Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think this was an inappropriate use of benefits/child maintenance?

90 replies

ForRareKoala · 04/10/2025 18:09

My mother lived on benefits/child maintenance from high income ex from age 0-13 while I was a child and from what I can gather was receiving about £2.5k a month total (I calculated this just now though it was probably even more in the past). We lived in a paid off house bought by my father so no mortgage.

Despite this there was never enough heating, not enough food so we were underweight (not drastically, but noticeable enough for regular comments) and I didn't notice it but my sister pointed out we both had far worse clothes than most people.

I think most the money went into her private pension which allowed her to retire very early and on (admittedly small) luxuries for herself. Even just little things such as her having a deep bath everyday while we had a short shower every other day kind of sucked.

I've spoke about this with my aunt (closest relative) who says the money "wasn't just for us", but AIBU to think that with this this much coming in we should have had a childhood where we didn't have to worry about the absolute basics?

OP posts:
arethereanyleftatall · 04/10/2025 18:55

I’m not saying you weren’t neglected, but lots of your info seems skewed against her. That amount sounds like a combination of spousal maintenance and child maintenance, spousal maintenance does affect benefits. Also ‘the house my father paid the mortgage of’ - well no, whilst they were together it was a joint contribution. Also so much maintenance suggests she did nearly all the parenting? And he left when you were babies? There seems to be quite a lot missing from your op which suggests your father isn’t exactly parent of the year either.

YourSnugHazelTraybake · 04/10/2025 18:54

Owly11 · 04/10/2025 18:50

I don’t think this is correct. Child and spousal maintenance did not affect tax credits so if op’s mum was not working and was claiming tax credits maintenance would not have been included. The tax credits would also have brought with it free school meals, milk vouchers, free prescriptions etc. The Tony Blair years were good years to be a single parent. There was sure start as well. How times change.

Child and spousal didn't affect child tax credits when they were introduced, but they were only paid for the child element. They were still deducted from the income support element . If ops mum was not working more than 16 hours she'd have been claiming child tax credits and income support.

Owly11 · 04/10/2025 18:50

YourSnugHazelTraybake · 04/10/2025 18:32

Op your understanding is wrong. Prior to 2010 child maintenance was treated as income for benefits. It's only under universal credit since 2010 that maintenance is ignored. So prior to that date all the maintenance your mum received was deducted from her income support or working tax credit, depending which she received.i think there was a small disregard of about £25 per week. So her income was much less than you're imagining. Income support rates for a single parent with two children in 2010 was a little over £200 per week / £800 per month. From that the child maintenance was deducted, so even adding on some child benefit and council tax allowance she had less than half what you think she had.

I don’t think this is correct. Child and spousal maintenance did not affect tax credits so if op’s mum was not working and was claiming tax credits maintenance would not have been included. The tax credits would also have brought with it free school meals, milk vouchers, free prescriptions etc. The Tony Blair years were good years to be a single parent. There was sure start as well. How times change.

FreyjaOfTheNorth · 04/10/2025 18:49

ForRareKoala · 04/10/2025 18:39

She didn't work anywhere near long enough and my aunt hasn't received any inheritance or family wealth.

What are you trying to achieve with this thread? We only have your version of events and you were a child. I find it highly unlikely that your parents detailed to a young child exactly how much money they received, spent, earned, etc. And you have admitted you don’t know the full facts. And you clearly don’t understand how benefits were calculated back then, as others have pointed out.

But if your mother was a single parent and not working (because she was raising young children), how did you expect her to save for her old age? Do you begrudge her the money so that she can pay her bills? Are you looking for a refund from her because you don’t feel she spent enough on you and because she - heaven forbid - took long baths? Did your father not have anything to do with you (aside from sending money)? Because if he didn’t, he’s the real villain here, not your mother.

ARichtGoodDram · 04/10/2025 18:47

Maintenance did used to count as income toward benefits. Even if you didn't get it.

My father was due to pay my grandmother £64 a week in maintenance for me and my siblings. When she had to claim benefits after my grandad died they treated that £64 (the amount is burned in my brain) as income, despite the fact the CSA never got a single penny from him. It made for a very poor childhood.

Later the system changed to people on benefits being allowed to keep a small amount of maintenance and the rest being owed to the Sec of State to go toward the welfare bill. That changed when the amount owed to the SoS got ridiculously high and "something" had to be done. So they decided people could keep their maintenance and it wouldn't be counted as income because they knew so many didn't bloody pay

ForRareKoala · 04/10/2025 18:46

YourSnugHazelTraybake · 04/10/2025 18:42

Yes I'm very sure. At the time I was working for income support as a benefit processor. The figures are also freely available on the government websites. Working tax credits were more generous than universal credit for people working, but as a single parent you had to work over 16 hours per week to qualify for that.

Ok thankyou for clarifying. I'm going to have a look at this but it does make it better. She did get a part time job when I was 13 but nothing changed.

OP posts:
WhamBamThankU · 04/10/2025 18:45

Did universal credit exist then??

ForRareKoala · 04/10/2025 18:43

CatsorDogsrule · 04/10/2025 18:40

Where was your father when your mother was neglecting you? Why didn't he insist on residency so that you were well cared for? Why is your mother the only one being demonised?

I don't know your mother's situation or her side of the story, and neither do you, but I don't think she is solely responsible for the neglect you seem to have endured.

I think he did push for it but it wasn't allowed due to concerns with alcohol. He was definitely the worse parent when I was very young.

Neither of them were any good really but my father at least turned it around in the later years whereas my mother just got worse and worse.

OP posts:
YouLookLikeStevieNicks · 04/10/2025 18:43

You absolutely can't base this off a benefit calculation for the current day. Benefits increase in line with inflation so in 2010 it would be nothing like the amount you're seeing on a benefit calculator now.

