How in gods name do you know he won’t do it?????

You have no idea at all either about his state of mind or his capacity for harm.

What an extraordinarily irresponsible post.

The child is at risk, serious risk best case.

YouBelongHere · 06/10/2025 18:22

Rosscameasdoody · 06/10/2025 18:13

Wow. Parenting a child with such severe problems is very difficult and can force families to breaking point. OP says he’s always been a hands on dad, and that poster’s DH was clearly an arsehole. It’s not the same thing at all.

I've not said it's not? But if both of this young childs parents said 'you know what, this is too much actually, I'm out' then where would that leave her?

Of course they're at breaking point but it is generally more socially acceptable for men to hold their hands up and wash their hands of parenting when it gets difficult. That's the only point I was trying to make.

I hope OP and her family get the support they need to make this easier for all of them.

Rosscameasdoody · 06/10/2025 18:20

Nestingbirds · 06/10/2025 17:45

I actually agree with you. The minimising and excusing of this particular adult man is shocking. When you think of the catastrophic consequences if op follows some of this deeply flawed advice - it just doesn’t bear thinking about.

He is openly saying he hates his child and that he would like to throw her off a bridge. How much more does he need to do?! Actually follow through… even then I suspect we would hear that he was ‘pushed to it’ - it is sickening.

As described by myself and several other posters with professional experience of this kind of situation - voicing a fleeting thought such as this and actually acting on it are two different things, and a world apart. The comment was made as a result of frustration and exhaustion, not anger. Surely you’re not naive enough to think that many people haven’t had such thoughts at times of similar stress ? Several posters have commented that they have, and it doesn’t mean they are a danger to their children.

Nanny0gg · 06/10/2025 18:16

MrsFantastic · 05/10/2025 21:46

He's obviously struggling and he's told you how he feels. I assume he didn't say it to your daughter's face. Aren't people always saying that men shouldn't bottle up their feelings so much? I don't think that makes him a "monster". Maybe you both need more help.

Edited

'Throwing her off a bridge'??

Monster

And I'd be terrified he'd do it

Rosscameasdoody · 06/10/2025 18:13

YouBelongHere · 06/10/2025 18:04

Lmao, maybe 😂 me personally I would describe a team project at work as 'mucking in', not a Dad parenting his kids. But I'm not going to debate that any further as don't wanna derail OP's thread when she clearly needs advice.

However the longer I dwell on this thread the less sympathy I have for OPs husband. It reminds me of a thread a while back from a different poster - OP, OP's husband and her young children were all very unwell and OP's husband told her 'i must be more ill than you as I can't get out of bed to look after the kids'. OP pointing out she didn't have a choice, he wasn't doing it and the kids needed looking after regardless of how ill she felt fell on deaf ears.

It probably is very difficult for him but he doesn't get to decide he's at the end of his tether and leave it all to you OP. He sees her an hour and evening (so not much 'mucking in' 😉). She can't help being ND. She can't stop being ND so he needs to look at ways to manage that and manage his expectations. And as I said in my first post, look at support available!

Wow. Parenting a child with such severe problems is very difficult and can force families to breaking point. OP says he’s always been a hands on dad, and that poster’s DH was clearly an arsehole. It’s not the same thing at all.

Nestingbirds · 06/10/2025 18:12

InterIgnis · 06/10/2025 17:57

Sure, he can indeed do those things. He may have done just that already. It seems OP would rather he didn’t though, given that she’s also struggling and him doing that may well push her past her own breaking point. What would that mean for the 7 year old? Or indeed the other two children who are by no means less important than their sister?

Op might well feel daunted going it alone, but what choice does she have? He is no longer a safe person, and no parent is going to leave a highly vulnerable young child in his care even for five minutes given what he has said.

Lucy2586 · 06/10/2025 18:05

InterIgnis · 06/10/2025 17:57

Sure, he can indeed do those things. He may have done just that already. It seems OP would rather he didn’t though, given that she’s also struggling and him doing that may well push her past her own breaking point. What would that mean for the 7 year old? Or indeed the other two children who are by no means less important than their sister?

Well he’s only there an hour a day i am sure she will manage even if he just goes for week and come back less scary.

YouBelongHere · 06/10/2025 18:04

TheWonderhorse · 06/10/2025 17:50

It's a description of working together, not parenting specifically 🤣

Of all the things on here, and you're asking the Lord for strength to handle a slang term. Each to their own.

Edited

Lmao, maybe 😂 me personally I would describe a team project at work as 'mucking in', not a Dad parenting his kids. But I'm not going to debate that any further as don't wanna derail OP's thread when she clearly needs advice.

However the longer I dwell on this thread the less sympathy I have for OPs husband. It reminds me of a thread a while back from a different poster - OP, OP's husband and her young children were all very unwell and OP's husband told her 'i must be more ill than you as I can't get out of bed to look after the kids'. OP pointing out she didn't have a choice, he wasn't doing it and the kids needed looking after regardless of how ill she felt fell on deaf ears.

It probably is very difficult for him but he doesn't get to decide he's at the end of his tether and leave it all to you OP. He sees her an hour and evening (so not much 'mucking in' 😉). She can't help being ND. She can't stop being ND so he needs to look at ways to manage that and manage his expectations. And as I said in my first post, look at support available!

InterIgnis · 06/10/2025 17:57

Lucy2586 · 06/10/2025 17:46

He can go and advocate for himself, he can go and book a hotel room he can do anything he wants. This is a distressed little girl this country has gone bat shit in the last 5 years people are ruthless.

Sure, he can indeed do those things. He may have done just that already. It seems OP would rather he didn’t though, given that she’s also struggling and him doing that may well push her past her own breaking point. What would that mean for the 7 year old? Or indeed the other two children who are by no means less important than their sister?

Lucy2586 · 06/10/2025 17:50

Nestingbirds · 06/10/2025 17:45

I actually agree with you. The minimising and excusing of this particular adult man is shocking. When you think of the catastrophic consequences if op follows some of this deeply flawed advice - it just doesn’t bear thinking about.

He is openly saying he hates his child and that he would like to throw her off a bridge. How much more does he need to do?! Actually follow through… even then I suspect we would hear that he was ‘pushed to it’ - it is sickening.

It is unbelievable as a parent I have been pushed to the brink myself. You put your big boy pants on you go and get your head sorted out and you advocate for your child not threaten to murder them bevause an hour a day of parenting is ruining your little snowflake head. Kick the bastard out.

TheWonderhorse · 06/10/2025 17:50

YouBelongHere · 06/10/2025 17:44

I don't 'find it offensive', I find it a dumb way to describe parenting. But each to their own!

It's a description of working together, not parenting specifically 🤣

Of all the things on here, and you're asking the Lord for strength to handle a slang term. Each to their own.