Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Tried three places for lunch today and none cater for women

489 replies

Mrsmunchofmunchington · 22/09/2025 20:10

I went out for lunch today with a friend.
Well, at least we tried to have lunch.
All three places, two pubs and one cafe, were not suitable for women because you needed a penis to get into them or to use the toilet.
We ended up coming back to my home instead.

AIBU to think that everywhere should offer equal service to women?
Or is it my fault for not checking in advance that I could eat there without a penis?
Should I have researched on tripadvisor?
Am I too entitled expecting businesses to ensure non penis having people can pay to eat lunch at their establishment?

Day in the life of a disabled person.

OP posts:
WeeGeeBored · 22/09/2025 23:34

TheNightingalesStarling · 22/09/2025 20:13

I think I've got it... everywhere was wheelchair inaccessible and you were using sex as an analogy?

If so... yanbu.

You clever person. I had no idea

LillyPJ · 22/09/2025 23:31

Kirbert2 · 22/09/2025 23:04

Why shouldn't disabled people have access to everywhere like other people?

For the reasons I suggested - it's just not practical. In an ideal world, everybody would have access to everything, regardless of ability, finances, location, education, height, weight, ethnicity, religion etc. But it's not an ideal world. In case you hadn't noticed, not all 'other people' have access to everywhere.

Beenaboutabit · 22/09/2025 23:29

Such a weird post to make a very tangential point.

id have a lot more empathy if I had come in to this post knowing wtf you were aiming to discuss

Sleighbells0625 · 22/09/2025 23:23

Mrsmunchofmunchington · 22/09/2025 20:14

I honestly thought it was clear enough but replace not catering for women with not catering for disabled people.
I substituted women to try and give some insight into the injustice to a wider audience.

Edited

It was very clear what you were trying to say.
I’m confused that so many didn’t get it.

sosorryimnotsorry · 22/09/2025 23:18

It’s a great analogy OP. People on here just don’t want to understand just how hard it is not to be able to access so many places.
There is no good reason that the vast majority of places can’t properly make their businesses accessible. Even the likes of listed buildings absolutely can make far more of an effort to make their buildings more accessible. The reality is there isn’t the will to do it. Which is shocking. No doubt I will be shouted down and told not to be ridiculous. But I’m not. Where there is a will there is often a way. The technology is there and some truly difficult buildings have been made to be accessible. The sad reality is that people just don’t get it unless they themselves have been affected by just how shocking accessibility is.

BoudiccaRuled · 22/09/2025 23:13

Mrsmunchofmunchington · 22/09/2025 20:40

I think I am a little bit in love with you for understanding!
Thank you.

It isn't though. Women are not the minority, at all. So it's a crap metaphor.
I'm disabled and, fortunately, we are very much in the minority. Britain is leaps and bounds ahead of most countries for disabled access, although obviously improving all the time and still a long way to go.
It is foolish to not plan in advance, if going out for a meal as a disabled person. This is why there are parking advantages, discounts etc etc. Being disabled is no fun at all, so leeways are given to lessen the difficulty. For the entire country to be "accessible" is unrealistic, and we need to be realistic.

JenniferJaneJayne · 22/09/2025 23:07

I get your frustration but I'm sure you can also see that providing a wheel chair accessible toilet isn't always possible as there may not be sufficient space, or the changes necessary would breach building regulations which are very strict with respect to fire and hygiene considerations, or the business may not have the financial capacity to make major changes.

gotmyknickersinatwist · 22/09/2025 23:07

TheProfoundlyPeculiarPointOfPete · 22/09/2025 20:13

Don't you keep a penis in your handbag for these occasions?

😆

Kirbert2 · 22/09/2025 23:04

LillyPJ · 22/09/2025 22:55

So the answer is to close all those that aren't accessible to all, no matter what their disability? Or to charge much higher prices to pay for huge alterations or new premises? Saying we will all experience disability is very misleading and the disability could be something like a broken arm. We don't all need access to everywhere all of the time.

Why shouldn't disabled people have access to everywhere like other people?

JudgeJ · 22/09/2025 22:56

Mrsmunchofmunchington · 22/09/2025 20:14

I honestly thought it was clear enough but replace not catering for women with not catering for disabled people.
I substituted women to try and give some insight into the injustice to a wider audience.

Edited

Whatever you thought etc. it was a clear as mud. Maybe stick to the story and forget the obscure analogies.

LillyPJ · 22/09/2025 22:55

WiddlinDiddlin · 22/09/2025 21:06

100% of humans will experience disability either temporarily or permanently if they live long enough. Those who don't are those who die before they get old enough for that to happen.

OP already made the point that these were not listed buildings.

If a venue is big enough to be a cafe, restaurant or pub, then it should be wheelchair accessible - if its not, it isn't a suitable venue in the first place.

So the answer is to close all those that aren't accessible to all, no matter what their disability? Or to charge much higher prices to pay for huge alterations or new premises? Saying we will all experience disability is very misleading and the disability could be something like a broken arm. We don't all need access to everywhere all of the time.

supersop60 · 22/09/2025 22:48

Springadorable · 22/09/2025 20:11

What are you on about?

My first thought

LillyPJ · 22/09/2025 22:48

I understand your frustration but surely you can understand that not everywhere can be made accessible to all. Surely it's no big thing to call ahead and check? It would save you a lot of time and effort, and it might make some venues more aware of the need for improved access.

Ihateslugs · 22/09/2025 22:48

I struggle to use stairs and use two walking sticks to get around. I can only go to restaurants where I can park outside, possibly using my blue badge.

So, even after researching the location to make sure it is suitable for me, it’s surprising how many places have the toilets up or down stairs which are inaccessible to me. I now have to phone first to check.

LillyPJ · 22/09/2025 22:44

I've never been anywhere that says you need a penis to get in or to use the toilet!

TheQuirkyMaker · 22/09/2025 22:42

Mrsmunchofmunchington · 22/09/2025 20:10

I went out for lunch today with a friend.
Well, at least we tried to have lunch.
All three places, two pubs and one cafe, were not suitable for women because you needed a penis to get into them or to use the toilet.
We ended up coming back to my home instead.

AIBU to think that everywhere should offer equal service to women?
Or is it my fault for not checking in advance that I could eat there without a penis?
Should I have researched on tripadvisor?
Am I too entitled expecting businesses to ensure non penis having people can pay to eat lunch at their establishment?

Day in the life of a disabled person.

You made a nice point, don't listen to the people who don't understand it.

mirrorsandlights · 22/09/2025 22:37

Kirbert2 · 22/09/2025 22:21

Where did OP say that the only issue was accessing a toilet?

Exactly.

tara66 · 22/09/2025 22:34

OP you'll be pleased to know in the very old ''colonial'' days of Harare, Zimbabwe there was a pub that had a clear sign above the door - ''NO WOMEN'' - I was shocked by it as a child and crept passed quickly!

mirrorsandlights · 22/09/2025 22:34

KilkennyCats · 22/09/2025 20:48

Did you deliberately choose venues not at ground level, op?

Tell me you know nothing about disabilities without telling me.

PollyBell · 22/09/2025 22:34

GAJLY · 22/09/2025 22:27

It's very frustrating but many places are old buildings with narrow doorways and turning points. They would have to do some serious rebuilding work to make it fully accessible. Did they offer to seat you outside? Or at least apologise?

Also what about cafes and restaurants only upstairs where there no access for a lift etc.

TooBigForMyBoots · 22/09/2025 22:29

3pears · 22/09/2025 22:05

You haven’t overestimated people’s understanding, you’ve overestimated your attempt at posting an analogy.

It’s shite you weren’t able to access these places. It’s unacceptable that you couldn’t. But you have posted about it in an odd way so now your thread is totally swerving the very valid point you wanted to make

I agree with this.

You made out this was a man vs woman thing when it's nothing of the sort. You were not denied because of anything to do with a penis. Penis owning men whose legs don't work would have been in exactly the same position as you and your friend.

GAJLY · 22/09/2025 22:27

It's very frustrating but many places are old buildings with narrow doorways and turning points. They would have to do some serious rebuilding work to make it fully accessible. Did they offer to seat you outside? Or at least apologise?

Kirbert2 · 22/09/2025 22:21

MissFitss · 22/09/2025 22:14

It doesn't make sense.

She could buy lunch. She could eat lunch. She could sit there and eat all day.

The issue is that she couldn't access a toilet.

Where did OP say that the only issue was accessing a toilet?

dancingqueen345 · 22/09/2025 22:17

Not sure I agree with the comparison to men given that that is half the population. Surely more similar to something like eating out with kids? And yes, I would research first to make sure it was child friendly (or use places I have been to previously and have experience of).

MissFitss · 22/09/2025 22:14

SmolkedSamon · 22/09/2025 22:12

I completely understood what you were saying, the last line made it very clear. I don’t really understand why other people didn’t get it.

I also understand your choice of analogy given that most people that use this website are women and therefore would understand the frustration of not being able to do something due to not having a penis (also the use of penis so much added a touch of humour - although that might just be my level of humour showing 🤣)

Anyway, as an able bodied women it perfectly illustrated to me how much work and planning it must take in being a disabled person day to day. It just be really tough and very frustrating for you

It doesn't make sense.

She could buy lunch. She could eat lunch. She could sit there and eat all day.

The issue is that she couldn't access a toilet.