Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To feel a bit bad for the met police on bbc panorama undercover

691 replies

Bloodyscarymary · 01/10/2025 21:46

Just watching the BBC Panorama doco “Undercover in the Police” and I can’t help feeling a bit uneasy.

Yes, the behaviour shown is awful and they should lose their jobs, but having their faces, names and secretly recorded conversations, sometimes even off duty over a pint broadcast feels like a bit of a violation of privacy.

I honestly would have thought secret filming like that couldn’t even be made public, but clearly it’s legal or the BBC wouldn’t air it.

I’m not excusing what was said at all. The culture clearly needs to change. But is it fair to single out these particular officers when the problem is obviously widespread?

I also felt some of the more junior officers had just absorbed the culture around them, and at times the journalist might have been nudging them into certain topics. A few of the comments even felt like dark humour or going along with pub chat. Still unacceptable, but if you secretly recorded doctors or other professions that probably use a lot of dark humour to get through it, I’m sure you’d hear things that would seem really callous to an outsider.

Absolutely they should be fired/reprimanded, but do they deserve complete public exposure like this? AIBU to feel uncomfortable about it?

YABU they deserve everything that’s coming their way

YANBU it’s too much personal exposure when the real problem is the Met culture not these individual cops

OP posts:
Bloodyscarymary · 01/10/2025 22:29

I’m clearly in the minority based on the comments. I guess I feel that people committing crimes (eg police brutality) are fair game for publication but recording them expressing views (no matter how much I disagree with them or find the views repugnant) in private when off-duty and publicising that with no blurred face etc is a bit Orwellian to me.

OP posts:
Driftingawaynow · 01/10/2025 22:27

Dappy777 · 01/10/2025 22:19

I’m increasingly suspicious of the BBC and its motivations. It is a left-wing organisation, and the left have always disliked the police, who they regard as “tools of the capitalist oppressors.” It’s hard to imagine the BBC exposing ANTIFA or Just Stop Oil, put it that way.

You see their left-wing bias everywhere. Radio 4 can’t even discuss Jane Austen or Tennyson without linking them to slavery or colonialism in some way.

Personally, I don’t think we give the police anywhere near enough credit or support. The majority of police officers I have met have been thoroughly decent men. If I had to deal with vicious, ignorant, foul-mannered little scumbags day in day out I’m sure I’d blurt out horrible and offensive things as well.

Edited

Both the left and the right have always accused the BBC of being biased against them. However, if you look at actual studies, it favours the right eg www.civitas.org.uk/content/files/BBC-impartiality-and-the-problem-of-bias.pdf

DramaLlamacchiato · 01/10/2025 22:26

Well, what most other people have said really.

This is a police force found to be institutionally racist, as well as with rapists and a murderer in their ranks. It’s fucking appalling and anyone in the police who holds and expresses these views is not fit to serve the public.

YABVVVVVVVU

JaniceBattersby · 01/10/2025 22:25

How else do you think the BBC could have better told this story other than by directly showing the officers saying what they said OP? Reporting like this has to be impactful else there’s no point in doing it.

The BBC’s editorial standards on undercover reporting are wildly high, often so high that journalists can’t meet the organisation’s own bar so never get the green light for their investigations.

I thought it was a fantastic piece of journalism that will be important in the battle to rid our capital’s police force of the institutional racism and sexism that still plagued it, despite numerous investigations and inquiries over a number of years.

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 01/10/2025 22:25

Dappy777 · 01/10/2025 22:19

I’m increasingly suspicious of the BBC and its motivations. It is a left-wing organisation, and the left have always disliked the police, who they regard as “tools of the capitalist oppressors.” It’s hard to imagine the BBC exposing ANTIFA or Just Stop Oil, put it that way.

You see their left-wing bias everywhere. Radio 4 can’t even discuss Jane Austen or Tennyson without linking them to slavery or colonialism in some way.

Personally, I don’t think we give the police anywhere near enough credit or support. The majority of police officers I have met have been thoroughly decent men. If I had to deal with vicious, ignorant, foul-mannered little scumbags day in day out I’m sure I’d blurt out horrible and offensive things as well.

Edited

And what's the excuse for them talking about women in such misogynistic tones. Or murdering them.

LikeWhoUsesTypewritersAnyway · 01/10/2025 22:25

Jellycatspyjamas · 01/10/2025 22:23

The police also deal with very vulnerable people every day who need them to be respectful, empathic and level headed. How could you trust those people to support a rape victim, or a victim of hate crime while they’re spewing the same hate?

Yep, this. ^ Anyone defending the police in this instance needs to give their head a good wobble!

CrimsonStoat · 01/10/2025 22:23

The Met needs ripping apart and a new force built in its place.

It's too corrupt to be saved.

Jellycatspyjamas · 01/10/2025 22:23

Dappy777 · 01/10/2025 22:19

I’m increasingly suspicious of the BBC and its motivations. It is a left-wing organisation, and the left have always disliked the police, who they regard as “tools of the capitalist oppressors.” It’s hard to imagine the BBC exposing ANTIFA or Just Stop Oil, put it that way.

You see their left-wing bias everywhere. Radio 4 can’t even discuss Jane Austen or Tennyson without linking them to slavery or colonialism in some way.

Personally, I don’t think we give the police anywhere near enough credit or support. The majority of police officers I have met have been thoroughly decent men. If I had to deal with vicious, ignorant, foul-mannered little scumbags day in day out I’m sure I’d blurt out horrible and offensive things as well.

Edited

The police also deal with very vulnerable people every day who need them to be respectful, empathic and level headed. How could you trust those people to support a rape victim, or a victim of hate crime while they’re spewing the same hate?

LikeWhoUsesTypewritersAnyway · 01/10/2025 22:22

Dappy777 · 01/10/2025 22:19

I’m increasingly suspicious of the BBC and its motivations. It is a left-wing organisation, and the left have always disliked the police, who they regard as “tools of the capitalist oppressors.” It’s hard to imagine the BBC exposing ANTIFA or Just Stop Oil, put it that way.

You see their left-wing bias everywhere. Radio 4 can’t even discuss Jane Austen or Tennyson without linking them to slavery or colonialism in some way.

Personally, I don’t think we give the police anywhere near enough credit or support. The majority of police officers I have met have been thoroughly decent men. If I had to deal with vicious, ignorant, foul-mannered little scumbags day in day out I’m sure I’d blurt out horrible and offensive things as well.

Edited

You have clearly not watched this documentary.

onlymethen · 01/10/2025 22:22

Bloodyscarymary · 01/10/2025 22:11

This guy I didn’t have a problem with being in the documentary because he was discussing a case in the office. I also don’t have a problem with the recording of actual instances of police violence or discussions about that.

The ones that made me particularly uncomfortable are the off duty conversations, or the jokey things that were clearly just bravado (like the finger breaking guy - I really doubt he has ever done that and we have zero context of what else was being said by others in that conversation).

The most concerning to me was the really young officer at the pub drinking with the journalist, who was prompting him, agreeing with what he said and literally egging him on to share his views when he realised he had gone too far. Yes he was horrifically racist - he should be fired as police officers must be held to a high standard of morals. But I’m not sure he deserves that conversation to be completely public for the world to see for all eternity.

That’s the very reason we should see this

LikeWhoUsesTypewritersAnyway · 01/10/2025 22:20

Are you having a laugh @Bloodyscarymary ? Hmm

I saw this tonight, with video footage showing the things they've said and done, including kicking a black man constantly until he passed out, and LAUGHING about it.

Then laughing at a pregnant woman who said her boyfriend had kicked her as hard as he could in the belly, in the hope that she would lose her baby. They laughed because they didn't believe her! They said 'yeah, so she SAYS! hahahahaha!'

They laughed at, and mocked people who were upset and physically hurt, and bragged about how they kicked the shit out of people in custody, and rolled around laughing at how funny it was.

Do I feel SORRY for them for getting caught out? As I said.... Are you having a laugh?! Hmm No I bloody don't! I am glad they have been exposed, and named and shamed. These were police officers who were paid good money to look after the public and uphold the law, and to try and create peace and look after people. The 'men' in this film footage are disgusting racists and misogynists, and utter, utter thugs. Always the MET police too isn't it?! It seems to attract the worst scum.

Disclaimer NAMPALT (Not all Met police are like that!) Some are though!

NessShaness · 01/10/2025 22:19

These officers are paid to serve and protect the public, and that includes some of the most vulnerable members of society.

The comments were disgusting, and as another poster said it’s endemic within the MET especially. Every single one of the rotten apples in the police force need to be exposed and held accountable for what they say and do.

Fucking hell, for a police officer to hold those views, never mind voice them, is terrifying. They are meant to uphold a code of ethics.

As a social worker I constantly have to reflect on and challenge my own attitudes and values and how they may impact my practice and the people I work with. Why don’t the police, who are also in a position of power, have to do this?

swingingbytheseat · 01/10/2025 22:19

It was pretty shocking to realise the biggest misogynistic, racist, homophobic arseholes are in positions of power like this.
I feel like they should sign an oath or something like doctors have to, this needs to be stamped out

Dappy777 · 01/10/2025 22:19

I’m increasingly suspicious of the BBC and its motivations. It is a left-wing organisation, and the left have always disliked the police, who they regard as “tools of the capitalist oppressors.” It’s hard to imagine the BBC exposing ANTIFA or Just Stop Oil, put it that way.

You see their left-wing bias everywhere. Radio 4 can’t even discuss Jane Austen or Tennyson without linking them to slavery or colonialism in some way.

Personally, I don’t think we give the police anywhere near enough credit or support. The majority of police officers I have met have been thoroughly decent men. If I had to deal with vicious, ignorant, foul-mannered little scumbags day in day out I’m sure I’d blurt out horrible and offensive things as well.

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 01/10/2025 22:18

Yes he was horrifically racist - he should be fired as police officers must be held to a high standard of morals. But I’m not sure he deserves that conversation to be completely public for the world to see for all eternity.

So a horrific racist should have his identity protected so that people don't know he's a horrific racist.

Jellycatspyjamas · 01/10/2025 22:18

Bloodyscarymary · 01/10/2025 22:11

This guy I didn’t have a problem with being in the documentary because he was discussing a case in the office. I also don’t have a problem with the recording of actual instances of police violence or discussions about that.

The ones that made me particularly uncomfortable are the off duty conversations, or the jokey things that were clearly just bravado (like the finger breaking guy - I really doubt he has ever done that and we have zero context of what else was being said by others in that conversation).

The most concerning to me was the really young officer at the pub drinking with the journalist, who was prompting him, agreeing with what he said and literally egging him on to share his views when he realised he had gone too far. Yes he was horrifically racist - he should be fired as police officers must be held to a high standard of morals. But I’m not sure he deserves that conversation to be completely public for the world to see for all eternity.

Not being racist is hardly “high moral standards”, it’s common decency and the absolute minimum of standards. The person had many options open to him - he could have challenged the journalist, walked away, changed the subject. It’s more than overdue that this stuff is exposed and people held to account.

edwinbear · 01/10/2025 22:18

The most concerning to me was the really young officer at the pub drinking with the journalist, who was prompting him, agreeing with what he said and literally egging him on to share his views when he realised he had gone too far. Yes he was horrifically racist - he should be fired as police officers must be held to a high standard of morals. But I’m not sure he deserves that conversation to be completely public for the world to see for all eternity

His parents should hear that. DS is being brought up to shut that conversation down, tell the journalist he’s completely out of order and walk away. I’d be so ashamed of DS and worry where I’d gone wrong if he’d just gone along with it ‘for the bands’.

GreenSedan · 01/10/2025 22:16

The programme makes a point of saying that many officers there are good public servants who are doing their best in challenging circumstances. The arseholes caught on camera being racist misogynists deserve to be named and shamed.

I absolutely despair that you feel sorry for them.

These people aren't selling fucking paperclips for a living. They have an extraordinary level of power over ordinary people's lives. The standards that they are (supposed to be) held to are in place for a bloody good reason.

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 01/10/2025 22:16

I remember there being an almost exact same exposé, possibly another Panorama one I'm not sure after Stephen Lawrence was murdered and several officers were covertly recorded spouting all kind of racist shit. Best part of 30 years later and here we are again with the same story and this time they are also spewing Andrew Tate style bollocks.
And then we're expected to feel sorry for them, really?!

Doingtheboxerbeat · 01/10/2025 22:16

Do every job , especially if in a position of trust , as if you are being filmed . Or if you are in retail etc, imagine you are told there's a mystery shopper is in the area.

Norugratsatall · 01/10/2025 22:11

You feel bad for them?! After the filth that has come out of their mouths?! I’ve just watched this with incredulity. The Met is toxic and rotten to the core. It’s frightening, terrifying. These are people we are supposed to trust…god help any of us if we find ourselves in London needing the assistance of the police. You are most definitely being unreasonable.

YourAmplePlumPoster · 01/10/2025 22:11

We could probably have done with some of their undercover journalists investigating the vast number of BBC nonces over the years. People in glasshouses......

Bloodyscarymary · 01/10/2025 22:11

EsmeSusanOgg · 01/10/2025 21:59

Deeply inappropriate comments. Lots of sexual comments about people in custody / victims. One case on the BBC website shows a sergeant disbelieve someone reporting rape and domestic abuse. She reported her abuser had kicked her in the stomach. According to another officer in the video who was unhappy with the decision to bail the person accused the woman had an obvious footprint on her stomach, corroborating her claims.

This is good journalism. They have only shown those who were abusing positions of trust and did so repeatedly.

This guy I didn’t have a problem with being in the documentary because he was discussing a case in the office. I also don’t have a problem with the recording of actual instances of police violence or discussions about that.

The ones that made me particularly uncomfortable are the off duty conversations, or the jokey things that were clearly just bravado (like the finger breaking guy - I really doubt he has ever done that and we have zero context of what else was being said by others in that conversation).

The most concerning to me was the really young officer at the pub drinking with the journalist, who was prompting him, agreeing with what he said and literally egging him on to share his views when he realised he had gone too far. Yes he was horrifically racist - he should be fired as police officers must be held to a high standard of morals. But I’m not sure he deserves that conversation to be completely public for the world to see for all eternity.

OP posts:
ForAzureSeal · 01/10/2025 22:09

If it makes more police scared of exposure to the point they never ever behave in such a way again then that would be a good thing. This is a force that has been in the spotlight for the last few years and was supposedly addressing the appalling culture. The police and police staff involved will not have been unaware what they were doing and saying was wrong. I felt sorry for their colleagues who were identifiable and clearly didn't agree with the culture. I worry they will be targeted. It was vile and I have no doubt more will be reported off the back of this. Brave journalists and colleagues who whistleblew.

MissLC · 01/10/2025 22:08

Undercover reporting doesn't sit well with me in general, though I admit I haven't watched this one (yet). It is tricky that bad people need to be called out but good people get caught up in the crossfire.
I worked in a place that was the subject of an undercover Panorama episode and did nothing wrong (& therefore wasn't featured in the program) but it still made me feel manipulated and violated. I thought I genuinely got on with the person and it's not fair that they only show the bad side of things not going well when there's so much good too.

Swipe left for the next trending thread