Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

11 million immigrants since 2000. When I

789 replies

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 08:40

Sorry, it’s another immigration one.

I always see immigration discussed in terms of race, religion, who may or may not be a good fit for the UK, whether it’s by small boats - to be honest, this is not the biggest worry for me.

The biggest worry is the sheer increase in our population and how many people this country can reasonably accommodate. We are now 8th in Europe for population density - only behind Belgium and the Netherlands, and a handful of places like Vatican City and the Channel Islands. At present we have net migration of around 500,000 a year.

I’m worried that the key issues of overpopulation are being overlooked to make this conversation all about race. What about our pollution levels, wildlife habitats, flood risk, food security, infrastructure? Will this eventually be a polluted city state country? It seems to be heading that way.

Posters always say we need immigration, but we have already welcome 11 million since 2000. If that still isn’t enough; what is? Or do we just keep going?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
YelloDaisy · 04/10/2025 16:05

i agree OP -it’s too much -most move to London which then gets all of the investment and the rest of the country goes to hang. The MPs deny it cos they are happy to lie to get votes - pretend immigration is needed to get immigrant votes, deny it’s an issue to get white votes -then what do you know - we end up with Reform.

BadWoIf · 04/10/2025 16:03

newbluesofa · 04/10/2025 14:24

Jamming everyone in to a megacity sounds like a recipe for appalling mental health for everybody, horrific pollution of air and water, plummeting birth rates, and ecological collapse.

Well that doesn't sound like appropriate infrastructure, which is what I said we need. So not sure why you've made all this stuff up, as if that's what I suggested? We need appropriate, functional infrastructure that takes mental health, happiness, and the environment into consideration. Not sure why you're making things up in order to argue with me

Well, I can only conclude that we must have very different ideas of what might be conducive to good mental health, happiness and a healthy environment. You lauded Bumblebee's suggestions that included getting rid of old people, banning newbuilds from having gardens, and intensively rearing chickens underground! I think these would be most people's idea of hell.

Bumblebee's suggestions:
> Increasing the size of the country like Dubai and the Netherlands do. As suggest we could dam the Wash for example. There must be area of coast we could recover and build on.
> Reducing the number of older people to house and feed. Which is pretty unpaleble to most.
> Increasing housing density. Like build a second tier of social house on top of the existing social housing on stilts. Or my other suggestion of using unproductive buildings - convert all reglious buildings to flats. We could alternatively ban gardens for new builds, make smaller houses, build higher or deeper - maybe we build underground housing. benefit the fields for food.
> Or increase food production density. We are already start to build verticals farms. May be intensively food like chickens could be raised underground underneath housing
What ever it is we need fundamental discussion about how to change the country. Spending 21 pages arguing if we should the numbers are 7, 8 or 11 is really irrelevant.

Your response:
These are all such interesting point and one of the most thoughtful posts I've seen on a MN immigration thread. I really like your point about food production density, unfortunately the government don't seem to be engaging with the farming industry very well but I'm sure plenty would be up for this.

suburburban · 04/10/2025 16:02

Myrtletown · 04/10/2025 16:00

Indeed. Like anonymous MN posts where they create figures and go on about infrastructure and the environment whilst not saying what they really mean. Like that?

We’ll beg to differ

Myrtletown · 04/10/2025 16:00

suburburban · 04/10/2025 16:00

It’s a lot of things

i think a lot of people feel the same but they mutter about it in corners

Indeed. Like anonymous MN posts where they create figures and go on about infrastructure and the environment whilst not saying what they really mean. Like that?

suburburban · 04/10/2025 16:00

Myrtletown · 04/10/2025 15:58

Well at least you own your racism I guess. It’s the insidious posters who are worse.

‘It’s nothing to do with colour / race - I just care SO MUCH for the environment me’

It’s a lot of things

i think a lot of people feel the same but they mutter about it in corners

Myrtletown · 04/10/2025 15:58

suburburban · 04/10/2025 15:56

So what though

a balance is fine but not so great when the area becomes like Southall

Well at least you own your racism I guess. It’s the insidious posters who are worse.

‘It’s nothing to do with colour / race - I just care SO MUCH for the environment me’

HelenaWaiting · 04/10/2025 15:57

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 15:08

The estimates range between 6m and even higher than my calculation; and none of that takes into account people here ‘off the record’ or overstaying visas.

So you lied in your original post; you lied repeatedly defending it and now you come up with more figures intended to alarm and sow division.

Don't get me wrong here: I completely agree that immigration needs to be controlled and I firmly believe that the asylum system is being abused by economic migrants. But if you have to lie to make your point, you have lost the argument. Also, this may be old fashioned, but I can't stand liars.

suburburban · 04/10/2025 15:56

Myrtletown · 04/10/2025 15:54

You said ‘there is white flight’ meaning white people are leaving because people of other colours are coming in.

you then said ‘which is a shame’ which suggests that white is the desirable colour for an area.

but also people of other colours than white are not automatically immigrants, which is what this post is about so which it would be inferred you’re speaking about.

so you have indicated you believe those very things I said. And clearly

So what though

a balance is fine but not so great when the area becomes like Southall

Myrtletown · 04/10/2025 15:54

suburburban · 04/10/2025 15:51

i haven’t made that comment in the first place

why is it so terrible of me to prefer things how they used to be in the 90s?

