Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To feel a bit bad for the met police on bbc panorama undercover

691 replies

Bloodyscarymary · 01/10/2025 21:46

Just watching the BBC Panorama doco “Undercover in the Police” and I can’t help feeling a bit uneasy.

Yes, the behaviour shown is awful and they should lose their jobs, but having their faces, names and secretly recorded conversations, sometimes even off duty over a pint broadcast feels like a bit of a violation of privacy.

I honestly would have thought secret filming like that couldn’t even be made public, but clearly it’s legal or the BBC wouldn’t air it.

I’m not excusing what was said at all. The culture clearly needs to change. But is it fair to single out these particular officers when the problem is obviously widespread?

I also felt some of the more junior officers had just absorbed the culture around them, and at times the journalist might have been nudging them into certain topics. A few of the comments even felt like dark humour or going along with pub chat. Still unacceptable, but if you secretly recorded doctors or other professions that probably use a lot of dark humour to get through it, I’m sure you’d hear things that would seem really callous to an outsider.

Absolutely they should be fired/reprimanded, but do they deserve complete public exposure like this? AIBU to feel uncomfortable about it?

YABU they deserve everything that’s coming their way

YANBU it’s too much personal exposure when the real problem is the Met culture not these individual cops

OP posts:
Pigeonenglish · 02/10/2025 14:22

godmum56 · 02/10/2025 14:21

no I don't think it does. I think that the people ARE the culture, they make the culture.

Edited

But they aren’t going to deal with ‘the people’; just the ones who happened to be caught on camera, so to speak.

godmum56 · 02/10/2025 14:21

Pigeonenglish · 02/10/2025 14:19

Exposing the individuals takes that point away, though (I do agree with what you are saying, though.)

no I don't think it does. I think that the people ARE the culture, they make the culture.

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 02/10/2025 14:20

I have only seen the coverage of this story on the news, @Bloodyscarymary, and frankly that was bad enough - I can’t imagine how much more dreadful stuff was on the full Panorama programme.

I have no sympathy for the officers involved - if they weren’t displaying horrific attitudes and saying racist, sexist, misogynistic and violent things, they wouldn't have been outed by the hidden camera footage.

I hope this sends a message to anyone else in the police force, who shares these vile attitudes, that it is utterly unacceptable, and they need to change, if they don’t want to risk their jobs. And the heads of all the police forces in the UK need to do everything necessary to root out any officer who shares these Met officers’ (lack of) standards.

Pigeonenglish · 02/10/2025 14:19

godmum56 · 02/10/2025 14:18

I think the fact that these people can say and do these things DOES expose that it is institutional. If it wasn't institutional they wouldn't get away with it or be so open about it. It may be a culture of "no one cares" rather than its permitted or encouraged but there is something rotten there.

Exposing the individuals takes that point away, though (I do agree with what you are saying, though.)

Pigeonenglish · 02/10/2025 14:18

mathanxiety · 02/10/2025 14:13

The reportage was very clear that it is sergeants' duty to maintain the discipline and the standards of the force, the group, the cohort (call it what you will) who are directly answerable to them.

I'd particularly target sergeants therefore. Leadership failure is screaming out from this report.

But each individual has his or her own conscience all the same, and all of them are sworn officers, who pledged to protect the citizens and uphold the law, so they're all culpable. All should be named and shamed and stripped of their jobs (and pensions imo).

and we think that means they will have the book thrown at them? It doesn’t. It means the ones the BBC exposed will in all probability be dismissed; the ones it didn’t expose won’t be, all will carry on until next time.

godmum56 · 02/10/2025 14:18

Pigeonenglish · 02/10/2025 13:59

I don’t think anyone’s arguing it shouldn’t be, just that it should be exposed in an institutional sense rather than an individual one.

Otherwise new recruits will join the police and in ten years will be just as unpleasant and dangerous as these individuals, irrespective of whether or not they were when they started.

I think the fact that these people can say and do these things DOES expose that it is institutional. If it wasn't institutional they wouldn't get away with it or be so open about it. It may be a culture of "no one cares" rather than its permitted or encouraged but there is something rotten there.

SomewhatAnnoyed · 02/10/2025 14:15

Ariela · 02/10/2025 09:02

Having worked in a very male dominated industry in the 80s, where 1 in perhaps 500 were female, I can assure you I never heard anything even mildly derogatory said about us then. We were treated with respect. No reason the police cannot do the same in this day and age.

Glad you didn’t suffer them saying it in front of you. Sadly they probably didn’t say it to your face but saved it til you were out the office/ they were in the pub and it was just the ‘lads’.

PurpleandWhite · 02/10/2025 14:14

Pricelessadvice · 02/10/2025 13:33

I don’t like undercover reporting to be honest. I’m not excusing these vile people at all, but in general I find undercover reporting problematic.
I do feel the reporter pushed and did ask some leading questions and agreed with things to get them to say more.

How else are you supposed to conduct undercover reporting? Ridiculous. Of course you need to pretend to be “in” otherwise you’ll get nothing. He barely even chuckled at anything they said.

mathanxiety · 02/10/2025 14:13

Pigeonenglish · 02/10/2025 13:37

None of the above.

I feel uncomfortable about holding individuals responsible when it’s a cultural problem. That’s my concern about this. It inevitably means those at the bottom will be disciplined (sacked) whilst those at the top will carry on.

It is like when an error of judgement is made at social services and the individual social worker inevitably carries the can.

The reportage was very clear that it is sergeants' duty to maintain the discipline and the standards of the force, the group, the cohort (call it what you will) who are directly answerable to them.

I'd particularly target sergeants therefore. Leadership failure is screaming out from this report.

But each individual has his or her own conscience all the same, and all of them are sworn officers, who pledged to protect the citizens and uphold the law, so they're all culpable. All should be named and shamed and stripped of their jobs (and pensions imo).

Pigeonenglish · 02/10/2025 14:06

Change2banon · 02/10/2025 14:03

It needs tackling as a package. Tossing out the active bad apples is a start. Once you see that you can’t behave that way in a job, you’re either going to toe the line, get out of the job or be kicked out.

Indeed but how are they going to be found without undercover reporters? That’s the heart of the issue. Because if anyone thinks ‘BBC have shown bad men, bad men have been shown the door’ they are unfortunately misguided and naive.

SomewhatAnnoyed · 02/10/2025 14:05

WaryHiker · 02/10/2025 08:01

Judging by what has happened in the past, if their faces had not been shown, very little would have happened to them.

You must have read articles and statistics on how many police officers are accused or even convicted of X,Y and Z and are simply relocated to other forces.

Like priests!

godmum56 · 02/10/2025 14:05

CollsR · 02/10/2025 11:17

Culture is made up by people. These people saying these horrible things are reinforcing the culture. More of this should be done. Every year, every police unit should have such an investigation. You could secretly record at my work and at my after work functions and you would not get anything like this ever.

This

Change2banon · 02/10/2025 14:03

Pigeonenglish · 02/10/2025 13:57

Interestingly I see it differently. I don’t think it’s as simple as removing the horrible people makes the organisation OK. It’s institutionally racist and sexist; it is that which needs tackling.

I am going back nearly thirty years here but two school friends of mine joined the police. They were really nice boys at school. I hope they have stayed so and become really nice men, but the problem with a corrupt institution is that it corrupts and changes everybody. Winterbourne is a good example of this.

It needs tackling as a package. Tossing out the active bad apples is a start. Once you see that you can’t behave that way in a job, you’re either going to toe the line, get out of the job or be kicked out.

Pigeonenglish · 02/10/2025 13:59

anothermondayyy · 02/10/2025 13:58

These are public servants!! We pay for them to have our safety and best interests at heart. Of course racism, misogyny, violence, abuse and corruption should be exposed FFS!!!

I don’t think anyone’s arguing it shouldn’t be, just that it should be exposed in an institutional sense rather than an individual one.

Otherwise new recruits will join the police and in ten years will be just as unpleasant and dangerous as these individuals, irrespective of whether or not they were when they started.

anothermondayyy · 02/10/2025 13:58

These are public servants!! We pay for them to have our safety and best interests at heart. Of course racism, misogyny, violence, abuse and corruption should be exposed FFS!!!

Pigeonenglish · 02/10/2025 13:57

Change2banon · 02/10/2025 13:54

No, but putting the blame on a system instead of individual personalities is the problem here. These men are vile, they don’t belong in the service. Simple as.

Interestingly I see it differently. I don’t think it’s as simple as removing the horrible people makes the organisation OK. It’s institutionally racist and sexist; it is that which needs tackling.

I am going back nearly thirty years here but two school friends of mine joined the police. They were really nice boys at school. I hope they have stayed so and become really nice men, but the problem with a corrupt institution is that it corrupts and changes everybody. Winterbourne is a good example of this.

LEWWW · 02/10/2025 13:56

Always hold people accountable. Those who are racist and misogynistic should not be in our police force.

Sartre · 02/10/2025 13:56

Doesn't surprise me. A former friend of mine is a police officer and she invited me out a couple of times with her colleagues. They were horrid. Just spent the night insulting people they were supposed to help. They also had a Lego figure they would carry around and would take pics of it posed in ways they had found victims/vulnerable people. I found it so grotesque that I stopped being friends with her. That and the fact she had an affair with her married sergeant.

Change2banon · 02/10/2025 13:54

Pigeonenglish · 02/10/2025 13:50

It still won’t make a difference if changes aren’t made at the top. That’s where the SS comparison comes in. Or is anyone really so naive as to think ‘oh, these men are bad, sack them, all is now well’?

No, but putting the blame on a system instead of individual personalities is the problem here. These men are vile, they don’t belong in the service. Simple as.

Pigeonenglish · 02/10/2025 13:50

Change2banon · 02/10/2025 13:46

This is nothing like your analogy of ss. These officers were blatantly vile, blatantly racist, blatantly misogynistic, and everything else. They were disgusting men, with complete disregard for anything and anyone around them. There’s nothing cultural about this. They are grown men who have taken oaths … they have disregarded everything in the worst way possible. They have their own minds and are in a profession that should behave very differently to how the did/do.

It still won’t make a difference if changes aren’t made at the top. That’s where the SS comparison comes in. Or is anyone really so naive as to think ‘oh, these men are bad, sack them, all is now well’?

Obeseandashamed · 02/10/2025 13:48

Having worked for an LA and given legal advice to the IOPC on disciplinary matters and complaints, I have no faith in the system whatsoever when it comes to taking action against officers. They close ranks, move them to desk jobs and reinstate them as soon as they can. There is no accountability.

Change2banon · 02/10/2025 13:46

Pigeonenglish · 02/10/2025 13:37

None of the above.

I feel uncomfortable about holding individuals responsible when it’s a cultural problem. That’s my concern about this. It inevitably means those at the bottom will be disciplined (sacked) whilst those at the top will carry on.

It is like when an error of judgement is made at social services and the individual social worker inevitably carries the can.

This is nothing like your analogy of ss. These officers were blatantly vile, blatantly racist, blatantly misogynistic, and everything else. They were disgusting men, with complete disregard for anything and anyone around them. There’s nothing cultural about this. They are grown men who have taken oaths … they have disregarded everything in the worst way possible. They have their own minds and are in a profession that should behave very differently to how the did/do.

Paul2023 · 02/10/2025 13:44

Jellywife · 02/10/2025 12:20

‘That man was a right toe rag’= ok

’Like all Islamics that man was a right toe rag’= not ok. Can you see the difference?

Yea I agree with that , it’s the context

Pigeonenglish · 02/10/2025 13:37

Change2banon · 02/10/2025 13:35

Well your thread didn’t go the way you wanted OP did it? Guess that’s why you’ve left, thankfully.

The 37% in voting, and those posting who are in agreement with OP, very obviously must be police officers themselves, family of officers, or just completely stupid.

None of the above.

I feel uncomfortable about holding individuals responsible when it’s a cultural problem. That’s my concern about this. It inevitably means those at the bottom will be disciplined (sacked) whilst those at the top will carry on.

It is like when an error of judgement is made at social services and the individual social worker inevitably carries the can.

Happyjoe · 02/10/2025 13:36

Bobiverse · 02/10/2025 13:35

I know a former writer who is now in the police. They changed careers about 17 years ago. It must just depend on the people doing the hiring.

Maybe. I know one journalist who works in PR for the Met, but that's not same as being out there on the streets.