Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Keir Starmer "sick and tired" of hearing about children who aren't school-ready

615 replies

Kirova · 28/09/2025 14:08

I get the point he's trying to make, of course, but it seems like a stick to beat parents with (and particularly mothers, of course). There's no sense in saying you want all children to be in the same place when they start school. Apart from anything else, some are nearly a year younger than others in their cohort, so clearly they are not going to be in the same place.

My youngest daughter was born premature, has a significant hearing impairment and various other difficulties. She will soon be two, and while she's doing brilliantly, I doubt she'll be "school-ready" by the government's current definition when she is four.

Not sure what my point is exactly, it just seems like another absurd over-simplification on the theme of failing our children, state of the country, etc.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Kidsgotothatschool · 28/09/2025 15:39

He’s right though.

He’s stating the bleeding obvious.

I don’t know a person in education who isn’t absolutely fed up with the amount of kids coming into school absolutely unprepared.

And I am not talking about those with particular needs.

Parents need to step up!

Unpaidviewer · 28/09/2025 15:37

Bambamhoohoo · 28/09/2025 15:28

Tbh aren’t a huge number of the people these services were aimed at just at work?!

I remember sure start, 11am stay and play on a Tuesday morning and similar.

I would assume if both parents are in work then the child would be at nursery, then surely the child would be learning most of these skills and the family would be getting support from them?

Cannedlaughter · 28/09/2025 15:37

I have worked with preschoolers and reception aged children for nearly 30 years and have seen the level children attend nursery 3+ and reception drop significantly. Many eat with their fingers, their expressive language is poor, they have poor attention and they are not toilet trained. There is a significantly higher level of children with significant additional needs. Everything seems to have got worse and it’s really concerning.
There are always the exceptions but as a whole the picture is not healthy. Parents do need to do more. TV, tablets, phones are probably at the heart of why things are deteriorating not just for the children but for the parents too.

CandleMug · 28/09/2025 15:36

mathanxiety · 28/09/2025 15:26

I disagree.

Children who have never been expected to sit down in a specific spot to eat a meal, children who tare allowed to ake a few bites and then hop up to run around, children who are parked in front of a tablet for long stretches every day, children who are disrracted by a tablet instead of being conversed with when doing daily stuff like going to the supermarket, children who are never read to, children who are never taken to places where they can't run around, climb, or roll on the grass are all turning up in schools where they are expected to sit down, to.engage in conversations with teachers, to have an interest in a story a teacher is reading, etc.

All of the above is fine and dandy but none of its relative if a child has undiagnosed SEN. No amount of involvement is going to make the issues significantly better, so it wouldn’t matter what the parents did/didn’t do because ultimately they will likely struggle throughout to varying degrees.

Brainstorm23 · 28/09/2025 15:36

Uggbootsforever · 28/09/2025 15:32

Agree, we shouldn’t be lessening expectations based on parental failures rather than what should be normal development.

The parents around me are woeful. Half of the kids are visibly obese by 7 or 8. The parents rush them to the corner shop after school pick up for more sweets and crisps. They ignore the letters telling them their children are fat and chuck them away, claiming it’s all a big body shaming conspiracy. They bring the kids mobiles so they can stare at them all the way home. Their only parenting tools are food and screen time, and if that fails, make up some excuse about the kid having some complex psychological tendency which means they can’t behave.

While I’m in favour of strict immigration control simply due to overcrowding, I will add these are mostly white working or middle class parents. The above doesn’t seem to apply to the immigrant families here.

I despair of some of the kids I see who are absolutely massive. I'm not talking about "puppy fat" i'm talking about rolls and rolls of fat.

I think we've lost sight of what a normal kid should actually look like. You should be able to see their ribs for example.

Livelovebehappy · 28/09/2025 15:35

I guess it might be a bit of a dig at parents increasingly thinking that teachers should take on the responsibilities of parenting. A lot of ‘gentle’ parenting seems to absolve parents of actually preparing their children for a classroom situation. Some aren’t properly toilet trained, some have a poor relationship with food, some have no social skills, some have barely touched a book or learnt to count, some don’t know how to re-act to the word ‘no’. It’s important that parents understand that education for academia and social skills actually starts at home and not just in the classroom.

Uggbootsforever · 28/09/2025 15:35

SatsumaDog · 28/09/2025 15:34

Well he’s the Prime Minister, so I’m afraid it’s his job to address it, not be ‘sick and tired’ of anything. The majority of the country are sick and tired of him, but we still have to put up with it for another few years.

