Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

11 million immigrants since 2000. When I

789 replies

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 08:40

Sorry, it’s another immigration one.

I always see immigration discussed in terms of race, religion, who may or may not be a good fit for the UK, whether it’s by small boats - to be honest, this is not the biggest worry for me.

The biggest worry is the sheer increase in our population and how many people this country can reasonably accommodate. We are now 8th in Europe for population density - only behind Belgium and the Netherlands, and a handful of places like Vatican City and the Channel Islands. At present we have net migration of around 500,000 a year.

I’m worried that the key issues of overpopulation are being overlooked to make this conversation all about race. What about our pollution levels, wildlife habitats, flood risk, food security, infrastructure? Will this eventually be a polluted city state country? It seems to be heading that way.

Posters always say we need immigration, but we have already welcome 11 million since 2000. If that still isn’t enough; what is? Or do we just keep going?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
Myrtletown · 04/10/2025 15:00

Bumblebee72 · 04/10/2025 14:52

So you what to change it to There has been some/lots/a few immigrants since 2000. I can see why MN might have found that unhelpful

Well yes. You can’t just make a figure up. Unless you want the UK to become like the US with fake facts and data used to push agendas. Be honest and truthful if you want discussion. The op doesn’t know the right number, that’s ok as it appears to probably not exist. But she shouldn’t make one up and state it as fact. Are you arguing with that logic?

Bumblebee72 · 04/10/2025 14:59

newbluesofa · 04/10/2025 14:56

OP clarified the title:

It cut my title in half - was supposed to say ‘when is our population too high?’

Changing the title to just 'when is our population too high?' would start the same discussion without any figures

Simple answer when the country is unable to produce enough food to feed itself, then it is overpopulated. The UK is over populated and has been for many years in my view.

Halfadoy · 04/10/2025 14:59

JaneEyre40 · 04/10/2025 09:49

Better?! Oh you are funny.

Yes most definitely better. The days when you could walk into a&e and be seen without a huge wait. You could see your family doctor whenever you needed to. The days when people could get a council house when they needed one and those council estates where very respectable and tidy places. Jobs were so much easier to come by and the opportunities for progression were vast. You could get a place in your local school without huge waiting lists and people respected authority. People were not terrified to say the wrong thing and were not treading on egg shells. Yes definitely better.

EasternStandard · 04/10/2025 14:58

nomas · 04/10/2025 14:54

You repeatedly colluded with OP without once questioning the figure.

No I said @Bumblebee72was closer. You quoted that said I know you’re aware.

Bumblebee72 · 04/10/2025 14:57

nomas · 04/10/2025 14:51

Why do you keep asking me the same questions?

Because if I had a viewpoint that was based on a number and realised that number was wrong, I would review my viewpoint. If it had turned that the population had only increase from 58m to 61m, I might ok that not be too worried about 4% over 25 years. Its a pretty different outcome to a 18% increase over the same period.

newbluesofa · 04/10/2025 14:56

Bumblebee72 · 04/10/2025 14:52

So you what to change it to There has been some/lots/a few immigrants since 2000. I can see why MN might have found that unhelpful

OP clarified the title:

It cut my title in half - was supposed to say ‘when is our population too high?’

Changing the title to just 'when is our population too high?' would start the same discussion without any figures

PracticallyPeapod · 04/10/2025 14:55

Harriet9955 · 04/10/2025 09:09

I see this a lot with older people in my line of work ( benefits). They've been in living in Spain for years then start getting health problems so come home. Invariably house prices have risen hugely in the years they've been away and they can't buy so looking for housing, housing benefits etc. I guess they've often paid taxes here for many years though so not like they haven't contributed.
The situation ( that I also see a lot) that makes me most annoyed though is elderly unwell men in their sixties and seventies bringing over young wives ( often in their 20's) form India and Pakistan to be their carers. These young women can't work, and whilst they can't get benefits until they get indefinite leave to remain, the husband can still start claiming benefits for the kids. They always seem able to father a couple of kids with this new wife whilst being disabled enough to need a carer. The women are stuck with not much english and unable to work. If the husband dies they have very limited language and job opportunities.

Edited

This describes my friend’s dad perfectly. He’s in his 70s, severely disabled, and after her mum died he went back to Nigeria and married a much younger woman. He now has 2 kids under 8 and a live in carer.

I have to say my friend is at a loss about the whole situation. She now has half siblings younger than her own kids and the whole situation is a constant source of worry. The kids are going back and forwards between countries and not getting a proper education.

nomas · 04/10/2025 14:54

EasternStandard · 04/10/2025 14:53

I said people can work it out, other posters did, fine by me. If you’re going to say other people are posting ‘lies’ perhaps check your figures first.

You repeatedly colluded with OP without once questioning the figure.

EasternStandard · 04/10/2025 14:53

nomas · 04/10/2025 14:49

And yet never questioned the OP. Funny that.

I said people can work it out, other posters did, fine by me. If you’re going to say other people are posting ‘lies’ perhaps check your figures first.

Bumblebee72 · 04/10/2025 14:52

Myrtletown · 04/10/2025 14:44

Um, again, I answered about 4 minutes ago. What’s wrong with you all!