You said ‘there is white flight’ meaning white people are leaving because people of other colours are coming in.

you then said ‘which is a shame’ which suggests that white is the desirable colour for an area.

but also people of other colours than white are not automatically immigrants, which is what this post is about so which it would be inferred you’re speaking about.

so you have indicated you believe those very things I said. And clearly

nomas · 04/10/2025 15:52

Bumblebee72 · 04/10/2025 15:47

So you maybe can turn to the point of the thread is a 18% increase in the population over 25 years with 60% of that coming from net migration a sensible number for you?

Genuinely, haven’t I already answered this?

JustSawJohnny · 04/10/2025 15:52

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 08:52

You’re welcome to look it up yourself, and provide a different source and number, but this is what ONS says.

It says it has increased, NOT that there have been 11 million immigrants!

What about the reduction in UK migration due to new EU regs post Brexit?

What about life expectancy increasing?

Stats are NEVER that cut and dry!

With headlines like that you could work for the Daily Fail 🙄

suburburban · 04/10/2025 15:51

Myrtletown · 04/10/2025 15:48

Hang on. If you’re non-white you’re are an immigrant?

or just undesirable?

which is it?

every now and again the ‘I’m not racist’ mask just slips doesn’t it

Edited

i haven’t made that comment in the first place

why is it so terrible of me to prefer things how they used to be in the 90s?

Myrtletown · 04/10/2025 15:48

suburburban · 04/10/2025 15:19

Yes I understand what you are saying.

however there is definitely white flight in the area which is a shame

Hang on. If you’re non-white you’re are an immigrant?

or just undesirable?

which is it?

every now and again the ‘I’m not racist’ mask just slips doesn’t it

Bumblebee72 · 04/10/2025 15:47

nomas · 04/10/2025 15:43

I did, and corrected to 6.6m.

So you maybe can turn to the point of the thread is a 18% increase in the population over 25 years with 60% of that coming from net migration a sensible number for you?

Myrtletown · 04/10/2025 15:45

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 15:08

The estimates range between 6m and even higher than my calculation; and none of that takes into account people here ‘off the record’ or overstaying visas.

Yes I know. Have I disputed that? Im responding to you asking me to provide you with one singular correct number. My post already says there isn’t one. Then you asked me again. I’m not going to make one up like you did, sorry!

I mean, I don’t really care what the number is tbh. I just take issue with misinformation and random estimates presented as fact. It’s a dangerous place to play

Bumblebee72 · 04/10/2025 15:43

nomas · 04/10/2025 15:40

So literate that you had to wait for me to go and add up the figures for you.

I have no idea what you are talking about. Again refer to my post of 10.26 and come back and apologise for the lies and misinformation.

nomas · 04/10/2025 15:43

Bumblebee72 · 04/10/2025 15:42

Again, I have acknowledge that is wrong, the like for like number of immigrants that have to the UK is 16m - gross migration. Refer to my post of 10.26. Alternatively go the ONS website and check the numbers yourself.

I did, and corrected to 6.6m.

Bumblebee72 · 04/10/2025 15:42

nomas · 04/10/2025 15:39

Again, OP was saying 11m immigrants, not 11m population increase!

Again, I have acknowledge that is wrong, the like for like number of immigrants that have to the UK is 16m - gross migration. Refer to my post of 10.26. Alternatively go the ONS website and check the numbers yourself.

nomas · 04/10/2025 15:40

Bumblebee72 · 04/10/2025 15:36

I don't think it is fair to say the 2.5m it was a lie. I think it was an illiterate misunderstanding of the data.

So literate that you had to wait for me to go and add up the figures for you.

nomas · 04/10/2025 15:39

Bumblebee72 · 04/10/2025 15:34

I have been clear that 11m is the increase in population. 8m is the net migration. You are the one who seems confused.

I don't really understand what type conspiracy theorist isn't happy to use the ONS data.

Again, OP was saying 11m immigrants, not 11m population increase!

EasternStandard · 04/10/2025 15:38

nomas · 04/10/2025 15:25

And yet didn’t question the OP or Bumblebee on 11m.

@Bumblebee72has been clear on what the figures mean, look at the detail of the posts

suburburban · 04/10/2025 15:36

newbluesofa · 04/10/2025 15:27

Interesting that you use the term white flight as this is quite a loaded term that implies racism, at least that's my knowledge of the word as I thought it was originally used to describe white people in the US in the 40s-50s leaving areas after black people moved there.

I think the same still applies though- areas go downhill because of government failings. White people more likely to have the money to leave so they do, immigrants don't. I don't think it's the fault of the immigrants but the government.

Reducing immigration may be necessary but only as a temporary measure, a sticking plaster while we fix the actual root issues. But the government wouldn't do that as someone said upthread, they're just interested in short term (4 year) measures to get reelected, no one is thinking long term

Oh but they do have money

how else should I describe the situation?

Bumblebee72 · 04/10/2025 15:36

TwistyTurnip · 04/10/2025 15:34

And so was the figure of 2.5m, which you provided earlier in the thread.

I don't think it is fair to say the 2.5m it was a lie. I think it was an illiterate misunderstanding of the data.

Bumblebee72 · 04/10/2025 15:34

Bumblebee72 · 04/10/2025 15:32

Refer to my post of 10.26 and then come back and apologise. You are again posting lies and misinformation.

I have been clear that 11m is the increase in population. 8m is the net migration. You are the one who seems confused.

I don't really understand what type conspiracy theorist isn't happy to use the ONS data.

TwistyTurnip · 04/10/2025 15:34

nomas · 04/10/2025 14:25

You’re not though.

11m was a lie.

8m was a lie.

You just pick out numbers from the air.

Edited

And so was the figure of 2.5m, which you provided earlier in the thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread