Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

11 million immigrants since 2000. When I

789 replies

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 08:40

Sorry, it’s another immigration one.

I always see immigration discussed in terms of race, religion, who may or may not be a good fit for the UK, whether it’s by small boats - to be honest, this is not the biggest worry for me.

The biggest worry is the sheer increase in our population and how many people this country can reasonably accommodate. We are now 8th in Europe for population density - only behind Belgium and the Netherlands, and a handful of places like Vatican City and the Channel Islands. At present we have net migration of around 500,000 a year.

I’m worried that the key issues of overpopulation are being overlooked to make this conversation all about race. What about our pollution levels, wildlife habitats, flood risk, food security, infrastructure? Will this eventually be a polluted city state country? It seems to be heading that way.

Posters always say we need immigration, but we have already welcome 11 million since 2000. If that still isn’t enough; what is? Or do we just keep going?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 12:37

ilovesooty · 04/10/2025 12:33

I see that the OP told me to engage with the thread but hasn't answered the question I asked.

Well there have been hundreds of responses to expecting me to reply to everyone is unrealistic. I’ll answer it now, what is it?

OP posts:
ilovesooty · 04/10/2025 12:34

seaelephant · 04/10/2025 12:22

Well yes - 42% of our welfare spend is on pensions. Next is disibility which is 11%. So yes, it is 'by far'.

It's over 50% if you count pension related benefits.

FOJN · 04/10/2025 12:34

EasternStandard · 04/10/2025 12:22

Without the smaller ones mentioned in the op does that put England at the top?

Turkey is listed above us but it's only for the European portion of Turkey and I don't know what the distribution is like across the whole country.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_and_population_of_European_countries

ilovesooty · 04/10/2025 12:33

PinkFrogss · 04/10/2025 09:50

OP won’t reply properly to posts that don’t fit their narrative - including ones where they have been incorrect. I kindly took the time to explain that more births than deaths would lead to a population increase, but I guess that didn’t fit with OP’s narrative either.

I see that the OP told me to engage with the thread but hasn't answered the question I asked.

Lua · 04/10/2025 12:31

If your argument is about populations size..... are you willing to limit the number of children per family? Do you support the benefit cap? Do you support people should choose to have an abortion?

Just wondering.... or is this another anti immigration disguised thread?

nomas · 04/10/2025 12:30

Jade3450 · 04/10/2025 11:49

You don’t need to add it up! Do you know how to read a graph? Just look at it and you will see that 11m is roughly accurate.

Oh, and the link to the population figures was posted up thread.

Still waiting for your link :)

I was referring to the last 11 million made up thread, in which I googled and posted the below.

11 million immigrants since 2000. When I
sussexman · 04/10/2025 12:30

EasternStandard · 04/10/2025 12:22

Without the smaller ones mentioned in the op does that put England at the top?

Ahead of Belgium, behind the Netherlands. 91% of the land in England is not developed (www.gov.uk/government/statistics/land-use-in-england-2022/land-use-statistics-england-2022#land-use-in-england), so we may be near the top of the list in Europe, but we are hardly overpopulated.

nomas · 04/10/2025 12:29

Jade3450 · 04/10/2025 11:51

If you add up the net migration, it totals 6.6m.

Where on earth did you get 11 million from?

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 12:25

FOJN · 04/10/2025 12:20

England is more densely populated than Belgium and the Netherlands. Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland are much less densely populated which makes the UK population density lower. England has also seen the biggest population increase in both absolute numbers and as a percentage.

I'm concerned about the rate of increase, lack of infrastructure and failure to develop infrastructure at the rate required as well as preservation of farmland and the effects of AI on job availability.

Acres of green fields are not sitting empty just waiting for us to get over an aversion to building houses. The cows that provide the milk for your morning coffee graze on that land.

Some people choose city living because it suits the stage of life they are at or they love the amenities available to them and some of us choose to live in the arse end of nowhere because we are happy to sacrifice convenience for peace and quiet. I like to be able to walk my dog in the countryside without getting in the car so I'd rather we didn't just keep developing without having a plan for how we will feed everyone and keep them employed.

I'm far less concerned about where people are coming from than about sustaining the rate of population growth. Controlling immigration is one of the few, if not the only, way of controlling the rate of population growth. If you find a way to renegotiate our borders with the sea, let me know.

Absolutely. I think some people in Scotland think their more relaxed feelings about immigration are due to being somehow inherently more sanguine, but clearly it’s because they don’t have the population density we do. I expect their feelings will change as they’re forced to develop more and more land up there.

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 04/10/2025 12:22

FOJN · 04/10/2025 12:20

England is more densely populated than Belgium and the Netherlands. Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland are much less densely populated which makes the UK population density lower. England has also seen the biggest population increase in both absolute numbers and as a percentage.

I'm concerned about the rate of increase, lack of infrastructure and failure to develop infrastructure at the rate required as well as preservation of farmland and the effects of AI on job availability.

Acres of green fields are not sitting empty just waiting for us to get over an aversion to building houses. The cows that provide the milk for your morning coffee graze on that land.

Some people choose city living because it suits the stage of life they are at or they love the amenities available to them and some of us choose to live in the arse end of nowhere because we are happy to sacrifice convenience for peace and quiet. I like to be able to walk my dog in the countryside without getting in the car so I'd rather we didn't just keep developing without having a plan for how we will feed everyone and keep them employed.

I'm far less concerned about where people are coming from than about sustaining the rate of population growth. Controlling immigration is one of the few, if not the only, way of controlling the rate of population growth. If you find a way to renegotiate our borders with the sea, let me know.

Without the smaller ones mentioned in the op does that put England at the top?

seaelephant · 04/10/2025 12:22

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 12:18

It’s not ‘by far’. The rest of the welfare state is now roughly equal to pensions when put together.

Well yes - 42% of our welfare spend is on pensions. Next is disibility which is 11%. So yes, it is 'by far'.

FOJN · 04/10/2025 12:20

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 08:40

Sorry, it’s another immigration one.

I always see immigration discussed in terms of race, religion, who may or may not be a good fit for the UK, whether it’s by small boats - to be honest, this is not the biggest worry for me.

The biggest worry is the sheer increase in our population and how many people this country can reasonably accommodate. We are now 8th in Europe for population density - only behind Belgium and the Netherlands, and a handful of places like Vatican City and the Channel Islands. At present we have net migration of around 500,000 a year.

I’m worried that the key issues of overpopulation are being overlooked to make this conversation all about race. What about our pollution levels, wildlife habitats, flood risk, food security, infrastructure? Will this eventually be a polluted city state country? It seems to be heading that way.

Posters always say we need immigration, but we have already welcome 11 million since 2000. If that still isn’t enough; what is? Or do we just keep going?

England is more densely populated than Belgium and the Netherlands. Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland are much less densely populated which makes the UK population density lower. England has also seen the biggest population increase in both absolute numbers and as a percentage.

I'm concerned about the rate of increase, lack of infrastructure and failure to develop infrastructure at the rate required as well as preservation of farmland and the effects of AI on job availability.

Acres of green fields are not sitting empty just waiting for us to get over an aversion to building houses. The cows that provide the milk for your morning coffee graze on that land.

Some people choose city living because it suits the stage of life they are at or they love the amenities available to them and some of us choose to live in the arse end of nowhere because we are happy to sacrifice convenience for peace and quiet. I like to be able to walk my dog in the countryside without getting in the car so I'd rather we didn't just keep developing without having a plan for how we will feed everyone and keep them employed.

I'm far less concerned about where people are coming from than about sustaining the rate of population growth. Controlling immigration is one of the few, if not the only, way of controlling the rate of population growth. If you find a way to renegotiate our borders with the sea, let me know.

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 12:18

seaelephant · 04/10/2025 12:11

It is a huge issue though. The state pension is by far the benefit that costs the taxpayer the most money. If you have double the number of pensioners to working people paying in, then taxes are going to have to skyrocket to accomodate. Either that or the state pension is dropped entirely or raised to such a high number that most will never recieve it. Not to mention the enormous burden of an aging population on the NHS without young people to fill the positions as doctors and nurses. Care homes currently staffed mostly by immigrants will be on their knees. I don't think we can even fathom just how bad things can get - it's not that the population is larger, it's that the majority will be old, not paying taxes and draining public services.

It’s not ‘by far’. The rest of the welfare state is now roughly equal to pensions when put together.

OP posts:
MyHeartyCoralSnail · 04/10/2025 12:15

seaelephant · 04/10/2025 12:11

It is a huge issue though. The state pension is by far the benefit that costs the taxpayer the most money. If you have double the number of pensioners to working people paying in, then taxes are going to have to skyrocket to accomodate. Either that or the state pension is dropped entirely or raised to such a high number that most will never recieve it. Not to mention the enormous burden of an aging population on the NHS without young people to fill the positions as doctors and nurses. Care homes currently staffed mostly by immigrants will be on their knees. I don't think we can even fathom just how bad things can get - it's not that the population is larger, it's that the majority will be old, not paying taxes and draining public services.

But we have lots of youngsters leaving medical school not able to get jobs. So that doesn’t ring true.Maybe some of the money we spend of undocumented immigrants can go towards the elderly. Changing the works environment so some people can continue working longer. Addressing the shit show that are retirement apartments would help free up larger houses

addadd · 04/10/2025 12:14

Bollihobs · 04/10/2025 12:07

AI Overview

The UK population has increased by approximately 11.1 million people since September 2000, from an estimated 58.9 million to 70 million by September 2025. This significant growth of nearly 19% over the last 25 years is driven primarily by net international migration, particularly following the 2004 EU expansion.

Interesting...

AnneShirleyBlythe · 04/10/2025 12:14

NototerrorismIntheUK · 04/10/2025 09:24

I think that's why the government have proposed stopping people bringing family members. Some brought grandparents, parents etc and many don't contribute adding to problems with care, NHS etc. Come to work, but really do we need all the family too, unless people agree to pay for them. That seems reasonable.

Edited

Shocking that this was ever allowed!

thedramaQueen · 04/10/2025 12:11

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 11:52

If I was in charge I would have a 3 point plan.

  1. Aiming for net migration in the tens of thousands - zero is unrealistic at present but only accepting migration for the purposes of critical jobs that cannot be filled locally.
  2. Dramatic curbing of the welfare state to force people back to work.
  3. Only approving building projects of flats - proper large 3/4 bedroom flats with large balconies and adequate storage, with strict regulation over size and sustainability. I have been searching for a flat like this for years - they don’t exist in the UK, only mainland Europe.

You do realise that a huge number of people on benefits are IN work!! I have seen estimates of about 40% of people on Universal credit benefit are in work. A better plan would be to make employers pay their employees a living wage!

seaelephant · 04/10/2025 12:11

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 12:00

Everyone’s acting like the worst thing that could happen is not having a big enough population to fulfil our overspending, when actually there are a million scenarios far worse than this. We have a duty to put this right for future generations, not hand them a Ponzi scheme which has ruined the country.

It is a huge issue though. The state pension is by far the benefit that costs the taxpayer the most money. If you have double the number of pensioners to working people paying in, then taxes are going to have to skyrocket to accomodate. Either that or the state pension is dropped entirely or raised to such a high number that most will never recieve it. Not to mention the enormous burden of an aging population on the NHS without young people to fill the positions as doctors and nurses. Care homes currently staffed mostly by immigrants will be on their knees. I don't think we can even fathom just how bad things can get - it's not that the population is larger, it's that the majority will be old, not paying taxes and draining public services.

addadd · 04/10/2025 12:10

Uggbootsforever · 04/10/2025 11:52

If I was in charge I would have a 3 point plan.

  1. Aiming for net migration in the tens of thousands - zero is unrealistic at present but only accepting migration for the purposes of critical jobs that cannot be filled locally.
  2. Dramatic curbing of the welfare state to force people back to work.
  3. Only approving building projects of flats - proper large 3/4 bedroom flats with large balconies and adequate storage, with strict regulation over size and sustainability. I have been searching for a flat like this for years - they don’t exist in the UK, only mainland Europe.

I think first step would be to a proper full analysis of where money is going now. The needy in the country actually need more welfare support right now not less. Looking after the genuine needy is a hallmark of a civilised society. But we do need to analyse exactly where public money is going. Millions in taxpayer money are going on public private partnerships which operate as a blank cheque, some things do work better done by public bodies and construction and hospitals are probably two of them, as long as public bodies can recruit good staff. But at the same time going back to your comment about getting people to work, we need to analyse the population, and look at specific areas which are going wrong and think of solutions for those specific areas. Things like education and mental health affect workers and at the moment we are completely panning in those areas.

I like your idea of decent flats - but at the moment again home building and home ownership is dominated by corporate partners which make a killing and this is not in the public's best interest if homes are substandard and rents too high, and so joined up thinking would be needed about that - need to check that any solutions we come up will actually work as intended.

PinkFrogss · 04/10/2025 12:08

Where are you getting 11 million from OP? I’m getting roughly 7.1 million based on the figures here: www.statista.com/statistics/283287/net-migration-figures-of-the-united-kingdom-y-on-y/

Bollihobs · 04/10/2025 12:07

BallerinaRadio · 04/10/2025 08:47

And what's your source? 11 million can't be right

AI Overview

The UK population has increased by approximately 11.1 million people since September 2000, from an estimated 58.9 million to 70 million by September 2025. This significant growth of nearly 19% over the last 25 years is driven primarily by net international migration, particularly following the 2004 EU expansion.

InsectsMatter · 04/10/2025 12:06

In the past immigrants integrated; now many bring their repulsive misogynistic anti semitic views with them.
It’s terrifying.

AnneShirleyBlythe · 04/10/2025 12:05

Livelovebehappy · 04/10/2025 09:16

There’s no easy answer to that. Maybe more education about the reality of what’s awaiting them here. People coming in who have no skills or no command of the English language are going to end up potentially jobless or exploited or living on the streets. I recall watching something some time ago where some immigrants were being interviewed who weren’t aware of the reality, having been sold the dream, and that they wouldn’t have come here had they known.

I wonder who is selling them that dream? Is it the government? I work in the NHS & we had an international recruitment drive a few years ago . The promo videos I saw did make our area seem much more desirable than it really is!

Neemie · 04/10/2025 12:03

fizzyroselemonade · 04/10/2025 08:42

ranked 8th for population density in Europe does not automatically translate to overpopulation

That is if you include micro states.

addadd · 04/10/2025 12:02

SanctusInDistress · 04/10/2025 11:50

Tell me you voted for brexiteers without telling me you voted for Brexit. Good luck trying to get any country to agree with the uk a Dublin-style return agreement when we have nothing in return to offer. oh yes, we hold all tbe cards right? Hahahahahahaha.

Your posting style is quite antagonistic, but to answer - no I didn't vote for Brexit, partly because we held no cards, as you say, but given what we know now, factors such as out of control increase in living costs, and the fact that we now know that there was a lot of background influence in the EU from economically powerful groups, and that they appear to be trying to convince us that armed conflict is the way forward, which will inevitably lead to ww3, which would mean our young people will be decimated and the rest of us starve, apart from things like negotiating similar terms re immigrants which as you say is somewhat unlikely (obviously, as economically powerful groups are encouraging immigration to the UK and coincidentally are the same groups which want ww3), I am not sure what the EU has to offer any of us right now? Perhaps when you have stopped laughing you could elucidate us. If I have misunderstood anything, please say. (When you have your laughter under control)