I asked them to remove the number which is your unverified estimation and leave the thread. This would seem a sensible start point for discussion no?

So you what to change it to There has been some/lots/a few immigrants since 2000. I can see why MN might have found that unhelpful

suburburban · 04/10/2025 14:52

HPFA · 04/10/2025 14:47

The environmental crisis is driving immigration as parts of the world become uninhabitable.

Of course, if we genuinely cared about these things we'd support climate measures and increase foreign aid. We'd set up asylum processing centres in Europe so that all claims could be properly assessed and those with valid claims could then proceed. Safer and a lot less expensive for all.

But oops, Reform wouldn"t support any of these things. Why do that when you could whip up hate instead?

Yes very true

nomas · 04/10/2025 14:51

Bumblebee72 · 04/10/2025 14:50

Have you changed your view in the light of the data being 100% different to what you believed before? Or is your view set regardless of the data?

Why do you keep asking me the same questions?

nomas · 04/10/2025 14:50

Bumblebee72 · 04/10/2025 13:46

It wasn't fabricated. It was the correct data but fundamentally misinterpreted.

So what was the net migration figure for the period?

Bumblebee72 · 04/10/2025 14:50

nomas · 04/10/2025 14:47

I’ve already explained that the figure of 2.5m was taken from a different thread and I posted the google data from that thread.

At least I’m willing to re-look at data. You seem fixated on your 11m lie, like a robot.

Edited

Have you changed your view in the light of the data being 100% different to what you believed before? Or is your view set regardless of the data?

nomas · 04/10/2025 14:49

EasternStandard · 04/10/2025 14:49

You are aware there are people posting who didn’t write the thread title?

I haven’t used 11m. I did question your figure as it was wrong.

And yet never questioned the OP. Funny that.

nomas · 04/10/2025 14:49

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 04/10/2025 14:44

I mean I hope they all get arrested for inciting anti semitism

Case in point for demonisation.

EasternStandard · 04/10/2025 14:49

nomas · 04/10/2025 14:47

I’ve already explained that the figure of 2.5m was taken from a different thread and I posted the google data from that thread.

At least I’m willing to re-look at data. You seem fixated on your 11m lie, like a robot.

Edited

You are aware there are people posting who didn’t write the thread title?

I haven’t used 11m. I did question your figure as it was wrong.

Bumblebee72 · 04/10/2025 14:48

nomas · 04/10/2025 14:42

Yes, they did lead to higher immigration.

I’m not calling for more immigration. I’m just not a fan of demonising immigrants and asylum seekers.

There's no value judgements in the OP post. It's economics.

nomas · 04/10/2025 14:47

EasternStandard · 04/10/2025 14:41

And your 2.5m figure, a lie?

I’ve already explained that the figure of 2.5m was taken from a different thread and I posted the google data from that thread.

At least I’m willing to re-look at data. You seem fixated on your 11m lie, like a robot.

HPFA · 04/10/2025 14:47

suburburban · 04/10/2025 14:22

My frustration is that we keep being told there is an environmental crisis and we need to invest in renewable resources which is fine but why then would you keep allowing more people to come here who surely create more of an issue with water, sewage and resources.

I would rather we kept our countryside for farming or for wildlife not more concrete boxes and flats

The environmental crisis is driving immigration as parts of the world become uninhabitable.

Of course, if we genuinely cared about these things we'd support climate measures and increase foreign aid. We'd set up asylum processing centres in Europe so that all claims could be properly assessed and those with valid claims could then proceed. Safer and a lot less expensive for all.

But oops, Reform wouldn"t support any of these things. Why do that when you could whip up hate instead?

Myrtletown · 04/10/2025 14:45

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 04/10/2025 14:44

lol- is this from the thread where the figure comes from you’re “research across the internet”

Well I asked my mates down the pub, sorry, during my research across the UK hospitality sector and they think you’re talking a load of codswhallop.

Funny that….seems made up numbers aren’t loved when on the other foot

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 04/10/2025 14:44

I mean I hope they all get arrested for inciting anti semitism

Myrtletown · 04/10/2025 14:44

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 14:43

Absolutely. Eventually they dodge clear questions so much you realise they’re trying to make the argument so incomprehensible it can mean anything they want it to mean.

Um, again, I answered about 4 minutes ago. What’s wrong with you all!

I asked them to remove the number which is your unverified estimation and leave the thread. This would seem a sensible start point for discussion no?

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 04/10/2025 14:44

Myrtletown · 04/10/2025 14:39

interesting - apparently most of those who are anti-immigration self identify as racists!

www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5421742-81-of-those-anti-mass-immigration-identify-as-racists?reply=147590142

lol- is this from the thread where the figure comes from you’re “research across the internet”

Well I asked my mates down the pub, sorry, during my research across the UK hospitality sector and they think you’re talking a load of codswhallop.

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 14:43

nomas · 04/10/2025 14:42

Yes, they did lead to higher immigration.

I’m not calling for more immigration. I’m just not a fan of demonising immigrants and asylum seekers.

Who is demonising immigrants? And what is that demonisation?

OP posts: