Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To feel a bit bad for the met police on bbc panorama undercover

691 replies

Bloodyscarymary · 01/10/2025 21:46

Just watching the BBC Panorama doco “Undercover in the Police” and I can’t help feeling a bit uneasy.

Yes, the behaviour shown is awful and they should lose their jobs, but having their faces, names and secretly recorded conversations, sometimes even off duty over a pint broadcast feels like a bit of a violation of privacy.

I honestly would have thought secret filming like that couldn’t even be made public, but clearly it’s legal or the BBC wouldn’t air it.

I’m not excusing what was said at all. The culture clearly needs to change. But is it fair to single out these particular officers when the problem is obviously widespread?

I also felt some of the more junior officers had just absorbed the culture around them, and at times the journalist might have been nudging them into certain topics. A few of the comments even felt like dark humour or going along with pub chat. Still unacceptable, but if you secretly recorded doctors or other professions that probably use a lot of dark humour to get through it, I’m sure you’d hear things that would seem really callous to an outsider.

Absolutely they should be fired/reprimanded, but do they deserve complete public exposure like this? AIBU to feel uncomfortable about it?

YABU they deserve everything that’s coming their way

YANBU it’s too much personal exposure when the real problem is the Met culture not these individual cops

OP posts:
Dodgethis · 01/10/2025 22:43

I’ll be honest, in the overall situation it’s not the racist misogynists in positions of power that I’m most worried about.

LikeWhoUsesTypewritersAnyway · 01/10/2025 22:43

Yep! I have no problem with their names and faces being publicised.

So yes. YABU @Bloodyscarymary

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 01/10/2025 22:43

Found it. It was a Panorama episode called The Secret Policeman. Filmed undercover by journalist Mark Daly and and broadcast in 2003. This is an extract from an interview about it.

In one scene to be shown in tonight's programme, a trainee is filmed wearing a Ku Klux Klan mask and threatening to beat up an Asian colleague. "He'll regret the day he was ever born a P**i," he says, before adding that his aim is "to eradicate the whole fucking country of people like him". Daly also recorded racist remarks made by other trainee officers. One recruit said murdered black teenager Stephen Lawrence "deserved to die", that his killing was "a good memory" and that white racists "should be given diplomatic immunity".

These officers were recorded and their identies shown on telly at the time. So do you feel sorry for them too, OP?

Littleguggi · 01/10/2025 22:41

They should be publicly shamed and fired at the very least! I have no problem with their identities and faces being shown!

Anyahyacinth · 01/10/2025 22:41

Trouble is the head of the Met has appeased his officers (after the armed officers work to rule etc..) when he came into post and said the service had no institutional racism or sexism...it looked like change might happen with Sarah Everard and Mark Duggan but they just dug in and circled the wagons rejecting criticism and change.

Toofficeornot · 01/10/2025 22:41

Bloodyscarymary · 01/10/2025 22:38

On the contrary, I completely see how that would impact how they treat victims of crime. I think they should be fired! My AIBU is about publishing their identities, faces etc in the documentary.

Unfortunately, we have to rely on journalists to uncover these things. The met clearly werent able to deal with it. They said they had.

Jellycatspyjamas · 01/10/2025 22:40

Bloodyscarymary · 01/10/2025 22:38

On the contrary, I completely see how that would impact how they treat victims of crime. I think they should be fired! My AIBU is about publishing their identities, faces etc in the documentary.

I’d want to know. If it was my neighbour, or friends husband, or god forbid, my child, I’d want to know.

AngryBird6122 · 01/10/2025 22:39

I have met four people who work for the MET police. All of them are/were awful....think they attract a certain type?

opencecilgee · 01/10/2025 22:39

no, they’re abhorrent

Bloodyscarymary · 01/10/2025 22:38

Thortour · 01/10/2025 22:33

So you think these ‘private’ views don’t impact on how they treat victims of crime? You think you can be a big old racist sexist idiot who thinks truly unpleasant things but a jolly good chap once you put your uniform on?
Did you see what the other custody officer said about the SGT letting that man go despite the fact that he kicked the pregnant woman in her stomach?

On the contrary, I completely see how that would impact how they treat victims of crime. I think they should be fired! My AIBU is about publishing their identities, faces etc in the documentary.

OP posts:
Littleguggi · 01/10/2025 22:38

It's wrong to have these views full stop, it doesn't matter if you are on duty or off duty. Absolutely sickening, made worse by the fact a minority of people on here are excusing the behaviour!

Jellycatspyjamas · 01/10/2025 22:37

Bloodyscarymary · 01/10/2025 22:29

I’m clearly in the minority based on the comments. I guess I feel that people committing crimes (eg police brutality) are fair game for publication but recording them expressing views (no matter how much I disagree with them or find the views repugnant) in private when off-duty and publicising that with no blurred face etc is a bit Orwellian to me.

When those views impact their ability to do their job, to treat people with respect and dignity, to apply the law without fear or favour? Or do you think they go on duty and suddenly shed that racist, misogynistic mindset?

Toofficeornot · 01/10/2025 22:36

Let's say you are white, your child marries a black man and have children. Your granddaughter is in a car accident with a white man, the man is aggresive and angry and threatens her, she calls her dad and it all gets a bit heated and the police are called.. and this police officer turns up. The aggressive man says its all your grandaughters fault and lies and says her dad threatened him.
How do you think this will play out for the innocent party, ie your granddaughter and her dad? The policemans bias could mean he sides with the man and skirts over the actual facts.
And this is why it is important to uncover racism in the police.
If someone holds very strong negative views about one sector of society, they can not do a job like policing. A racist plumber isnt going to ruin someones life, but a racist policeman could.
I don't like racists full stop but a a racist or mysogynist person in a position of authority is dangerous.

Thortour · 01/10/2025 22:35

It’s worrying you think it’s ok to have these views when you’re ’off duty’.

justasking111 · 01/10/2025 22:35

Friends daughter married a met officer. They didn't see a lot of them so were blissfully ignorant. That is until they relocated to be near our friends. The mask soon slipped. Now they loathe him and wonder why he's so unpleasant to his wife and his in laws. They say nothing to keep the peace.

He's now in the local force and you have to hope he doesn't infest the officers there.

Stompythedinosaur · 01/10/2025 22:34

I think they are disgusting and deserve what they get. I don't believe people should have signed up to be in the police if they aren't able to resist peer pressure or have enough integrity to do what is right even when others are being horrific.

I don't think sacking a few people will change the prevalent culture though.

Praying4Peace · 01/10/2025 22:33

suburberphobe · 01/10/2025 21:54

AIBU to feel uncomfortable about it?

Why? They've been exposed as racist mysoginist creeps.

These are people we are paying our taxes for! FFS.

Good on the BBC for exposing them.

This and what is really scary is that the public are at the mercy of these attitudes and behaviour. More so the vulnerability of those caught up in the criminal justice system.
There is a long way to go before the public are assured that the police force are just and fair.
There has been little change since the racist attitudes exposed in the murder of Stephen Lawrence

Thortour · 01/10/2025 22:33

Bloodyscarymary · 01/10/2025 22:29

I’m clearly in the minority based on the comments. I guess I feel that people committing crimes (eg police brutality) are fair game for publication but recording them expressing views (no matter how much I disagree with them or find the views repugnant) in private when off-duty and publicising that with no blurred face etc is a bit Orwellian to me.

So you think these ‘private’ views don’t impact on how they treat victims of crime? You think you can be a big old racist sexist idiot who thinks truly unpleasant things but a jolly good chap once you put your uniform on?
Did you see what the other custody officer said about the SGT letting that man go despite the fact that he kicked the pregnant woman in her stomach?

LeonMccogh · 01/10/2025 22:32

Bloodyscarymary · 01/10/2025 22:30

I would have been more comfortable if the off-duty conversations had identities concealed - so we could see and hear that there are massive cultural issues but individual officers in that context weren’t singled out.

Why shouldn’t they be singled out? Shame isn’t always a bad thing.

NoSoupForU · 01/10/2025 22:32

I understand what you're getting at regards the issue being widespread and deep set.

But those who were exposed weren't innocent. It was their own choice to exhibit shitty behaviour and shitty language, for which there should be consequences.

LeonMccogh · 01/10/2025 22:32

They fully deserved to be made examples of. It’s a strong warning to others who might be attempted to behave similarly.

NessShaness · 01/10/2025 22:31

Bloodyscarymary · 01/10/2025 22:29

I’m clearly in the minority based on the comments. I guess I feel that people committing crimes (eg police brutality) are fair game for publication but recording them expressing views (no matter how much I disagree with them or find the views repugnant) in private when off-duty and publicising that with no blurred face etc is a bit Orwellian to me.

Off duty isn’t an excuse.

You don’t switch your moral compass on when you go to work and off when you clock out. This is who they are at their core, it’s their belief system, it is the real them, and they should be nowhere near vulnerable people needing help.

Bloodyscarymary · 01/10/2025 22:30

JaniceBattersby · 01/10/2025 22:25

How else do you think the BBC could have better told this story other than by directly showing the officers saying what they said OP? Reporting like this has to be impactful else there’s no point in doing it.

The BBC’s editorial standards on undercover reporting are wildly high, often so high that journalists can’t meet the organisation’s own bar so never get the green light for their investigations.

I thought it was a fantastic piece of journalism that will be important in the battle to rid our capital’s police force of the institutional racism and sexism that still plagued it, despite numerous investigations and inquiries over a number of years.

I would have been more comfortable if the off-duty conversations had identities concealed - so we could see and hear that there are massive cultural issues but individual officers in that context weren’t singled out.

OP posts:
Thortour · 01/10/2025 22:30

No I don’t feel bad. You can get me as drunk as a skunk and I wouldn’t say the things they said. I’ve been teaching for decades and I’ve dealt with some deeply problematic children who have even been violent to me and at no point have I felt the need to hurt them.
The searching of that woman where the custody sgt rushed down to ‘help’ was appalling. He spoke in an incredibly unpleasant way. The use of violence. The racism, sexism and hate they expressed should mean immediate dismissal.

InterestQ · 01/10/2025 22:30

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.