Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

11 million immigrants since 2000. When I

789 replies

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 08:40

Sorry, it’s another immigration one.

I always see immigration discussed in terms of race, religion, who may or may not be a good fit for the UK, whether it’s by small boats - to be honest, this is not the biggest worry for me.

The biggest worry is the sheer increase in our population and how many people this country can reasonably accommodate. We are now 8th in Europe for population density - only behind Belgium and the Netherlands, and a handful of places like Vatican City and the Channel Islands. At present we have net migration of around 500,000 a year.

I’m worried that the key issues of overpopulation are being overlooked to make this conversation all about race. What about our pollution levels, wildlife habitats, flood risk, food security, infrastructure? Will this eventually be a polluted city state country? It seems to be heading that way.

Posters always say we need immigration, but we have already welcome 11 million since 2000. If that still isn’t enough; what is? Or do we just keep going?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
addadd · 04/10/2025 11:44

SanctusInDistress · 04/10/2025 11:31

Sweetie, here is the difference:

the Dublin agreement is between EU countries. It means that they can be returned to the previous EU country they came from. Small boats came to the uk from France, so they could automatically be returned to France. No questions asked.

spain and Greece border Africa, people arrive there directly from an non-eu country, so it is a preferred route because there no other EU country to return them to. The uk is no longer part of the eu so we can’t return them back to France where they came from.

if you look at the graph for the uk, small boats started rising straight after Brexit be After Brexit made it harder for us to send them back to France.

do you understand the implications of Brexit better now?

Edited

So you are saying that we (the UK) need to put in place terms which are equivalent to the Dublin agreement? Sounds sensible.

[I don't think you should refer to someone you don't know as sweetie though]

Jade3450 · 04/10/2025 11:44

nomas · 04/10/2025 11:38

I said the figure of 2.5m was up to 2023.

I will find a link for up to 2025, probably 3 million +.

Where is your link for the 11 million figure?

Posted above, by me and another poster.

Awaiting your ‘probably 3 million in 25 years even though it was over half that in two of those years alone’ link eagerly!

Oh, and STOP trying to discredit others when you yourself are peddling misinformation as if it’s true.

Howszaboutthat · 04/10/2025 11:44

orangessquashed · 04/10/2025 09:08

My bigger concern is that with the amount of men coming here, men will seriously outnumber women for an entire generation and what impact will that have?

I’ve thought about this too!

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 11:44

seaelephant · 04/10/2025 11:43

We need even more. The population is about to sharply nosedive as pensioners die out and young people stop breeding. At that point we'll be crying out for a second Windrush but it'll be too lare.

No, we really don’t.

OP posts:
Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 11:43

addadd · 04/10/2025 11:39

You need to be skeptical of the research around immigration as there are funding streams which work their way back to people who are giving billions towards activism to encourage immigration and there is sometimes a link to what appears to be independent "research" groups. This in itself is a worry - when immigration is being so badly thought out, why are there people donating billions to add problems, before we have digested current problems? The fact that around 70 percent agree with your AIBU here and 30 percent don't and the sort of comments you are getting are also relevant when working out what the problem is.

What we need is a proper transparent objective analysis from the government, and transparency over who is donating to pro immigration and why. It just feels like there is something a bit worrying about the lack of cogency and lack of transparency.

I agree with you, this is nothing to do with being anti immigration. I am an immigrant in the EU - working, paying taxes. It is to do with lack of cogency.

Edited

I think in itself it’s very peculiar we can’t easily access a clear figure re immigration figures in the last decade, 2 decades, 3 decades. It’s something you assume would be public information as standard - so why not?

OP posts:
seaelephant · 04/10/2025 11:43

We need even more. The population is about to sharply nosedive as pensioners die out and young people stop breeding. At that point we'll be crying out for a second Windrush but it'll be too lare.

TwistyTurnip · 04/10/2025 11:42

nomas · 04/10/2025 11:25

What a shame all the people who hate our country can't just leave and we could replace them with immigrants. They'd be a damn sight more useful.

Amen @HPFA

Maybe we could pay them £2,000 relocation fee to piss off.

I’ve just asked MS Copilot again. The first time I asked, it gave me a figure of 7.3 million. The second time I asked it has given me a range of between 6-7 million; higher than the figure of 2.5 million you have given in your post above. Copilot has used Migration Observatory and .GOV.UK as its information source. I checked out your link and couldn’t see where you got your figure of 2.5 million from?

TheFrendo · 04/10/2025 11:41

YellowTigerTail · 04/10/2025 08:51

My view is that we have an aging population, and over the coming decades, immigration is the only way we will be able to get enough young people into the country to do all the jobs required to support the economy and keep the pensions going for the huge numbers of OAPs.

Also in terms of population density, the vast vast majority of this country is countryside and not built up. It's hard to believe when you are in a big city. I believe there a a few new towns being built here and there and I imagine that will continue

Edited

You can have that opinion.

The population increase of 10,000,000+ since 2000 will be an underestimate as it does not count those here illegally.

The British people did not vote for this. It has been imposed on them.

EasternStandard · 04/10/2025 11:39

nomas · 04/10/2025 11:23

Not this crap again. Net migration was 2.5 million, not 11 million.

You keep popping up with different names quoting the fake 11 million statistic.

2.5m net migration since 2000?

It’s higher than that

addadd · 04/10/2025 11:39

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 11:25

Italy, Spain, and Greece experienced more unauthorised arrivals by sea than the UK in 2024.

When did they leave the EU?

You need to be skeptical of the research around immigration as there are funding streams which work their way back to people who are giving billions towards activism to encourage immigration and there is sometimes a link to what appears to be independent "research" groups. This in itself is a worry - when immigration is being so badly thought out, why are there people donating billions to add problems, before we have digested current problems? The fact that around 70 percent agree with your AIBU here and 30 percent don't and the sort of comments you are getting are also relevant when working out what the problem is.

What we need is a proper transparent objective analysis from the government, and transparency over who is donating to pro immigration and why. It just feels like there is something a bit worrying about the lack of cogency and lack of transparency.

I agree with you, this is nothing to do with being anti immigration. I am an immigrant in the EU - working, paying taxes. It is to do with lack of cogency.

nomas · 04/10/2025 11:38

Jade3450 · 04/10/2025 11:36

It doesn’t give a figure for net migration in the last 25 years.

Would you like to directly quote the part that says net migration is only 2.5 million since 2000? 😂

How could this possibly be true if net migration for 2022 and 2023 ALONE was over 800,000?

Edited

I said the figure of 2.5m was up to 2023.

I will find a link for up to 2025, probably 3 million +.

Where is your link for the 11 million figure?

Jade3450 · 04/10/2025 11:36

nomas · 04/10/2025 11:34

What do you think it shows?

It doesn’t give a figure for net migration in the last 25 years.

Would you like to directly quote the part that says net migration is only 2.5 million since 2000? 😂

How could this possibly be true if net migration for 2022 and 2023 ALONE was over 800,000?

Digdongdoo · 04/10/2025 11:35

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 11:03

Crap public services that do the bare minimum.

And you think that would improve things for the next generations? How so?

Notonthestairs · 04/10/2025 11:35

CatchingtheCat · 04/10/2025 11:28

That is because indigenous population is now a minority group in most of London and have been displaced by immigrants.

This is not true.

nomas · 04/10/2025 11:34

Jade3450 · 04/10/2025 11:32

This literally does not show this!

What do you think it shows?

Jade3450 · 04/10/2025 11:32

nomas · 04/10/2025 11:29

Edited

This literally does not show this!

SanctusInDistress · 04/10/2025 11:31

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 11:25

Italy, Spain, and Greece experienced more unauthorised arrivals by sea than the UK in 2024.

When did they leave the EU?

Sweetie, here is the difference:

the Dublin agreement is between EU countries. It means that they can be returned to the previous EU country they came from. Small boats came to the uk from France, so they could automatically be returned to France. No questions asked.

spain and Greece border Africa, people arrive there directly from an non-eu country, so it is a preferred route because there no other EU country to return them to. The uk is no longer part of the eu so we can’t return them back to France where they came from.

if you look at the graph for the uk, small boats started rising straight after Brexit be After Brexit made it harder for us to send them back to France.

do you understand the implications of Brexit better now?

nomas · 04/10/2025 11:29

Jade3450 · 04/10/2025 11:25

Do you have a link for the 2.5 million statistic please? If OP has to provide one then so do you.

Did you look at the data posted above?

Why don’t you believe it?

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/internationalmigration/bulletins/longterminternationalmigrationprovisional/latest?utm_source=chatgpt.com

My statistic is for up to 2023. But even if you add in the last two years, it’s nowhere near 11 million Hmm

localnotail · 04/10/2025 11:29

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 11:23

What shitshow? If our public services are still dire after record immigration, doesn’t that show immigration isn’t a silver bullet?

Hmmm I think you completely missed the point I was making. Shitshow = current state of public services. Which is primarily due to huge budget cuts by our last government, and not due to the population increase (which happens everywhere and is inevitable).

Edited to add: any normal government would increase funding due to projected population growth (no matter by which means). But the tories done the exact opposite.

CatchingtheCat · 04/10/2025 11:28

MotherMary14 · 04/10/2025 11:13

I can separate the economics, thanks. I live in London, a city that runs on immigrant workers and the taxes generated here prop up the rest of the country. What I can't separate is the idea that immigrants must be treated as less than pond algae because they are non-British.

That is because indigenous population is now a minority group in most of London and have been displaced by immigrants.

Jade3450 · 04/10/2025 11:28

TwistyTurnip · 04/10/2025 11:24

Well going by the last three years, I’m yet to be convinced.

Theyre not ‘coming down’.

They were abnormally high in 2022 and 2023 (net migration c800k) and in 2024 the figures were half that (c430k).

But if you look at the trend on this graph it isn’t generally ‘coming down’. 2024’s 430k net migration was still miles higher than the figures pre-2022.

11 million immigrants since 2000. When I
Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 11:27

lljkk · 04/10/2025 11:26

On the raw question, I would like total UK population to stabilise at about 20-35 million. And global humanity count to stabilise below 4 billion.

Won't happen in my or my children's lifetime even if every single immigrant is stopped from entering UK forever more. "Limiting immigration" isn't a solution.

If you do want to limit immigration anyway, doing things to improve quality of life where people are leaving from would be the optimal strategy. Make Afghanistan, Albania, Syria wherever a much nicer place to live. This used to be an objective of foreign aid. Fix the problems there so the people there now don't come here and bring their problems with them.

Then it became fashionable not to bother to send foreign aid and budgets were sharply cut. As a result, more people will leave those difficult places to try to live somewhere nicer, like the UK. This is what people in democratic countries voted for, they voted to increase immigration to high income countries. <shrug>

I think that’s very ambitious figure - I think 40 million would be realistic but achievable, in that it gives us a buffer in terms of food production and would mean no further house building while not having to engage in things like mass deportation which I find unethical.

But yes a huge decrease is needed, somehow. I would be interested to see how quickly this would happen if we got immigration to net zero given they generally follow the ‘local’ birth rate.

OP posts:
lljkk · 04/10/2025 11:26

On the raw question, I would like total UK population to stabilise at about 20-35 million. And global humanity count to stabilise below 4 billion.

Won't happen in my or my children's lifetime even if every single immigrant is stopped from entering UK forever more. "Limiting immigration" isn't a solution.

If you do want to limit immigration anyway, doing things to improve quality of life where people are leaving from would be the optimal strategy. Make Afghanistan, Albania, Syria wherever a much nicer place to live. This used to be an objective of foreign aid. Fix the problems there so the people there now don't come here and bring their problems with them.

Then it became fashionable not to bother to send foreign aid and budgets were sharply cut. As a result, more people will leave those difficult places to try to live somewhere nicer, like the UK. This is what people in democratic countries voted for, they voted to increase immigration to high income countries. <shrug>

Jade3450 · 04/10/2025 11:25

nomas · 04/10/2025 11:23

Not this crap again. Net migration was 2.5 million, not 11 million.

You keep popping up with different names quoting the fake 11 million statistic.

Do you have a link for the 2.5 million statistic please? If OP has to provide one then so do you.

Did you look at the data posted above?

Why don’t you believe it?

CleverTraybake · 04/10/2025 11:25

Blusteryskies · 04/10/2025 10:08

Agreed, it should be deleted. I'm so fed up with people peddling lies on this site. How many more fools will read her post and treat it as fact? No wonder so many fools are gobbling up Reform's bile, when so many can't even begin to comprehend or analyse statistics.

Edited

No wonder so many fools are gobbling up Reform's bile, when so many can't even begin to comprehend or analyse statistics.

This, x100, with alarm bells on.

I think there should be some basic IQ, comprehension & maths tests before people are allowed to vote