Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Smear test - is it normal to find leaves and twigs?

535 replies

User748937744 · 01/10/2025 18:18

Ok, clickbait title - for a reason!

I am in my 40s and had my first smear test today. It was so fine and so quick and so painless and so straightforward and I wish I’d been brave enough to go for all the many years I’ve ignored the invitations!

Aibu to tell as many people as I can who might also never have gone to just do it?

I’ll happily go back next time I’m called.

I only went today because I’ve had some symptoms that were concerning.

It was so built up as something embarrassing and possibly painful in my head and it just wasn’t either.

Please, please go. You can always say you’re nervous and would like to be seen by someone really understanding.

OP posts:
user1493379562 · 03/10/2025 12:53

Glowingup · 03/10/2025 03:55

Well I’m sorry but I think I trust published research over “a nurse who does them”. Why would she be in any way qualified or knowledgeable about the causes of cervical cancer?
People like to scaremonger with stuff like this but there are very good reasons why further testing is only done on those with HPV due to huge amounts of unnecessary invasive treatment in the past.

I think you will find nurses that specialise in any specialty have to do extensive training in the subject. When I worked in Colposcopy we had practice nurses who came into observe what happens to women with positive smear tests.so they could relate it to their patients if necessary They are not just nurses so please don't be so condescending. I would advise any women who experience difficulties with a nurse at a GP clinic go to a well woman or GUM clinic instead.

user1493379562 · 03/10/2025 12:21

Spookyspaghetti · 01/10/2025 21:31

I’ve only had sex with one man, definitely no opportunity or inclination for cheating, but I have had HPV. I’ve had lots of transvaginal ultrasounds in the past and gyne surgery/c-section in the past so it’s my view that one of those is the most likely cause.

It doesn't matter matter if you have only had sex with one man. If he had, had sex with another woman previous to you he could have picked up a HPV which can remain dormant for years and years. According to the consultant I worked for even nuns can get HPV! Maybe not all nuns are virgins when they take up their vows, who knows?

mondaytosunday · 03/10/2025 12:16

I’ve always gone and actually had my first smear as a teenager as they do that in the US before you go on the pill. At most they were slightly uncomfortable though you do feel rather vulnerable but it’s a necessity and it never occurred to me to not go. But my last at about age 60 was so painful even the nurse suggested that it be the last one (I haven’t been sexually active since my DH passed away 15 years ago). Unless I have some symptoms I’m never doing that again.

IAmThePrettiestManOnMyIsland · 03/10/2025 12:14

Lellochip · 03/10/2025 10:26

It feels like they're doing less testing, but from what I've read, it's not actually for cost-cutting purposes - HPV primary testing is more sensitive, catching significantly more cases of pre-cancerous cells than traditional cytology alone, and allows detection earlier. Cell changes without HPV are no longer considered as high-risk for cancer. You're also much less likely to go on to develop cancer in the next 5 years after a negative HPV test, than you are in the 3 years after negative cytology.

I appreciate this is all true and most cases of cervical cancer are caused by HPV. My concern is with the few who may fall through the cracks and develop cervical cancer without having HPV. I do feel this is corner cutting. I've also learned from this thread that you can do a HPV test at home, so sitting there legs akimbo for what many women find an embarrassing and uncomfortable test seems almost pointless if they aren't screening the sample fully.

Idontpostmuch · 03/10/2025 12:08

@user1493379562 Well done to the consultant who admits it's 'mainly' caused by sex. The NHS should be doing more to get the message across that the virus can spread in other ways. Some women will be stopping smears because they think they can't get HPV, but we can all get it. I'm living proof.

Idontpostmuch · 03/10/2025 11:58

Yodeldodeldo · 02/10/2025 21:14

I don't go because I've lost faith.
No help with painful periods since 1994, belittling attitude of midwives during labour.
I've given up on the NHS for help with obs and gynae.

Obs and Gyn consultants are truly horrible. Arrogant, belittling and (in one case) surprisingly ignorant.

Idontpostmuch · 03/10/2025 11:29

Glowingup · 03/10/2025 03:55

Well I’m sorry but I think I trust published research over “a nurse who does them”. Why would she be in any way qualified or knowledgeable about the causes of cervical cancer?
People like to scaremonger with stuff like this but there are very good reasons why further testing is only done on those with HPV due to huge amounts of unnecessary invasive treatment in the past.

Ask her. She's on this thread. Nobody really knows. Every figure is an estimate. I'm sure the practice nurse who bothered to participate in this thread - for no personal gain - won't have plucked the number out of thin air.

ldnmusic87 · 03/10/2025 11:10

I had a traumatic experience with one in my twenties.

For everyone it's not just 'go! it's nothing!'

TheSpiritofDarkandLonelyWater · 03/10/2025 11:06

I am glad people are posting their experiences about pain and bad attitudes from HCPs as it has made me feel a lot less alone and like a freak.
Women sharing those personal experiences about pain are not putting off others from having smears. What is putting of women is the potential to be patronised by nurses and treated like they have something wrong with them for feeling pain. The blame is put on the woman laying on the table instead of the person at the foot of it.
Yet women on here are doing the same to each other. What happened to 'my body my choice'? It seems cervixes are fair game on here and everyone gets to have an opinion on everyone elses.
Making out like all women will eventually have cervical cancer one day and smear tests are what stop them. Scaring women into a test with a lie is not on either.
If lots of women are in pain then something about the procedure needs to change and there is nothing wrong with highlighting that.

ruethewhirl · 03/10/2025 11:03

FlyMeSomewhere · 03/10/2025 10:01

But the comments online aren't calm are they! Look at your awful use of words "women in literal agony" ? What have you achieved by posting such an extreme statement? Except terrifying women out of smears! You don't need to post extreme scare mongering. You write in your first comment that women are in literal agony for every smear test and then pretended to be level headed in your next paragraph? Too late you've already done the damage! My smears hurt but it's a few minutes and needs to be done and most women will cope just fine with it.

For those experiencing pain like I have, you speak to the nurse doing it! You don't go online and deliberately put other women off!
And don't make fake names up for me! You don't sound big or clever doing it!

I am trying to get you to understand what other women go through, but I am clearly flogging a dead horse. I 'pretended' nothing. I flagged the literal agony (no exaggeration) in strong terms deliberately, to highlight the need for better procedures during smears. My request for calm was a direct response to your hyberbole and the multiple exclamation marks you used. Did I use language such as 'dramatic scare story', 'smash a big fist through any good', accuse anyone of depriving children of their mother, or suggest that women should be silent about their pain? No. Did I use a single exclamation mark in my response to you? No.

And it's obvious you couldn't be bothered to read/digest my post properly, otherwise you'd have presumably taken in the fact that I was proposing something that would increase the number of smear tests taken, thereby decreasing instances of cervical cancer and subsequent deaths. It's hardly rocket science. But hey, you carry on invalidating other women's experiences, proposing that women's pain not be talked about, and trying to silence posters on this thread, if you really think that's a more effective way of getting more women to have smears. 🤷‍♀️

Also, I wasn't calling you 'Sandra', that wasn't the context at all. If you're going to carry on accusing other posters of all sorts, I suggest you at least do them the courtesy of reading their posts properly before jumping to react.

Glowingup · 03/10/2025 10:56

Lellochip · 03/10/2025 10:26

It feels like they're doing less testing, but from what I've read, it's not actually for cost-cutting purposes - HPV primary testing is more sensitive, catching significantly more cases of pre-cancerous cells than traditional cytology alone, and allows detection earlier. Cell changes without HPV are no longer considered as high-risk for cancer. You're also much less likely to go on to develop cancer in the next 5 years after a negative HPV test, than you are in the 3 years after negative cytology.

Yes it has nothing to do with corner cutting

Lellochip · 03/10/2025 10:26

IAmThePrettiestManOnMyIsland · 03/10/2025 08:53

I learned this at my last smear test and it really pissed me off! I think it is irresponsible corner cutting.

It feels like they're doing less testing, but from what I've read, it's not actually for cost-cutting purposes - HPV primary testing is more sensitive, catching significantly more cases of pre-cancerous cells than traditional cytology alone, and allows detection earlier. Cell changes without HPV are no longer considered as high-risk for cancer. You're also much less likely to go on to develop cancer in the next 5 years after a negative HPV test, than you are in the 3 years after negative cytology.

Kuretake · 03/10/2025 10:25

User748937744 · 03/10/2025 10:13

I was told that my cervix looked perfectly healthy and that being able to see it clearly was also really helpful for the medical team. Just my experience/what I was told.

I wonder if anyone is ever referred as a result of something visual? I have certainly never heard of it but I guess it's possible.

User748937744 · 03/10/2025 10:19

StrongLikeMamma · 03/10/2025 09:41

Thanks for this op - I have been putting it off. Will book!

Thank you for posting this. I sincerely hope it’s as straightforward for you as it was for me. Please do tell them that you’re nervous (if you are)!

OP posts:
User748937744 · 03/10/2025 10:13

Kuretake · 03/10/2025 09:02

So is there any reason to have them done rather than just an HPV test?

I was told that my cervix looked perfectly healthy and that being able to see it clearly was also really helpful for the medical team. Just my experience/what I was told.

OP posts:
Woodwalk · 03/10/2025 10:11

Some attitudes seem to be keeping silent about the pain, repeat the party line that it's totally painless for all to trick more women into making an uninformed decision!

Jade Goody had many many symptoms of cervical cancer. She chose not to attend an appointment advising her that further cells required removing. I'm not sure how over the years this has been morphed into a narrative that she never had a smear test in her life.

Jade's death was a tragedy and bought attention to cervical cancer. It should also have bought attention throughout the NHS about cervical screening, how it is handled, WHY people choose not to attend (and whether that is simply because they can't be bothered - I suspect not!) and making changes to manage the pain some women experience. Instead they chose to plaster a message around that it's painless, and leave women who experience severe pain and bleeding to feel they were just not tough enough/deformed down there.

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 03/10/2025 10:07

FlyMeSomewhere · 03/10/2025 10:01

But the comments online aren't calm are they! Look at your awful use of words "women in literal agony" ? What have you achieved by posting such an extreme statement? Except terrifying women out of smears! You don't need to post extreme scare mongering. You write in your first comment that women are in literal agony for every smear test and then pretended to be level headed in your next paragraph? Too late you've already done the damage! My smears hurt but it's a few minutes and needs to be done and most women will cope just fine with it.

For those experiencing pain like I have, you speak to the nurse doing it! You don't go online and deliberately put other women off!
And don't make fake names up for me! You don't sound big or clever doing it!

She's making women realise that they're not alone if they find it agonising.

As for speaking to the nurse, don't make me laugh. I'm sure there are some who would actually care but there's even an HCP on this thread saying 'A few moments of being uncomfortable could save your life!' and minimising what some women go through. Surely she should be acknowledging that many women find it very painful and offering the benefit of her experience.

FlyMeSomewhere · 03/10/2025 10:06

Glowingup · 03/10/2025 09:48

Such dramatics. As I’ve said above, Jade Goody had repeated smears. She said in an interview that she ignored one letter saying she needed yet more cells from her cervix removed - the fourth time she had been required to have this. This was then twisted to make it sounds like she never went for smears. She did. She was having severe symptoms for four years with bleeding and passing out from pain and repeatedly sought medical help and was fobbed off. All the while the cancer was growing. The sheer arrogance of the NHS to try to use her story as some sort of lesson for women who don’t have smear tests. It’s a textbook of failure.

But these comments will stop women having smears and the result will be the same! An avoidable loss of life! So many horrible women on here calling cancer "dramatics"! It's not dramatics to the families picking up the pieces after a woman dies and leaves kids and a bereft husband and parents behind.

FlyMeSomewhere · 03/10/2025 10:01

ruethewhirl · 03/10/2025 09:40

So women who are experiencing literal agony every time they go for a smear should stay silent? Presumably because they're just being ninnies and dramatic attention seekers, everyone knows it's just a moment of mild discomfort, get over yourself Sandra.

Or, alternatively, we could calmly introduce into the narrative the information that 'smears are painful for some women. If you experience pain, tell the clinician straight away, he/she will help you.' And then fucking CHANGE the narrative around women's pain during smears, and CHANGE how clinicians approach them, so that said clinician actually does help, is trained to know what to do for those of us who struggle with smears - different size speculum, different position, whatever's needed - and doesn't lose patience, rush the patient, sneer, 'other' the patient if they are built differently down there (as has happened to me), or imply the patient is just being a big ol' baby and needs to woman up.

Then perhaps we'd have a shot at win-win, with more women attending for smears and fewer opting out. More lives saved. Or, you know, women could just carry on shaming other women over their pain. Whatever. 🤷‍♀️

But the comments online aren't calm are they! Look at your awful use of words "women in literal agony" ? What have you achieved by posting such an extreme statement? Except terrifying women out of smears! You don't need to post extreme scare mongering. You write in your first comment that women are in literal agony for every smear test and then pretended to be level headed in your next paragraph? Too late you've already done the damage! My smears hurt but it's a few minutes and needs to be done and most women will cope just fine with it.

For those experiencing pain like I have, you speak to the nurse doing it! You don't go online and deliberately put other women off!
And don't make fake names up for me! You don't sound big or clever doing it!

ruethewhirl · 03/10/2025 09:51

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 03/10/2025 09:42

FFS if you read my previous posts I've mentioned what helped me. It also helped me knowing that other people find smears traumatic. If I thought everyone else breezed through them I'd think there was something wrong with me. So please take your fucking dramatics and maybe do something useful like suggest how women who are traumatised can find ways to cope with the smear, rather than visit a fucking oncology unit.

This 1000%.

Glowingup · 03/10/2025 09:48

FlyMeSomewhere · 03/10/2025 09:34

There's no decency in the posts! Nobody ends the comments encouraging women to still have smears because most women cope with it just fine! Go to a oncology unit or ask Jade Goodies kids who grew up without her if I'm being dramatic! A woman that reads comments like that could end up dead!

Such dramatics. As I’ve said above, Jade Goody had repeated smears. She said in an interview that she ignored one letter saying she needed yet more cells from her cervix removed - the fourth time she had been required to have this. This was then twisted to make it sounds like she never went for smears. She did. She was having severe symptoms for four years with bleeding and passing out from pain and repeatedly sought medical help and was fobbed off. All the while the cancer was growing. The sheer arrogance of the NHS to try to use her story as some sort of lesson for women who don’t have smear tests. It’s a textbook of failure.

BitOutOfPractice · 03/10/2025 09:47

This thread reminds me of threads where someone is talking about their awful mother and people pile in to say “at least you have a mother, mine has died”.

Quite clearly the op had good intentions starting this thread to encourage women who have never been, to go. I expect this thread has had the absolute opposite effect.

She wasn’t denying anyone’s experience. Or trying to silence women. She was telling us about her experience which is just as valid as anyone else’s.

bloody stupid title though op 😬

Anxioustealady · 03/10/2025 09:46

FlyMeSomewhere · 03/10/2025 09:34

There's no decency in the posts! Nobody ends the comments encouraging women to still have smears because most women cope with it just fine! Go to a oncology unit or ask Jade Goodies kids who grew up without her if I'm being dramatic! A woman that reads comments like that could end up dead!

Women likely share that smears are painful because we mostly hear "don't be frightened to get smears, they're painless, you just need to relax"... like we're just being silly. It's very annoying.

I have attended every single smear test I've been invited to, and I have excellent pain tolerance and control of my breathing, but they are VERY painful for me. Yes they're worth doing, but women are allowed to share their experiences! Lying that they're painless for all women doesn't help. Sharing experiences and strategies for reducing pain does!

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 03/10/2025 09:43

ruethewhirl · 03/10/2025 09:40

So women who are experiencing literal agony every time they go for a smear should stay silent? Presumably because they're just being ninnies and dramatic attention seekers, everyone knows it's just a moment of mild discomfort, get over yourself Sandra.

Or, alternatively, we could calmly introduce into the narrative the information that 'smears are painful for some women. If you experience pain, tell the clinician straight away, he/she will help you.' And then fucking CHANGE the narrative around women's pain during smears, and CHANGE how clinicians approach them, so that said clinician actually does help, is trained to know what to do for those of us who struggle with smears - different size speculum, different position, whatever's needed - and doesn't lose patience, rush the patient, sneer, 'other' the patient if they are built differently down there (as has happened to me), or imply the patient is just being a big ol' baby and needs to woman up.

Then perhaps we'd have a shot at win-win, with more women attending for smears and fewer opting out. More lives saved. Or, you know, women could just carry on shaming other women over their pain. Whatever. 🤷‍♀️

All of this, said so much more eloquently than I could

StrongLikeMamma · 03/10/2025 09:42

Change2banon · 03/10/2025 09:38

I had pre cancerous cells aged 23, detected through a smear test. Mine would have turned to cancer. 23 years old, 23! So I’d probably have been dead by 30 had I not been for smear tests. I’m very thankful we have them. I would encourage everyone to be tested. Yes everyone has different experiences, ranging from nothing to excruciating. Personally, I’d choose excruciating over dying every time 🤷‍♀️

💛