In 2010, minimum wage was 5.93 and it's now 12.21. So you're probably talking about half of what today's benefits would be. Maintenance would also have been classed as income back then.

YourSnugHazelTraybake · 04/10/2025 18:42

ForRareKoala · 04/10/2025 18:38

Are you sure?

I'm going to admit I'm not fully clued up but I thought benefits were much more generous in the past. It seems a little difficult to believe they've increased that much.

Yes I'm very sure. At the time I was working for income support as a benefit processor. The figures are also freely available on the government websites. Working tax credits were more generous than universal credit for people working, but as a single parent you had to work over 16 hours per week to qualify for that.

VikaOlson · 04/10/2025 18:42

Did your mum have enough food and heating?

Why wasn't your dad around?

WinterOnItsWayOut · 04/10/2025 18:41

You can only put a v small amount into pensions from unearned income although that would have changed when she got a job. So wouldn’t have been massive, although could have been stocks and shares ISA maybe.

I don’t disagree that she was protecting her future a bit (as all women are regularly told to do) but it does sound v neglectful to not provide the basics from that

CatsorDogsrule · 04/10/2025 18:40

Where was your father when your mother was neglecting you? Why didn't he insist on residency so that you were well cared for? Why is your mother the only one being demonised?

I don't know your mother's situation or her side of the story, and neither do you, but I don't think she is solely responsible for the neglect you seem to have endured.

ForRareKoala · 04/10/2025 18:40

MrsTerryPratchett · 04/10/2025 18:38

I understand why you think it’s about the high income. But it isn’t really.

Your mum is a neglectful and poor mother. I know plenty of women on tiny incomes, scraping by, whose children eat decent meals. Not feeding your children adequately, unless you’re starving, is dreadful.

I think this is what bothers me. With age I've realised I would never do this myself but at the time I thought it was normal.

OP posts:
ForRareKoala · 04/10/2025 18:39

sunshine244 · 04/10/2025 18:37

How do you know the benefits money went into private pension? Could the pension not have been built up from her job, or family / inheritance?

The system that long ago was very different.

She didn't work anywhere near long enough and my aunt hasn't received any inheritance or family wealth.

OP posts:
ThisStateOfIndependenceShallBe · 04/10/2025 18:39

NeverDropYourMooncup · 04/10/2025 18:30

It was deducted pound for pound from council tax benefits and everything over a fiver was taken from income support.

Yes, when I had to claim income support in 2005 they contacted my ex to get him to pay child maintenance so it could be deducted from my benefits.

I'd also been claiming child tax credits which I believe weren't affected by child maintenance, but they were quite a new benefit then.

InTheMountainsThere · 04/10/2025 18:38

ForRareKoala · 04/10/2025 18:33

I'm 28 now.

Then it's possible that whoever has told you that your mother had these specific sums from these specific sources is trying to wond you up/ stir up trouble. You very specifically state how much universal credit she received, but universal credit didn't come in until 2013, and you're talking about the period between 1997 and 2010/11.

ForRareKoala · 04/10/2025 18:38

YourSnugHazelTraybake · 04/10/2025 18:32

Op your understanding is wrong. Prior to 2010 child maintenance was treated as income for benefits. It's only under universal credit since 2010 that maintenance is ignored. So prior to that date all the maintenance your mum received was deducted from her income support or working tax credit, depending which she received.i think there was a small disregard of about £25 per week. So her income was much less than you're imagining. Income support rates for a single parent with two children in 2010 was a little over £200 per week / £800 per month. From that the child maintenance was deducted, so even adding on some child benefit and council tax allowance she had less than half what you think she had.

Are you sure?

I'm going to admit I'm not fully clued up but I thought benefits were much more generous in the past. It seems a little difficult to believe they've increased that much.

OP posts:
MrsTerryPratchett · 04/10/2025 18:38

I understand why you think it’s about the high income. But it isn’t really.

Your mum is a neglectful and poor mother. I know plenty of women on tiny incomes, scraping by, whose children eat decent meals. Not feeding your children adequately, unless you’re starving, is dreadful.

sunshine244 · 04/10/2025 18:37

How do you know the benefits money went into private pension? Could the pension not have been built up from her job, or family / inheritance?

The system that long ago was very different.

ForRareKoala · 04/10/2025 18:33

InTheMountainsThere · 04/10/2025 18:32

How old are you? How far in the past was this?

I'm 28 now.

OP posts:
user1471538283 · 04/10/2025 18:33

It was selfish and neglectful. The money was for you and your sister. Admittedly some should have gone on utilities and groceries for everyone but it clearly didn't.

This is the shit my DM pulled. Nothing came before her wants but she made out she was going without.

YourSnugHazelTraybake · 04/10/2025 18:32

Op your understanding is wrong. Prior to 2010 child maintenance was treated as income for benefits. It's only under universal credit since 2010 that maintenance is ignored. So prior to that date all the maintenance your mum received was deducted from her income support or working tax credit, depending which she received.i think there was a small disregard of about £25 per week. So her income was much less than you're imagining. Income support rates for a single parent with two children in 2010 was a little over £200 per week / £800 per month. From that the child maintenance was deducted, so even adding on some child benefit and council tax allowance she had less than half what you think she had.

InTheMountainsThere · 04/10/2025 18:32

ForRareKoala · 04/10/2025 18:28

She got a job when I was about 13. From what I can gather, the benefits savings limit does not include private pensions so she paid money into this to stay under the limit.

Edited

How old are you? How far in the past was this?

RubySquid · 04/10/2025 18:32

shellyleppard · 04/10/2025 18:15

@ForRareKoala if it was that much she wouldn't have got universal credit.....seems like a very high amount??

Chid maintenance doesn't count as income for benefits purposes