I think we are all tired of ‘addressing’ aka paying for intensive support for lazy adults to escape their most basic duties

EasternStandard · 28/09/2025 15:35

SatsumaDog · 28/09/2025 15:34

Well he’s the Prime Minister, so I’m afraid it’s his job to address it, not be ‘sick and tired’ of anything. The majority of the country are sick and tired of him, but we still have to put up with it for another few years.

Yep

Noagency · 28/09/2025 15:35

I am staggered at the number of Y4 - Y6 (with no additional support needs) who still cannot use a tissue or wash their hands. Those are things they should have learned before they started school.

SatsumaDog · 28/09/2025 15:34

Well he’s the Prime Minister, so I’m afraid it’s his job to address it, not be ‘sick and tired’ of anything. The majority of the country are sick and tired of him, but we still have to put up with it for another few years.

SushiForMe · 28/09/2025 15:34

Bedtelly · 28/09/2025 14:33

What does school ready look like?

Mine is a year away from school and I don't really know what that phrase means.

Potty trained, know how to clean themselves after a poo (best effort basis…), knows how to eat with cutlery (even if uses hands occasionally), can get changed for PE (even if the clothes are sometimes back to front), can put coat / shoes on, is used to sitting down for 10-15min to listen to a story or watch something not on a screen.

postop · 28/09/2025 15:32

DS1 started school at just turned 5 (due to a house move). DS2 started at just turned 4. There is a huge difference in a year at that age and IME, no allowances made in a class of 30.

Cakeandusername · 28/09/2025 15:32

I’d also agree there’s a shift in expectations and children just aren’t expected to do small self care tasks that would have been normal not that long ago. Busy parents probably find it easier to just do things for them.

Uggbootsforever · 28/09/2025 15:32

NuovaPilbeam · 28/09/2025 15:16

If children at the age appropriate level are in the minority, maybe the expectations of young children need to change

What, because we are evolving to actually be less capable than children were 30 years ago?

These age related expectations are not fabricated from thin air. They are based on what ordinary children were able to manage at 4 or 5 not so many years ago. Yes there has to be support in the community but parents also need to take some ownership of teaching their DC the basics.

Agree, we shouldn’t be lessening expectations based on parental failures rather than what should be normal development.

The parents around me are woeful. Half of the kids are visibly obese by 7 or 8. The parents rush them to the corner shop after school pick up for more sweets and crisps. They ignore the letters telling them their children are fat and chuck them away, claiming it’s all a big body shaming conspiracy. They bring the kids mobiles so they can stare at them all the way home. Their only parenting tools are food and screen time, and if that fails, make up some excuse about the kid having some complex psychological tendency which means they can’t behave.

While I’m in favour of strict immigration control simply due to overcrowding, I will add these are mostly white working or middle class parents. The above doesn’t seem to apply to the immigrant families here.

CandleMug · 28/09/2025 15:30

mathanxiety · 28/09/2025 15:00

I think you're taking the remarks too personally.

Anecdotal evidence from this site alone, as well as comments from teacher organisations, paint a picture of NT children arriving in school in nappies, with low to no school readiness skills (by which I mean the ability to follow simple directions like 'sit down', the ability to focus on a two minute story the teacher is reading, and ability to perform simple tasks like putting on a jacket).

If parents feel shamed that that sort of neglect, so much the better. But I fear the response will be excuses and whataboutery.

How do you know at 4 for certain that they are NT though? That’s the point.

It’s fine saying they should be ready etc… however at that age it’s impossible for the average Jo to know whether or not those difficulties are due to ‘neglect’ or whether there is underling SEN. Most ND isn’t diagnosed until much later unless it’s the extreme end. There are people with ASD that have degrees and are more academic than the average person, yet they struggle to get their clothes on…. It’s not as simple as lazy parenting.

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 28/09/2025 15:30

Just an anecdotal story re starting school -

My Mum was a SAHM and I could read before starting school - but the school wouldn’t believe it and held me back behind those who’d been to preschool. I was not happy!

Shed also taught me weights and measures - but they were all imperial and school were of course teaching metric! I remember not being happy about that either (now I think exclusively in metric and can’t remember the how imperial measurements work at all).

It was a bad start in a primary school where I was never happy. Loved secondary school where they treated you as a person.

underthecokesign · 28/09/2025 15:30

AnneLovesGilbert · 28/09/2025 14:23

When she starts school presumably you’ll be hoping the school are able to support her rather than stretched too think by the needs of the children who are currently starting school unable to sit on the floor and hold a book because they’ve spent 4 years on a sofa in front of YouTube. Who are in nappies because no one could be bothered to potty train them. Who can’t use cutlery because no one taught them.

You’re doing your best, not all parents are and everyone pays a price for shit parenting.

This. Some parents just can't be arsed and I don't see the point in denying that.

Sunshineandoranges · 28/09/2025 15:30

If the children who can be school ready are, it will leavethe school staff more time to help the children who need more help.

Bambamhoohoo · 28/09/2025 15:28

Unpaidviewer · 28/09/2025 15:27

We have a free stay and play which is run by the council. They have weeks where different professions come in to give talks and advice on dental care, potty training, behaviour etc. All the mums who attend are middle class sahm, none seem to need the help. How do you force those struggling to use services?

Tbh aren’t a huge number of the people these services were aimed at just at work?!

I remember sure start, 11am stay and play on a Tuesday morning and similar.

Unpaidviewer · 28/09/2025 15:27

Lougle · 28/09/2025 15:13

Sure start closed because they weren't reaching the people they were targeting. It ended up that parents who already had the skills and resources that sure start intended to bring were using it, and those parents who it intended to help weren't using it.

We have a free stay and play which is run by the council. They have weeks where different professions come in to give talks and advice on dental care, potty training, behaviour etc. All the mums who attend are middle class sahm, none seem to need the help. How do you force those struggling to use services?

NuovaPilbeam · 28/09/2025 15:27

Many things are intuitive like sitting quietly, follow instructions, those things don’t need to be ‘taught’ so even children from deprived/complex backgrounds would be able to do those things.

Sadly, this really isn't true.
Children given a lot of screen time, sat in a pub with dads phone etc tend to have poor attention span or won't sit quietly unless there's a screen involved. Children who live in homes where there are low demands and few meaningful consequences if they don't follow instructions, tend to be poor at following them/doing things they don't want to do.

mathanxiety · 28/09/2025 15:26

CandleMug · 28/09/2025 15:17

You describe it perfectly as to what is expected. I think what people are forgetting, is that some of the children that can’t do those things are likely to be the ones that have disability/special needs that haven’t been diagnosed at that point.

Many things are intuitive like sitting quietly, follow instructions, those things don’t need to be ‘taught’ so even children from deprived/complex backgrounds would be able to do those things.

I disagree.

Children who have never been expected to sit down in a specific spot to eat a meal, children who tare allowed to ake a few bites and then hop up to run around, children who are parked in front of a tablet for long stretches every day, children who are disrracted by a tablet instead of being conversed with when doing daily stuff like going to the supermarket, children who are never read to, children who are never taken to places where they can't run around, climb, or roll on the grass are all turning up in schools where they are expected to sit down, to.engage in conversations with teachers, to have an interest in a story a teacher is reading, etc.

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 28/09/2025 15:25

Scandidandi · 28/09/2025 15:22

starmer was born on the 2nd of September so will have been the oldest in his year.
im a summer baby and was one of the youngest in the year. My little girl was born right at the end of August. Regardless of her ability I will be holding her back a year. I wish there had been that opportunity for me

I don’t think the govt is making policy based on Starmer’s birthday!

CatHairEveryWhereNow · 28/09/2025 15:25

There’s definitely an attitude shift of lower expectations.

I do agree with that.

Though I think that they made it easier to defer a year is a postive move that's happened since mine started school.

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 28/09/2025 15:22

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 28/09/2025 14:59

He wants both parents working so he can get tax off both of them and he wants mothers to raise their children so they can be ‘school ready’. Well done Keir. How about sorting out the economy so mothers can actually be at home with their kids instead of delegating that task to preschools and nurseries?

Nurseries tend to support potty training really well though, although of course they don’t do it for you.

The kids who aren’t toilet trained on starting school tend not to have been to nursery. It’s usually those kept at home and with a parent almost exclusively until they’re 4/5 that struggle - obviously not if it’s a good parent, of whom there are many amongst SAHPs, but the rubbish parents within this group.

Also I don’t think Starmer “wants both parents working”, he just wants them to have that choice. Supporting parents will subsidised nursery will cost as much as the govt gets in tax from those parents. And you do know he doesn’t personally keep the taxes!?