Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Tried three places for lunch today and none cater for women

489 replies

Mrsmunchofmunchington · 22/09/2025 20:10

I went out for lunch today with a friend.
Well, at least we tried to have lunch.
All three places, two pubs and one cafe, were not suitable for women because you needed a penis to get into them or to use the toilet.
We ended up coming back to my home instead.

AIBU to think that everywhere should offer equal service to women?
Or is it my fault for not checking in advance that I could eat there without a penis?
Should I have researched on tripadvisor?
Am I too entitled expecting businesses to ensure non penis having people can pay to eat lunch at their establishment?

Day in the life of a disabled person.

OP posts:
Macarena1980 · 23/09/2025 21:03

NimbleDreamer · 23/09/2025 20:41

It wasn't. Try harder next time.

It’s you who needs to try harder not the OP, you’ve completely missed the point.

RememberBeKindWithKaren · 23/09/2025 20:57

Glad I read all Ops updates. Certainly isn't clear from the opening post. You need to re-word and try again, I'm afraid.

Jenkibubble · 23/09/2025 20:50

Mrsmunchofmunchington · 22/09/2025 20:14

I honestly thought it was clear enough but replace not catering for women with not catering for disabled people.
I substituted women to try and give some insight into the injustice to a wider audience.

Edited

Sorry this has happened

Im not in a wheelchair but when looked after baby niece a few weeks back it dawned on me quite how many cafes were inaccessible for a pushchair !
No ramps and steps up - no escalators / lifts in shops with upstairs areas .
Very poor !

RoadTripsOceanDips · 23/09/2025 20:44

OP your point was very clear, it was an excellent analogy. You even wrote at the end of your post, “a day in the life of disabled people”. Clearly really poor comprehension skills on display.

Sorry you have to deal with this.

NimbleDreamer · 23/09/2025 20:41

Mrsmunchofmunchington · 22/09/2025 20:14

I honestly thought it was clear enough but replace not catering for women with not catering for disabled people.
I substituted women to try and give some insight into the injustice to a wider audience.

Edited

It wasn't. Try harder next time.

Thalia31 · 23/09/2025 20:35

Weird

TheBeaTgoeson1 · 23/09/2025 20:33

Oh you were being silly. Sorry, didn’t get it!

Macarena1980 · 23/09/2025 20:32

I was so confused at first! But totally get your point, it’s really not on! Sorry you have to deal with this.

Lyraloo · 23/09/2025 20:29

Mrsmunchofmunchington · 22/09/2025 20:39

No.
My point was imagine a world where women cannot routinely turn up and buy lunch where ever. This is in fact normality for many disabled people.
MN is mainly a female place so hence the men being universally accepted example.
Nothing to do with men themselves in this instance.
Christ on a bike.
Clearly I have hugely over estimated people’s understanding.
Lesson learned.

From the amount of negative answers you’ve received it’s clear that the point was badly made and most of us didn’t have a clue what you were talking about. Now you’re being argumentative with anyone that disagrees! I’d have been full of sympathy and outrage for you, had it been more obvious what you were complaining about. Now I just find you annoying!

Ticktockk · 23/09/2025 20:26

There are some idiots on here. I understood your post OP, and understood the analogy.

pollymere · 23/09/2025 20:26

Oddly relatable... I was in Selfridge's and followed the sign for the disabled toilet. It turns out that it was along a corridor marked as the Men's toilet. And indeed, just before the open doorway of the Gents was a toilet facility for disabled folk. I did wonder if I needed a penis to use it, but some kindly menfolk assured me that it wasn't actually in the Gents itself. I felt very strange walking back surrounded by men who were still drying hands or doing up their flies though!

If Accessibility means having to go through a kitchen or have to do some undignified action — it's not Accessible. I suspect those dining destinations were happy to serve you outside in the freezing cold to be "accessible".

Lyraloo · 23/09/2025 20:24

I’ve never been anywhere that didn’t have toilet facilities for both sexes!

TallulahLikesHoola · 23/09/2025 20:18

sosorryimnotsorry · 23/09/2025 18:44

As someone with 15+ years of working with the disabled community I don’t think I am being remotely harsh. There are a huge number of businesses that could do a hell of a lot more to make their businesses accessible. But until they are forced to or find themselves in the situation they don’t bother. There are plenty of things that can be done for far cheaper than the figure you quote. But it often takes some out of the box thinking and an open mind to work through the challenges.

Are you an architect who has experience and knowledge of adaptations for listed buildings?
You could make an absolute fortune for all the advice you can give about the 'plenty things' that can be done. I'm sure you could do so even just from the businesses in Edinburgh Old Town!

CameForAVacationStayedForTheRevolution · 23/09/2025 20:11

Soontobe60 · 23/09/2025 20:06

Because many, many buildings that are not new were built in such a way that it’s impossible to add a disabled toilet, or their only facilities are upstairs. I can’t do stairs as my knees are knackered. If I were going somewhere new, I would check in advance the stair situation to avoid a futile journey. Similarly, my DH would check the menu for food he can eat - he’s a very fussy eater, coeliacs might check, vegans etc.
What do you suggest for such establishments?

Exactly. They don’t have to be a listed building for any alterations to be difficult/impossible/not financially viable. They may rent the premises and not be allowed to make alterations. They may open direct onto a pavement and not have space to put a ramp in. It may not be structurally safe to knock a bigger doorway out. 🤷‍♀️

I am sorry and I agree it must be bad always having to think about stuff like this. Dd has coeliac disease and from an eating out pov it is comparable in that there are places we can’t go to. Sometimes we don’t know till we get there. Normally we have to plan ahead. Any trip to a new town involves much searching of trip advisor or coeliac fb groups for advice.

Soontobe60 · 23/09/2025 20:06

Mrsmunchofmunchington · 22/09/2025 20:19

When people have posted in a straight forward manner about lack of accessibility there have been suggestions of calling ahead, maybe checking with disability organisations.
Well meant but why should we have to?
Imagine the outrage if women had to ask in advance if they could get into a pub or cafe?

Because many, many buildings that are not new were built in such a way that it’s impossible to add a disabled toilet, or their only facilities are upstairs. I can’t do stairs as my knees are knackered. If I were going somewhere new, I would check in advance the stair situation to avoid a futile journey. Similarly, my DH would check the menu for food he can eat - he’s a very fussy eater, coeliacs might check, vegans etc.
What do you suggest for such establishments?

HevenlyMeS · 23/09/2025 20:02

I'm so confused too
I didn't even know there's restaurants cafes around where just men are permitted ✨🤔🙏

Jade3450 · 23/09/2025 19:54

I haven’t RTFT and I’m sorry you had access problems.

But I don’t think your analogy quite works.

Women are half the population and there would be no justifiable reason to deny them access.
People who use wheelchairs, on the other hand, while of course having the same rights as everyone else, have a unique set of needs that can’t always be catered for, especially in old buildings.

Are you suggesting old buildings should never be used as cafes or restaurants? Or that everyone not accessible should be knocked down and rebuilt?

If I went into my local town I would find many old buildings that could not cater for disabled access. It’s often not their fault.

Butterflyarms · 23/09/2025 19:52

It took me a bit to twig but once I got it I realised YANBU.

Lammysaurus · 23/09/2025 19:47

I really hope the Deputy Prime Minister doesn't read this! 🦖

OP, I found it confusing because there are plenty of venues in the world where you'd be denied entry for being female and on the internet no one knows where you're located. YANBU to point out the problem of lack of accessibility (and lack of transparency where there is insufficient accessibility).

Cojones · 23/09/2025 19:46

Mrsmunchofmunchington · 22/09/2025 20:39

No.
My point was imagine a world where women cannot routinely turn up and buy lunch where ever. This is in fact normality for many disabled people.
MN is mainly a female place so hence the men being universally accepted example.
Nothing to do with men themselves in this instance.
Christ on a bike.
Clearly I have hugely over estimated people’s understanding.
Lesson learned.

Wow, @Mrsmunchofmunchington you have wildly overestimated that we would immediately think ah yes this isn’t about men but disabled access. This is a cunning poster indeed.

I’m really sorry you’ve had a shit day and the access you needed wasn’t in place; I agree in an ideal world you wouldn’t have to phone ahead. But we live in a country where there are a lot of things that still need to be put right. Calling ahead would have been the way to go to ensure you could get inside to eat.

AgnesX · 23/09/2025 19:40

ToKittyornottoKitty · 22/09/2025 20:39

Why are we specifically having a go at women here? It’s a stupid analogy. And lots of people have to plan ahead when eating out for all sorts of reasons, it’s not that ridiculous

Yep, the "you are unreasonable for expecting parity" types are alive and kicking.

Missing the point entirely.

CoffeeLipstickKeys · 23/09/2025 19:38

Bernardo1 · 23/09/2025 19:30

Wetherspoons have changed the whole pub culture. Women are welcome, no bother. I know older ladies who meet up for lunch. You don't have to buy alcoholic drinks. I now and then have a traditional breakfast and unlimited tea/coffee for less than £7

Yes my gran and her gaggle of ladies likes spoons

AgnesX · 23/09/2025 19:37

Mrsmunchofmunchington · 22/09/2025 20:14

I honestly thought it was clear enough but replace not catering for women with not catering for disabled people.
I substituted women to try and give some insight into the injustice to a wider audience.

Edited

It would seem not. Generally most don't actually even think of disabled people.

CoffeeLipstickKeys · 23/09/2025 19:36

KilkennyCats · 23/09/2025 19:31

No, it wasn’t a magic bullet to ensure everyone read it. People read and respond to all sorts of guff on here!

lol best description mn ever

KilkennyCats · 23/09/2025 19:31

sosorryimnotsorry · 23/09/2025 19:17

But it made you read it! When lots wouldn’t have bothered if it had been clear from the start. Whether you like it or not it the truth. Therefore it has indeed worked.

No, it wasn’t a magic bullet to ensure everyone read it. People read and respond to all sorts of guff on here!

Swipe left for the next trending thread