Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Keir Starmer "sick and tired" of hearing about children who aren't school-ready

615 replies

Kirova · 28/09/2025 14:08

I get the point he's trying to make, of course, but it seems like a stick to beat parents with (and particularly mothers, of course). There's no sense in saying you want all children to be in the same place when they start school. Apart from anything else, some are nearly a year younger than others in their cohort, so clearly they are not going to be in the same place.

My youngest daughter was born premature, has a significant hearing impairment and various other difficulties. She will soon be two, and while she's doing brilliantly, I doubt she'll be "school-ready" by the government's current definition when she is four.

Not sure what my point is exactly, it just seems like another absurd over-simplification on the theme of failing our children, state of the country, etc.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
mugglewump · 28/09/2025 20:41

For some children, there is a biological or developmental reason why they are not school ready. However, this isn't about those children. This is about the children who aren't talked to enough, so they do not have the speaking, listening and communication skills necessary. The ones that have had only screens to entertain them who do not know how to play nor have not developed the necessary motor skills. And finally, those whose parents have not put much effort in to nappy training.

Happyjoe · 28/09/2025 20:40

TwinklySquid · 28/09/2025 20:37

Unless you have 1-2-1, a childcare provider is not going to be able to give as much time as a child needs in regards to consistency. They can be a great helper in toilet training but can’t do it all.

Well done if your child got it in a weekend. Most people I know did not get it that quickly. It took a while . Longer because childcare might do it one way (or want nappies on as they don’t want to have to do constant changes) and parents another

Am not being funny but it is still not the job of the school. It's the parents responsibility and it ends there.

We can send a man to the moon and suddenly potty training own child is too troublesome?

Happyjoe · 28/09/2025 20:39

BetterTheOnesYouKnow · 28/09/2025 20:05

Resign Sir Kier - From Donkey Field to Dirty Deal Keir’s £295k Loophole - Starmer Exposed.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dDu5umA1Vbg

Where is your concern over the billions wasted on PPE, every single fast track contracts went to a someone linked to a conservative MP?
I get fed up with selective politics bashing, if going to get on your high horse, tell them all off.

TwinklySquid · 28/09/2025 20:37

Bambamhoohoo · 28/09/2025 20:18

Their childcare would then take it on. You coincide the start of potty training with a long weekend or holiday then they manage it day to day and you do it in the evening. It’s not like potty training stops when their parents work 😂

Unless you have 1-2-1, a childcare provider is not going to be able to give as much time as a child needs in regards to consistency. They can be a great helper in toilet training but can’t do it all.

Well done if your child got it in a weekend. Most people I know did not get it that quickly. It took a while . Longer because childcare might do it one way (or want nappies on as they don’t want to have to do constant changes) and parents another

Happyjoe · 28/09/2025 20:35

Tess592 · 28/09/2025 20:29

DS was useless with cutlery an still had the occasional accident at school - he wasn't diagnosed with ASD and dyspraxia (NHS) until he was 10.

I bet any money that almost all of these kids have undiagnosed disabilities and it has nothing at all to do with lazy parenting. If you're a lazy parent then there's no way in hell you want to still be changing nappies on a 4 year old, not to mention the cost.

I'm sick of hearing about it too, this topic has been done to fucking death and teachers are the worst. They're absolutely clueless about ASD, dyspraxia, etc etc.

Edited

If nearly all these kids who are not potty trained are poorly then there should be a national concern. 1 in 4 children are not potty trained by the time they start school - that is a LOT of children who are poorly?

Tess592 · 28/09/2025 20:29

DS was useless with cutlery an still had the occasional accident at school - he wasn't diagnosed with ASD and dyspraxia (NHS) until he was 10.

I bet any money that almost all of these kids have undiagnosed disabilities and it has nothing at all to do with lazy parenting. If you're a lazy parent then there's no way in hell you want to still be changing nappies on a 4 year old, not to mention the cost.

I'm sick of hearing about it too, this topic has been done to fucking death and teachers are the worst. They're absolutely clueless about ASD, dyspraxia, etc etc.

Bambamhoohoo · 28/09/2025 20:18

TwinklySquid · 28/09/2025 20:16

If you have two parents, who are working 9-5 in an office and rely on childcare, they probably aren’t seeing their child enough in the hours around to make a meaningful impact on potty training.

When my daughter was in that stage, I worked both part time and full time. It was far easier to be consistent when I was part time.

Their childcare would then take it on. You coincide the start of potty training with a long weekend or holiday then they manage it day to day and you do it in the evening. It’s not like potty training stops when their parents work 😂

TwinklySquid · 28/09/2025 20:16

Helen1625 · 28/09/2025 17:32

At 4, nearly 5 years of age, that's more than enough time to potty train a child. Working or otherwise.

If you have two parents, who are working 9-5 in an office and rely on childcare, they probably aren’t seeing their child enough in the hours around to make a meaningful impact on potty training.

When my daughter was in that stage, I worked both part time and full time. It was far easier to be consistent when I was part time.

citygirl77 · 28/09/2025 20:12

CatHairEveryWhereNow · 28/09/2025 17:33

That's surely not normal.

Not least because toilet access at DC secondary was not really there - (and yes girls did trurtant during periods) and nieces school in another part of UK was similar. They locked toilet and heavily resticted access to point it often wasn't there in practise.

They did in both cases have toilet passes but getting one was involved GP and hospitals and then actaully managing to get right staff member to unlock - and yes many cmplained and schools insisted it wasn't as restrictive as kids found it.

Toilets have to be organised, because of vaping and the feeling of intimidation. Our students have cards which they scan to access the bathrooms. It means key stage 4 cannot enter the key stage 3 bathrooms.

Bushmillsbabe · 28/09/2025 20:10

Bedtelly · 28/09/2025 14:33

What does school ready look like?

Mine is a year away from school and I don't really know what that phrase means.

It means

  • toilet trained (unless a medical, developmental reason why unable)
  • able to take self to toilet, go to toilet, flush, wash hands and return to the group
  • to be able to feed themselves with knife and fork
  • to be able to take off and out on their own coat and shoes independently - some may need help with buttons/zips
  • able to take turns and share most of the time
-to be able to sit and listen to a story or lesson for at least 10 minutes

My oldest acheived all these easily a year before starting, but she is one of the oldest in her year. My youngest is a summer born, premature, has digestive issues which made toilet training harder, and probably only acheived them all a couple months before starting - children do vary widely. And some children do have additional needs which make it harder, but they let teachers know before starting what sorts of support their child may need, are at leaston wait lists for extra support. The biggest challenge are those where parents have written 'no concerns etc' on admission forms, and then they start and are clearly way behind where they should be.

BetterTheOnesYouKnow · 28/09/2025 19:59

In response to an article in the Times disclosing the VAT raid will cost the taxpayer £20billion Rachel Reeves throws her toys out of the pram and shows her true colours. Grow up. And resign.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ovhC4XAf9hE

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ovhC4XAf9hE

RoseGlass7 · 28/09/2025 19:46

Yabu because I don't think he was aiming it at you OP.

He was aiming it at parents who can't be bothered to toilet train etc. It's often the same parents who don't bother to ask kids to do homework, don't teach manners etc. There needs to be a certain level of accountability with adults raising children.

Dinnerplease · 28/09/2025 19:39

Statistically parents now spend more time with their children than they did in the 60s and 70s. There was a lot more being left to your own devices or being left in unregulated childcare. You also wouldn't have been in a SS for failure to use cutlery...

Whatever else you lay at Labour's door, given they've only been in power for just over a year, the school readiness of the current reception cohort isn't their fault. I think it was clumsily worded on the PMs part but he probably meant he was sick of young children being failed by the system.

ApplepieGirl1 · 28/09/2025 19:36

Its the system - unhelpful that all children are expected to attend school at just turned 4. For most it is far too young and 5 would be better. Great for those that are ready but I think they should be allowed to start early and 5 should be the norm.

Mistyglade · 28/09/2025 19:33

If we’re being rational and pragmatic I doubt he would have been thinking of children with significant developmental issues such as your DD, surely you can see that.

Bambamhoohoo · 28/09/2025 19:28

itsgettingweird · 28/09/2025 19:13

But I’m not talking about a disorder.

As I’ve said it’s difficulties amusing about.

Same as a child with a speech and language disorder is different to a child with speech and language difficulties.

Difficulties are generally delays which can be overcome or something which can be overcome.

Disorders (I hate that word!) are disabilities or permanent and usually medical or genetic in nature as well.

If a child hasn’t had a childhood of parental interaction I’m wondering if that’s what causes them difficulties in responding to instruction by an adult at school and a lot of children being not ready .

But attachment “difficulties” isn’t a real thing? That’s my point, it’s a fair ponder but I don’t think it relates to a real attachment issue. I think that’s just surmising “oh they’re being ignored that must lead to something”- listen I was left alone all the time when I was growing up pottering around whilst my mum looked after siblings, entertained friends or napped on the sofa 😂 I don’t remember her playing with me or indeed doing any activities with me. It’s just the modern equivalent

GagMeWithASpoon · 28/09/2025 19:17

OneForTheRoadThen · 28/09/2025 18:57

I work across a school nursery and in Reception. We have an intake of 60 in Reception (2 classes) and 1 has started in pull ups. We have 1 in nursery in pull-ups but it is clear he has significant SEN. The one in Reception is NT as far as we are aware.

However we do have a couple of accidents (both poo and wee) each day from a couple of the kids but most children are fully trained by the time they join us. Obviously that’s just my experience but it doesn’t seem as widespread as reported.

Similar experience here. Last year , no children in nappies. This year one, as he’s completely non verbal , and it’s more for peace of mind .

The surveys that are always referenced don’t actually mention nappies when they are talking about not being toilet trained. Just frequent mishaps with toileting .

itsgettingweird · 28/09/2025 19:13

Bambamhoohoo · 28/09/2025 19:08

I don’t see how it could. Been given an iPad instead of interacted with doesn’t replicate the kind of trauma experienced for attachment disorder to be present

But I’m not talking about a disorder.

As I’ve said it’s difficulties amusing about.

Same as a child with a speech and language disorder is different to a child with speech and language difficulties.

Difficulties are generally delays which can be overcome or something which can be overcome.

Disorders (I hate that word!) are disabilities or permanent and usually medical or genetic in nature as well.

If a child hasn’t had a childhood of parental interaction I’m wondering if that’s what causes them difficulties in responding to instruction by an adult at school and a lot of children being not ready .

GagMeWithASpoon · 28/09/2025 19:12

Uggbootsforever · 28/09/2025 14:19

The vast majority of kids who aren’t school ready were not premature. They’re kids who have been dumped in front of screens and fed pouches while mum and dad scroll their phone and vape.

Source for that?

Bambamhoohoo · 28/09/2025 19:08

itsgettingweird · 28/09/2025 18:48

Yes I agree attachment disorder is extremely rare.

But I’m wondering if we are seeing attachment difficulties through increased use of screens.

and if attachment difficulties may present with a cross over of ND?

Im just musing but if a child has spent their time in a pushchair with a screen rather than interacting with the world it will have had an affect in development.

I wonder if it has similar effects to developmental trauma?

I don’t see how it could. Been given an iPad instead of interacted with doesn’t replicate the kind of trauma experienced for attachment disorder to be present

Newsenmum · 28/09/2025 19:08

MyDeftHedgehog · 28/09/2025 14:56

Im guessing it means they can use the toilet unaided, use cutlery for eating and sit quietly and listen when requested.
I say Im guessing because 25/30 years ago it was virtually unheard of that teachers would be expected to change the nappies of 5 year old because they have never been toilet trained

There were also a lot more special schools.

HonoriaBulstrode · 28/09/2025 19:02

when I started school in 1960.... most mothers of young children were SAHP's, and there was no screen time or even daytime tv (apart from the lunchtime news) so I guess they had the time to teach us these skills.

I get a bit miffed at the assumption that SAH mothers in the past had so much more time.

I started school in 1959. My mother was a SAHP. But we had no central heating, so she had coal fires to clear out every day, and a solid fuel boiler to keep going. No automatic washing machines, so washing took up a large chunk of one day a week. No modern fabrics, so nearly everything needed ironing, and ironing was much harder work. No freezers (and some people didn't even have fridges), so you needed to shop most days, and supermarkets were in their infancy, so it took longer. No car, so you walked or took the bus. No microwaves and limited convenience foods, so meal preparation and cooking took longer (and it wasn't that long since rationing had ended, so there was was a whole generation of young mothers who had never really had the opportunity to learn to cook with a variety of ingredients.)

And since there was no daytime tv, we had to learn to entertain ourselves while mum was doing washing, housework or cooking. We did have plenty of books, drawing and colouring materials etc. She was available to listen and talk to us, but couldn't drop everything to play.

(I can remember exactly when I learned to tie my shoelaces. I was 4 yr 9m, staying with my aunt while my mother was in hospital having my younger sibling. My boy cousin, 2 yrs older, was rather condescending about the fact that I couldn't quite yet manage it. I wasn't having that, so when he showed me, I made sure to get it right.)

OneForTheRoadThen · 28/09/2025 18:57

Bambamhoohoo · 28/09/2025 14:53

All anyone mentions with this is nappies. I’d love to know how many children start reception in nappies all day 🤨

I work across a school nursery and in Reception. We have an intake of 60 in Reception (2 classes) and 1 has started in pull ups. We have 1 in nursery in pull-ups but it is clear he has significant SEN. The one in Reception is NT as far as we are aware.

However we do have a couple of accidents (both poo and wee) each day from a couple of the kids but most children are fully trained by the time they join us. Obviously that’s just my experience but it doesn’t seem as widespread as reported.

itsgettingweird · 28/09/2025 18:48

Bambamhoohoo · 28/09/2025 18:15

my understanding is attachment disorder is uncommon and doesn’t present without (serious) neglect. It’s rare for a baby boy to form an attachment with their mother/ main caregiver.

not the same as attachment theory, which is widely debunked as taking serious neglect and applying it to children with healthy attachments who have been left to cry at night.

Yes I agree attachment disorder is extremely rare.

But I’m wondering if we are seeing attachment difficulties through increased use of screens.

and if attachment difficulties may present with a cross over of ND?

Im just musing but if a child has spent their time in a pushchair with a screen rather than interacting with the world it will have had an affect in development.

I wonder if it has similar effects to developmental trauma?

Swipe left for the next trending thread